Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 874.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 874.11 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 874.11

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 874
CRIMINAL GANG ENFORCEMENT AND PREVENTION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 874.11
874.11 Electronic communication.Any person who, for the purpose of benefiting, promoting, or furthering the interests of a criminal gang, uses electronic communication to intimidate or harass other persons, or to advertise his or her presence in the community, including, but not limited to, such activities as distributing, selling, transmitting, or posting on the Internet any audio, video, or still image of criminal activity, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.s. 15, ch. 2008-238.

F.S. 874.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 874.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 874.11


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 874.11
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S874.11 - INTIMIDATION - GANG MEMBER USE ELECTRONIC COMM TO HARASS - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FIGUEROA- SANTIAGO, v. STATE, 116 So. 3d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . He entered a negotiated no contest plea to the offense, which is a violation of section 874.11, Florida . . . to entering his plea, Figueroa-Santiago filed a motion to dismiss the charge, arguing that section 874.11 . . . Section 874.11, Fla. . . . In Enoch, the First District concluded that section 874.11 violates the First Amendment and does not . . . See § 874.11 (emphasis added). . . .

ENOCH, v. STATE, 95 So. 3d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Naymontie Enoch appeals his convictions and sentences pursuant to sections 874.05(1) and 874.11, Florida . . . Holder is not dispositive of our analysis of section 874.11. . . . We are unwilling to accept this very broad conclusion in reviewing section 874.11. . . . The various parts of section 874.11 cannot be viewed in isolation. . . . We conclude that section 874.11 lacks sufficient constitutional safeguards. . . .

In ANADELL,, 190 B.R. 309 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1995)

. . . claims bar date has passed, and the only claims of record are CSFO’s for $72,302.57 and a tax claim of $874.11 . . .