Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORENCE v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, 566 U.S. 318 (U.S. 2012)

. . . . § 901.211(2) (2010) (similar); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 764.25a(2) (West 2000) (similar); Wash. . . .

KASTRITIS, R. v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH SHORES, R. v. R., 835 F. Supp. 2d 1200 (M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 901.211, an officer conducts a “strip search” of an arrested person by having that individual “remove . . . Stat. § 901.211 (emphasis added). . . . Id. at 901.211(2)(a)-(b). . . . Id. at 901.211(3), (5) (emphasis added). . . . Stat. § 901.211(l)(a), (3). . . .

STATE v. FERNANDEZ,, 50 So. 3d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . ) (finding the exclusionary rule is not a remedy for violation of a “strip search” statute, section 901.211 . . .

BROWN, v. SHORT,, 729 F. Supp. 2d 125 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . . § 901.211(1) (West 2009); 725 III. Comp. . . .

JENKINS, v. STATE, 978 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 2008)

. . . The Second District then addressed whether the search violated section 901.211 of the Florida Statutes . . . Id. at 29 & n. 2 (quoting § 901.211(3), Fla. Stat.). . . . “the legislature explicitly addressed the issue of remedies in section 901.211(6) but failed to make . . . subsection (2) refers only to “traffic, regulatory, or misdemeanor of-fensefs].” § 901.211(2), Fla. . . . On the other hand, section 901.211(6) makes explicit reference to civil and injunctive remedies. . . . majority that the search of Jenkins under the facts and circumstances of this case did not violate section 901.211 . . . Section 901.211 requires that the police do more than just prevent body parts from being exposed. . . . Instead the police violated section 901.211 and subjected Jenkins to a degrading, embarrassing, and public . . . majority also concludes that exclusion of the evidence is not a proper remedy for a violation of section 901.211 . . .

RUMORE, v. STATE, 969 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Rumore’s person was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment but unlawful under section 901.211, Florida . . . search suppressed because the exclusionary rule is inapplicable in the context of violations of section 901.211 . . .

PERRY, v. STATE, 968 So. 2d 70 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 901.211, Florida Statutes (1997), governs strip searches and “codifies minimum acceptable standards . . . agency or facility without obtaining the written authorization of the supervising officer on duty. § 901.211 . . . “A strip search conducted in violation of the statutory requirements set forth in section 901.211, in . . . Because the state failed to prove that the deputies complied ’ with section 901.211(5), it failed to . . .

LASTER, v. STATE, 933 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . to the United States Constitution but was unlawful under the Florida Strip Search statute, section 901.211 . . .

JENKINS, v. STATE, 924 So. 2d 20 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Jenkins contends that the police violated the provisions of section 901.211, Florida Statutes (2003), . . . (a) The Statutory Provisions Section 901.211 provides: (1) As used in this section, the term “strip . . . Nor does the State suggest that section 901.211 is inapplicable due to the circumstance that Jenkins . . . [his] buttocks.” § 901.211(1). . . . See § 901.211(6). But this is not a material distinction. . . .

PERRY, v. STATE, 846 So. 2d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . duty” in that it presented no proof that the strip search was performed in compliance with section 901.211 . . . was sufficient to support a finding that the deputy followed the statutory requirements of section 901.211 . . . The state further argues that even if the search did not comply with section 901.211, Florida Statutes . . . of conduct for law enforcement officers conducting strip searches of persons arrested in Florida. § 901.211 . . . “A strip search conducted in violation of the statutory requirements set forth in section 901.211, in . . .

J. IRONS, v. STATE, 787 So. 2d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . We find that any violation of section 901.211 was de minimis. . . .

AMAECHI, v. WEST, R., 237 F.3d 356 (4th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 901.211 (West 1996); Iowa Code Ann. § 702.23 (West 1993), we find state law persuasive on our interpretation . . .

STATE v. DAYS,, 751 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . At the suppression hearing, Days argued that the police violated section 901.211, Florida Statutes (1997 . . . Subsection 901.211(1) defines a “strip search” as “having an arrested person remove or arrange some or . . . Consequently, we believe section 901.211 does not apply. . . .

STATE v. J. AUGUSTINE,, 724 So. 2d 580 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . during that search, and any [of his] statements ... related thereto,” as being violative of section 901.211 . . . It then found that no violation of section 901.211 had occurred, but that the jail’s internal policy . . . A strip search conducted in violation of the statutory requirements set forth in section 901.211, in . . .

D. F. a v. STATE, 682 So. 2d 149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . have been suppressed because the strip search constituted a clear and substantial violation of section 901.211 . . . Section 901.211 mandates specific procedures before a strip search may be conducted. . . . Section 901.211 provides: (1)As used in this section, the term “strip search” means having an arrested . . . The state concedes that the strip search was done in violation of section 901.211 in that the search . . . The state does not agree that 901.211(4) was violated because the officer’s strip search did not include . . . is the proper remedy when evidence is obtained from a search that violates the provisions of section 901.211 . . . requirements related to strip searches where the search was undertaken with probable cause under section 901.211 . . . Section 901.211, Florida Statutes (1993), provides: "(1) As used in this section, the term 'strip search . . .

WELCH, v. S. RICE, a, 636 So. 2d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . We reverse because the trial court erred in finding that subsection 901.211(5), Florida Statutes (1991 . . . Subsection 901.211(5) requires the written authorization of a supervising officer to conduct a strip . . . She contended that she was immune from such a search by subsection 901.211(2) which prohibits, with some . . . was conducted without the written authorization of a supervising officer as required by subsection 901.211 . . . On April 23, 1993, the trial court entered summary judgment in Rice’s^ favor, holding that section 901.211 . . .

JUSTICE, v. CITY OF PEACHTREE CITY, a a, 961 F.2d 188 (11th Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 901.211. . . .

RANKIN, v. G. COLMAN,, 476 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . By virtue of Chapter 81-313, Laws of Florida, 1981, (Sec. 901.211, Fla.Stat. (1981)) strip searches of . . .