Cases from cite.case.law:

MONCRIEFFE a k a v. STATE, 55 So. 3d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . ; however, law enforcement officials may not make citizen’s arrests under color of their office); § 901.25 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MCCALLA,, 286 F. App'x 610 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 901.25(1) — (2). . . .

ESPIN, v. STATE, 953 So. 2d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 901.25(3), Florida Statutes (2003) provides: If an arrest is made in this state by an officer . . .

J. LIPSCOMB, v. COLUMBUS MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 261 F. Supp. 2d 626 (N.D. Miss. 2003)

. . . of Hours Reasonably Expended The Plaintiffs seek an award for a total of 3,748.5 attorney hours and 901.25 . . .

STATE v. R. GELIN,, 844 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . time of the BOLO, Detective King was in fresh pursuit of the defendants within the meaning of Section 901.25 . . . However, pursuant to Section 901.25, Florida Statutes, an arrest made outside the officer’s jurisdiction . . . Section 901.25, Florida Statutes, governing the concept of fresh pursuit and arrests outside the jurisdiction . . . municipal officer of this state to arrest and hold in custody a person not arrested in fresh pursuit. § 901.25 . . .

PORTER, v. STATE, 765 So. 2d 76 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Based upon the foregoing historical facts, the trial court concluded that pursuant to section 901.25, . . . “Fresh pursuit” and “arrest outside the jurisdiction” are defined, in pertinent part, in section 901.25 . . . In arriving at the conclusion that section 901.25 entitled the Pompano Beach police officers to arrest . . . Section 901.25, Florida Statutes (1997), however, contains none of the restrictions on fresh pursuit . . . There is nothing in section 901.25 to suggest that fresh pursuit is somehow negated by virtue of the . . .

STATE v. GREER,, 761 So. 2d 343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Under section 901.25(1), Florida Statutes (1997), which addresses both fresh pursuit and arrests outside . . . See § 901.25(2). . . .

WNJU- TV, INC. d b a v. BARNETT BANK OF BROWARD COUNTY, N. A. N. A. n k a N. A. v. WNJU- TV, d b a AMF, 739 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . July 17, 1998, the court rendered Final Judgment in favor of Barnett, and awarded Barnett costs of $901.25 . . .

INGRAM, a a v. J. JONES, a T. a a a S. a F. a a, 46 F. Supp. 2d 795 (N.D. Ill. 1999)

. . . in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants, an award of attorneys’ fees and costs totalling $119,-901.25 . . .

HUEBNER, v. STATE, 731 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . WHETHER AN OFF-DUTY POLICE OFFICER IS AN OFFICER FOR PURPOSES OF FLORIDA STATUTES 901.18, 901.25(2) AND . . . WHETHER AN OFFICER IS IN “FRESH PURSUIT”, WITHIN THE MEANING OF FLORIDA STATUTE 901.25, WHERE HIS TESTIMONY . . . Section 901.25(2), Florida Statutes, provides that any duly authorized state, county, or municipal arresting . . . 901.18 and to make an arrest, outside his jurisdiction, while in fresh pursuit pursuant to section 901.25 . . . Rather, the provisions of sections 901.25(2) and 901.15 govern the detention and arrest authority of . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. LEONARD,, 718 So. 2d 314 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Further, an arrest made outside an officer’s jurisdiction is authorized by § 901.25 where, as here, the . . .

STATE v. JOY,, 637 So. 2d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Pursuant to section 901.25, Florida Statutes (1991), an officer with arrest power may arrest a person . . . who has violated a county or municipal ordinance or chapter 316 or has committed a misdemeanor.” § 901.25 . . .

BAGSBY v. ST. LOUIS BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS,, 783 F. Supp. 1214 (E.D. Mo. 1992)

. . . hourly rate of $125 per hour multiplied by 415.21 hours of attorney time yields a lodestar of $51,-901.25 . . .

STATE v. SOBRINO,, 587 So. 2d 1347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See § 901.25, Fla.Stat. (1989); see, e.g., Hansen v. . . . The State has disclaimed reliance on section 901.25, Florida Statutes (1989). .For purposes of this analysis . . .

STATE v. W. ENGLEHARDT,, 465 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . arresting a person outside an officer’s jurisdiction while the officer is in fresh pursuit is section 901.25 . . .

STATE v. POTTER,, 438 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . respondent’s apparent violation of section 316.089(1) clothed Officer Green with authority under section 901.25 . . . Relevant portions of section 901.25(1) and (2) provide: (1) The term “fresh pursuit” as used in this . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. ENGLEHARDT, 4 Fla. Supp. 2d 76 (Palm Beach Cty. Ct. 1983)

. . . Section 901.25(2) F.S. provides: “Any duly authorized state, county or municipal arresting officer is . . . Whatever the case at common law, I construe Section 901.25 F.S., as amended in 1978, as having added . . . I believe fresh pursuit, as used in Section 901.25 now means pursuit without unreasonable delay in the . . . neighboring police department The Williams’ case took place prior to the effective date of Section 901.25 . . . Section 901.25 F.S. was amended by the 1978 Legislature to include just such situations as presented . . .

STATE v. PHOENIX STATE v. HALL, Jr. STATE v. HALE,, 428 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . . § 901.25, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

CLINTON, v. STATE, 421 So. 2d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . not in “fresh pursuit” of the appellant, they had no authority to arrest the appellant under section 901.25 . . .

STATE v. JONES,, 417 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . See § 901.25(1), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

CHEATEM a k a v. STATE, 416 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . When section 901.25 was amended in 1978 by the Florida Legislature, violations of sections 316.605 and . . .

DEALTO, v. B. KEATING, In, 409 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The possible violation of section 901.25(3), Florida Statutes (1981), does not deprive the lower court . . .

UNITED STATES v. IBLE,, 630 F.2d 389 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 901.25 (1979). . . .

STATE v. PINOAMADOR, 389 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The trial court also found that this arrest was unlawful under Section 901.25, Florida Statutes (1979 . . .

R. HANSEN v. STATE, 385 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . or support a “hot pursuit” theory so as to give the police extra jurisdictional powers under Section 901.25 . . .

PARKER, v. STATE, 362 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . although not authorized to arrest outside his jurisdiction unless such arrest is in “hot pursuit”, Section 901.25 . . .

STURMAN, v. CITY OF GOLDEN BEACH,, 355 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Pursuant to Section 901.25, Florida Statutes (1975), the Golden Beach officers had no authority to cross . . . Section 901.25 provides that: “Municipal officer, arrest outside corporate limits in fresh pursuit. — . . .

AKINS, v. HAMLIN,, 327 So. 2d 59 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Secs. 321.05, 901.25, F.S.1973. . . .

GREENE, M. D. v. CITY OF SUNRISE, 323 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . .-25 (1973): “901.25 Municipal officer arrest outside corporate limits in fresh pursuit. . . . [Sjince the Legislature has enacted Section 901.25 to give a municipal police officer the authority to . . .

EDGAR FLOWERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 152 Fla. 649 (Fla. 1943)

. . . See Section 901.25, Fla. Stats. 1941. . . .

v. Co., 49 F. 309 (8th Cir. 1892)

. . . accordance with the provisions of the statute of the state of Nebraska, the sum claimed as a lien being $901.25 . . . Jaynes, which amount, after allowing all payments and just credits thereon, is the full sum of $901.25 . . . above-described real estate, buildings, and the appurtenances thereto belonging, for the said sum of $901.25 . . .