The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 902
PRELIMINARY HEARINGS

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 902

PRELIMINARY HEARINGS

902.15 Undertaking by witness.

902.17 Procedure when witness does not give security.

902.19 When prosecutor liable for costs.

902.20 Contempts before committing trial court judge.

902.21 Commitment to jail in another county.

902.15 Undertaking by witness.—When a defendant is held to answer on a charge for a crime punishable by death or life imprisonment, the trial court judge at the preliminary hearing may require each material witness to enter into a written recognizance to appear at the trial or forfeit a sum fixed by the trial court judge. Additional security may be required in the discretion of the trial court judge.

History.—ss. 39, 40, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(39), (40); s. 16, ch. 70-339; s. 26, ch. 2004-11.

Note.—Former s. 902.16.

902.17 Procedure when witness does not give security.—

(1) If a witness required to enter into a recognizance to appear refuses to comply with the order, the trial court judge shall commit the witness to custody until she or he complies or she or he is legally discharged.

(2) If the trial court judge requires a witness to give security for her or his appearance and the witness is unable to give the security, the witness may apply to the court having jurisdiction to try the defendant for a reduction of the security.

(3) If it appears from examination on oath of the witness or any other person that the witness is unable to give security, the trial court judge or the court having jurisdiction to try the defendant shall make an order finding that fact, and the witness shall be detained pending application for her or his conditional examination. Within 3 days from the entry of the order, the witness shall be conditionally examined on application of the state or the defendant. The examination shall be by question and answer in the presence of the other party and counsel, and shall be transcribed by a court reporter or stenographer selected by the parties. At the completion of the examination the witness shall be discharged. The deposition of the witness may be introduced in evidence at the trial by the defendant, or, if the prosecuting attorney and the defendant and the defendant’s counsel agree, it may be admitted in evidence by stipulation. The deposition shall not be admitted on behalf of the state without the consent of the defendant.

(4) If a conditional examination is not made within 3 days, the witness shall be discharged.

(5) A witness detained for conditional examination shall be entitled to fees as a witness for the period of her or his commitment.

History.—s. 41, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(41); s. 17, ch. 70-339; s. 1471, ch. 97-102; s. 27, ch. 2004-11.

902.19 When prosecutor liable for costs.—

(1) If a person makes a complaint before a county court judge that a crime has been committed and is recognized by the county court judge to appear before the court having jurisdiction to give evidence of the crime and fails to appear, the person is liable for all costs occasioned by his or her complaint, and the county court judge may enter a judgment and execution for the costs as in other cases.

(2) A person who voluntarily appears before a grand jury, state attorney, or county court judge shall not be paid per diem or mileage as a witness unless the grand jury finds a true bill, the state attorney files an information, or the county court judge holds the party charged for trial.

(3) A person who voluntarily appears or has himself or herself summoned before a county court judge as a witness on the trial of a misdemeanor shall not be paid per diem or mileage as a witness unless the trial results in a conviction of the defendant.

History.—s. 43, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(43); s. 2, ch. 67-427; s. 18, ch. 70-339; s. 34, ch. 73-334; s. 1472, ch. 97-102; s. 17, ch. 2013-25.

902.20 Contempts before committing trial court judge.—A committing trial court judge holding a preliminary hearing shall have the same power to punish for contempts that she or he has while presiding at the trial of criminal cases.

History.—RS 2795; GS 3845; RGS 5940; CGL 8206; s. 19, ch. 70-339; s. 1473, ch. 97-102; s. 28, ch. 2004-11.

Note.—Former s. 932.04.

902.21 Commitment to jail in another county.—If a person is committed in a county where there is no jail, the committing trial court judge shall direct the sheriff to deliver the accused to a jail in another county.

History.—s. 7, ch. 6213, 1911; RS 2879; GS 3938; RGS 6039; CGL 8340; s. 20, ch. 70-339; s. 29, ch. 2004-11.

Note.—Former s. 932.39.

F.S. 902 on Google Scholar

F.S. 902 on Casetext

Amendments to 902

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 902

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S626.902 1a - FRAUD - AGENT REPRESENT OR AID UNAUTHORIZED INSURER - F: T

S626.902 1a - FRAUD - AGENT AID UNAUTH INSURER SUBSQ OFF - F: S

S626.902 1b - FRAUD - NON AGENT REP OR AID UNAUTHORIZED INSURER - F: T

S626.902 1b - FRAUD - NON AGENT AID UNAUTH INSURER SUBSQ OFF - F: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Hearing on S. 902 et al. before the Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs, 99th Cong., 2d Sess . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . National Railroad Passenger Corporation , 513 U.S. 374, 379, 115 S.Ct. 961, 130 L.Ed.2d 902 (1995) (" . . .

GE ENERGY POWER CONVERSION FRANCE SAS, CORP. SAS, v. OUTOKUMPU STAINLESS USA, LLC,, 140 S. Ct. 1637 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Converteam SAS , 902 F.3d 1316 (2018). . . . the parties actually sign an agreement to arbitrate their disputes in order to compel arbitration." 902 . . . Compare 902 F.3d 1316, 1326 (CA11 2018), and Yang v. . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . National Railroad Passenger Corporation , 513 U.S. 374, 115 S.Ct. 961, 130 L.Ed.2d 902 (1995), or MWAA . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . State , 357 Ore. 553, 574, 355 P.3d 902, 914 (2015). . . .

COMCAST CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN- OWNED MEDIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1009 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Monica's Congregation , 902 F.2d 1259, 1262-1263 (1990). . . .

AVERY v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1080 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Winkelman , 746 F.3d 134, 135-136 (CA3 2014) ; In re Bourgeois , 902 F.3d 446, 447 (CA5 2018) ; Taylor . . .

OCHOA, v. LEVINE,, 140 S. Ct. 2511 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-902. Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TAYLOR, v., 935 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1639, 203 L.Ed.2d 902 (2019) ; Henderson , 906 F.3d at 1118 ; United States v. . . .

F. SHARPE, v. UNITED STATES,, 935 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Cl. at 812 ; J.A. 902. The Navy proceeded to implement the Board's recommendations. . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Johnson, 913 F.3d at 902 (concluding the omission of video evidence was not prejudicial because the . . .

UNITED STATES v. HAWKINS, a. k. a. D III, a. k. a., 934 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Strickland , 902 F.2d 937, 940 (11th Cir. 1990) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. HOPPER,, 934 F.3d 740 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Durrive , 902 F.2d 1221 (7th Cir. 1990). . . . Durrive , 902 F.2d 1221 (7th Cir. 1990), we adopted a "policy" of "routinely addressing evidentiary sufficiency . . .

ANDERSON, AS TRUSTEE FOR NEXT- OF- KIN OF ANDERSON v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Dr. M. D. HCMC D. J. A. F. HCMC M. D. s J. L. L. T. D. M. T., 934 F.3d 876 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Baer , 28 F.3d 895, 902 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 513 U.S. 1084, 115 S.Ct. 739, 130 L.Ed.2d 641 . . . Sellers , 28 F.3d at 902 (citations omitted). . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Robinson , 902 F.3d 483, 498 (5th Cir. 2018) (Willett, J., concurring dubitante), revised on petition . . . Ct. at 1162 (Sotomayor, J., dissenting); see also Zadeh , 902 F.3d at 499 & n.10 (Willett, J., concurring . . . Zadeh , 902 F.3d at 499 & n.10 (Willett, J., concurring dubitante) (quoting Kisela , 138 S. . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . BACKGROUND ... 902 A. Legal Background ... 902 B. Factual History ... 902 C. . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . testimony of the custodian or another qualified witness, or by a certification that complies with Rule 902 . . .

R. MEIER v. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, CITY OF s St. H. St. St. St. St. G. a St. St. P. O. DSN, 934 F.3d 824 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Keener, 902 F.3d 796, 801 (8th Cir. 2018) (quoting Corwin v. . . .

A. CARVELLI, v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, M. R. Jr., 934 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Whole Foods Mkt., Inc. , 905 F.3d 892, 902 (5th Cir. 2018), and a description of company products as . . . See, e.g ., Singh , 918 F.3d at 64 ; Whole Foods Mkt. , 905 F.3d at 902. . . .

ROMO, v. P. BARR,, 933 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . See, e.g. , Mielewczyk , 575 F.3d at 996-98 ; Barragan-Lopez , 508 F.3d at 902-05 ; Coronado-Durazo , . . .

KOH, v. USTICH,, 933 F.3d 836 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cline , 902 F.3d 643, 651-52 (7th Cir. 2018) (holding that the district court did not conduct the requisite . . .

BASTARDO- VALE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 934 F.3d 255 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Inc ., 902 F.3d 147, 152 (3d Cir. 2018), reh'g denied (Sept. 17, 2018) ("Nevertheless, it is also a ' . . .

STUDDARD, v. SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, J. I., 934 F.3d 478 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 900-01, 902. . . .

CLARK, v. WARDEN,, 934 F.3d 483 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . In re Wogenstahl , 902 F.3d 621, 629 (6th Cir. 2018) (order) (brackets, citation, and internal quotation . . .

UNITED STATES v. JOBE,, 933 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Luong , 470 F.3d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 2006). I. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WALKER,, 934 F.3d 375 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 31, 195 L.Ed.2d 902 (2016). . . .

A. LAVITE, v. J. DUNSTAN,, 932 F.3d 1020 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wernert , 823 F.3d 902, 910 (7th Cir. 2016). . . .

LUXOTTICA GROUP, S. P. A. a v. AIRPORT MINI MALL, LLC, a d. b. a. LLC, a a. k. a. C. C., 932 F.3d 1303 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Baxter Int'l, Inc. , 345 F.3d 866, 902 (11th Cir. 2003) (holding, in the context of the Medicare Secondary . . .

ATEN INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD. v. UNICLASS TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD. Co. Co., 932 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . See J.A. 902 at 7:20-8:4; J.A. 870 at 23:8-11; J.A. 923 at 90:14-15. . . .

MCDONOUGH A. v. CYCLING SPORTS GROUP, INC. Co., 392 F. Supp. 3d 320 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A. , 902 F.2d 194, 196 (2d Cir. 1990). . . .

O. CAMPOS, v. COOK COUNTY,, 932 F.3d 972 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Whitticker , 398 F.3d 899, 902 (7th Cir. 2005) (citing Washington v. . . .

COFFEY, v. CARROLL, 933 F.3d 577 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Detroit , 902 F.3d 552, 560 (6th Cir. 2018) (internal citations omitted). III. ANALYSIS A. . . . See Bunkley , 902 F.3d at 560. . . .

INGRAM v. UNITED STATES, 932 F.3d 1084 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d at 892-902, which, to the best of my knowledge and belief, was a publication of "new" facts, . . .

CARDOZA SALAZAR, v. P. BARR,, 932 F.3d 704 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sessions , 902 F.3d 764, 772 (8th Cir. 2018). . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. Iv n Ra l A. B. n III G. M. a J. R. J. A. Jr., 931 F.3d 111 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 902(1) (stating that "property of the estate" when used in the municipal bankruptcy context "means . . . See 11 U.S.C. § 902(2) (defining "special revenues"). . . . U.S.C. § 943(a) (granting standing to object to a plan of adjustment to "special tax payer[s]"); id. § 902 . . . that Report explains, "[new] Section [928], along with the definition of special revenues in Section 902 . . . See 11 U.S.C. § 902(2) (defining "special revenues"). . . .

J. MAHLER, v. FIRST DAKOTA TITLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a LLC, a LLC C. A. Jr., 931 F.3d 799 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . United Parcel Serv., Inc. , 794 F.3d 899, 902 (8th Cir. 2015). . . .

YOC- US, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES v., 932 F.3d 98 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Clark , 902 F.3d 404, 410 (3d Cir. 2018) (citing Rodriguez , 135 S. Ct. at 1615 ). . . .

SOLUTRAN, INC. v. ELAVON, INC. U. S., 931 F.3d 1161 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Br. at 65 (relying on discussion of In re Abele , 684 F.2d 902 (C.C.P.A. 1982) in In re Bilski , 545 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORNETTE,, 932 F.3d 204 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hodge , 902 F.3d 420, 426 (4th Cir. 2018) (citing Winston , 850 F.3d at 682 ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MOODY,, 931 F.3d 366 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Chavez , 902 F.2d 259, 265 (4th Cir. 1990) ; cf. United States v. . . .

MCCOTTRELL S. v. WHITE, 933 F.3d 651 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Indiana Univ. , 902 F.3d 724, 730 (7th Cir. 2018) ("We review a summary judgment de novo , ... and we . . .

DILLON BOILER SERVICES, CO. INC. v. SOUNDVIEW VERMONT HOLDINGS, LLC,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 187 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. , 619 F.2d 902, 905 (1st Cir. 1980) ("The mere fact that a subsidiary company . . .

IN RE SCHATZ, v., 602 B.R. 411 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2019)

. . . (In re Ammirati), 187 B.R. 902 (D.S.C. 1995), aff'd [,] 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1996) (upholding Bankruptcy . . .

HUNT, WAL- MART STORES, INC., 931 F.3d 624 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Corr. , 406 F.3d 895, 902 (7th Cir. 2005) (no actionable harassment where harasser referenced . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. WISEMAN, Jr., 932 F.3d 411 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Singleton , 902 F.2d 471, 472 (6th Cir. 1990) : (1) that defendant was under an unlawful and present, . . .

WEST, v. CITY OF CALDWELL, 931 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Strickland , 902 F.2d 937, 942 (11th Cir. 1990). The Third, Tenth, and D.C. . . .

CALIFORNIA v. ABBVIE INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 1176 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Health Coop. , 902 F.3d 1051, 1057 (9th Cir. 2018) (quoting Geographic Expeditions, Inc. v. . . . Suarez is perfectly free to choose a litigation forum, Hansen , 902 F.3d at 1056, and AbbVie has not . . .

K. T. v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., 931 F.3d 1041 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 902. . . .

STATE BY AND THROUGH TENNESSEE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE,, 931 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pence , 838 F.3d 902, 904 (7th Cir. 2016). . . .

DOE, v. TRUMP CORPORATION,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 265 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Reliable Churchill LLLP , 902 F.3d 132, 140 (2d Cir. 2018). . . . See Empire Merchants , 902 F.3d at 141 (quoting Hemi Grp., LLC v. . . . See Empire Merchants , 902 F.3d at 136. . . . Empire Merchants , 902 F.3d at 141. . . . Empire Merchants , 902 F.3d at 143-44. . . .

UNITED STATES v. IWAI,, 930 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hill , 902 F.3d 529, 536 (5th Cir. 2018) ("In assessing whether the officers created the exigency, we . . .

W. EATON, v. PACHECO,, 931 F.3d 1009 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . App. vol. 13, 902. . . .

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ACRES, PERMANENT OVERLAY EASEMENT FOR ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR ACRES IN MILFORD AND WESTFALL TOWNSHIPS, PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS a c o L. P., 931 F.3d 237 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Cox , 902 F.3d 344, 354 (3d Cir. 2018) (citation omitted); United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LINDSAY,, 931 F.3d 852 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Durham , 902 F.3d 1180, 1210 (10th Cir. 2018) (upholding section 2423(c) under broader power than under . . . 299, 308 (3rd Cir. 2011) (upholding section 2423(c) under Lopez / Morrison framework), and Durham , 902 . . . See Durham , 902 F.3d at 1211 ; Bollinger , 798 F.3d at 219. . . . See Durham , 902 F.3d at 1211 ; Bollinger , 798 F.3d at 219 ; see also Fredette, supra , at 9 ("Between . . .

WOOD GROUP PRODUCTION SERVICES, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, A., 930 F.3d 733 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . light of this holding, the ALJ did not initially decide whether Malta enjoyed maritime status under § 902 . . . That requirement-located at § 902-is satisfied by any person engaged in maritime employment, including . . . longshoring operations, and any harbor-worker including a ship repairman, shipbuilder, and ship-breaker. § 902 . . . Because no cargo requirement appears in the language of § 902(3), we similarly reject Wood Group's maritime . . .

PRESQUE ISLE COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, v. HIGHMARK HEALTH, f k a f k a, 391 F. Supp. 3d 485 (W.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Highmark Inc. , 902 F.3d 323, 341 (3d Cir. 2018) (quoting Hanover 3201 Realty, LLC v. Vill. . . . Inc. , 902 F.3d at 342 (quoting City of Pittsburgh v. W. . . .

SMITH v. UNITED STATES, 930 F.3d 978 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States, 902 F.3d 868, 872-73 (8th Cir. 2018) ; cf. United States v. . . .

ADAME- HERNANDEZ, v. P. BARR,, 929 F.3d 1020 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder, 615 F.3d 900, 902 (8th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . . See Guardado-Garcia, 615 F.3d at 902. Adame-Hernandez argues that our decision in Bobadilla v. . . .

INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES PROJECT, INCORPORATED, v. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY III, L. L. C. CPF PC L. L. C. HLI L. L. C. L. L. C., 930 F.3d 660 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lincoln , 920 F.3d at 902. . . .

HENRY, a v. HULETT,, 930 F.3d 836 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . McCarty , 781 F.3d 889, 902-04 (7th Cir. 2015) (Hamilton, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment . . . See 781 F.3d at 902-04 (Hamilton, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MILLS,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 528 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . CR 13-902, 2015 WL 13798679, at *2 (C.D. Cal. . . .

UNITED STATES v. RANKIN,, 929 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hathaway , 798 F.2d 902, 911 (6th Cir. 1986) ). . . .

INDIVIOR INC. UK RB Rx, LLC, v. DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES, S. A. Dr. s UT, USA, UK RB v. LLC,, 930 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Patent Application No. 60/473,902 (the " '902 application"). See J.A. 198. . . . The '902 application, however, does not suggest possession of a polymer component including at least . . . Indeed, as the district court correctly acknowledged, the '902 application provides over ninety examples . . . In concluding that the '902 application supplied adequate written description support for claim 1, the . . . Nothing in the '902 application even arguably suggests possession of a polymer component including at . . . Patent Application 60/473,902 (the " '902 application"). B. . . . The priority question turns on whether the '902 application provides an adequate written description . . . The district court held that the '150 patent properly claimed priority from the '902 application. . . . Together with example formulations listed in the '902 application, the court found that this passage . . . Here, however, the '902 application does direct a skilled artisan to the claimed polymer component. . . .

STARR INDEMNITY LIABILITY COMPANY, v. BRIGHTSTAR CORP., 388 F. Supp. 3d 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., 31 N.Y.2d 436, 442 n.3, 340 N.Y.S.2d 902, 293 N.E.2d 76 (1972) (citations omitted . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. DESOTELL,, 929 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kelly , 337 F.3d 897, 902 (7th Cir. 2003) ). A knowing and voluntary waiver "must be enforced." . . .

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, v. S. NADKARNI,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 917 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . App. 3d 1029, 1040, 211 Cal.Rptr. 902 (1985). . . .

ROXX ALLISON LTD. v. JEWELERS INC., 385 F. Supp. 3d 377 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir. 1990). . . .

IN RE HARMS, v., 603 B.R. 19 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . testimony of the custodian or another qualified witness, or by a certification that complies with Rule 902 . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. HAMILTON, 929 F.3d 943 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Durham , 902 F.3d 1180, 1236-37 n.45 (10th Cir. 2018) (noting two-level enhancement for obstruction of . . .

F. HOFFMANN, v. L. PULIDO, CSATF- SP C. CSATF- SP,, 928 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Passenger Corp ., 513 U.S. 374, 379, 115 S.Ct. 961, 130 L.Ed.2d 902 (1995) ("[W]e would ordinarily feel . . .

A. N. BY AND THROUGH PONDER v. SYLING,, 928 F.3d 1191 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Huckaby , 902 F.3d 1136, 1144 (10th Cir. 2018), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 139 S. . . . Ct. at 308 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Halley , 902 F.3d at 1144. . . . Halley , 902 F.3d at 1149 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Hope , 536 U.S. at 741, 122 S.Ct. 2508 . . . See Halley , 902 F.3d at 1149. The district court also cited Lamb v. . . .

RODRIGUEZ v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, 387 F. Supp. 3d 130 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Sessions , 835 F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Article III of the U.S. . . .

CRUTSINGER, v. DAVIS,, 929 F.3d 259 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Davis , 902 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2018) ; Hernandez v. . . . Davis , 902 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2018) ; see also Hernandez v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. AYRES,, 929 F.3d 581 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sadler, 864 F.3d 902, 904 (8th Cir. 2017). . . .

MALDEN TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LLC,, 386 F. Supp. 3d 96 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Philip Morris, Inc., 453 Mass. 431, 902 N.E.2d 421, 424 (2009). a. . . . Aspinall, 902 N.E.2d at 424. b. . . .

COLBRUNO, v. KESSLER, a, 928 F.3d 1155 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Huckaby , 902 F.3d 1136, 1155 (10th Cir. 2018) ("Conduct that shocks the judicial conscience is deliberate . . .

A. ZADEH v. ROBINSON,, 928 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Robinson , 902 F.3d 483 (5th Cir. 2018), and substitute the following. . . . Robinson , 902 F.3d 483, 498 (5th Cir. 2018) (Willett, J., concurring dubitante). . . . Tex., Apr. 26, 2016), aff'd , 902 F.3d 483 (5th Cir. 2018). Barry v. Freshour , No. . . .

CABAS, v. P. BARR,, 928 F.3d 177 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Evid. 902(3), the face of the arrest warrant reveals no cause to doubt its genuineness. . . .

TD BANK N. A. v. W. HILL, II,, 928 F.3d 259 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Dist., 132 F.3d 902, 904 n.1 (3d Cir. 1997) ). . . . Passenger Corp. , 513 U.S. 374, 380, 115 S.Ct. 961, 130 L.Ed.2d 902 (1995) (considering an alternative . . .

E. D. v. SHARKEY BCRC- IFC BCRC- IFC BCRC- IFC, 928 F.3d 299 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Barger , 902 F.3d 185, 192 (3d Cir. 2018). . . . Kane , 902 F.3d at 194 (citing Mullenix v. Luna , --- U.S. ----, 136 S. . . . Kane , 902 F.3d at 195 (quoting Hope v. . . .

LOUISIANA- PACIFIC CORPORATION, v. JAMES HARDIE BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., 928 F.3d 514 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Richardson-Vicks, Inc. , 902 F.2d 222, 229 (3d Cir. 1990) (emphasis added). . . .

BERKSHIRE v. BEAUVAIS,, 928 F.3d 520 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Klare , 902 F.3d 630, 635-36 (6th Cir. 2018) (" 'Ordinarily an appellate court does not give consideration . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. ARCTURUS CORPORATION L. L. C. J. R. Co. L. L. C. AMG L. L. C., 928 F.3d 400 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . P'ship 902 F.2d 805, 808 n.5 (10th Cir. 1990) ; Rivanna , 840 F.2d at 242 n.10. . . . App'x at 589 ; Robinson , 349 F.3d at 172 ; Banghart , 902 F.2d at 808 n.5. . . . See, e.g. , Robinson , 349 F.3d at 171 ; Banghart , 902 F.2d at 808 n.5 ; Rivanna , 840 F.2d at 242 n . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v., 385 F. Supp. 3d 138 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . "Special revenues" are defined, as here relevant, in Section 902(2)(A) and 902(2)(D) of the Bankruptcy . . . (2)(A) and/or 902(2)(D) and are therefore exempt from Section 552(a). . . . ERS also contends that the legislative history of Section 902(2)(A) confirms a limited interpretation . . . (2)(A) or Section 902(2)(D) of the Bankruptcy Code. . . . United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857, 120 S.Ct. 1904, 146 L.Ed.2d 902 (2000) ).) . . .

GREEN, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 68 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Sessions , 835 F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. Cir. 1987). . . .

P. MITCHELL, v. WISCONSIN, 139 S. Ct. 2525 (U.S. 2019)

. . . National Railroad Passenger Corporation , 513 U.S. 374, 408, 115 S.Ct. 961, 130 L.Ed.2d 902 (1995) (O'Connor . . .

IN RE GENERIC PHARMACEUTICALS PRICING ANTITRUST LITIGATION LLC, v., 386 F. Supp. 3d 477 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Highmark Inc. , 902 F.3d 323, 335 (3d Cir. 2018) (citing Ins. Brokerage , 618 F.3d at 321 ). . . . Lifewatch Servs. , 902 F.3d at 333 (quoting Ins. Brokerage , 618 F.3d at 321-22 ). . . .

BALOGA, v. PITTSTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, 927 F.3d 742 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . State Police , 902 F.3d 178, 184 (3d Cir. 2018) (quoting Watson v. . . .

J. BEASON, v. MARSKE,, 926 F.3d 932 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 371 F.3d 900, 902 (7th Cir. 2004). . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. B. III G. M. J. R. J. A. Jr., 927 F.3d 597 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 902(2) ; 48 U.S.C. § 2161(a) (incorporating 11 U.S.C. § 902 into PROMESA), and that it has a security . . .

UNITED STATES v. PAYNE,, 382 F. Supp. 3d 71 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Erwin , 902 F.2d 510, 513 (7th Cir. 1990) (noting that when a state "sends no document granting pardon . . . Erwin , 902 F.2d at 512. . . . See Erwin , 902 F.2d at 513 ("The final sentence of § 921(a)(20) cannot logically mean that the state . . .

UNITED STATES v. RAZZ,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 1397 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . App'x 902, 905 (11th Cir. 2013) ("Because no statute or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure authorizes . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIRTASH, DF,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 872 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Hoskins , 902 F.3d 69, 97 (2d Cir. 2018). . . . Hoskins , 902 F.3d at 76. . . . Hoskins , 902 F.3d at 78. . . . can be discerned by looking to the statute's text, structure, and legislative history. " Hoskins , 902 . . . Hoskins , 902 F.3d at 76. . . .

BARBEE, v. BIG RIVER STEEL, LLC, 927 F.3d 1024 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . OK Foods , 902 F.3d 775, 779 (8th Cir. 2018). . . . Melgar , 902 F.3d at 778. . . .

BROWN, Jr. v. J W GRADING, INC. IQ, ECO IQ LLC IQ, LLC LLC LLC, 390 F. Supp. 3d 337 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Corp., 619 F.2d 902, 905 (1st Cir. 1980) ; Garcia Colon v. Garcia Rinaldi, Civ. A. . . .

DIVA LIMOUSINE, LTD. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 392 F. Supp. 3d 1074 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . PeaceHealth , 515 F.3d 883, 902 (9th Cir. 2008). . . .

W. EVES, v. R. LEPAGE,, 927 F.3d 575 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Robinson, 902 F.3d 483, 499 (5th Cir. 2018) (Willett, J., concurring dubitante). . . .

P. SCANLAN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC., 384 F. Supp. 3d 520 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . LLC, 902 F.3d 274, 279-80 (3d Cir. 2018) (quoting Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. White Consol. . . .

ZOMM, LLC, v. APPLE INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 946 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Radioshack Corp. , 902 F. Supp. 2d 503, 508 (D. Del. 2012) ). a. . . .

NEXTEEL CO. LTD. SeAH v. UNITED STATES,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1276 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2019)

. . . Red Raspberry Comm'n, 859 F.2d at 902 ; Carlisle Tire, 10 C.I.T. at 302, 634 F. Supp. at 421. . . .