Cases from cite.case.law:

MEDINA, v. STATE, 182 So. 3d 843 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 903.0471, Fla. . . . Rambosk, 100 So.3d 2, 4 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (the probable cause determination required under section • 903.0471 . . .

HARRIS, v. RYAN,, 147 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Sections 903.047(l)(a), 903.0471, and 907.041(4)(c)7, Florida Statutes (2014), provide for revocation . . . Section 903.0471, Florida Statutes (2014), provides that “a court may, on its own motion, revoke pretrial . . . The Florida Supreme Court found that an adversarial hearing was not required and that section 903.0471 . . . The Florida Supreme Court has, in fact, construed section 903.0471 broadly to authorize trial courts . . .

KNIGHT, v. GEE,, 161 So. 3d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . finds probable cause to believe that the defendant committed a new crime while on pretrial release,” § 903.0471 . . .

A. GRIGLEN, v. RYAN,, 138 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . release should not be equated with “pretrial release” as that term of art is used in sections 903.047 and 903.0471 . . . Therefore his release could not be revoked pursuant to section 903.0471 as a result of his subsequent . . .

PAOLERCIO, v. STATE, 129 So. 3d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . 916.17, Florida Statutes (2012), did not apply and that Petitioner could be detained pursuant to section 903.0471 . . . Petitioner claims he is entitled to immediate release in Osceola County Case No. 12-793 because section 903.0471 . . . Section 903.0471 provides: Violation of condition of pretrial release — Notwithstanding section 907.041 . . . Although section 903.0471 authorizes revocation of a competent defendant’s release and the imposition . . . Therefore, the trial court detained Petitioner pursuant to section 903.0471, finding that there was probable . . .

SANTIAGO, v. P. RYAN,, 109 So. 3d 848 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . from an order revoking his pretrial release and detaining him without bond entered pursuant to section 903.0471 . . . The very purpose of enacting section 903.0471 was to reinstate the common and well justified practice . . .

SIMEUS, v. RAMBOSK,, 100 So. 3d 2 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . trial court subsequently revoked pretrial release and ordered pretrial detention pursuant to section 903.0471 . . . Pursuant to section 903.0471, the trial court may on its own motion revoke pretrial release and order . . . The probable cause determination required under section 903.0471 is similar to the probable cause determination . . . therefore did not provide a sufficient basis for the required probable cause determination under section 903.0471 . . .

GINSBERG, v. RYAN,, 60 So. 3d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 903.0471 (authorizing court, on its own motion, to "revoke pretrial release and order pretrial detention . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 19 So. 3d 306 (Fla. 2009)

. . . The FPDA contrasts the language of section 907.041 with section 903.0471, Florida Statutes (2008), violation . . . State, 843 So.2d 871, 880 (Fla.2003) (stating that while section 903.0471 only requires that the judge . . .

BLAIR, v. STATE L., 15 So. 3d 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 903.0471, Fla. . . . State, 843 So.2d 871, 878 (Fla.2003) (finding section 903.0471 constitutional and suggesting that an . . .

NEELD, v. STATE, 977 So. 2d 740 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 903.0471 provides that a court may, on its own motion, revoke pretrial release and order pretrial . . .

NEWTON, v. STATE, 963 So. 2d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .; see § 903.0471, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

BAEHREN, v. STATE, 962 So. 2d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . His bond was revoked pursuant to section 903.0471, Florida Statutes, after the trial court found probable . . .

BYNUM, v. RYAN,, 954 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Therefore, the defendant was not placed on pretrial release pursuant to sections 903.047-903.0471, Florida . . . unrelated misdemeanor charge and the trial court ordered him held without bond pursuant to section 903.0471 . . .

ALEXANDER, v. JUDD,, 930 So. 2d 847 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The Florida Supreme Court held that section 903.0471, Florida Statutes, which allows a trial court to . . . Section 903.047 is immediately followed by section 903.0471, which is the subject of Parker and states . . . revoke the pretrial release in case number CF06-000735-XX, it was properly proceeding under section 903.0471 . . . been on any form of pretrial release as to those charges, the trial court could not rely on section 903.0471 . . . Neither Parker nor section 903.0471 addresses the court’s authority to hold a defendant with no bond . . .

DOUSE, Jr. v. STATE L., 930 So. 2d 838 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . response the State argued that “regardless of chapter 916” the court had the authority under section 903.0471 . . . The court finds that ... under [section] 903.0471 that he has violated these conditions of release and . . . For competent defendants, section 903.0471 does indeed authorize revocation of release and the imposition . . .

RESENDES, v. L. BRADSHAW,, 935 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 903.0471, Fla. Stat. (2005); Parker v. State, 843 So.2d 871 (Fla.2003). . . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. ROTH,, 890 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Spears, 814 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding section 903.0471, Florida Statutes, constitutional . . .

GADSON, v. JENNE,, 882 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 903.0471, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

REYES, v. McCRAY, Co., 879 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . In a perversion of logic, the State also seeks to justify the trial court’s action by reference to § 903.0471 . . .

PERRY, v. STATE, 842 So. 2d 301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 903.0471, Florida Statutes, provides for revocation of bail under the circumstances presented . . . The supreme court also found that section 903.0471 does not violate substantive due process or procedural . . . However, section 903.0471 is independent of section 907.041, and the procedures and requirements of the . . . Following Parker, we conclude that with regard to bail revocations pursuant to section 903.0471, if a . . . There is no indication in the language of section 903.0471, in contrast to section 907.041, that the . . .

PARKER, v. STATE, 843 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 2003)

. . . In this case, the trial court denied pretrial release under section 903.0471, Florida Statutes, finding . . . Thus, the Fourth District expressly declared section 903.0471 valid, and we exercised our discretion . . . The initial constitutional question posed by section 903.0471, as construed by the majority, is whether . . . Under section 903.0471, the crime for which the defendant might be arrested could range from driving . . . Section 903.0471 thus makes a novel use of the venerable concept of probable cause. . . . He later filed a motion to reconsider the bond revocation, contending that section 903.0471, Florida . . . And finally, the Legislature enacted section 903.0471, which provides as follows: 903.0471 Violation . . . THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECTION 903.0471 Parker claims that section 903.0471 is unconstitutional for . . . As noted earlier, section 903.0471 provides: 903.0471 Violation of condition of pretrial release.— Notwithstanding . . . Procedural Due Process Finally, Parker contends that section 903.0471 violates procedural due process . . .

WILLIAMS, v. SPEARS,, 814 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . The question presented is whether section 903.0471, Florida Statutes (2001) is constitutional. . . . In 2000, the Florida legislature enacted section 903.0471, Florida Statutes, which provides: 903.0471 . . . That being so, the defendant fell within the terms of section 903.0471. . . . Section 903.0471 is consistent with the approach followed in other jurisdictions. . . . For the reasons stated, we hold that section 903.0471, Florida Statutes, is constitutional. . . .

STATE v. PAUL,, 783 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 2001)

. . . .” § 903.0471, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . The Legislature also created section 903.0471, which provides: 903.0471 Violation of condition of pretrial . . . State, 780 So.2d 210 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), the Fourth District upheld the constitutionality of section 903.0471 . . . Although newly-enacted section 903.0471 is a freestanding provision authorizing pretrial detention if . . . Additionally, by enacting section 903.0471 and section 907.045(4)(b)7, the Legislature used the term . . .

PARKER, v. STATE, 780 So. 2d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . while on pretrial release and ordered his detention pursuant to recently enacted Florida Statute § 903.0471 . . . Before the passage of section 903.0471, the law in this court conflicted with the law in two other district . . . Although newly enacted section 903.0471 was not in effect when release was revoked in Bams, this court . . . We concluded that section 903.0471 clarified that the legislature had not intended that section 907.041 . . . The same legislature which passed section 903.0471 also amended section 907.041 to authorize pretrial . . .

BARNS, v. STATE, 768 So. 2d 529 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Significantly, the legislature created section 903.0471, which provides: 903.0471 Violation of condition . . . Section 903.0471 obviously allows this result when a defendant has committed new crimes while on pretrial . . . In creating sections 903.0471 and 907.041(4)(b)7, the legislature used the term “pretrial detention” . . .