The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 903.27(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . . § 903.27(4)-(5), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . proceedings, including execution, until the motion has been heard and a decision rendered by the court.” § 903.27 . . . with two copies of the judgment and a certificate stating that the judgment remains unsatisfied. § 903.27 . . . section 903.28(1) or a motion to set aside judgment pursuant to the pertinent provisions of section 903.27 . . .
. . . The promissory note provided Defendant would make monthly payments in the minimum amount of $903.27 until . . .
. . . is simply this: Whether Appellants were required to comply with the mandatory provisions of section 903.27 . . . Section 903.27(5), Florida Statutes (2009), provides: After notice of judgment against the surety given . . . This Court has held that “[o]nce a forfeiture has been reduced to judgment ... section 903.27, Florida . . . Appellants acknowledged as much, citing section 903.27 in their motion filed in the circuit court. . . . void” (as opposed to “voidable”), a surety would act at its own peril filing a motion under section 903.27 . . . judgment of bail forfeiture against Continental for $5000, plus costs and interest, pursuant to section 903.27 . . . See § 903.27(5), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . requiring the Appellants to pay into escrow the amount of the judgment as otherwise required by Section 903.27 . . .
. . . DCA 1980), this court examined whether the clerk of court could enter a judgment pursuant to section 903.27 . . .
. . . See § 903.27(5) (allowing the surety or the bail bond agent thirty-five days to seek relief from the . . . JURISDICTION Based on the following language of section 903.27(1), the amended bond forfeiture judgment . . . ANALYSIS Section 903.27 sets forth a precondition to seeking to discharge or to set aside a bond forfeiture . . . By the means of section 903.27(1), the legislature has endowed the clerks of court with the authority . . .
. . . that because the forfeiture judgment had been rendered, Snapp could only seek a remedy under section 903.27 . . . If section 903.27(5) is applicable to this case, which we question, payment was within the required 35 . . . by section 903.26 to the bonding company caused it to have to pay the forfeited bond under section 903.27 . . . remedy on rehearing when Snapp timely paid the forfeited bond within the 35 days specified by section 903.27 . . .
. . . pursuant to section 903.26 in order to avoid the entry of a judgment against the surety under section 903.27 . . . money to the clerk of court pursuant to section 903.26, no final judgment will be entered under section 903.27 . . . See § 903.27, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . the bail bondsman is not forced to allow the issue to go to judgment against the surety under section 903.27 . . .
. . . . § 903.27(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .
. . . and respondent below, seeks review of an order vacating a final judgment entered pursuant to section 903.27 . . . after the expiration of the thirty-five day period for setting aside the judgment set forth in section 903.27 . . .
. . . See § 903.27, Fla. Stat. (1999). Reversed and remanded. . . .
. . . . §§ 903.26(2)(a),(b), 903.27(1). . . .
. . . . § 903.27(1), Fla. Stat. On June 20, 1994, Mann and Severson satisfied the judgment. . . . notes, Mann and Severson did not move to set the judgment aside until 118 days after it was entered. § 903.27 . . .
. . . -3 reports one unsecured debt of $110.00 incurred sometime in 1986, four unsecured debts totalling $903.27 . . .
. . . paid the amount of the bond; and (c) the surety moved to set aside the judgment pursuant to section 903.27 . . . The State contends, in substance, that a motion to set aside the judgment under subsection 903.27(5) . . . Prior to 1986, subsection 903.27(5) contained a sentence which provided, “Upon the filing of such a motion . . . . 86-151, § 9, Laws of Fla., and the amendment substituted the present final sentence in subsection 903.27 . . . We therefore hold that relief was not available to American Bankers under subsection 903.27(5). . . .
. . . Once a forfeiture has been reduced to judgment, however, section 903.27, Florida Statutes (1985), exclusively . . . trial court incorrectly invoked the provisions of section 903.28 on behalf of the surety where section 903.27 . . .
. . . See § 903.27(5), Fla.Stat. American appeals. We affirm. . . .
. . . The court so ruled relying on Section 903.27(5), Florida Statutes, which proscribes a 45-day time limit . . . Section 903.27(5) proscribes a 45-day time limit for the filing of motions to set aside judgments of . . . The trial court relied on Section 903.27(5) to find it was without jurisdiction to grant relief in this . . . to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b), when such is applicable, notwithstanding a failure to comply with Section 903.27 . . .
. . . . § 903.27(1), Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .
. . . bondsman did not file a motion to set aside the Final Judgment within the 45 day time limit of Section 903.27 . . .
. . . Section 903.27, Florida Statutes (1975), states that if the forfeiture is not paid or discharged within . . . In Resolute II, the surety’s motion was addressed to the court’s discretion under section 903.27(2), . . . In chapter 82-175, Laws of Florida, the legislature made extensive revisions to sections 903.26, 903.27 . . .
. . . shall be prepared to give effect to this Order, and to proceed to entry of judgment pursuant to Section 903.27 . . . As it does not appear that judgment has been entered as provided by section 903.27(1), nor that appellants . . . have surely abandoned remedies available in circuit court under section 903.26(5) or 903.27(2), the . . .
. . . The applicable sections of Florida Statutes are recited below: Section 903.27, Florida Statutes (1979 . . . section 903.28 because a sister court has held that once a forfeiture judgment is rendered only section 903.27 . . . However, in Resolute the time for filing a motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to section 903.27 . . . Once a judgment has been vacated pursuant to subsection 903.27(2) or Florida Rule of Civil Procedure . . . United Bonding the court held that a judgment entered after a forfeiture was paid was void under section 903.27 . . .
. . . . § 903.27(1), Fla.Stat. (1981). . § 903.27(2), Fla.Stat. (1981). . § 903.27(1), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . .
. . . See § 903.27, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . . and is limited to filing a motion to vacate the final judgment within forty-five days of its entry. § 903.27 . . .
. . . vacate a judgment forfeiting an appearance bond, nor made any mention of the provisions of Section 903.27 . . . Thus we are not called on to answer the question whether Section 903.27(2), with its forty-five day limit . . .
. . . The Surety company appeals the estreature before entry of a final judgment pursuant to section 903.27 . . .
. . . See § 903.27(2), Fla.Stat. (1977); Allied Fidelity Insurance Company v. . . .
. . . Dade County, 289 So.2d 456 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); § 903.27(2), Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .
. . . forfeiture on October 12,1978, and on January 22, 1979, a judgment was entered pursuant to Section 903.27 . . . Thereafter, appellant filed a motion to set aside judgment pursuant to Section 903.27, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . The narrow question presented here is whether the clerk had power to enter a judgment under Section 903.27 . . . of those rules, we think that a circuit court clerk is powerless to enter a judgment under Section 903.27 . . . Section 903.27 reads in pertinent part as follows: (1) If the forfeiture is not paid or discharged within . . .
. . . See Section 903.27(2), Florida Statutes (1977); Resolute Insurance Company v. . . .
. . . As the state correctly points out, Section 903.27(2), Florida Statutes (1977), is applicable here and . . .
. . . Insurance Company filed a timely motion to set aside the final judgment of forfeiture pursuant to Section 903.27 . . .
. . . Subsequently, statutory proceedings were instituted pursuant to § 903.27(1), Fla.Stat., to have judgments . . . Pursuant to the provisions of § 903.27(1), Fla. . . . Implicit in its holding was that the remedy afforded a surety company, pursuant to § 903.27(2), Fla.Stat . . . contained therein, they should have sought relief within the forty-five day period provided for in ‘ § 903.27 . . .
. . . If the forfeiture is not paid or discharged within thirty days, § 903.27 provides for a copy of the order . . . By subparagraph (2) of § 903.27, after notice of judgment given to the surety by the clerk, “the surety . . .
. . . See § 903.27(2) Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .
. . . Section 903.27(2), Fla.Stat, F.S.A., provides that “[a]fter notice of judgment . . . the surety or bail . . . We are therefore presented with a clear question as to whether or not these two sections (903.27 and . . . Section 903.27 presently reads as follows : “903.27 Forfeiture to judgment.— “(1) If the forfeiture is . . . remission of forfeiture section, would ordinarily have been applied in the trial court while section 903.27 . . . with the decision in Keefe, supra, that once the forfeiture has been reduced to judgment only section 903.27 . . .
. . . Pursuant to § 903.27, Fla. . . .
. . . Appellant argues that the final judgments were improperly entered by the trial court judge and that § 903.27 . . .
. . . . § 903.27, F.S.A. . . . S. § 903.27, F.S.A., in 1955 held that under the statute as it existed at that time the trial judge correctly . . . At that time F.S. § 903.27, F.S.A., (1953) provided that the court may discharge the forfeiture if “the . . . Under F.S. § 903.27, F.S.A., the Clerk was authorized to enter judgment only if the forfeiture was not . . .
. . . opinion cited is inconclusive and is based upon the recitation in the statute (903.28 F.S. 1957, now 903.27 . . . Such one year limitation no longer exists. 903.27 F.S. 1967, 1969. . . .
. . . of the circuit court and an appropriate judgment thereon was ultimately entered in accordance with § 903.27 . . .
. . . . § 903.27, F.S.A. provides that in such cases the prosecuting attorney of the Court in question “shall . . . have been made,” thereby clearly contemplating that such order of forfeiture must be in writing. § 903.27 . . .
. . . . § 903.27. . . . Therefore, these cases are not governed by F.S.A. § 903.27, as amended in 1961, but are governed by F.S.A . . .
. . . in 195(K Its re' turns for the five monthsending duly 31, 1950, showed a net operating loss of |208)903.27 . . .
. . . Sec. 903.27, F.S.A. This position is untenable, as we will demonstrate. . . .
. . . It is true that under the statute, Section 903.27, Florida Statutes 1953 and F.S.A., the opportunity . . .
. . . One of the plantations (Waterloo, for cane crop) was leased, however, during 1933 for $903.27; also, . . .