Cases from cite.case.law:

In FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, 156 So. 3d 499 (Fla. 2015)

. . . . §§ 905.17, 905.28(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, 124 So. 3d 819 (Fla. 2013)

. . . On 9Q5§§ 905.17, 905.28(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

MILLER, v. STATE, 42 So. 3d 204 (Fla. 2010)

. . . See § 905.17(1), Fla.'Stat. (2005). . . .

REPORT OF THE SUPREME COURT WORKGROUP ON PUBLIC RECORDS, 825 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 2002)

. . . are normally kept in a sealed container and are not subject to public inspection pursuant to Section 905.17 . . .

STATE v. KNIGHT,, 661 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . a public records exemption for grand jury testimony; such an exemption is contained within section 905.17 . . . Section 905.17(1) provides: The notes, records, and transcriptions [of the grand jury] are confidential . . . More importantly, in re-enacting section 905.17, the legislature did set forth a statement of public . . . Section 905.17 provides the general exemption from section 119.07 and thus is subject to the requirements . . . an exception to the exemption contained in section 905.17.Nothing in Article I, Section 24 requires . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992)

. . . (See §§ 905.16, 905.17, 905.19, 905.22, 27.-02, 27.16, 27.21, & 27.22, Fla.Stat.) . . . prosecuting attorney cannot be present while the grand jury is deliberating or voting (see section 905.17 . . .

THOMPSON, v. STATE, 565 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 1990)

. . . Sections 905.17 and 905.-27 of the Florida Statutes (1987), do not establish a duty to record grand jury . . .

PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC. v. DOE, a a, 460 So. 2d 406 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . that the term “grand jury proceeding” is synonymous with “grand jury session” as defined in Section 905.17 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. D. HAWKINS,, 450 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1984)

. . . The costs of these proceedings in the amount of $905.17 are assessed against the respondent. . . .

In GETTY, 427 So. 2d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Appellant urges that because section 905.17(1), Florida Statutes (1979), restricts those present during . . . Section 905.17(1) provides: No person shall be present at the sessions of the grand jury except the witness . . .

R. WHEELER, v. STATE, 311 So. 2d 713 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . testimony was based upon the construction the District Court of Appeal, First District, placed upon §§ 905.17 . . . However, the Supreme Court rejected that interpretation of §§ 905.17 and 905.19, F.S.1973, and held that . . .

A. RUDD C. v. STATE T. CHRISTIAN,, 310 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 1975)

. . . . §§ 905.17 and 905.-19, F.S.A. . . . Fla.Stat. § 905.17(1), F.S.A., provides as follows: “No person shall be present at the sessions of the . . . Florida Statute 905.17(1) is specific as to who may be present at sessions of the Grand Jury and the . . . grand jurors legal advice regarding the offense lodged against the appellant contrary to F.S.A. §§ 905.17 . . .

STATE T. CHRISTIAN, v. A. RUDD C., 302 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . persons actually conducted the interrogation of Petitioner before the Grand Jury in violation of F.S. 905.17 . . . The court, in its opinion, found the above procedure not violative of Florida Statutes 905.17 and 905.19 . . . subsequently amended by the 1970 Florida Legislature, in pertinent part as follows: Florida Statute 905.17 . . . Florida Statute 905.17 (1970-1974) “No person shall be present at the sessions of the grand jury except . . . attorney shall attend * * In view of the foregoing legislative amendments, a finding that Sections 905.17 . . .

STATE v. O. McARTHUR,, 296 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . The defendant relies upon F.S.‘905.17, F.S.A., which provides: “905.17 Who may be present during session . . . F.S. 905.17, F.S.A., refers to who may be present tat grand jury sessions — rather than who must. . . . If there is to be a change in what we conceive to be the clear provisions of F.S. 905.17 and 905.27, . . .

v., 39 Fla. Supp. 189 (Okeechobee Cty. Cir. Ct. 1973)

. . . F.S.A. 905.17. . . . law was amended in 1951 by Chapter 26584, Laws of Florida, which today is known as Florida Statute 905.17 . . . The particular language of F.S. 905.17 is not clear and apparently no Florida court has specifically . . . complete record of the grand jury proceedings could be made and filed with the clerk as provided by F.S. 905.17 . . .

M. SPENCER, v. M. SPENCER,, 242 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . Recently, in construing Section 905.17, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which provides that a grand juror failing . . . State, Fla.App. 1968, 217 So.2d 591, concluded: “* * * Section 905.17 provides only that violators may . . .

STATE v. GARTENMAYER,, 239 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . The court further found that this violation of the statutes (See Section 905.17 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.) rendered . . .

A. GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 220 So. 2d 393 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . §§ 905.17; 905.24; 905.27, F.S.A. . . .

MATTOX, Jr. v. CARSON, LOWE, v. CARSON,, 295 F. Supp. 1054 (M.D. Fla. 1969)

. . . would be entitled to the presence of counsel before these hearings which would be contrary to Section 905.17 . . .

H. HARPER, v. STATE, 217 So. 2d 591 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Section 905.17, F.S.A.1965, and sentencing him to three days imprisonment. . . . Pinter’s presence inside the grand jury session was expressly contrary to Section 905.17, the applicable . . . to show cause why he should not be adjudged in contempt for, “ * * * [Violation of Florida Statute 905.17 . . . and the proceedings generally that the trial court erroneously concluded that the terms of Section 905.17 . . . Thus, Section 905.17 provides only that violators may be found in contempt; it does not constitute a . . .

In BREVARD COUNTY, GRAND JURY,, 206 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . persons might be in contempt of the Circuit Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit under Section 905.17 . . . October 17 might be the basis of a charge of criminal contempt against one or more persons under Section 905.17 . . .

STATE BATEMAN, v. J. O TOOLE,, 203 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . . § 905.17 provides: “ * * * The stenographic records, notes or any transcript thereof made by the court . . . F.S.A. § 905.17 was not in existence at the time of the decision which was posited on the theory that . . .

STATE F. LOWE, v. A. NELSON,, 202 So. 2d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . clearly no analogy between such inquests before a prosecutor and before a grand jury, citing Sections 905.17 . . .

DOTTY, v. STATE, 197 So. 2d 315 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . . §§ 905.17 and 905.19. . . . To give effect to the evident legislative intent in construing F.S.A. §§ 905.17 and 905.19 we construe . . . The legislature in promulgating F.S.A. §§ 905.17 and 905.19 similarly imposed official duties upon prosecuting . . . F.S.A. § 905.17 “Who may be present during sessions of grand jury. . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 196 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1967)

. . . (See sec’s 905.16, 905.17, 905.19, 905.22, 27.02, 27.16, 27.21 & 27.22 FS.) . . . the prosecuting attorney cannot be present while the grand jury is deliberating or voting (see sec. 905.17 . . .

GORDON, v. E. GERSTEIN,, 189 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 1966)

. . . clearly no analogy between such inquests before a prosecutor and before a grand jury citing Sections 905.17 . . .

STATE v. CLEMMONS, 150 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 1963)

. . . See Section 905.17 and Section 905.27, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . .

TRAFFICANTE, Jr. v. STATE, 92 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 1957)

. . . . § 905.17, F.S.A. provides in part that transcriptions of testimony before a grand jury “shall be opened . . .