Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. ROBERTS,, 143 So. 3d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 910.005(l)(a), Fla. . . . Jurisdiction Statute Section 910.005, governing State criminal jurisdiction, provides as follows: (1) . . . See § 910.005(l)(a). . . . See § 910.005(2), (3). We conclude that it does. Case Law No Florida case is directly on point. . . . The Kansas jurisdictional statute included a provision nearly identical to section 910.005(3): “A crime . . .

SANDERS, v. STATE, 77 So. 3d 914 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Sanders argued that pursuant to section 910.005, Florida Statutes (2008), Florida did not have jurisdiction . . . b) The conduct outside the state constitutes an attempt to commit an offense within the state.... § 910.005 . . . contends that the alleged grand theft does not fall under either paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection 910.005 . . . ] an attempt to commit an offense within” Florida under 910.005(l)(b). . . . The defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under subsection 910.005(1), which the . . .

SIMMONS, v. STATE, 944 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2006)

. . . .” § 910.005(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005) (emphasis added); see also Simmons v. . . . Section 910.005(2) explains that an offense is committed partly within Florida if “either the conduct . . .

SIMMONS, v. STATE, 934 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 2006)

. . . . § 910.005(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

STATE v. RUIZ,, 909 So. 2d 986 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Saunders, 508 So.2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)(holding that section 910.005(l)(b) of the Florida Statutes . . . Section 910.005 of the Florida Statutes (2003) provides: 910.005. . . . . § 910.005(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

LEVINE, v. STATE, 849 So. 2d 455 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Under section 910.005, Florida has jurisdiction to prosecute cases in which: (1) A person is subject . . .

BLACK, v. STATE, 819 So. 2d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 910.005(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . ] occurs within the state.” § 910.005(2), Fla. Stat. '(1993). . . . See § 910.005(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . also alleged and proved “act[s] in furtherance of the [RICO] conspiracy occurring] in the state.” § 910.005 . . .

STATE v. STEPANSKY,, 761 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 2000)

. . . that the fatal blow to the victim was probably struck in Alabama, we held that pursuant to section 910.005 . . . the element of premeditation occurred in Florida, jurisdiction was properly exercised under section 910.005 . . .

LYONS, v. STATE, 711 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . .” § 910.005(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . Because the State had jurisdiction under section 910.005(2), there is no need to reach the question challenging . . . The State of Florida properly exercised its jurisdiction under section 910.005, over Lyons’ criminal . . .

STEPANSKY, v. STATE, 707 So. 2d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . The general criminal jurisdiction of the State of Florida is set out in section 910.005, Florida Statutes . . .

ROSS, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 910.005(l)(d), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that a person can be prosecuted for an offense . . . The second district looked to section 910.005(l)(d) in holding that the crime was subject to prosecution . . . See § 910.005(2), Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . may be a violation of this statute so long as the requirements for prosecution set forth in section 910.005 . . . Section 910.005(2) states: An offense is committed partly within this state if either the conduct that . . .

GORE, v. STATE, 573 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 910.005, Florida Statutes (1987); Lane v. State, 388 So.2d 1022 (Fla.1980). . . .

TARAWNEH v. STATE, 562 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Florida Statutes Section 910.005(l)(c) provides for jurisdiction in Florida where “conduct outside the . . . Section 910.005(l)(a) confers jurisdiction over offenses “committed wholly or partly within the state . . . of their conspiracy in Florida to provide jurisdiction in this state under Florida Statutes Section 910.005 . . .

STATE v. COSTA,, 558 So. 2d 525 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 910.005(3), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that “[a]n offense that is based on an omission . . .

DOMBERG, Jr. v. STATE, 518 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . See section 910.005(1), Florida Statutes. . . .

STATE v. SAUNDERS,, 508 So. 2d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 910.005(1)(b) provides: (1) A person is subject to prosecution in this state for an offense that . . .

KEEN, v. STATE, 504 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1987)

. . . that the fatal blow to the victim was probably struck in Alabama, we held that pursuant to section 910.005 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 465 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1985)

. . . the statutory presumption of jurisdiction arising from the victim’s body being found in Florida, § 910.005 . . .

ROSS, v. STATE, 411 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . . § 910.005(2), Fla. Stat. (1979). . . .

LANE, v. STATE, 388 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 1980)

. . . retains jurisdiction to try this defendant for first-degree murder under the provisions of sections 910.005 . . . By section 910.005, we have broadened our jurisdiction to allow the trial of the homicide offense when . . . The applicable provisions of section 910.005 provide: (1) A person is subject to prosecution in this . . .

BATTLE, v. STATE, 365 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . In support of this position, appellee relies upon Section 910.005(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). . . . Thus, contrary to appellee’s contention, Section 910.005(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), did not confer . . .

CARONE, v. STATE, 361 So. 2d 437 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Appellant’s contention is laid to rest by the provisions of Section 910.005(l)(d), Florida Statutes ( . . . 1977), which states: 910.005 State criminal jurisdiction.— (1) A person is subject to prosecution in . . .

PETERSON, HOWELL HEATHER d b a D. C. a v. O NEILL,, 314 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . §§ 63.102, 78.03, 83.11, 910.005 et seq., that the lawsuit should be tried in the area where the cause . . .