Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. LOSADA,, 89 So. 3d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . LEGAL ANALYSIS Section 910.03(1), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that “Except as provided in s. 910.035 . . . conjunctively, and before trial the defendant may elect the county in which he or she will be tried. § 910.03 . . . trial in the county where the offense was committed, the defendant may request a change in venue. § 910.03 . . .

STATE v. A. KOTECKI,, 82 So. 3d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . A different statute, section 910.03, Florida Statutes (2010), covers venue in criminal trials. . . . See § 910.03(1) (“By his or her election, the accused waives the right to trial in the county in which . . .

STATE v. LUIS, A., 949 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 910.03,. Fla. Stat. (2006); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.151, 3.240. . . .

CHANDLER, v. V. CROSBY, Jr., 454 F. Supp. 2d 1137 (M.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . . § 910.03(1) (1993) to conduct the trial in Pinellas County where a jury picked from Orange County would . . . Pursuant to section 910.03(1), Florida Statutes (1993), Chandler initially elected to be tried in Hillsborough . . . See § 910.03(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994). . . . Stat. § 910.03 from Hillsborough County to Pinellas County, see Dkt. 19, App. C, Vol. 11 at 2076. . . .

STANEK- COUSINS, v. STATE, 912 So. 2d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . longer good law because, in the interim since it was decided, the legislature has amended sections 910.03 . . . See §§ 910.03(3), 26.021(21). . . .

CHANDLER, v. STATE, 848 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 2003)

. . . Pursuant to section 910.03(1), Florida Statutes (1993), Chandler initially elected to be tried in Hillsborough . . . See § 910.03(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994). . . .

S. SAILOR, v. STATE, 733 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 910.03(1), Florida Statutes (1995) states in material part that “criminal prosecutions shall . . . Like the constitutional provision it was designed to implement, section 910.03(1), provides a clear and . . . This construction of the substantive provisions of section 910.03(1), Florida Statutes is supported by . . . Section 910.03(3), Florida Statutes (1995) states that “[i]f a court finds that a fair and impartial . . . See § 910.03 Fla. Stat. (1971). . . . The concurring opinion suggests section 910.03, Florida Statutes (1997), can be read as reflecting a . . . Section 910.03, Florida Statutes (1997) does not prohibit state motions for change of venue. . . . ." § 910.03(3), Fla. . . . Florida Statutes section 910.03, cited in the majority and concurring opinions, applies where the place . . . Section 910.03 does not refer to the State’s right to request a change of venue. . . . Florida Statutes section 910.03(3), allowing the selection of a jury from another county, was not asserted . . .

LEON, v. STATE, 695 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Moreover, section 910.03, Florida Statutes (1995), adds to the constitutional provision that: “Except . . . case, it would have been quite proper for the state to have alleged, as the constitution and section 910.03 . . . If defendant did not like the prosecutor’s choice of venue, he had a complete remedy under section 910.03 . . . We agree with the state in its contention that the constitution and section 910.03(1) save its conjunctive . . .

STATE v. L. STEPHENS,, 608 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 910.03 would have authorized this trial in Seminole County for the burglary in Volu-sia County . . . The problem with relying on section 910.03 is that the information in this case did not allege the burglary . . .

STATE v. L. STEPHENS,, 586 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 910.03 would have authorized this trial in Seminole County for the burglary in Volusia County . . . The problem with relying on section 910.03 is that the information in this case did not allege the burglary . . .

MARTIN, v. STATE, 488 So. 2d 653 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . one county), his right to be tried in the county of his choice is guaranteed by Sections 910.02 and 910.03 . . . the state the right to file an indictment in Duval County, petitioner argues that Sections 910.02 and 910.03 . . . The petitioner’s reliance on sections 910.02 and 910.03 and on Article I, Section 16 of the Florida Constitution . . . The accused is entitled to elect the county in which he will be tried, as provided in s. 910.03. . . . Section 910.03, Florida Statutes, states: Except as provided in s. 910.035 criminal prosecutions shall . . .

STATE v. KATZ,, 417 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The trial court also relied on Sections 910.02 and 910.03, Florida Statutes (1981). . . .

CRITTENDON, v. STATE, 338 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . .; § 910.03, F.S.1975. . . .

MURPHY, v. STATE, 252 So. 2d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . Florida Statute § 910.03, F.S.A. provides that criminal prosecutions shall be tried in the county where . . .

BATEMAN, v. STATE E. POTTER, v. STATE, 238 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 1970)

. . . . §§ 910.03, .08, F.S.A. . . . .

COLLINS, Jr. v. STATE, 197 So. 2d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . right to a * * * trial, by an impartial jury, in the county where the crime was committed * * Section 910.03 . . .

RHODEN, v. STATE, 179 So. 2d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . public trial, by an impartial jury, in the-county where the crime was committed * * *» Florida Statutes 910.03 . . .