Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 910.15 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 910.15 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 910.15

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 910
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 910.15
910.15 Crimes facilitated by communication systems.
(1) A person charged with committing a crime facilitated by communication through use of the mail, telephone, or newspaper or by radio, television, Internet, or another means of electronic data communication may be tried in the county in which the dissemination originated, in which the dissemination was made, or in which any act necessary to consummate the offense occurred.
(2) For purposes of this section, if a communication is made by or made available through the use of the Internet, the communication was made in every county within the state.
History.s. 1, ch. 80-25; s. 2, ch. 2001-99; s. 7, ch. 2007-143.

F.S. 910.15 on Google Scholar

F.S. 910.15 on Casetext

Amendments to 910.15


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 910.15
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 910.15.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. HEMMERLY,, 723 So. 2d 324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . on the affidavit of a federal officer who has seen the misdemeanor committed while under subsection 910.15 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE, 717 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 1998)

. . . ENFORCEABLE IN ALL COUNTIES OF FLORIDA, AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MAY EFFECT ARRESTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 910.15 . . .

UNITED STATES v. N. ROBERTSON, 638 F. Supp. 1202 (E.D. Va. 1986)

. . . . ยงยง 910.1 to 910.15 (West Supp.1985) (same). . . . .

PHILIPP BROTHERS METAL CORPORATION, v. S. S. RIO IGUAZU v. EMPRESA LINEAS MARITIMAS ARGENTINAS ARGENTINE LINES, 658 F.2d 30 (2d Cir. 1981)

. . . Both defendants were also found to be liable for the charge of $910.15 Philipp Brothers paid to ascertain . . .

PHILIPP BROTHERS METAL CORPORATION, v. SS RIO IGUAZU v. EMPRESA LINEAS MARITIMAS ARGENTINAS, 498 F. Supp. 645 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)

. . . It also billed the plaintiff $910.15 for the extra labor required to weigh the broken, rebundled and . . . In addition Pittston and Empresa are liable to plaintiff for the charge of $910.15 imposed on Philipp . . .

M. EVERETT, v. A. RIBICOFF,, 200 F. Supp. 103 (N.D. Fla. 1961)

. . . The net earnings of the partnership for the year 1957 were reported as $8,-910.15. . . .