Cases from cite.case.law:

PEARSON, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., 270 So. 3d 441 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . . § 913.03(10), Fla. . . .

BENTLEY, v. STATE, 233 So. 3d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . P. 3.300(c) and § 913.03, Fla. . . .

MCCRAY, v. STATE, 220 So. 3d 1119 (Fla. 2017)

. . . State, 894 So.2d 88, 98 (Fla. 2004) (citing §§ 913.03, 913.08, Fla. Stat. (2003)). . . . “Section 913.03 of the Florida Statutes outlines the grounds to support cause challenges.” Id. . . .

WELCH, v. STATE, 189 So. 3d 296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . (quoting Singer, 109 So.2d at 23); see also § 913.03(10), Fla. . . .

GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 143 So. 3d 1171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 913.03 of the Florida Statutes, which specifies the grounds for challenging a juror for cause . . . individual juror may be made only on the following grounds,” and then lists twelve separate grounds. § 913.03 . . . Section 913.03(10), the only relevant subsection in the instant appeal, provides that a cause challenge . . . prevent him or her from serving as a fair and impartial juror, and the case law has applied section 913.03 . . .

MATARRANZ, v. STATE, 133 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 2013)

. . . The majority likewise fails to heed the statutory framework established in section 913.03(10), Florida . . . And at the same time, the majority displaces the legislative judgment reflected in section 913.03(10) . . . State, 894 So.2d 88, 98-99 (Fla.2004) (recognizing that section 913.03(10) outlines the grounds that . . . In derogation of both section 913.03 and our case law recognizing the manifest error standard of review . . . This change in the law — which disregards section 913.03(10) — has far-reaching implications and is radically . . .

MATARRANZ, v. STATE, 99 So. 3d 534 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Guzman, 934 So.2d at 15 (quoting § 913.03(10), Fla. Stat. (2011)). . . .

BOLLING, v. STATE, 61 So. 3d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 913.03 provides the grounds for a challenge for cause, including that “[t]he juror has a state . . . of mind regarding the defendant ... that will prevent the juror from acting with impartiality.” § 913.03 . . .

MILLER, v. STATE, 42 So. 3d 204 (Fla. 2010)

. . . .” § 913.03(10), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

BANKS, v. STATE, 46 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 2010)

. . . Kopsho, 959 So.2d at 170; see also § 913.03(10), Fla. . . .

WADE, v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 857 (Fla. 2010)

. . . .” § 913.03(10), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

McKENZIE, v. STATE, 29 So. 3d 272 (Fla. 2010)

. . . See § 913.03(10), Fla. Stat. (2006). POLSTON, J., concurs. . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 28 So. 3d 838 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Section 913.03(10), Florida Statutes (2005), provides that a juror may be challenged for cause on the . . . The per curiam opinion’s view on this point cannot be reconciled with section 913.03(10). . . . Finally, with respect to this point, I note that section 913.03 sets forth a list of grounds on which . . . been injured by the offense charged ... that will prevent the juror from acting with impartiality.” § 913.03 . . . Such a presumption is not consistent with section 913.03. . . .

IBARRONDO, v. STATE, 1 So. 3d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . State, 934 So.2d 11, 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (citing § 913.03(10), Fla. . . .

BIGHAM, v. STATE, 995 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 2008)

. . . .” § 913.03(10), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 969 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2007)

. . . .” § 913.03(10), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

KOPSHO, v. STATE, 959 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 2007)

. . . See § 913.03, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . .

COMPANIONI, Jr. v. CITY OF TAMPA,, 958 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . decision, the court said: The fact of being a deputy sheriff is a ground of challenge for cause, Section 913.03 . . .

C. DORSEY, v. REDDY, M. D., 931 So. 2d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . State, 934 So.2d 11, 2006 WL 335479 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 15, 2006) (citing § 913.03(10), Fla. . . .

LAMARCA, v. STATE v. R., 931 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 2006)

. . . While the court did not indicate which provision of section 913.03, Florida Statutes (1997), justified . . .

GUZMAN, v. STATE, 934 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 913.03(10), Florida Statutes (2003). . . .

BUSBY, v. STATE, 894 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 2004)

. . . See §§ 913.03; 913.08, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . Section 913.03 of the Florida Statutes outlines the grounds that support cause challenges. . . . See § 913.03(l)-(9), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . the court determines that he or she can render an impartial verdict according to the evidence.... § 913.03 . . . Such a construction also renders superfluous that aspect of section 913.03 which sets forth juror impartiality . . .

CRAWFORD, v. STATE, 805 So. 2d 997 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 913.03, Florida Statutes (2000), provides a list of grounds to challenge individual jurors for . . .

B. BOYKINS, v. STATE, 783 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 913.03, Florida Statutes (1999) identifies twelve grounds for a challenge for cause. . . .

FRANCO, v. STATE, 777 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 913.03, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

KERESTESY, v. STATE, 760 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . .” § 913.03(10), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

SHAHGODARI, v. STATE, 744 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Appellant relied upon section 913.03(6), Florida Statutes, which provides for a challenge to an individual . . . that tried another person for the offense charged in the indictment, information, or affidavit.” § 913.03 . . . construed to apply to Isaac’s prior jury service, the state urged the trial court to interpret section 913.03 . . . offense or transaction charged in the information. - The state also argued that, in any event, section 913.03 . . . We hold that section 913.03(6), Florida Statutes, does not apply to a juror who has previously served . . .

HUBER, v. STATE, 669 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 913.03, Florida Statutes (1993), sets out the grounds for challenge for cause in a criminal trial . . .

JUDAH, v. STATE, 654 So. 2d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 913.03, Fla.Stat.; Waddell v. . . .

DENMARK, v. STATE, 656 So. 2d 166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Under section 913.03(9), Florida Statutes (1989), Denmark’s counsel could have challenged the juror for . . .

ALEN, v. STATE, 596 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . procedure, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.300; Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.431(c), or perhaps to the applicable criminal statute, § 913.03 . . . Section 913.03(10), Florida Statutes (1991), narrowly restricts the usual "bias” ground for a challenge . . .

POLYNICE, v. STATE, 568 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Under subsection 913.03(9), Florida Statutes (1987), a prospective juror must be excused if he or she . . . Under subsection 913.03(10), Florida Statutes (1987), a prospective juror must be excused if he or she . . .

KIBLER, v. STATE, 546 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1989)

. . . Section 913.03, Florida Statutes (1987), lists twelve grounds for a challenge for cause. . . .

COOK, v. STATE, 542 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 1989)

. . . See also § 913.03(10), Fla. . . . See §§ 913.03(2), (10), Fla.Stat. (1985) (permitting challenges for cause on grounds of mental or physical . . .

STEWART, v. L. DUGGER, As, 847 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . . §§ 913.03, 913.-13 (West 1985). There are a variety of disqualifications. . . .

KENNEDY, v. L. WAINWRIGHT, R. C., 483 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1986)

. . . jurors whose beliefs would preclude them finding the defendant guilty regardless of the evidence, § 913.03 . . .

ROSS, v. STATE, 474 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1985)

. . . Section 913.03(9), Florida Statutes (1983), states that a juror may be challenged for cause on the ground . . . find nothing in the record to indicate that the juror was subject to dismissal for cause under section 913.03 . . .

DARDEN, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 725 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 913.03 (1983). . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 440 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 913.03, Florida Statutes (1981), provides: A challenge for cause to an individual juror may be . . . Not only does Irby ignore the clear language of the Florida Constitution and Section 913.03(10), but . . .

IRBY, v. STATE, 436 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 913.03(10), Florida Statutes, provides that a jury may be challenged “for cause” if possessed . . . Pursuant to § 913.03(10), therefore, the challenged correctional officers should have been excused upon . . .

HIGHLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. LUCCI,, 423 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . State, 412 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); §§ 913.03, 913.12, Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.R. Civ.P.1.431. . . .

PEEK, v. STATE, 413 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Weber to render an impartial verdict, see Section 913.03(10), Florida Statutes (1979), whether or not . . .

SKIPPER, v. STATE, 400 So. 2d 797 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 913.03, Florida Statutes. Appellant has a heavy burden of showing an abuse of discretion. . . .

PERI, v. STATE, 412 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 913.03, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

LEON, v. STATE, 396 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . State, 143 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962), cert, dismissed, 155 So.2d 696 (Fla.1963); § 913.03(10), Fla.Stat . . .

JENKINS, v. STATE, 380 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The basis for challenges for cause are set forth in Section 913.03(9), Florida Statutes (1979). . . .

M. MACK, v. C. ALEXANDER,, 575 F.2d 488 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . The dispute arose over $913.03 in income taxes owed by the plaintiff which have accumulated since 1972 . . .

STATE v. W. RODGERS,, 347 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 1977)

. . . Therein the Court said: “The fact of being a deputy sheriff is a ground of challenge for cause, Section 913.03 . . .

HUNT, v. STATE, 330 So. 2d 502 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . cause to the individual juror by Hunt does not come within or meet the grounds for challenge under § 913.03 . . .

MURPHY, v. STATE OF FLORIDA,, 363 F. Supp. 1224 (S.D. Fla. 1973)

. . . Florida law provides as follows : § 913.03 Grounds for Challenge to Individual Jurors for Cause 10) The . . .

WILLIAMS, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 427 F.2d 921 (5th Cir. 1970)

. . . They were all excused for reasons consistent with Florida Statutes Sections 913.03 and 53.021, F.S.A. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 308 F. Supp. 81 (S.D. Fla. 1969)

. . . They were all excused for reasons consistent with Florida Statutes Sections 913.03 and 53.021, F.S.A. . . .

WILSON v. STATE, 225 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1969)

. . . Also, Sec. 913.03(3), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., states the grounds for a challenge for causé to an individual . . .

PORTER, v. STATE, 160 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1963)

. . . Sec. 913.03, F.S.A., which specifies the grounds for challenge to jurors for cause does not include relationship . . . between the trial judge and a juror, although it does in 913.03(9) provide for challenge because of . . .

CARNLEY v. COCHRAN, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, 369 U.S. 506 (U.S. 1962)

. . . Stat., 1959, §913.03(1). . . . Stat., 1959, § 913.03. Ignorance of a ground for challenge is no defense. Denmark v. . . .

B. SINGER, v. STATE, 109 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 1959)

. . . Section 913.03(11), F.S.A., provides that a challenge for cause may be made to an individual juror on . . . We conclude that veniremen Davis and Carter were not witnesses for the State under § 913.03(11), F.S.A . . . On appeal defendant also contends that venireman Davis should have been excused under § 913.03(10), F.S.A . . . Sec. 913.03, F.S.A., states that a challenge for cause may be made only on twelve grounds specified therein . . . Shaw were sufficient to inform the court that the defense was relying upon Sec. 913.03(10), F.S.A., which . . .

EX PARTE GEORGE L. SULLIVAN, 155 Fla. 111 (Fla. 1944)

. . . The fact of being a deputy sheriff is a ground of challenge for cause, Section 913.03, Florida Statutes . . .