Cases from cite.case.law:

MCCRAY, v. STATE, 220 So. 3d 1119 (Fla. 2017)

. . . State, 894 So.2d 88, 98 (Fla. 2004) (citing §§ 913.03, 913.08, Fla. Stat. (2003)). . . .

R. JACKSON, v. STATE, 213 So. 3d 754 (Fla. 2017)

. . . ANALYSIS Guilt Phase Peremptory Challenges Jackson alleges that section 913.08, Florida Statutes (2007 . . . Section 913.08 is rationally related to a legitimate interest in providing fair and efficient trials. . . . Therefore, we reject his facial constitutional challenge to section 913.08. . . . Jackson also alleges that section 913.08 is unconstitutional as applied to him because the trial court . . . Therefore, Jackson’s as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of section 913.08 also fails. . . .

BLAKE, v. STATE v. H., 180 So. 3d 89 (Fla. 2014)

. . . See § 913.08(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). : B. . . .

MATARRANZ, v. STATE, 133 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Section 913.08(10) points to the fundamental role of the trial court in assessing the credibility of . . .

LaVALLEY, v. STATE, 30 So. 3d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The majority properly resolves this case by applying the plain language of section 913.08, Florida Statutes . . . The statute, section 913.08(1), Florida Statutes, specifies that the number of challenges is determined . . . Pursuant to section 913.08(1), Florida Statutes (2006), and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.350( . . . Section 913.08 and rule 3.350 link the number of peremptory challenges to the “offense charged,” in the . . .

VICTORINO, v. STATE, 23 So. 3d 87 (Fla. 2009)

. . . See also § 913.08, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

KOPSHO, v. STATE, 959 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 2007)

. . . See § 913.08(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

BUCHANAN, v. STATE, 927 So. 2d 209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 913.08 of the Florida Statutes (2005) is in accord: 913.08. . . . . § 913.08(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . We interpret section 913.08(l)(a)’s reference to the punishment for the “offense charged” to pertain . . .

BUSBY, v. STATE, 894 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 2004)

. . . He did so by using one of the ten statutory peremptory challenges given to him in section 913.08(l)(a . . . criminal trials, peremptory challenges are granted equally to the State and to the defendant by section 913.08 . . . See §§ 913.03; 913.08, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . See § 913.08(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . peremptory challenges at the expense of the other in contravention of the plain language of section 913.08 . . .

COX, v. STATE, 764 So. 2d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . The statute applicable, section 913.08, provides in pertinent part: (1) The state and the defendant shall . . . See Smellie, 720 So.2d at 1132 (“We interpret section 913.08(1)(a)’s reference to the punishment for . . .

WHITAKER, v. STATE, 784 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . contends that the trial court erred in denying him ten peremptory challenges as prescribed by Section 913.08 . . . Section 913.08(1) provides: (1) The state and the defendant shall each be provided with the following . . . If we were to adopt the defendant’s construction of Section 913.08(1), we would achieve “the incongruous . . .

SMELLIE, v. STATE, 720 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . As to the first issue, section 913.08(1), Florida Statutes (1997), provides in relevant part: The state . . . We interpret section 913.08(l)(a)’s reference to the punishment for the “offense charged” to pertain . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992)

. . . The suggested rule is a transcription of section 913.08, Florida Statutes, excluding subdivision (5), . . .

KIBLER, v. STATE, 546 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1989)

. . . . § 913.08, Fla.Stat. (1987). The picking of a jury is an art, not a science. . . .

STEWART, v. L. DUGGER, As, 847 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 913.08 (West 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.350 (West 1975 and Supp.1987). . . .

LIVINGSTON, v. STATE, 512 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 913.08 the court considering consolidated cases held, “ * * the number of challenges * * * would . . .

KOENIG, v. STATE, 497 So. 2d 875 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . examination of the relationship between the defendant’s peremptory challenge right guaranteed by Section 913.08 . . . Section 913.08 provides in pertinent part: “(1) The State and the defendant shall each be allowed the . . .

STATE v. NEIL, NEIL, v. STATE, 457 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1984)

. . . . § 913.08, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . .

L. ANDREWS, v. STATE, 438 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Recommended Action: (A) Expand pool of eligible jurors, (B) Revise Florida Statute 913.08 by reducing . . .

CAPERS, v. STATE, 433 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . State, 370 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); § 913.08(10), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

WILSON, v. STATE, 304 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 1974)

. . . by attacking vel non (and as applied) the trial judge’s ruling upholding the constitutionality of § 913.08 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 222 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1969)

. . . . § 913.08(2), F.S.A. to receive only the six peremptory challenges he received and that the two additional . . . State, supra, which discussed F.S. § 913.08 the court considering consolidated cases held, “ * * * the . . . the trial judge may limit peremptory challenges to the number designated for single cases in F.S. § 913.08 . . .

KELLEY, v. STATE, 212 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Each defendant was entitled to sixteen peremptory challenges under Section 913.08, Florida Statutes, . . .

BRANCH v. STATE, 212 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Each defendant was entitled to sixteen peremptory challenges under Section 913.08, Florida Statutes, . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 206 So. 2d 673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . THE COURT: Yes, 913.08. MR. MENSH: Yes, sir. . . . Sec. 913.08 F.S. . . . Sec. 913.08 F.S.A. for a capital case. . . . Sec. 913.08, Florida Statutes 1953, and F.S.A. . . . Sec. 913.08 F.S.A. in a misdemeanor case. . . . Stats., § 913.08, F.S.A. . . . It provides: “913.08 Number of peremptory challenges The state and the defendant shall each be allowed . . . Sec. 913.08, Florida Statutes 1953, and F.S.A. . . .

COSTANTINO, v. STATE, 203 So. 2d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . The appellant has also argued that under § 913.08(2) Florida Statutes, F.S.A., he should have been allowed . . .

COLLINS, Jr. v. STATE, 197 So. 2d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Section 913.08 2T.S.A. provides: “The state and the defendant shall each be allowed the following number . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 196 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1967)

. . . Committee Note: The suggested rule is a transcription of FS 913.08, excluding subdivision (5), which . . .

SWAIN v. ALABAMA, 380 U.S. 202 (U.S. 1965)

. . . . §913.08 (1963); Ga. Code Ann. § 59-805 (1937); Ill. Ann. . . .

CARNLEY v. COCHRAN, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, 369 U.S. 506 (U.S. 1962)

. . . Stat., 1959, § 913.08. It is certain that he could have made no challenge to the panel as a whole. . . .

J. M. BLACKWELDER, v. STATE, 100 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

. . . Section 913.08, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides that the state and the defendant shall each be allowed . . .

MEADE, Jr. v. STATE, 85 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 1956)

. . . All .the references in the statute, Sec. 913.08, are,to an offense, in the singular, and it is in the . . .

McCOLLUM v. STATE, 74 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1954)

. . . defendant has exercised 6 of the 10 peremptory challenges allowed by law in a capital case, section 913.08 . . .

NELSON v. WHITE, 83 F. 215 (9th Cir. 1897)

. . . supplies, there remains due to him a balance of nine hundred and forty-three and eight one-hundredths ($913.08 . . .