Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. WONG,, 271 So. 3d 74 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Section 913.10, Florida Statutes (1985), and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.270 provide for a twelve-person . . .

LESSARD, v. STATE, 232 So. 3d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 913.10, Fla. Stat. (2017). . Miller, Six of One Is Not A Dozen of the Other, 146 U. Pa. L. . . . See, e.g., 2017 Florida Senate Bill No. 962, (proposing change to section 913.10, Florida Statutes, to . . .

ORTIZ, v. STATE, 188 So. 3d 113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . true that first degree murder is a capital felony pursuant to section 782.04(1)(a), and that section 913.10 . . .

JIMENEZ, v. STATE, 167 So. 3d 497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . qualifications and the number of jurors, not fewer than six, shall be fixed by law”) (emphasis added); § 913.10 . . .

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, v. R. SMITH, 159 So. 3d 888 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 913.10, Fla. Stat. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT NO., 146 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 913.10, Fla. Stat. . . . Definitions for enhanced penalty. § 913.10, Fla. Stat. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 137 So. 3d 995 (Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 913.10, Fla. Stat. . . .

WALLING, v. STATE, 105 So. 3d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . issues that merit discussion: 1) whether appellant was entitled to a twelve-member jury under section 913.10 . . . Hogan, 451 So.2d 844, 845 (Fla.1984) (“For the purposes of defining ‘capital’ under [section 913.10] . . . Only if the accused can lawfully be put to death does section 913.10 require a twelve-person jury. . . . Section 913.10 has never been interpreted to apply to cases where death was not a legal possibility. . . . In sum, any capital case for purposes of section 913.10 is a case where the death sentence may lawfully . . .

E. GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 982 So. 2d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 913.10, Florida Statutes (2006), is the current law that “fixes” the number of jurors: “Twelve . . . Obviously, the Florida Legislature could address this issue prospectively by amending section 913.10 . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 857 So. 2d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . The legislature has enacted section 913.10, Florida Statutes to provide that, “Twelve persons shall constitute . . .

L. HALL, v. STATE, 853 So. 2d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 913.10, Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.270 require that 12 persons . . . “Twelve persons shall constitute a jury to try all capital cases_” § 913.10, Fla. . . .

CABBERIZA, v. W. MOORE,, 217 F.3d 1329 (11th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 913.10 (West 1996), even though they were not facing the death penalty. See State v. . . .

PALAZZOLO, v. STATE, 754 So. 2d 731 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 913.10, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.270. . . . .

McLAUGHLIN, v. STATE, 721 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1998)

. . . enforcement officer, and an auxiliary correctional officer, as those terms are respectively defined in s. 913.10 . . .

SMART, v. STATE, 695 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 913.10, Florida Statutes, provides that “[tjwelve persons shall constitute a jury to try all . . . The quoted language of section 913.10, Florida Statutes, is restated verbatim in rule 3.270 of the Florida . . .

HOWELL, v. STATE, 687 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 913.10, Florida Statutes (1995), provides that “[tjwelve persons shall constitute a jury to try . . .

J. CHATELOIN, v. K. SINGLETARY,, 89 F.3d 749 (11th Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 913.10 (West 1985). . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992)

. . . Except for substituting the word “persons” for “men,” the suggested rule is a transcription of section 913.10 . . . Save for certain rewording, the suggested rule is a transcription of section 913.10(2), Florida Statutes . . .

STATE v. L. GRIFFITH,, 561 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 1990)

. . . Section 913.10, Florida Statutes (1985), and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.270 state that twelve . . .

L. GRIFFITH, v. STATE, 548 So. 2d 244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . that the defendant’s admitted failure personally to forego the twelve-person jury required by section 913.10 . . .

ALFONSO v. STATE, 528 So. 2d 383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 913.10, Florida Statutes (1985), and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.270 provide for a twelve-person . . .

LIVINGSTON, v. STATE, 512 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . A jury of twelve, twice the number required in other criminal cases, is provided in Sec. 913.10, Florida . . .

MELVIN a v. OLD BEN COAL COMPANY, a, 610 F. Supp. 131 (S.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . . § 913.10 (1984); 47 Fed.Reg. 23883 (1982). . . .

COOPER, v. STATE, 453 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Also, Section 913.10, Florida Statutes (1981), and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.270 provide for a jury of 12 persons . . .

RUSAW, v. STATE, 429 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . defendant contended that the judge erred in ordering a trial by a six-person jury since both section 913.10 . . .

FISCHER, v. STATE, 429 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Florida Statutes, Section 913.10 provides for twelve person juries to try capital cases and juries of . . .

HOGAN, v. STATE, 427 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 913.10, Florida Statutes (1981), and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.270 are identical and . . .

GROOMES, v. STATE, 401 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S.Ct. 1893, 26 L.Ed.2d 446 (1970), the Supreme Court upheld Section 913.10, . . .

ROTH, v. STATE, 385 So. 2d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . He contends his right to be tried by a twelve-person jury as provided by Section 913.10, Florida Statutes . . .

BALLEW v. GEORGIA, 435 U.S. 223 (U.S. 1978)

. . . . § 913.10 (West 1973); Ky. Rev. Stat. § 29.015 (1971); Mass. Gen. . . .

W. RODGERS, v. STATE, 338 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Sec. 913.10, Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.270, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provide that six . . .

DONALDSON, v. SACK,, 265 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1972)

. . . . § 913.10, F.S.A. . Portee v. State, 253 So.2d 866 (Fla.1971). . Fla.Const. art. . . .

C. O MALLEY, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 237 So. 2d 813 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . . § 913.10, F.S.A. provides that — “Twelve men shall constitute a jury to try all capital cases, and . . . CfPR 1.270 is identical with the foregoing § 913.10, except that the Rule uses the word “persons” instead . . .

WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA, 399 U.S. 78 (U.S. 1970)

. . . . §913.10 (1) (1967): “Twelve men shall constitute a jury to try all capital cases, and six men shall . . . . § 913.10 (1) (1967). As Mr. . . .

GRISSOM, v. STATE, 237 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . By statute (§ 913.10(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.), provision is made for capital cases to be tried before a . . .

HEARNS, v. STATE, 223 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 1969)

. . . Section 913.10(1), F.S.A. Rule 1.270, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A. . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 206 So. 2d 673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . §§ 912.01, 913.08, 913.10, 913.10(2), 924.32(2).” In Blackwelder v. . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 196 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1967)

. . . : Except for substituting the word “persons” for “men,” the suggested rule is a transcription of FS 913.10 . . . Committee Note: Save for certain rewording, the suggested rule is a transcription of FS 913.10(2), except . . . suggested rule is a transcription of FS 913.08, excluding subdivision (5), which is lifted from FS 913.10 . . .

NEWTON, v. STATE JOHNSTON, v. STATE, 178 So. 2d 341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . . * * *” § 913.10(2), Fla.Stats., F.S.A. . See Bailey v. . . .

MEADE, Jr. v. STATE, 85 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 1956)

. . . A jury of twelve, twice the number required in other criminal cases, is provided in Sec. 913.10, Florida . . .