Cases from cite.case.law:

. . . court partially closed the courtroom during the testimony of the victim, J.L., pursuant to section 918.16 . . . Specifically, Kovaleski asserts that a partial closure pursuant to section 918.16(2) runs afoul of the . . . We find that section 918.16(2) acceptably embraces the requirements set forth in Waller, Pursuant to . . . Regarding the third prong of Waller, we find that allowing the parties enumerated in section 918.16(2 . . . Section 918.16(2) has remained the same since 2001. . See Fla. S. . . . Therefore, in my view, the application of section 918.16, Florida Statutes (2001), did not result in . . . In my view, however, section 918.16 cannot obviate the need for an individualized inquiry before a partial . . . In conclusion, the application of section 918.16 without conducting a Waller inquiry and making individualized . . .

. . . Section 918.16(2), Florida Statutes (2001), provides: When the victim of a sex offense is testifying . . . Waller addressed the total closure of a court proceeding, not a partial closure such as section 918.16 . . . to the partial closure authorized by the statute, explaining: The Legislature, by enacting section 918.16 . . . Accordingly, section 918.16 is narrowly drawn to ensure that a defendant’s right to an open trial is . . . Per section 918.16, Florida Statutes, which, we note, Clements has not challenged as unconstitutional . . .

. . . his immediate family from the courtroom during the testimony of the victim, A.H., contrary to section 918.16 . . . the request of the victim, victim or witness advocates designated by the state attorney’s office. § 918.16 . . . to remain in the courtroom and did not draw the trial court’s attention to the language of section 918.16 . . . defendant failed to preserve argument on appeal, that trial court erred in not complying with section 918.16 . . . , where “the parties knew that the State was attempting to comply with section 918.16” and defense counsel . . .

. . . . § 918.16 notwithstanding.” . . . Stat. § 918.16, the state trial court closed the courtroom during the testimony of the six-year-old victim . . . The applicable version of § 918.16 provided: In the trial of any case, civil or criminal, when any person . . . Stat. § 918.16 (1997). . . . . Stat. § 918.16 and our decisions in Judd and Douglas v. Wainwright, 739 F.2d 531 (11th Cir.1984). . . .

. . . Section 918.16, Florida Statutes provides for a partial closure of the courtroom “when any person under . . . of 16 or any person with mental retardation ... is testifying concerning any sex offense.... ” Id. § 918.16 . . . Id. § 918.16(2). . . . Id. § 918.16(1); see also id. § 918.16(2). . . . Section 918.16 does not require a television link for remote viewing. . . .

. . . fundamental error for the trial court to order a partial closure of the courtroom under subsection 918.16 . . . At the time of the trial, subsection 918.16(2), Florida Statutes (2000) provided: (2) When the victim . . . addressed the procedure to be applied where the State seeks partial closure of the courtroom under section 918.16 . . . for Waller findings in connection with a request for partial closure of the courtroom under section 918.16 . . .

. . . Springer first argues that the partial closure of the courtroom in accordance with section 918.16, Florida . . .

. . . to remain in the courtroom and did not draw the trial court’s attention to the language of section 918.16 . . .

. . . Originally, the courtroom was partially closed under Florida Statutes section 918.16, which allows for . . .

. . . ground that the court erred in closing the courtroom during his revocation hearing pursuant to section 918.16 . . . alleged lewd act, and the prosecutor asked the judge to “clear the courtroom pursuant to Florida Statute 918.16 . . . Section 918.16 requires the closure of a courtroom when a victim of a sex offense testifies and provides . . . as improvidently granted, 782 So.2d 868 (Fla. 2001), the court held that closure pursuant to section 918.16 . . . The court reasoned that, in enacting section 918.16, the legislature has implicitly reviewed the Waller . . .

. . . has mandated that trial courts must first apply a four-part analysis before statutes such as section 918.16 . . . to close the courtroom during the testimony of M.L. and the two teenagers under authority of section 918.16 . . . That statute provides: 918.16 Sex offenses; testimony of person under age 16 or person with mental retardation . . .

. . . Section 918.16(1), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that when any person under the age of sixteen is . . .

. . . The Florida Legislature balanced the various interests applicable in this case as provided in section 918.16 . . . the trial court cleared the courtroom “without making the necessary findings pursuant to [sjection 918.16 . . . 5th DCA 1999), that a separate Waller inquiry is not required when the trial court follows section 918.16 . . . The Legislature, by enacting section 918.16, recognizes that there is a substantial, if not compelling . . . partial closing during the testimony of a sex crime victim are fulfilled by compliance with section 918.16 . . .

. . . Section 918.16(2), Florida Statutes (1999), empowers a trial court to clear the courtroom of all persons . . . In tacit recognition of this limitation, section 918.16 carefully identifies those members of the public . . . Whitson’s counsel objected, arguing that section 918.16 requires a showing before closure can occur. . . . We further observe that section 918.16 does not authorize total closure of the courtroom but expressly . . . As we have noted above, section 918.16(2), Florida Statutes (1999), is designed to protect the child . . .

. . . Section 918.16 (1), Florida Statutes (1999), authorizes closure of the courtroom while a minor victim . . .

. . . Pursuant to section 918.16, Florida Statutes (1997) the State asked that the courtroom be cleared before . . . The trial court read section 918.16 as mandatory and overruled the objection. . . . The court ordered that all persons not permitted by section 918.16 leave the courtroom. . . . ’s list of persons permitted to remain in attendance, here the trial court followed section 918.16 and . . . Accordingly, section 918.16 is narrowly drawn to ensure that a defendant’s right to an open trial is . . .

. . . Section 918.16, Florida Statutes (1989), provides that in a trial when any person under the age of sixteen . . . court in this case failed to apply the Waller prerequisites and apparently did not adhere to section 918.16 . . .

. . . to a public trial when it ordered the courtroom to be cleared of all spectators, pursuant to section 918.16 . . . Section 918.16, Florida Statutes (1987), provides: In the trial of any case, civil or criminal, when . . .

. . . . §918.16 (1979); Ga. Code § 81-1006 (1978); Miss. Const., Art. 3, § 26; N. H. Rev. Stat. . . . . § 918.16 (1979) (providing for mandatory exclusion of general public but not press during testimony . . .

. . . contracts allowed or allowable- 16,052.01 959,206.59 Balance in policyholders’ surplus as 5/31/62_ 1, 299, 918.16 . . .

. . . _ 30, 065.33 Petitioner’s proposal — Additional taxes_$85, 506. 09 Respondent’s proposal— “ “ -159, 918.16 . . .