The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 918
CONDUCT OF TRIAL

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 918

CONDUCT OF TRIAL

918.015 Right to speedy trial.

918.0155 Expeditious disposition of particular criminal cases involving a child under age 16.

918.0157 Right to trial by jury.

918.016 Trial of remaining defendants after grant of continuance to others.

918.03 Procedure when offense committed outside state.

918.04 Procedure when offense committed in another county.

918.05 View by jury.

918.06 Separation and detention of jurors; admonition by court.

918.07 Admonition to officer in charge of jurors.

918.10 Charge to jury; request for instructions.

918.12 Tampering with jurors.

918.13 Tampering with or fabricating physical evidence.

918.16 Sex offenses; testimony of person under age 16 or who has an intellectual disability; testimony of victim; courtroom cleared; exceptions.

918.19 Closing argument.

918.015 Right to speedy trial.—

(1) In all criminal prosecutions the state and the defendant shall each have the right to a speedy trial.

(2) The Supreme Court shall, by rule of said court, provide procedures through which the right to a speedy trial as guaranteed by subsection (1) and by s. 16, Art. I of the State Constitution, shall be realized.

History.—s. 195, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(202); s. 6, ch. 71-1(B).

Note.—Former s. 916.01.

918.0155 Expeditious disposition of particular criminal cases involving a child under age 16.—Every criminal case prosecuted under chapter 782, chapter 784, chapter 787, chapter 794, chapter 796, chapter 800, chapter 827, or chapter 847 which involves the abuse of a child or unlawful sexual contact or acts performed in the presence of, with, or upon a child under the age of 16 shall be heard and disposed of as expeditiously as possible.

History.—s. 1, ch. 85-53; s. 23, ch. 2010-117.

918.0157 Right to trial by jury.—In each prosecution for a violation of a state law or a municipal or county ordinance punishable by imprisonment, the defendant shall have, upon demand, the right to a trial by an impartial jury in the county where the offense was committed, except as to any such prosecution for a violation punishable for a term of imprisonment of 6 months or less, if at the time the case is set for trial the court announces that in the event of conviction of the crime as charged or of any lesser included offense a sentence of imprisonment will not be imposed and the defendant will not be adjudicated guilty, unless a right to trial by jury for such offense is guaranteed under the State or Federal Constitution.

History.—s. 1, ch. 86-115.

918.016 Trial of remaining defendants after grant of continuance to others.—When a continuance is granted to one or more of several defendants, the court may proceed with the trial of the defendants who have not been granted a continuance.

History.—s. 202, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(210); s. 110, ch. 70-339.

Note.—Former s. 916.09.

918.03 Procedure when offense committed outside state.—When a court determines that it does not have jurisdiction because the offense charged was committed outside this state, the court may discharge the defendant or direct the clerk to communicate the location of the defendant to the chief executive of the state, territory, or district where the offense was committed. The court may commit the defendant to custody or admit him or her to bail for a reasonable period of time to await a requisition for his or her extradition. If a requisition is not received within the time set by the court, the defendant shall be discharged. If the defendant has been admitted to bail, the court shall order the bond canceled and any deposit of money or bonds returned.

History.—s. 208, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(216); s. 112, ch. 70-339; s. 1536, ch. 97-102.

918.04 Procedure when offense committed in another county.—When a court determines that it does not have jurisdiction because the offense charged was committed in another county of this state, the defendant shall be committed to custody or admitted to bail for a reasonable time to await a warrant for his or her arrest from the proper county. The clerk shall notify the prosecuting attorney of the proper county of the location of the defendant. If the defendant is not arrested on a warrant from the proper county within the time set by the court, he or she shall be discharged. If the defendant has been admitted to bail, the court shall order the bond canceled and any deposit of money or bonds returned.

History.—s. 209, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(217); s. 113, ch. 70-339; s. 1537, ch. 97-102.

918.05 View by jury.—When a court determines that it is proper for the jury to view a place where the offense may have been committed or other material events may have occurred, it may order the jury to be conducted in a body to the place, in custody of a proper officer. The court shall admonish the officer that no person, including the officer, shall be allowed to communicate with the jury about any subject connected with the trial. The jury shall be returned to the courtroom in accordance with the directions of the court. The judge and defendant, unless the defendant absents himself or herself without permission of court, shall be present, and the prosecuting attorney and defense counsel may be present at the view.

History.—s. 210, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(218); s. 114, ch. 70-339; s. 1538, ch. 97-102.

918.06 Separation and detention of jurors; admonition by court.—The court shall admonish the jury that it is their duty not to converse among themselves or with anyone else on a subject connected with the trial or to form or express an opinion on a subject connected with the trial until the cause is submitted to them. When the jurors leave the jury box, the court may direct that the jury be kept together in the charge of a proper officer or allow them to separate. If the court permits the jurors to separate, it shall admonish them not to view the place where the offense appears to have been committed.

History.—s. 211, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(219); s. 115, ch. 70-339.

918.07 Admonition to officer in charge of jurors.—When the jury is committed to the charge of an officer, the officer shall be admonished by the court to keep the jurors together in the place specified and not to permit any person to communicate with them on any subject except with the permission of the court given in open court in the presence of the defendant or the defendant’s counsel. The officer shall not communicate with the jurors on any subject connected with the trial and shall return the jurors to court as directed by the court.

History.—s. 212, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(220); s. 116, ch. 70-339; s. 1539, ch. 97-102.

918.10 Charge to jury; request for instructions.—

(1) At the conclusion of argument of counsel, the court shall charge the jury. The charge shall be only on the law of the case and must include the penalty for the offense for which the accused is being charged.

(2) All charges to the jury shall be delivered orally and shall be taken by the court reporter, transcribed, and filed.

(3) At or after the close of the evidence, a party may file written requests that the court instruct the jury on the law as stated in the requests. The court shall inform counsel of its proposed action on the requests before their arguments to the jury.

History.—s. 215, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(223); s. 1, ch. 22775, 1945; s. 117, ch. 70-339.

918.12 Tampering with jurors.—Any person who influences the judgment or decision of any grand or petit juror on any matter, question, cause, or proceeding which may be pending, or which may by law be brought, before him or her as such juror, with intent to obstruct the administration of justice, shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

History.—s. 1, ch. 72-315; s. 1540, ch. 97-102.

918.13 Tampering with or fabricating physical evidence.—

(1) It is unlawful for any person, knowing that a criminal trial, proceeding, or investigation by a duly constituted prosecuting authority, law enforcement agency, grand jury, or legislative committee of this state is pending or is about to be instituted, to:

(a) Alter, destroy, conceal, or remove any record, document, or other item with the purpose to impair its verity or availability in such proceeding or investigation; or

(b) Make, present, or use any record, document, or other item, knowing it to be false.

(2)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a person who violates subsection (1) commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(b) A person who violates subsection (1) relating to a criminal trial, proceeding, or investigation that relates to a capital felony commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

History.—s. 2, ch. 72-315; s. 1, ch. 2022-84.

918.16 Sex offenses; testimony of person under age 16 or who has an intellectual disability; testimony of victim; courtroom cleared; exceptions.—

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), in the trial of any case, civil or criminal, if any person under the age of 16 or any person with an intellectual disability as defined in s. 393.063 is testifying concerning any sex offense, the court shall clear the courtroom of all persons except parties to the cause and their immediate families or guardians, attorneys and their secretaries, officers of the court, jurors, newspaper reporters or broadcasters, court reporters, and, at the request of the victim, victim or witness advocates designated by the state attorney’s office.

(2) If the victim of a sex offense is testifying concerning that offense in any civil or criminal trial, the court shall clear the courtroom of all persons upon the request of the victim, regardless of the victim’s age or mental capacity, except that parties to the cause and their immediate families or guardians, attorneys and their secretaries, officers of the court, jurors, newspaper reporters or broadcasters, court reporters, and, at the request of the victim, victim or witness advocates designated by the state attorney may remain in the courtroom.

History.—s. 28, ch. 77-312; s. 5, ch. 90-211; s. 26, ch. 94-154; s. 109, ch. 99-3; s. 1, ch. 99-157; s. 8, ch. 2000-338; s. 96, ch. 2004-267; s. 37, ch. 2013-162.

918.19 Closing argument.—As provided in the common law, in criminal prosecutions after the closing of evidence:

(1) The prosecuting attorney shall open the closing arguments.

(2) The accused or the attorney for the accused may reply.

(3) The prosecuting attorney may reply in rebuttal.

The method set forth in this section shall control unless the Supreme Court determines it is procedural and issues a substitute rule of criminal procedure.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2006-96.

F.S. 918 on Google Scholar

F.S. 918 on Casetext

Amendments to 918

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 918

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S918.12 - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - TAMPER WITH JUROR - F: T

S918.13 - EVIDENCE-DESTROYING - RENUMBERED SEE REC # 8703 - F: T

S918.13 1a - EVIDENCE-DESTROYING - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9577 - F: T

S918.13 1a - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - TAMPER W EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDING - F: T

S918.13 1a - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - TAMPER EVIDENCE IN CAPITAL FEL CRIM PROCEEDING - F: S

S918.13 1b - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9579 - F: T

S918.13 1b - FRAUD - FABRICATE/USE FALSE EVIDENCE IN CRIM ROCEEDING - F: T

S918.13 1b - FRAUD - FABRICATE/USE FALSE EVIDENCE CAP FEL CRIM PROC - F: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Regan , 453 U.S. 654, 679-683, 101 S.Ct. 2972, 69 L.Ed.2d 918 (1981) ; United States v. . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, 140 S.Ct. 918, 205 L.Ed.2d 519 (2020). . . .

B. CHIAFALO, v. WASHINGTON, 140 S. Ct. 2316 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . ----, 140 S.Ct. 918, 205 L.Ed.2d 519 (2020). . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Matal , 278 F.Supp.3d 891, 918 (2017). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Regan , 453 U.S. 654, 686, 101 S.Ct. 2972, 69 L.Ed.2d 918 (1981) ). . . .

ST. HUBERT v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1727 (U.S. 2020)

. . . her entire legal argument to a form on which "[f]ew prisoners manage to squeeze more than 100 words." 918 . . . Hubert's case. 918 F.3d, at 1174. . . . See 918 F.3d, at 1203 (Martin, J., dissenting from denial of reh'g en banc). . . . See 918 F.3d, at 1196 (opinion of Wilson, J). . . .

J. LUCERO, v. R. KONCILJA,, 140 S. Ct. 2512 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-918. Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Egan , 484 U.S. 518, 530, 108 S.Ct. 818, 98 L.Ed.2d 918 (1988). . . .

UNITED STATES v. TAYLOR, v., 935 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Carroll , 918 F.3d 1323, 1328-29 (11th Cir. 2019) ; Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Labor v. . . .

SCHINK, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 935 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sullivan , 918 F.2d 1567, 1574 (11th Cir. 1990). . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Carpenter, 918 F.3d 895, 900 (10th Cir. 2019). . . . Johnson, 918 F.3d at 906 ("[B]ecause we conclude that trial counsel was not deficient ... . . .

UNITED STATES v. FITZGERALD,, 935 F.3d 814 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dominguez-Maroyoqui , 748 F.3d 918, 920 (9th Cir. 2014). . . .

U. S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. HUI FENG Of PC,, 935 F.3d 721 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 894, 918 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). . . .

BIRD, v. i DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DHS, R., 935 F.3d 738 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Owens-Illinois, Inc. , 665 F.2d 918, 924 (9th Cir. 1982) (internal quotation omitted), the essence of . . .

IN RE BOWLES,, 935 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Calderon, 151 F.3d 918, 924 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). . . .

DYROFF, v. ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC., 934 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Santa Monica , 918 F.3d 676 (9th Cir. 2019) is of no help to Plaintiff. . . .

ANDERSON, AS TRUSTEE FOR NEXT- OF- KIN OF ANDERSON v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Dr. M. D. HCMC D. J. A. F. HCMC M. D. s J. L. L. T. D. M. T., 934 F.3d 876 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Motors Corp. , 533 F.3d 913, 918 (8th Cir. 2008). . . .

SCRIMO, v. LEE,, 935 F.3d 103 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Kuhlman, 839 F.2d 918, 926 (2d Cir. 1988) (quoting People v. . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. at 918-19. . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Smith , 56 F.3d 918, 922 (8th Cir. 1995) (holding that where a party failed to object to a judge's allegedly . . .

MYMAIL, LTD. v. OOVOO, LLC, IAC, 934 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Creative Compounds, LLC , 918 F.3d 1338, 1342 (Fed. . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . from the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws under Nedlloyd applied to the class action, id. at 918 . . .

MARTINEZ, v. WALGREEN COMPANY,, 935 F.3d 396 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Beard , 858 S.W.2d 918, 919-20 (Tex. 1993) (explaining that "[t]he statutory duty established by the . . .

LEWIS, v. CITY OF UNION CITY, GEORGIA,, 934 F.3d 1169 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Union City , 918 F.3d 1213, 1220 (11th Cir. 2019) (en banc). . . . Lewis , 918 F.3d at 1219. But both proposed positions would still expose her to the spray. . . . Lewis , 918 F.3d at 1231. . . . City of Union City , 918 F.3d 1213 (11th Cir. 2019). . . . Lewis , 918 F.3d at 1220-21. . . . City of Union City , 918 F.3d 1213, 1220 (11th Cir. 2019). Id. at 1218. . . . Lewis , 918 F.3d at 1260, citing Furnco Const. Corp. v. . . .

A. CARVELLI, v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, M. R. Jr., 934 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cigna Corp ., 918 F.3d 57, 64 (2d Cir. 2019), "generalized statements about [a company's] transparency . . . See, e.g ., Singh , 918 F.3d at 64 ; Whole Foods Mkt. , 905 F.3d at 902. . . .

MEJIA- RAMOS, v. P. BARR,, 934 F.3d 789 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gonzales, 416 F.3d 918, 921 (8th Cir. 2005) ). . . .

HAWKINS v. I- TV DIGITALIS TAVKOZLESI ZRT. f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V. v. i- TV f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V., 935 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Grp., Inc. , 918 F.2d 438, 454-55 (4th Cir. 1990). But it does not work here. . . .

ST. CHARLES SURGICAL HOSPITAL, L. L. C. v. LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 935 F.3d 352 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Huntington Ingalls, Inc. , 918 F.3d 406, 412-13 (5th Cir. 2019), reh'g en banc granted , 923 F.3d 427 . . .

W. C. ENGLISH, INC. v. RUMMEL, KLEPPER KAHL, LLP CDM, 934 F.3d 398 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . App. 5th 355, 364, 215 Cal.Rptr.3d 918 (2017) ; United Rentals Hwy. Techs. v. . . .

SMITH, OSF v. OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,, 933 F.3d 859 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Blanas , 393 F.3d 918, 930 (9th Cir. 2004) (noting that summary judgment is disfavored if discovery is . . .

J. BAUWENS, v. REVCON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., 935 F.3d 534 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Indus., Inc. , 252 F.3d 911, 918 (7th Cir. 2001) ("The Supreme Court made clear in Bay Area that the . . .

M. RODEN, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 548 (S.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . Sullivan , 905 F.2d 918, 927 (6th Cir. 1990) ; Varley v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HATAWAY,, 933 F.3d 940 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Meux, 918 F.3d 589, 591-92 (8th Cir. 2019). B. The South Carolina Conviction. . . .

BASTARDO- VALE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 934 F.3d 255 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas, 918 F.3d 440, 447 (5th Cir. 2019) (holding that a "prior judicial decision . . . Dec. at 49, with Alabama-Coushatta Tribe, 918 F.3d at 449 (holding that "a court should not defer to . . .

DUPREE, v. FAY SERVICING, LLC, LLC,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 639 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Bayer Corp., 918 F.3d 372, 379-80 (4th Cir. 2019) (If a case " 'was not properly removed, because it . . .

PILLAR DYNASTY LLC, v. NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., 933 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Two Wheel Corp. , 918 F.2d 1060, 1064 (2d Cir. 1990). . . . Honda Motor Co. , 918 F.2d at 1064. . . .

VALBRUNA SLATER STEEL CORPORATION, v. JOSLYN MANUFACTURING COMPANY,, 934 F.3d 553 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. , 918 F.2d 658, 662-64 (6th Cir. 1990) (Ohio law); McCarter . . .

ALONSO, LLP LLP S. v. J. WEISS, 932 F.3d 995 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Inc. , 918 F.2d 579, 586 (6th Cir. 1990) (quoting C. WRIGHT & A. . . .

COFFEY, v. CARROLL, 933 F.3d 577 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 911, 918, 197 L.Ed.2d 312 (2017) (the Fourth Amendment right to be free from malicious prosecution . . .

GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, v. ISAACSON R. S. Mo. K. M. a, 932 F.3d 721 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Iowa City, Iowa , 496 F.3d 915, 918 (8th Cir. 2007). . . .

JONES, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 831 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . Sullivan , 905 F.2d 918, 926 (6th Cir. 1990). . . .

UNITED STATES v. JOHN, 391 F. Supp. 3d 458 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Johnson, 816 F.2d 918, 924 (3d Cir. 1987). . . .

POWER Al B. LLC, v. ERIE FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 587 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Arnot-Ogden Mem'l Hosp., 918 F.2d 411, 416 (3d Cir. 1990) (applying Pennsylvania law) ; see also W. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ- MIESES,, 931 F.3d 134 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Ackies, 918 F.3d 190, 197 (1st Cir. 2019). . . .

FORCE, A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F. N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. TZVI S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. v. FACEBOOK, INC., 934 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Santa Monica , 918 F.3d 676, 682 (9th Cir. 2019). . . . HomeAway.com , 918 F.3d at 682. . . . City of Santa Monica , 918 F.3d 676, 684 (9th Cir. 2019) ("[W]e have repeatedly held the scope of [Section . . .

ATLAS BREW WORKS, LLC, v. P. BARR,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 6 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . USDA, 918 F.3d 151, 157 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

IN RE WASHINGTON, v. N. A., 602 B.R. 710 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . (In re Veal) , 450 B.R. 897, 918 (9th Cir. BAP 2011). . . .

CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, a v. WELLS FARGO CO. N. A., 931 F.3d 1274 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Union City , 918 F.3d 1213, 1217 (11th Cir. 2019) (en banc). . . . Lewis , 918 F.3d at 1226 (internal quotation marks omitted). . . . Wells Fargo volunteered "legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason[s] for its actions," Lewis , 918 F.3d at . . .

UNITED STATES v. GONZALES,, 931 F.3d 1219 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Duran , 127 F.3d 911, 918 (10th Cir. 1997). . . .

GENETIC VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC. v. LABOKLIN GMBH CO. KG,, 933 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . anaerobic working capacity of muscle and other tissue was directed to patent-eligible subject matter. 918 . . .

ORTIZ, v. ADVANCED CALL CENTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 236 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Capital Management Services, LP , 918 F.3d 236 (2d Cir. 2019), in which the Second Circuit held that . . .

UNITED STATES v. SHELDON TREE TOP,, 931 F.3d 720 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wilkins, 909 F.3d 915, 918 (8th Cir. 2018) ; United States v. . . .

SMITH, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 932 F.3d 302 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Altai, Inc ., 918 S.W.2d 453, 456 (Tex. 1996). . . . Krusen , 678 S.W.2d 918, 923 (Tex. 1984) ] (malpractice in muscular dystrophy gene screening could not . . .

UNITED STATES v. VARGAS- MOLINA,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 809 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . Barr , 918 F.3d 498, 503 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Yamataya v. . . . Mendoza-Garcia , 918 F.3d at 503 (alterations in original) (quoting Bridges v. . . . Mendoza-Garcia , 918 F.3d at 507-08. . . . Mendoza-Garcia , 918 F.3d at 502. Asylum is a form of discretionary relief, Marouf v. . . . See 918 F.3d at 504, 507. . . .

IN RE CANNON,, 931 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Jackson, 918 F.3d 467, 484-86 (6th Cir. 2019) (holding federal carjacking under § 2119 categorically . . .

P. J. BY THROUGH MR. MRS. W. J. L. G. MR. MRS. L. G. M. L. MR. MRS. J. L. Mr. v. CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, 931 F.3d 156 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Idaho , 677 F.3d 910, 917-918 (9th Cir. 2012) (Prison Litigation Reform Act). . . .

HUPP R. H. a v. COOK C. R., 931 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. at 918. . . . Ct. at 918-19. . . .

CARVAJAL VASQUEZ, v. GAMBA ACEVEDO,, 931 F.3d 519 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States using temporary work visas, which weighed against an intention to stay. 600 F.3d 912, 918 . . .

RODRIGUEZ v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, 930 F.3d 1123 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Pasadena , 671 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Taylor v. . . .

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ACRES, PERMANENT OVERLAY EASEMENT FOR ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR ACRES IN MILFORD AND WESTFALL TOWNSHIPS, PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS a c o L. P., 931 F.3d 237 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States v. 68.94 Acres of Land , 918 F.2d 389, 393 n.3 (3d Cir. 1990). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. GOODRIDGE,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 159 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Kroll , 918 F.3d 47, 52-54 (2d Cir. 2019) ; United States v. . . .

NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY P. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Justice , 331 F.3d 918, 940 (D.C. Cir. 2003) ). . . .

NNEBE, v. DAUS, v., 931 F.3d 66 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Cigna Corp. , 918 F.3d 57, 62 (2d Cir. 2019). II. . . .

ANDERSON v. GHALY,, 930 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Pasadena , 671 F.3d 918, 927 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Runyon v. Bd. of Trs. of Cal. . . .

F. WORTHY, D. Co. v. CITY OF PHENIX CITY, ALABAMA,, 930 F.3d 1206 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Melvin , 918 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2017) ("Under the fourth factor, that the penalties at issue . . . Code § 32-5A-8, that alone does not render a sanction criminally punitive, see Melvin , 918 F.3d at 1300 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GUTIERREZ- RAMIREZ,, 930 F.3d 963 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Samuels , 611 F.3d 914, 918 (8th Cir. 2010) (drug offense occurring eight years prior not too remote) . . .

E. HORSEY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 97 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Id. at 267-69 ; see also Egan , 484 U.S. 518, 108 S.Ct. 818, 98 L.Ed.2d 918 (1988). . . .

IN RE J. ELMS, D. W., 603 B.R. 11 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . Plata (In re Plata ), 958 F.2d 918, 923 (9th Cir. 1992) ); see also In re Hamilton , 493 B.R. 31, 38 . . .

MANNING v. CALDWELL, s FOR CITY OF ROANOKE s, 930 F.3d 264 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . ."); see also Booth , 88 S.E.2d at 918 ("On the basis of such a portmanteau word ... the judiciary has . . . Commonwealth , 197 Va. 177, 88 S.E.2d 916, 918 (1955), without any conduct at all. . . .

FUSARO, v. R. COGAN, C. J. A. J. Jr., 930 F.3d 241 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Justice , 331 F.3d 918, 934 (D.C. . . .

LTTB, LLC, v. REDBUBBLE, INC., 385 F. Supp. 3d 916 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Id. at 918. . . .

STARR INDEMNITY LIABILITY COMPANY, v. BRIGHTSTAR CORP., 388 F. Supp. 3d 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Tyco Grp., 13 N.Y.3d 209, 214, 890 N.Y.S.2d 401, 918 N.E.2d 913 (2009) ; Oppenheimer & Co. v. . . .

S. R. NEHAD K. R. v. N. BROWDER, 929 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gates , 99 F.3d 911, 918 (9th Cir. 1996). . . .

CORBITT, SDC, a v. VICKERS,, 929 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ortiz , 918 F.3d 1301, 1307 (11th Cir. 2019) (noting that, at the motion to dismiss stage, "[w]e are . . . See Sebastian , 918 F.3d at 1307 (noting that, at the motion to dismiss stage, we must draw all reasonable . . . Sebastian , 918 F.3d at 1307 ; St. George v. . . .

VYLOHA, v. P. BARR,, 929 F.3d 812 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Barr , 918 F.3d 558, 561 (7th Cir. 2019) ; Plaza-Ramirez v. . . . Barr , 922 F.3d 346, 354 (7th Cir. 2019) ; Herrera-Garcia , 918 F.3d at 561. . . . See Herrera-Garcia , 918 F.3d at 561. . . .

IN RE MCCANN, LLC, LLC, F LLC, LLC, SMC LLC, v., 601 B.R. 813 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Runyon , 218 F.3d 915, 918 (8th Cir. 2000). . . .

SIMON, v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, 929 F.3d 118 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Comm'r of Internal Revenue , 279 U.S. 716, 727-28, 49 S.Ct. 499, 73 L.Ed. 918 (1929) (having jurisdiction . . .

TWUM, v. P. BARR,, 930 F.3d 10 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Barr, 918 F.3d 215, 220-21 (1st Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks, alterations, and citation omitted . . .

TOWNES TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 585 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Bayer Corp. , 918 F.3d 372, 376 (4th Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). . . . Bayer Corp. , 918 F.3d 372, 385 (4th Cir. 2019). . . . Bayer Corp. , 918 F.3d 372, 385 (4th Cir. 2019). . . . Bayer Corp. , 918 F.3d 372 (4th Cir. 2019), recognized just that. . . . Burrell , 918 F.3d at 387 n.5. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOBY,, 928 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gaines , 918 F.3d 793, 800 (10th Cir. 2019), the complexity of the issue-including how the Local Rules . . .

MAPLE DRAKE AUSTELL OWNER, LLC, v. D. F. PRAY, INC., 385 F. Supp. 3d 373 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Storms, 102 A.D.2d 663, 664, 476 N.Y.S.2d 918 (2d Dep't 1984) ("The Appellate Division is a single statewide . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 392 F. Supp. 3d 244 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 921 (2d Cir. 1961) ). . . .

ATHENA DIAGNOSTICS, INC. LTD. E. V. v. MAYO COLLABORATIVE SERVICES, LLC,, 927 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Creative Compounds, LLC , 918 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2019). . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. J. TRUMP, T. K., 929 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Egan , 484 U.S. 518, 529, 108 S.Ct. 818, 98 L.Ed.2d 918 (1988) )); see also Franklin , 505 U.S. at 818 . . .

COLBRUNO, v. KESSLER, a, 928 F.3d 1155 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hyler , 918 F.3d 1109, 1116 (10th Cir. 2019). This complaint cannot clear such a high standard. Mr. . . .

CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA, 928 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . essence, such warnings represent apparent false alarms as they appear to be 'crying wolf.' " Id. at 918 . . .

YANG, v. P. BARR,, 929 F.3d 26 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . A089 918 765 & A089 918 766 (B.I.A. Apr. 13, 2012). . . .

TARGET GENERAL MERCHANDISE, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1326 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 915, 918 (1998) (" Primal Lite I "), aff'd , 182 F.3d 1362. . . . Supp. 2d at 918. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PALACIOS,, 928 F.3d 450 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Allen , 918 F.3d 457, 460 (5th Cir. 2019). . . . Allen , 918 F.3d at 460 (citation omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MATHEWS,, 928 F.3d 968 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Isabella , 918 F.3d 816, 836 (10th Cir. 2019) ("We review evidentiary decisions applying the [Federal . . .

GRAHAM, v. CITY OF MANASSAS SCHOOL BOARD, d b a v. d b a, 390 F. Supp. 3d 702 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Hospice Support Care, Inc., 268 Va. 482, 603 S.E.2d 916, 918 (2004) ). . . .

ESTATE OF MENDEZ, Sr. Jr. v. CITY OF CERES,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1189 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Gates , 99 F.3d 911, 918 (9th Cir. 1996). . . . Trevino , 99 F.3d at 918. . . . previously noted, isolated or sporadic events are not predicates for liability, Trevino , 99 F.3d at 918 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FURLOW,, 928 F.3d 311 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Mouzon , 326 S.C. 199, 485 S.E.2d 918, 919, 922 (1997) (describing indictment and conviction for crime . . .

PAVATT, v. CARPENTER,, 928 F.3d 906 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Workman, 682 F.3d 880, 918 (10th Cir. 2012). . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 390 F. Supp. 3d 311 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 921 (2d Cir. 1961) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HEARTLAND HOSPICE, INC., 386 F. Supp. 3d 884 (N.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. , 874 F.3d 905, 918 (6th Cir. 2017) (citing Antoon, supra , 788 F.3d at 614- . . . Ibanez, supra , 874 F.3d at 918. . . .

JAGUAR LAND ROVER LIMITED, v. BENTLEY MOTORS LIMITED,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 665 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Id. at 918. . . .

ELBIT SYSTEMS LAND AND LTD. LLC, v. HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC,, 927 F.3d 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Inc. , 918 F.2d 160, 161 n.1 (Fed. Cir. 1990). . . . Johannsen , 918 F.2d at 164. . . .

KANE COUNTY, UTAH, v. UNITED STATES, 928 F.3d 877 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 787 F.3d 918, 920 (8th Cir. 2015). . . .

UNITED STATES v. WARE, Jr., 385 F. Supp. 3d 529 (E.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Cox , 708 F.2d 132, 136 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 464 U.S. 918, 104 S.Ct. 284, 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983) . . .