The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . See § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (2005) ; State v. Cantrell , 417 So.2d 260, 260 (Fla. 1982). AFFIRMED . . . .
. . . susceptible of differing constructions shall be construed most favorably to the accused.... [ Section 921.16 . . . Stat., and stretching those words to now authorize something that neither section 775.087 nor section 921.16 . . .
. . . 2012 sentences would be served consecutively to the 2001 and 2003 sentences as required by section 921.16 . . . Larson argues, in part, that the application of the mandatory language of section 921.16(1), in the absence . . . (citing § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1993) ) ). . . . Here, the failure of both the trial court and counsel to recognize the ramifications of section 921.16 . . . The Crump decision does not address pending conditional-release violations, Scantling, or section 921.16 . . .
. . . . §§ 921.00265(1), 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .
. . . The State cites section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (2016) to support its position that the sentences . . . But, it was not required to do so under § 921.16. . . .
. . . crimes “charged in separate informations,” the presumption is that the sentences are consecutive, See § 921.16 . . . imposed for offenses not charged in the same information or indictment be served concurrently, section 921.16 . . .
. . . As a result, pursuant to section 921.16, Florida.Statutes (2012), the sentence is to be served consecutively . . .
. . . Finally, while section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (2013), requires that Hughes’ sentences for counts . . . concurrently unless the court directs that two or more of the sentences be served consecutively." § 921.16 . . .
. . . providing "the sentencing judge may order the sentences to be served concurrently or consecutively”); § 921.16 . . .
. . . See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1995); Benyard v. Wainwright, 322 So.2d 473 (Fla.1975); Hughes v. . . .
. . . Section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (2011), explains when sentences are to run concurrently: A defendant . . . The court in Ransone further explained, “Pursuant to section 921.16(1), unless the trial court directs . . . cases, by operation of statute, the Broward sentence was consecutive to the Miami-Dade sentences. § 921.16 . . . Matthews, 891 So.2d 479, 481 (Fla.2004) (explaining that, pursuant to section 921.16(1), because the . . . Fourth District properly applied our precedent in Daniels and the statutory requirements of section 921.16 . . .
. . . points on the score-sheet; and consecutive sentences are expressly authorized by §§ 921.0024(2) and 921.16 . . . Stat. § 921.16(1); see also Fla. . . .
. . . . § 3584(a); § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .
. . . . § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). In the sole ground in his motion, Mr. . . .
. . . (citing § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2004)). . . . Section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (2004), sets forth when sentences are to run concurrently: A defendant . . . Pursuant to section 921.16(1), unless the trial court directs that sentences for separately charged offenses . . . Fourth District properly applied our precedent in Daniels and the statutory requirements of section 921.16 . . . Therefore, under section 921.16(1), Ran-sone’s Broward sentence was consecutive to his previous Miami-Dade . . .
. . . The operative statute is section 921.16(3), Florida Statutes (2005). . . .
. . . On appeal, Caldwell argues that section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (2007), requires sentences to be . . .
. . . . § 921.16(1), Fla. . . . Matthews, 891 So.2d 479, 481 (Fla.2004) (explaining that, pursuant to section 921.16(1), because the . . . This conclusion conflicts with section 921.16(1) which provides that, unless a trial court specifies . . . Nevertheless, pursuant to section 921.16(1), the sentence on the unrelated case is consecutive not concurrent . . . imposed, and certify conflict with Tharpe which we believe conflicts with the requirements of section 921.16 . . .
. . . . § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (2001); Bilyou v. State, 404 So.2d 744 (Fla.1981); State v. . . .
. . . State, 650 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .
. . . . §921.16 (2007)); Kansas (Kan. Stat. Ann. §21-4608 (2007)); Mississippi (Miss. . . .
. . . See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .
. . . To the contrary, section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (2000), made it clear that the two sentences would . . .
. . . sentence a criminal defendant to concurrent or consecutive sentences,” citing sections 775.021(4)(a), 921.16 . . .
. . . See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat.; Harris v. . . .
. . . Nielson’s sentences consecutively pursuant to section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (1983), which provides . . . served concurrently with the other sentences, the Department of Corrections has properly obeyed section 921.16 . . . the sentence is concurrent or consecutive to any active sentence being served is not marked, section 921.16 . . .
. . . See § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . See § 921.16(1), Fla. . . . imposed for offenses not charged in the same information or indictment be served concurrently, section 921.16 . . .
. . . argued that his consecutive sentences did not comply with the oral pronouncement and that under section 921.16 . . . Discussion Section 921.16(1) provides, in pertinent part: A defendant convicted of two or more offenses . . . Section 921.16 places the burden on the trial court “to sentence with certainty” in the oral pronouncement . . . Because the trial court did not direct otherwise, section 921.16(1) requires that Mr. . . .
. . . See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2000); § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000); § 775.021(4), Fla. . . .
. . . . § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2004); Byrd, v. State, 853 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); McCarthur v. . . .
. . . (“and the sentencing judge may order the sentences to be served concurrently or consecutively”); § 921.16 . . .
. . . Section 921.16(1) provides that concurrent sentences must be imposed unless the trial court specifically . . . However, section 921.16 provides the opposite. . . . Section 921.16 is inclusive, and it places the burden on the trial judge to sentence with certainty. . . . state filed that it intended to seek enhanced punishment as a prison releasee reof-fender. .Section 921.16 . . .
. . . Johns sentence pursuant to section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (1995). . . . Johns sentence pursuant to the legislative mandates of section 921.16(1). See, e.g., Fox v. . . . See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1995). The rule of lenity, therefore, has no applicability herein. . . . consecutively unless the court directs that two or more of the sentences be served concurrently. § 921.16 . . .
. . . However, pursuant to section 921.16(1) of the Florida Statutes (1995), because the trial court did not . . . sentence in case number 90-5611, the sentence was structured to run consecutively pursuant to section 921.16 . . . sentence in case number 90-5611, the sentence was structured to run consecutively pursuant to section 921.16 . . . Section 921.16(1) of the Florida Statutes (1995) provides: A defendant convicted of two or more offenses . . .
. . . no PRR sentence involved, the 2 sentences could have been imposed consecutively, pursuant to section 921.16 . . .
. . . See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . See § 921.16(1); Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265 (Fla.2003); Hunter v. . . .
. . . Section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes, provides that “[a] defendant convicted of two or more offenses charged . . .
. . . . § 921.16(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .
. . . Since the trial court is allowed to impose consecutive sentences, see § 921.16, Fla. . . .
. . . In Rozmestor, the Fifth District held that section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (1979), permitted a court . . . Similarly, section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988), authorized Stroman’s sentencing court only . . . There were no changes in the wording of section 921.16(1) between the 1979 and 1988 versions. . . .
. . . had given credit for in Citrus County [which counsel said the court had the discretion to do under 921.16 . . .
. . . does not determine whether sentences under it are to be concurrent or consecutive, and because section 921.16 . . .
. . . .” § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). . . .
. . . release, the Department of Corrections deemed the sentences to run consecutive pursuant to section 921.16 . . .
. . . Consequently under section 921.16(1) Florida Statutes (2001), and Bruce v. . . .
. . . See also § 921.16(2), Fla. Stat. (1991). . . .
. . . below, the state responded to Glenn’s motion contending the Department of Corrections, under section 921.16 . . .
. . . 289731 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 21, 2000) which held that trial courts have discretion pursuant to section 921.16 . . . Section 921.16(1) is an integral part of the Criminal Punishment Code and applies to guidelines sentences . . . consecutive sentences under the Act if the crimes do not arise out of the same criminal episode, section 921.16 . . .
. . . Consecutive sentences on the two counts are permissible, § 921.16, Fla. . . .
. . . erred in imposing consecutive, as opposed to concurrent, sentences is without merit in light of section 921.16 . . .
. . . In addition, section 921.16 provides that sentences run concurrently if not otherwise specified. . . . Const. . 921.16. . . .
. . . each of which constitutes a separate violation of law, is subject to multiple sentencing); see also § 921.16 . . .
. . . Section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (1997), states in pertinent part: A defendant convicted of two or . . . As the trial court was vested with the discretion pursuant to section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (1997 . . .
. . . The trial court expressly declined to exercise its discretion under section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes . . . See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat.; Bruce v. State, 679 So.2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). . . .
. . . Debtor’s husband lent the Debtor money out of his half of the proceeds so that the Debtor could pay a $921.16 . . .
. . . Section 921.16(2), Florida Statutes, has been construed as investing the Department of Corrections with . . .
. . . See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .
. . . We note that, pursuant to section 921.16(1), Fla. . . .
. . . . § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1993); see also Benyard v. . . . Section 921.16(1) states as follows: (1) A defendant convicted of two or more offenses charged in the . . . imposed for offenses not charged in the same information or indictment be served concurrently, section 921.16 . . .
. . . DOC, on the other hand, relied on section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (1993), and Kirkland v. . . .
. . . Section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (1993), provides in pertinent part: A defendant convicted of two . . .
. . . . § 921.16(1) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . . § 921.16(1), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . He maintains that the trial court exceeded the discretion allowed it under section 921.16, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Additionally, under section 921.16(2), Florida Statutes (1987), a court may, but is not required to, . . .
. . . trial court’s consecutive sentencing, although seemingly consistent with section 775.021(4)(a) and 921.16 . . .
. . . his attorney was ineffective because she did not inform the court that it had the power under section 921.16 . . .
. . . . § 921.16, Fla.Stat. (1993); Johnson v. State, 538 So.2d 553 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). . . .
. . . See § 921.16(1), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . . § 921.16(1), Fla.Stat. (1985). See also § 775.021(4), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .
. . . sentence concurrently with a federal sentence is by transfer to federal prison pursuant to section 921.16 . . .
. . . See § 921.16(1), Fla.Stat. (1991). The trial court’s order fails to refute Knight’s claim. . . .
. . . trial court’s decision whether to make the sentence consecutive or concurrent is governed by section 921.16 . . .
. . . In Richardson, the court stated: Under section 921.16(2), Florida Statutes (1981), a Florida court may . . .
. . . However, since the judge did not order the sentences to run consecutive, section 921.16(1), Fla.Stat. . . .
. . . Section 921.16, Florida Statutes (1989), provides that sentences of imprisonment for offenses not charged . . .
. . . State, 554 So.2d 512 (Fla.1990), approving, 540 So.2d 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); § 921.16, Fla.Stat. (1987 . . .
. . . Section 921.16(2), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that a Florida court “may direct that a sentence . . .
. . . See Sections 893.135, 921.16(1), Florida Statutes, and Berrio at 980. AFFIRMED. . . .
. . . While the state concedes that such credit appears to be statutorily mandated by section 921.16(1), it . . .
. . . Pursuant to section 921.16(1), Florida Statutes (1989), a defendant convicted of two or more crimes charged . . .
. . . See § 921.16, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .
. . . to impose consecutive sentences, the court perceived a conflict between the guidelines and section 921.16 . . .
. . . sentenced to 364 days in jail, to-be served consecutive to the first sentence by virtue of section 921.16 . . .
. . . See § 921.16(1) Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .
. . . whether the guidelines range takes precedence over the discretion given to a trial judge by section 921.16 . . . First, the guidelines law was enacted subsequent to section 921.16, Florida Statutes (1987) and thus . . . consecutive sentences would exceed the guidelines, we have no doubt that the judge’s discretion under section 921.16 . . .