Cases from cite.case.law:

HENRY, v. STATE, 141 So. 3d 557 (Fla. 2014)

. . . proceedings and announced the intent to pursue, a determination of Henry’s competency under section 922.07 . . . understands the nature and effect of the death penalty and why it is to be imposed upon him or her.” § 922.07 . . . Moreover, three doctors recently evaluated Henry to determine his competency under section 922.07 and . . .

MUHAMMAD f k a v. STATE, 132 So. 3d 176 (Fla. 2013)

. . . See § 922.07, Fla. Stat. (2013); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.811 and 3.812. . . .

GORE, v. STATE, 120 So. 3d 554 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Pursuant to section 922.07, Florida Statutes (2012), the Governor temporarily stayed Gore’s execution . . .

GORE, v. D. CREWS,, 720 F.3d 811 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 922.07, appointed a commission of three psychiatrists to evaluate Gore’s mental competence to be . . .

BARNES, v. STATE, 124 So. 3d 904 (Fla. 2013)

. . . See § 922.07(3), Florida Statutes (2012); Johnston v. . . .

FERGUSON, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 716 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 922.07, the Governor temporarily stayed the execution and appointed a commission of three psychiatrists . . . Ann. § 922.07(2) (1985). . . .

SIMMONS, v. STATE v. S., 105 So. 3d 475 (Fla. 2012)

. . . See § 922.07(3), Fla. Stat. (2009); Provenzano v. State, 760 So.2d 137, 140 (Fla.2000). . . .

FERGUSON, v. STATE, 112 So. 3d 1154 (Fla. 2012)

. . . As required by section 922.07, Florida Statutes (2012), the Governor temporarily stayed Ferguson’s execution . . . (citing § 922.07(3), Fla. . . .

HILL, Jr. v. HUMPHREY,, 662 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 922.07 (1985) (proceedings when person under sentence of death appears to be insane)); see also Goode . . . Stat. § 922.07 does not violate due process). . . .

GROSSMAN, v. STATE, 29 So. 3d 1034 (Fla. 2010)

. . . The trial court dismissed this claim on the ground that the claim was premature under both section 922.07 . . . See also § 922.07, Fla. . . . conclude that the trial court properly dismissed this claim because under rule 3.811(c) and section 922.07 . . .

JOHNSTON, v. STATE, 27 So. 3d 11 (Fla. 2010)

. . . See § 922.07(3), Fla. Stat. (2009); Provenzano v. State, 760 So.2d 137, 140 (Fla.2000). . . .

E. BILLIOT, v. B. EPPS,, 671 F. Supp. 2d 840 (S.D. Miss. 2009)

. . . . § 922.07 (1985) to have Ford declared incompetent to be executed. . . . Fla.Stat. § 922.07 (1985 and Supp. 1986). Id. at 422, 106 S.Ct. 2595. . . . Ann. § 922.07(1) (Westlaw 2009); Ga.Code Ann. § 17-10-60 (Westlaw 2009); Ky.Rev.Stat. . . .

HALL, v. QUARTERMAN,, 534 F.3d 365 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 922.07 (1985 and Supp.1986)). . 477 U.S. at 401, 106 S.Ct. 2595. . . . .

PHILMORE, v. STATE v. R., 937 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 2006)

. . . because the claim is not ripe, and that a defendant must submit this claim in accordance with section 922.07 . . .

PANETTI, v. DRETKE,, 448 F.3d 815 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 922.07(2)). . . .

WALTON, v. M. JOHNSON,, 440 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 922.07(3) (1985 & 2005). . . .

WALTON, v. M. JOHNSON,, 407 F.3d 285 (4th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 922.07(3) (1985 & 2005). . . . . § 922.07(3) (West 2001). . . .

DAVIS, v. STATE v. V. Jr., 875 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 2003)

. . . State, 817 So.2d 786, 799 (Fla.2002); § 922.07, Fla. Stat. (2003); Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.811. . . .

GRIFFIN, v. STATE, 866 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2003)

. . . Section 922.07(1), Florida Statutes (2002), also provides that the Governor shall stay the execution . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v. WATTS,, 800 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 2001)

. . . See § 922.07, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . Id. § 922.07(3) (emphasis added). . . . Id. § 922.07(4). . . .

COE, v. BELL,, 89 F. Supp. 2d 922 (M.D. Tenn. 2000)

. . . . § 922.07 (“whether he or she understands the nature and effect of the death penalty and why it is to . . .

H. PROVENZANO, v. STATE, 751 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 1999)

. . . filings with the Governor claiming that Provenza-no was insane to be executed, pursuant to section 922.07 . . . Section 922.07 states: Proceedings when person under sentence of death appears to be insane.— (1) When . . . after a defendant has made sufficient allegations of insanity to the Governor, pursuant to section 922.07 . . . the Legislature to consider establishing a timetable as to when a claim must be filed under section 922.07 . . . Yet Provenzano did not file his section 922.07 claim until July 5, 1999, more than two weeks after receiving . . . Dugger, 686 F.Supp. 1523 (M.D.Fla.1988); § 922.07, Fla. Stat. . . . See § 922.07, Fla. Stat. . . . Waldman, M.D., and Leslie Parsons, D.O., the three experts appointed by Governor Bush pursuant to section 922.07 . . .

POLAND, v. STEWART,, 41 F. Supp. 2d 1037 (D. Ariz. 1999)

. . . . § 922.07 (1985 and Supp.1986) provides inadequate assurances of accuracy to satisfy the requirements . . .

ALVORD, v. STATE, 694 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 1997)

. . . Subsequently, the Governor ordered a competency evaluation pursuant to section 922.07, Florida Statutes . . .

In MEDINA,, 109 F.3d 1556 (11th Cir. 1997)

. . . On December 2, 1996, counsel for Medina invoked Florida Statutes § 922.07, representing that Medina might . . .

MEDINA, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 960 F. Supp. 275 (M.D. Fla. 1997)

. . . On December 2,1996, pursuant to section 922.07, Florida Statutes (1995), Petitioner wrote a letter to . . .

MEDINA, v. STATE, 690 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 1997)

. . . The letter invoked the provisions of section 922.07, Florida Statutes (1995), which sets forth an executive . . . Pursuant to section 922.07, the Governor appointed a commission of three psychiatrists to determine whether . . .

MARTIN, v. K. SINGLETARY,, 795 F. Supp. 1572 (S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . . § 922.07 if he wished to pursue the claim further. Martin v. . . . Believing the § 922.07 proceedings were unconstitutional under Ford, supra, Martin’s counsel advised . . . Accordingly, a new § 922.07 proceeding was initiated, and the panel of psychiatrists found Martin competent . . .

ALVORD, v. L. DUGGER,, 541 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1989)

. . . judicial determination of his competency to be executed separate from the existing procedure under section 922.07 . . .

MARTIN, v. L. DUGGER,, 686 F. Supp. 1523 (S.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . . § 922.07 (West 1985). . . . Stat. § 922.07. The doctor’s task was to examine the competency of Martin. . . . Martin sought a stay of the § 922.07 proceedings claiming that any use of § 922.07 was unconstitutional . . . Martin claims that Fla.Stat. § 922.07 and Fla. . . . applied section 922.07 in a constitutionally impermissible manner. . . .

MARTIN, v. STATE, 515 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 1987)

. . . See § 922.07, Fla. Stat. (1987). . . . nature and effect of the death penalty, and why it is to be imposed upon him as required by Section 922.07 . . .

MARTIN, v. L. DUGGER, MARTIN, v. STATE, 515 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1987)

. . . Thereafter, pursuant to the earlier request of Martin’s lawyer invoking the provisions of section 922.07 . . . quo warranto or for extraordinary relief in the nature of quo warranto seeking to stay the section 922.07 . . . Upon advice of his lawyer, Martin then refused to participate in the section 922.07 examination, and . . . denied the motion, pointing out that by its own terms rule 3.811 is only effective after a section 922.07 . . . Dugger, I dissent from the reordering of a section 922.07 examination. . . . We directed Martin’s counsel to follow the procedures set out in section 922.07, Florida Statutes (1985 . . . That motion argues that section 922.07 is inadequate to protect a mental incompetent’s right not to be . . . The motion argues that rule 3.811’s direction to first proceed under section 922.07 is improper and asks . . . i proceedings under section 922.07 ... are initiated, and such proceedings result in a determination . . . That part of Justice Marshall’s opinion is not a majority opinion, however, and section 922.07 and rule . . .

PERICOLA, III, v. STATE, 499 So. 2d 864 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 922.07, Florida Statutes (1969), set forth the procedures to be followed by the Governor when . . . However, by Chapter 70-339, Section 134, Section 922.07 was amended to provide, as it does today, that . . . In the same term in which Section 922.07 was amended, Section 921.09 was repealed and replaced by Rule . . .

In EMERGENCY AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULE COMPETENCY TO BE EXECUTED, 497 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 1986)

. . . When proceedings under section 922.07, Florida Statutes (1985), are initiated, and such proceedings result . . .

MARTIN, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 497 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 1986)

. . . counsel wish to pursue this claim, we direct them to initiate the sanity proceedings set out in section 922.07 . . . execution is scheduled for Nov. 18, 1986, time would appear to be of the essence in proceeding under § 922.07 . . . We note that the governor may extend the warrant period under § 922.07(2). . . . .

FORD v. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 477 U.S. 399 (U.S. 1986)

. . . . § 922.07(3) (1985 and Supp. 1986). . . . Stat. §922.07(3) (1985). . . . . § 922.07(1) (1985). . . . .” §922.07(3) (Supp. 1986) (emphasis added). . . . . § 922.07 (1985). . . . statute, the Governor of Florida appointed a panel of three psychiatrists to evaluate whether, under §922.07 . . . Stat. §922.07 (1985 and Supp. 1986). . . . Stat. §922.07 (1985 and Supp. 1986), as noted earlier, is the State’s placement of the decision wholly . . . Stat. §922.07 (1985 and Supp. 1986); Ga. Code Ann. § 17-10-62 (1982); Ill. Rev. . . .

ADAMS, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 484 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1986)

. . . A panel of three psychiatrists has been appointed by the governor under the authority of section 922.07 . . . We have considered and rejected such attacks on the validity of 922.07. Goode v. . . .

FORD, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 752 F.2d 526 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 922.07 (1983). . . . Florida’s prohibition is incorporated in Fla.Stat. § 922.07 (1983), which prescribes both the test of . . . Fla.Stat. § 922.07(2) (1983). . . . . § 922.07 (1983). . . . F.S.A. § 922.07(2) and (3). . . . 43-2622 (1977); Cal.Penal Code § 3700 et seq. (1979); Conn.Gen.Stat. § 54-101 (1980); Fla.Stats. § 922.07 . . .

ALVORD, v. STATE, 459 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 1984)

. . . the pendency of Alvord’s 3.850 proceeding, the Governor of Florida invoked the provisions of section 922.07 . . . that his client is presently insane and requested the governor to examine Alvord pursuant to section 922.07 . . . In this proceeding, Alvord argues that, separate and apart from the procedure outlined in section 922.07 . . . 604 (1950), and specifically rejected the contention that the statutory process set forth in section 922.07 . . . The governor is proceeding to make a competency determination under section 922.07 and we find neither . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE JACKSON, v. L. WAINWRIGHT, JACKSON, v. STATE, 452 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 1984)

. . . judicial determination should be made in addition to and aside from that determination made under section 922.07 . . .

FORD, v. G. STRICKLAND, Jr. L. FORD, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 734 F.2d 538 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . denied the writ on appeal from the petitioner’s first habeas corpus petition, the governor began his § 922.07 . . . contended in response that he was unable to assert his “newly ripened claim” until completion of the § 922.07 . . . barring execution is dependent upon the governor’s implementation of the statutory procedures of § 922.07 . . . On the contrary, Florida employs a statutory procedure to avoid that result, see Fla.Stats. § 922.07, . . . 1983, Ford, through his attorneys, sought exhaustion of state remedies pursuant to Florida Statute § 922.07 . . . The Governor did not render a decision with respect to the § 922.07 proceeding until he signed the death . . . most probably have been met with a ruling that Ford’s sole relief was pursuant to Florida Statute § 922.07 . . .

FORD, v. L. WAINWRIGHT, FORD, v. STATE, 451 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1984)

. . . Thereafter proceedings to determine petitioner’s mental competency were instituted pursuant to section 922.07 . . . In addition to the proceedings that were instituted on behalf of petitioner pursuant to section 922.07 . . . separate judicial determination of sanity must be made apart from the statutory procedure in section 922.07 . . . , we addressed this issue, agreed “that an insane person cannot be executed,” and held that section 922.07 . . . Thus, in Goode we held that under section 922.07 the governor can make the determination; Goode does . . .

GOODE, Jr. III, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 731 F.2d 1482 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . Then, pursuant to Florida Statute 922.07, the governor of Florida entered an executive order appointing . . . insane and that it violates the Constitution to execute an insane person, and (2) that Florida Statute 922.07 . . . claim is a newly ripened claim that could not be presented until the governor had gone through the § 922.07 . . . barring execution is dependent upon the governor’s implementation of the statutory procedures of § 922.07 . . .

GOODE, III, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 448 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 1984)

. . . After Hysler the legislature enacted section 922.07, Florida Statutes (1983) (originally chapter 19554 . . .

SOLESBEE v. BALKCOM, WARDEN, 339 U.S. 9 (U.S. 1950)

. . . . § 922.07 (1941). (36) Miss. Code Ann. § 2558 (1942). E. . . .