The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 924
CRIMINAL APPEALS AND COLLATERAL REVIEW

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 924.066

924.066 Collateral relief.—

(1) Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this chapter, a prisoner in custody may seek relief based upon claims that the judgment of conviction or sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or law of the United States or the State of Florida.

(2) Either the state or a prisoner in custody may obtain review in the next higher state court of a trial court’s adverse ruling granting or denying collateral relief. The state may obtain review of any trial court ruling that fails to enforce a procedural bar.

(3) A person in a noncapital case who is seeking collateral review under this chapter has no right to a court-appointed lawyer.

History.—s. 6, ch. 96-248.

F.S. 924.066 on Google Scholar

F.S. 924.066 on Casetext

Amendments to 924.066

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 924.066

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 924.066.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BAKER, v. STATE, 210 So. 3d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 924.066(3), Fla. . . .

BELIVEAU, v. STATE, 144 So. 3d 634 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 924.066(3), Fla. Stat. (2018); Gantt, 714 So.2d at 1116-17. . . .

E. JORDAN, v. STATE, 81 So. 3d 595 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . jeopardy purposes because the state filed a timely motion for rehearing under rule 3.800(b)(1)(B)); § 924.066 . . .

HOGAN, v. STATE, 12 So. 3d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 924.066(2), Florida Statutes (2000, 2002), provides, “Either the state or a prisoner in custody . . .

MANN, v. STATE, 937 So. 2d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Finally, section 924.066(3), Florida Statutes (2005), provides: “A person in a noncapital case who is . . .

CRAMER, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 461 F.3d 1380 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 924.066(2); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(3). . . . .

STATE v. VASQUEZ,, 918 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

STATE v. CHAMBERS,, 891 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2003); State v. Lasley, 507 So.2d 711 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). . . .

STATE v. RUDOLF, Jr., 821 So. 2d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . To the extent that section 924.066(2), Florida Statutes (1999), seeks to confer jurisdiction for district . . . that any new sentence will be a final appealable order granting collateral relief pursuant to section 924.066 . . .

VERRONE, v. STATE, 797 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 924.066(2), Fla. . . .

STATE v. DELVALLE,, 745 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . jurisdiction to hear this appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(l)(M) and section 924.066 . . . Section 924.066(2) provides, “Either the state or a prisoner in custody may obtain review in the next . . . Read in conjunction, Rule 9.140(c)(l)(M) and section 924.066(2) allow the State to appeal from a final . . .

RUSSO, v. AKERS,, 724 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 1998)

. . . Section 924.066(3), Florida Statutes, appears to conflict with the holding in Weeks and Graham that counsel . . . Therefore, we construe section 924.066(3) to mean that there is no statutory right to counsel. . . . appellate or collateral proceedings unless the use is constitutionally or statutorily mandated.”); § 924.066 . . .

RUSSO, v. SELMAN,, 702 So. 2d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . the necessary findings, the appointment of the public defender in this case is contrary to section 924.066 . . .

RUSSO, v. AKERS,, 701 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . collateral proceedings in non-capital cases unless constitutionally or statutorily mandated and that section 924.066 . . . Section 924.066(3), Florida Statutes, appears to conflict with the holding in Weeks and Graham that counsel . . . Therefore, we construe section 924.066(3) to mean that there is no statutory right to counsel. . . .