Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. LUNDY,, 233 So. 3d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . The State’s statutory authority to appeal is set forth in sections 924.07 and 924.071, Florida Statutes . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 229 So. 3d 1116 (Fla. 2017)

. . . appeal by the state is authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, or sections 924.07 or 924.071 . . . appeal by the state is authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, or sections 924.07 or 924.071 . . . appeal by the state is authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, or sections 924.07 or 924.071 . . . appeal by the state is authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, or sections 924.07 or 924.071 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 188 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 2015)

. . . appeal by the state is authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, or sections 924.07 or 924.071 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 167 So. 3d 395 (Fla. 2015)

. . . appeal by the state is authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, or sections 924.07 or 924.071 . . .

MILLER, v. STATE, 152 So. 3d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . appeal by the state is authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, or sections 924.07 or 924.071 . . .

STATE v. McMAHON,, 94 So. 3d 468 (Fla. 2012)

. . . The State’s authority to appeal a criminal case is set forth in sections 924.07 and 924.071, Florida . . . The grounds for appeal by the State set forth in section 924.071, Florida Statutes (2009), are not applicable . . . Section 924.071 provides for state appeals from certain pretrial orders and delineates when a stay is . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 26 So. 3d 534 (Fla. 2009)

. . . as an interlocutory appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c) or sections 924.07 or 924.071 . . . appeal by the state is authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, or sections 924.07 or 924.071 . . .

STATE v. WATSON,, 909 So. 2d 942 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . However, sections 924.07 and 924.071, Florida Statutes (2005), list the orders in criminal cases that . . .

FLORIDA v. THOMAS, 532 U.S. 774 (U.S. 2001)

. . . . §924.071(1) (1996) (“The state may appeal from a pretrial order... suppressing evidence”); Fla. . . .

STATE v. M. K. a, 786 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The state contends that the appeal is authorized by section 924.071(1)(k), but this statute applies exclusively . . . Following the decision McLeod, the Legislature enacted section 924.071(1)(k), Florida Statutes, which . . .

PEARSON, v. W. MOORE,, 767 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See §§ 924.07, 924.071, Fla. Stat. (1997); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140. . . .

STATE v. R. SOWERS,, 763 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Subsection (c)(1) should be read in tandem with sections 924.07 & 924.071, Florida Statutes (1997), which . . .

STATE v. GAINES,, 731 So. 2d 7 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Both sections 924.07 and 924.071 contain provisions, other than the one on which the state relies in . . .

I. T. v. STATE, 694 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 1997)

. . . were concerned in that case with only two specific sections of chapter 924: section 924.07 and section 924.071 . . . Sections 924.07 and 924.071 are substantially the same in the current statutes. . . .

STATE v. SETZLER, H., 667 So. 2d 343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . .” § 924.071(1), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

STATE v. F. RILEY,, 648 So. 2d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . See §§ 924.07, 924.071, Fla. Stat. (1993); see also State v. . . .

FONTANA, v. RICE,, 644 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 1994)

. . . The district court found the habeas petition to be grounded at least in part on section 924.071(2), Florida . . . Genung, 300 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), concluding that even if section 924.071, Florida Statutes, . . . We hold that section 924.071(2) does not apply to this appeal. . . . Section 924.071(2) applies only to appeals by the State from pretrial orders dismissing a search warrant . . . Therefore, the petition’s reliance on section 924.071(2) was erroneous. . . .

STATE v. FUDGE,, 645 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Thus, no appeal is authorized by section 924.071. . . .

BLORE, v. J. FIERRO,, 636 So. 2d 1329 (Fla. 1994)

. . . court suppression order is governed not by rule 9.140, as stated by the district court, but by section 924.071 . . . Although the district court upheld the State’s appeal based on rule 9.140, we find that section 924.071 . . . The legislature has enacted section 924.071, which provides: “The state may appeal from a pretrial order . . . In so holding, we acknowledge that we have previously held that sections 924.07 and 924.071, Florida . . . provide for the manner of appeals from the county court to the circuit court, and sections 924.07 and 924.071 . . .

FONTANA, v. RICE,, 630 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . His argument appears to be grounded, at least in part, in the following language from section 924.071 . . . Genung, 300 So.2d 271 (Fla.2d DCA 1974), this court concluded that the mandatory language of section 924.071 . . .

STATE v. FRY,, 621 So. 2d 529 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . .-07, 924.071, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . Section 924.071(1), Florida Statutes (1991), permits appeals from pretrial orders suppressing evidence . . .

STATE v. ALVAREZ,, 600 So. 2d 49 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . view, however, the State’s right of appeal in a criminal case is prescribed by sections 924.07 and 924.071 . . . While sections 924.07 and 924.071 are invalid as applied to interlocutory appeals from the circuit court . . .

STATE v., 600 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 1992)

. . . The state shall pay all costs of such appeal except for the defendant’s attorney’s fee. 924.071 Additional . . .

STATE v. LAPINSKI,, 535 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . See § 924.071(1), Fla.Stat. . . .

STATE v. DEAN,, 532 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . We have jurisdiction under section 924.071(1), Florida Statutes (1985). . . .

STATE v. PETTIS,, 520 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1988)

. . . of appeal under either article V, section 4(b)(1) of the Florida Constitution or sections 924.07 and 924.071 . . . nonap-pealable discovery orders and citing Harris as authority for proposition that sections 924.07 and 924.071 . . . Sections 924.07 and 924.071, Florida Statutes (1985) and Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.130 and . . . Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) and section 924.071(1) provide a remedy for the state even though a reciprocal interlocutory . . . does not mean that we and the legislature should not continue to review and amend sections 924.07 and 924.071 . . .

STATE v. HARWOOD, 488 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . to the order granting the motion to suppress, which latter order is clearly appealable under section 924.071 . . .

J. P. W. a A. B. a R. A. a v. STATE, 476 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1985)

. . . criminal case, it has an appellate remedy to the extent that such is granted by sections 924.07 and 924.071 . . .

STATE v. G. P. a, 476 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1985)

. . . Sections 924.07 and 924.071, Florida Statutes (1981), provide as follows: 924.07 Appeal by state. — The . . . The state shall pay all costs of such appeal except for the defendant’s attorney’s fee. 924.071 Additional . . .

STATE v. C. C. E. V. C. A. Q. A. M. E. S. E., 476 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 1985)

. . . and would hold that the state’s right of appeal in criminal cases, provided by sections 924.07 and 924.071 . . . cases are analogous to criminal cases and I find that the legislature intended for sections 924.07 and 924.071 . . . In criminal cases, the state is given the right to appeal such an order by section 924.071(1). . . . In criminal cases, the state may appeal such a suppression order before proceeding to trial. § 924.071 . . . Sections 924.07 and 924.071, Florida Statutes (1981), provide as follows: 924.07 Appeal by state —The . . . Sections 924.07 and 924.071, Florida Statutes (1981), provide as follows: 924.07 Appeal by state — The . . . The state shall pay all costs of such appeal except for the defendant’s attorney’s fee. 924.071 Additional . . .

STATE v. CREIGHTON,, 469 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1985)

. . . In view of this virtual prohibition of the common law, we can see sections 924.07 and 924.071 as strictly . . . governed by statute, we now come to the remaining question of whether either section 924.07 or section 924.071 . . . Nowhere in sections 924.07 or 924.071 is provision made for appeal by the state frpm an order granting . . . Section 924.071, Florida Statutes (1981), provides additional grounds for appeal by the state in criminal . . .

STATE v. LOPEZ,, 402 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 924.071(2), Florida Statutes (1979), provides for an automatic stay during the pendency of a . . . the Jenkins case, our supreme court held that regardless of the automatic stay provided in section 924.071 . . .

STATE v. JENKINS,, 389 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 1980)

. . . Further, the Cannon court rejected the contention that section 924.071(2), Florida Statutes, grants the . . . Stat. § 924.071(2), which provides for an automatic stay during the pendency of such an appeal has been . . . Stat. § 924.071(2) was adopted, merely by filing an appeal from an order of suppression and without any . . . We disagree with the interpretation stated in Smail and Pearce that section 924.071(2) automatically . . . It is our view that existing rule 3.191(d)(2) and section 924.071(2) do not contradict each other. . . .

STATE v. WILLIAMS,, 386 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . . § 924.071(1), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

STATE v. E. VILLAVICENCIO,, 381 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The state contends that it is entitled to rely on the automatic stay provisions of Section 924.071(2) . . .

STATE v. RAMOS,, 378 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . . § 924.071, Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .

STATE v. OLIVER,, 368 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . . § 924.071(1), Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .

STATE v. D AMATO, F., 358 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . See § 924.071, Fla.Stat. (1967). . . . .

TUCKER, v. STATE, 357 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1978)

. . . argues that it is entitled to an automatic stay during ' the pendency of its appeal by virtue of Section 924.071 . . .

STATE v. THOMPSON,, 357 So. 2d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . The State takes this appeal pursuant to Chapter 924.071 Fla.Stat. (1975), from an order suppressing evidence . . .

ESPERTI, v. WAINWRIGHT,, 447 F. Supp. 1289 (M.D. Fla. 1978)

. . . . § 924.071. The petitioner at the same time filed a cross-appeal. . . . In light of the mandatory stay provisions in Fla.Stat. § 924.071, the state judge on January 19, 1969 . . . Florida Statute § 924.071, pursuant to which the respondent filed the appeal, granted an automatic stay . . .

STATE v. SHIPMAN A., 360 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . They cite a sentence from Sec. 924.071(2) Florida Statutes (1975) which says: “A defendant in custody . . . Genung, 300 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), it was held the word “shall” in Sec. 924.071(2) means “may” . . .

WINGERT, v. STATE, 353 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 924.071(1), Florida Statutes (1975); and Fla.App. Rule 6.3. . . .

STATE v. A. WILCOX,, 351 So. 2d 89 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Additional grounds for appeal by the state are set out in Sec. 924.071 (1975). . . . .

JENKINS, v. STATE, 349 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . DOWNEY, Judge, concurring specially: This court has previously held that Section 924.071(2), Florida . . . However, if the question of the effect of Section 924.071(2) were before us for the first time I would . . . appellant’s motion for discharge filed pursuant to Rule 3.191) on authority of the analysis of Section 924.071 . . .

STATE v. SMAIL,, 346 So. 2d 641 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . The interlocutory appeal was taken pursuant to Section 924.071, Florida Statutes (1975), which reads . . . as follows: “924.071 Additional grounds for appeal by the state; time for taking; stay of cause.— (1) . . . This overlooks the fact that Section 924.071, as a whole, only became effective upon being incorporated . . . by statute prior to the enactment of the speedy trial rule is tolled pending an appeal under Section 924.071 . . .

STATE v. BALE,, 345 So. 2d 862 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . See Sections 924.07 and 924.071, Florida Statutes (1975); State v. . . .

TUCKER, v. STATE, 344 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . The state asserts that § 924.071(2), Fla. . . .

STATE v. PEARCE, 336 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . 180-day period prescribed by the Rule expired during the State’s interlocutory appeal, pursuant to § 924.071 . . . We reasoned that the Supreme Court adopted § 924.071 when it promulgated Appellate Rule 6.3 b and thus . . . The context and language of § 924.071(2) indicate a legislative purpose to stay the case automatically . . . We therefore need not presume that criminal Rule 3.191(d)(2)(iv) was intended to excise from § 924.071 . . . There are practical reasons so to reconcile the provisions of § 924.071(2), F.S., and Rule 3.191(d)(2 . . .

STATE v. WISE,, 336 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Rule 3.191 and sections 924.07 and 924.071, F.S., relating to appeals by the state, contain no language . . . See Rule 3.191(d)(2), supra; sections 924.07 and 924.071, supra; see also State v. . . .

STATE v. CANNON, 332 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 924.071(2), which provides for an automatic stay during the pendency of such an appeal has been superseded . . . deprive a defendant of the benefits of the Speedy Trial Rule, which did not exist when Fla.Stat. § 924.071 . . .

STATE v. WARREN,, 329 So. 2d 383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . The State of Florida, by this interlocutory appeal pursuant to F.S. 924.071, seeks our review of an order . . .

STATE v. WILLIAMS,, 303 So. 2d 74 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . By this interlocutory appeal, pursuant to § 924.071(1), Fla.Stat., we are called upon to review the propriety . . .

STATE v. CAIVANO,, 304 So. 2d 139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . See Rule 6.3 FAR; §§ 924.07 and 924.071 F.S.; State v. Williams, Fla.App.2d 1970, 237 So.2d 69. . . .

STATE HARRINGTON, v. S. GENUNG,, 300 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Petitioner then made application for release on his own- recognizance pursuant to Florida Statute 924.071 . . . Petitioner files this petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging that under Florida Statute 924.071( . . . Therefore, petitioner falls within Florida Statute 924.071(2). . . . We hold that the word “shall” as set forth by the legislature in Florida Statute 924.071(2) must be interpreted . . .

STATE v. R. NERI,, 290 So. 2d 500 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . appeals the granting of the motion to suppress pursuant to authority granted in Florida Statutes, Section 924.071 . . .

STATE v. E. FULKERSON,, 300 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . . §§ 924.07, and 924.071 F.S.A. remain unprovided for by the rule. . . .

STATE v. A. SEXTON, STATE v. G. BOSS,, 283 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Florida Statutes, Section 924.071, F.S.A., provides that: “The state may appeal from a pretrial order . . . F.A.R., Rule 6.3, sub. b, 32 F.S.A., provides that: “Appeals pursuant to Section 924.071, Florida Statutes . . .

SCHUTY a k a v. STATE, 281 So. 2d 507 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . shall not stay the operation of an order in favor of the defendant except as provided in F.S., Section 924.071 . . .

STATE v. BROOKS,, 281 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . . § 924.071, the granting of a motion to suppress. Patrolmen R. D. Be-van and J. D. . . .

STATE v. WOODARD,, 280 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . . § 924.071, F.S.A. Clinton Woodard, appellee, was observed by a member of the St. . . .

ESPERTI, v. STATE, 276 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Florida Statute § 924.071, F.S. . . . Florida Statute § 924.071, F.S.A., provides for an automatic stay of proceedings when the State appeals . . .

STATE v. D. OLSON,, 267 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . The state appeals pursuant to § 924.071, F.S.1969, F.S.A., from an interlocutory order suppressing certain . . .

STATE v. SPANIERMAN,, 267 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . The state appeals, pursuant to § 924.071, F.S.1969, F.S.A., from an interlocutory order suppressing certain . . .

STATE v. FOUST,, 262 So. 2d 686 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 924.071(1), F.S.A.; see Rule 6.3, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A. . . .

L. BRYANT, v. BLOUNT, Jr., 261 So. 2d 847 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . its disposition by operation of Chapter 70-339, Section 149, Laws of Florida, now carried as Section 924.071 . . . Reading subsection (2) in pari marteria with subsection (1) of Section 924.071, Florida Statutes, F.S.A . . . Since we now hold that the State’s appeal of December 8, 1970, is not within the purview of Section 924.071 . . .

STATE v. SMITH, Jr., 260 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1972)

. . . Appeals pursuant to Section 924.071, Florida Statutes 1967, shall be taken within the time prescribed . . . This Rule breathes life into a legislative Act which purports to permit appellate “2- F.S. § 924.071, . . . unless the Supreme Court of Florida adopts such statute as its own (as it did with regard to Section 924.071 . . .

STATE v. BOND, 255 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . Appellant seeks review by interlocutory appeal, pursuant to the provisions of F.S. section 924.071(1) . . .

STATE v. SMITH, Jr., 254 So. 2d 402 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . unless the Supreme Court of Florida adopts such statute as its own (as it did with regard to Section 924.071 . . . F.S. § 924.071, F.S.A. . F.S. § 924.07(8), F.S.A. . . . .

STATE v. A. HOPPER, STATE v. A. HOPPER,, 251 So. 2d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . The state appeals pursuant to § 924.071, F.S. 1969, F.S.A. from an order suppressing certain evidence . . .

CARROLL, v. STATE, 251 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 1971)

. . . . § 924.071, F. . . . However, turning to Fla.Stat. § 924.071, F.S.A., if evidence is suppressed or a search warrant quashed . . . The state’s appeal, however, was not taken under the purview of Fla.Stat. § 924.071, F.S.A., and the . . .

STATE v. BRYANT,, 250 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . The state appeals pursuant to § 924.071, F.S.1969, F.S.A., from an interlocutory order granting defendant . . .

STATE v. JACKSON,, 240 So. 2d 88 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . This appeal by the State of Florida is taken pursuant to § 924.071(1) Fla.Stat., F.S.A., which permits . . .

STATE v. PROFERA, 239 So. 2d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . The State brings this interlocutory appeal under F.S.1967, section 924.071, F.S.A., for the purpose of . . .

STATE v. DYCUS,, 238 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . The state brings this interlocutory appeal, pursuant to § 924.071(1), F.S.A., to review an order of the . . .

STATE v. BUDNICK, Jr., 237 So. 2d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . . § 924.071, F.S.A. provides that “the state may appeal from a pre-trial order * * * suppressing evidence . . . Rule 6.3, subd. b, 32 F.S.A. provides that “appeals pursuant to Section 924.071, Florida Statutes 1967 . . . Surely the legislature in enacting F.S. § 924.071, F.S.A., and the Supreme Court in promulgating F.A.P . . .

STATE v. PRESSLEY,, 234 So. 2d 734 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . appeal brought by the state under authority of Rule 6.3, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., and § 924.071 . . .

STATE v. WILLIAMS L., 227 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . § 924.071, 1967, in that its enumeration of the instances the State may appeal from adverse decisions . . . Stat.1967, § 924.07, F.S.A., to which § 924.071 is clearly supplementary, to deal only with direct appeals . . .

STATE v. WILLIAMS,, 227 So. 2d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . F.S.1967, Section 924.071, F.S.A. . . . .

STATE v. JONES,, 222 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . This is an appeal by the State of Florida, authorized by § 924.071 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., from an order of . . .

STATE v. JONES,, 219 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . The defendants-appellees have moved to dismiss an appeal taken by the State of Florida pursuant to § 924.071 . . .

STATE v. McKINNEY,, 212 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 1968)

. . . . § 924.071 [F.S.A.] from an order which suppressed the ‘cocaine’ but denied the motion as to all other . . .

In FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES, 211 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1968)

. . . Appeals pursuant to Section 924.071, Florida Statutes 1967, shall be taken within the time prescribed . . .