Cases from cite.case.law:

CADLE COMPANY, v. G G ASSOCIATES,, 737 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Stat. (1997); • § 924.17, Fla. Stat. (1969). . . .

F. MILLIGAN, v. PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,, 704 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1998)

. . . insolvent by the circuit judge or the judge of the county court, upon affidavit and proof as required by s. 924.17 . . .

In BATSON, C. III, E. v. STATE, 700 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . adjudged insolvent by the circuit court or the county court, upon affidavit and proof as required by s. 924.17 . . . County next asserts that the substantive law in relation to indigent filing fees is found in section 924.17 . . . But section 924.17, by its terms, does not relate to whether costs should be paid on behalf of the indigent . . . We find section 924.17 irrelevant to the issue before the court. . . .

PRESTELLO, v. STATE, 691 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 924.17, Fla. Stat. (1995); Venuto v. State, 615 So.2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). . . .

R. DAVIS, v. STATE, 634 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 924.17, Florida Statutes (1991), provides that if the court determines that the defendant is . . .

VENUTO, v. STATE, 615 So. 2d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . assessed against defendant who had been adjudicated insolvent because no statute authorizes it); § 924.17 . . .

D. CLIBURN, v. STATE, 510 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . State, 459 So.2d 494, 495 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); §§ 27.56, 924.17 Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

JENKINS, v. STATE, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1984)

. . . Sections 939.05 and 939.15, as well as 924.17, are asserted as protecting Jenkins from the costs assessment . . . insolvent by the circuit judge or the judge of the county court, upon affidavit and proof as required by s. 924.17 . . .

JENKINS, v. STATE, 422 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Sections 939.05 and 939.15, as well as 924.17, are asserted as protecting Jenkins from the costs assessment . . .

STATE v. BYRD,, 378 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 1979)

. . . insolvent by the circuit judge or the judge of the county court, upon affidavit and proof as required by s. 924.17 . . . insolvent by the circuit judge or the judge of the county court, upon affidavit and proof as required by s. 924.17 . . .

HILLMAN, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,, 375 So. 2d 336 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . . § 924.17, Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .

H. COX, v. STATE, 334 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1976)

. . . insolvent by the circuit judge or the judge of the county court, upon affidavit and proof as required by § 924.17 . . .

MACK, v. STATE, 305 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . insolvent by the circuit judge or the judge of the county court, upon affidavit and proof as required by § 924.17 . . .

E. GUSTAFSON, v. STATE, 251 So. 2d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . See Florida Statutes §,§ 57.091, 924.17, 939.04-939.06, 939.15, F.S.A. . . .

WILLIS, v. STATE, 245 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1971)

. . . determination that defendant, appellant herein, is not insolvent within the meaning of Florida Statutes § 924.17 . . . J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and DREW (Retired), JJ., concur. . “924.17. . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 227 So. 2d 354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . Section 924.17, F.S.A., as a prerequisite to an adjudication of insolvency. . . .

In L. G. T. a No., 216 So. 2d 54 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . entry of an order finding the juvenile appellant insolvent within the meaning of F.S.1967, Section 924.17 . . . F.S.1967, Section 924.17, F.S.A. . Keur v. State, Fla.App.1963, 160 So.2d 546; Gaston v. . . .

UNITED STATES REIS, v. E. LEPPIG,, 256 F. Supp. 881 (S.D. Fla. 1966)

. . . , that petitioner was not entitled to be declared insolvent within the meaning of Florida Statute § 924.17 . . . appellant may even have regular earnings and yet be insolvent within the meaning of Florida Statute § 924.17 . . . Florida District Court of Appeal, was, and still is, insolvent within the meaning of Florida Statute § 924.17 . . .

FOXWORTH, v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 167 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 1964)

. . . Under Section 924.17, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the petitioner was entitled to an adjudication on the . . . Section 924.17, supra. . . .

DIXON, v. STATE, 163 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . . § 924.17, F.S.A., containing the prescribed oath of insolvency. See Keur v. . . .

KEUR, v. STATE, 160 So. 2d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . However, § 924.17, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., does set forth a form of oath; and an oath in the statutory . . . Pursuant to what is now § 924.17, Florida Statutes, supra, he made an affidavit of insolvency. . . . Having no other property or assets, the defendant was held to be insolvent under § 924.17, supra. . . .

G. BRIZZIE, Jr. v. STATE, 120 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . facts appearing in the record, we are under the opinion that the appellant properly invoked section 924.17 . . .

M. CHAVIGNY, v. STATE, 113 So. 2d 838 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . Chavigny filed in each case an application pursuant to section 924.17, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., seeking . . .

GASTON, v. STATE, 106 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

. . . Appellant, defendant below, applied to the trial court to be adjudged insolvent pursuant to Section 924.17 . . . The test on an inquiry of insolvency under F.S. § 924.17 F.S.A. is whether the applicant, himself, has . . .

ANDERSON, v. STATE, 85 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1956)

. . . Record of Hillsborough County finding the appellant not to be insolvent within the meaning of Section 924.17 . . . Forty-seven ($47.00) , Dollars pep month, and that he is not insolvent within the meaning of Section 924.17 . . . defendant, Lorenzo Anderson, be and he is hereby declared not to be insolvent within the meaning of Section 924.17 . . . reversed with directions to enter an order finding appellant to be insolvent within the meaning of Section 924.17 . . .

RASTRALLI, v. STATE, 76 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 1954)

. . . Thereafter, he sought the benefits of the insolvency statute, section 924.17, Florida Statutes 1951, . . . directions that an order be entered finding the defendant to be insolvent, within the meaning of section 924.17 . . .

LAWRENCE v. STATE, 76 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1954)

. . . directions that an order be entered finding each petitioner to be insolvent within the meaning of Section 924.17 . . .

LOY, v. STATE, 74 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1954)

. . . . § 924.17, F.S.A., and testified as to his insolvency before the trial judge as provided in that statute . . . above, the Court finds: that the defendant, Alton Loy, is not insolvent within the meaning of Section 924.17 . . . order appealed from entitle appellant to an adjudication of insolvency under the provisions of F.S. § 924.17 . . .

OTIS E. HIGGINBOTHAM LESTER HIGGINBOTHAM v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 155 Fla. 274 (Fla. 1944)

. . . Each of the appelllants were adjudged insolvent by the trial court as authorized by Sections 924.17 and . . .

ECKER CONSTITUTING INSTITUTIONAL BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE, v. WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CORP., 318 U.S. 448 (U.S. 1943)

. . . The main lines extend eastward 924.17 miles from Oakland, Calif., to Salt Lake City, Utah, and northward . . .

STATE R. C. CHENEY v. HONORABLE R. H. ROWE,, 152 Fla. 316 (Fla. 1943)

. . . to establish by creditable and satisfactory testimony to the lower court, in conformity with Section 924.17 . . . all the evidence offered by the petitioner and the State of Florida under the provisions of Section 924.17 . . . Section 924.17 supra, is a re-enactment of Section 8468 C.G.L. . . . The construction placed On Section 924.17 supra, should not be such as to complicate or possibly impair . . . The legal sufficiency of the application made under the provisions of Section 924.17, Florida Statutes . . .

In WESTERN PAC. R. CO., 34 F. Supp. 493 (N.D. Cal. 1940)

. . . A main line extends eastward 924.17- miles from Oakland, California, to Salt Lake City, Utah. . . .