Cases from cite.case.law:

TEJADA, v. CADILLAC ESCALADE VIN NO, 267 So. 3d 1032 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . by a law enforcement agency and shall be subject to forfeiture proceedings pursuant to ss. 932.701 - 932.704 . . .

HUDSON, v. CITY OF SUNRISE,, 237 So. 3d 1031 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 932.704(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016) ; see also Sanchez v. . . . determine whether there was probable cause for the seizure.' " (alteration in original) (quoting § 932.704 . . . convincing evidence that the contraband article was being used in violation" of the Forfeiture Act. § 932.704 . . . The person contesting the forfeiture in the second stage is identified in section 932.704 as a "claimant . . . Pursuant to the 2016 amendments to section 932.704(8), the clear and convincing standard was changed . . .

In FORFEITURE OF FORD EXPLORER, No. v. T. M., 203 So. 3d 992 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 932.704(5)(a). . . . See § 932.704(5)(b). No adversarial hearing was requested. . . . Forfeiture Act.” § 932.704(8); see also Gomez, 41 So.3d at 184. . . . reinstate the complaint, enter a finding of probable cause to support the seizure in accord with section 932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF PONTIAC SOLSTICE, No. v. s, 210 So. 3d 78 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . (10), not section 932.704(9). . . . (10) to its interpretation of section 932.704(9). . . . However, to the extent that the Fifth District in Cox interpreted sections 932.704(9)(b) and 932.704( . . . Sections 932.704(9) and 932.704(10) use different language to describe when a claimant may recover damages . . . Attorney’s Fees and Costs under Section 932.704(10) Mr. . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, JACKSONVILLE POLICE FIRE PENSION FUND, v. W. LEE,, 189 So. 3d 120 (Fla. 2016)

. . . providing for attorney’s fees within the Public Records Act without using “good faith” language), with § 932.704 . . .

L. BRADSHAW, v. McCORMICK, Jr., 182 So. 3d 845 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . which may be seized by a law enforcement agency and is subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704 . . . See § 932.704(4), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

J. CONNOLLY, Jr. v. STATE, 172 So. 3d 893 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . otherwise included in paragraph (a), may be seized and is subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704 . . .

MATOS, v. STATE, 190 So. 3d 115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 932.704(4), Fla. . . .

In Re FORFEITURE OF EUROS e v., 170 So. 3d 810 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . He also moved for an award of attorneys’ fees under both section 932.704(10) and section 57.105, of the . . . Cherokee, 898 So.2d 223, 224-25 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (addressing a claim for attorney’s fees under section 932.704 . . . However, we leave it to the court below to determine whether to award fees under section 932.704(10) . . . Section 932.704(10) provides: (10) The court shall award reasonable attorney's fees and costs, up to . . . any party from electing to seek attorney’s fees and costs under chapter 57 or other applicable law. § 932.704 . . .

G. AGRESTA, v. CITY OF MAITLAND,, 159 So. 3d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 932.704(1), Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis added). . . .

SMITH, v. BRUSTER,, 151 So. 3d 511 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . That forfeiture proceedings pursuant to section 932.704, Florida Statutes, had not and would not be followed . . .

SANCHEZ, v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,, 149 So. 3d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . While now codified by sections 932.703 and 932.704, Florida Statutes (2013), this two-step approach to . . . within 90 days of the seizure or by the claimant in an action to recover the property. § 932.703(1), 932.704 . . .

BURNS, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,, 147 So. 3d 95 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . § 932.704(10), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . prejudice Appellants’ motion as it pertains to damages, for Appellants to seek damages pursuant to section 932.704 . . .

MOSTOWICZ, v. J. ISRAEL,, 142 So. 3d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. . . .

B. PATEL, v. STATE, 141 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .; see also §§ 932.701(2)(g) and 932.704, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

WAHEED, v. STATE, 134 So. 3d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . §§ 932.703(2)(b), 932.704(4), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . determines that probable cause exists, a jury trial will be held on the ultimate issue of forfeiture. § 932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF NISSAN MURANO, IDENTIFICATION NO. St. v., 125 So. 3d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . We hold that the requirement in section 932.704(4) to “promptly proceed” with a forfeiture action is . . .

LEWIS, v. RUTHERFORD, In CCR U. S., 117 So. 3d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . trial court’s order, we need not consider whether a settlement was reached that complies with section 932.704 . . . See id. § 932.704(7) ("When the claimant and the seizing law enforcement agency agree to settle the forfeiture . . .

In FORFEITURE OF IN U. S. CURRENCY. LLC, v., 106 So. 3d 47 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 932.704(4)(b). . . . If so, the property is forfeited. § 932.704(8). . . . The specific statute at issue here, section 932.704(9), provides in subsection (a) that “[w]hen the claimant . . . Id. at 414 (citing § 932.704(9)(b)). . . . We reverse the order denying the motion to determine damages under section 932.704(9)(b), and we remand . . .

CITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH, v. D. BERRIO,, 64 So. 3d 713 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . the City filed a verified complaint for final order of forfeiture pursuant to sections 932.701 and 932.704 . . . 11, 2009, the claimant filed a motion for damages, attorney’s fees, and costs pursuant to subsection 932.704 . . . The trial court denied the motion for fees under section 932.704, and Berrio did not appeal that denial . . .

SHERIFF OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, v. OLIVER,, 59 So. 3d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . articles for criminal purposes while protecting the proprietary interests of innocent owners .... ” § 932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF PONTIAC FIREBIRD NO. E. v., 47 So. 3d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 932.704, entitled “Forfeiture proceedings,” provides in part: “The seizing agency shall promptly . . . complaint in the circuit court within the jurisdiction where the seizure or the offense occurred.” § 932.704 . . . We hold that the requirement in section 932.704(4) to “promptly proceed” with a forfeiture action is . . .

HUDSON, v. STATE, 39 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . because the seizing agency failed to file a timely forfeiture complaint in accordance with section 932.704 . . . The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Statute 932.704, as the crimes committed and property . . . Section 932.704, Florida Statutes (2007), entitled “Forfeiture proceedings” provides in part: “(4) The . . . We hold that the requirement in section 932.704(4) to “promptly proceed” with a forfeiture action is . . . In light of sections 932.704(4) and 932.701(2)(c), and DeGregorio, APD had to file its forfeiture complaint . . .

GOMEZ, v. VILLAGE OF PINECREST,, 41 So. 3d 180 (Fla. 2010)

. . . . §§ 932.701(2), 932.704(4), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . Velez, 934 So.2d at 1164 (citing § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (2002)). . . . Section 932.704(9)(b) provides: The trial court shall require the seizing agency to pay to the claimant . . . party from electing to seek attorney’s fees and costs under chapter 57 or other applicable law. ‘ § 932.704 . . .

GOMEZ, v. VILLAGE OF PINECREST, a, 17 So. 3d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Together, the two stages constitute a “Forfeiture proceeding” as described in section 932.704 of the . . . Village of Pinecrest (“Pine-crest”), as the seizing agency, notified Gomez that, pursuant to section 932.704 . . . Section 932.704(9)(b) provides, in pertinent part: The trial court shall require the seizing agency to . . .

H. BRUCE, III, v. BEARY,, 498 F.3d 1232 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 932.704(9)(a). . . . Stat. § 932.704(9)(b). Burger, 482 U.S. at 705-06, 107 S.Ct. 2636. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. S. FREY,, 965 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . issue an order finding probable cause to proceed with the forfeiture proceeding pursuant to section 932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF SEVEN THOUSAND AND DOLLARS UNITED STATES CURRENCY. v. E., 942 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 932.704(4), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . probable cause is established, the property is held until a trial on the ultimate issue of forfeiture. § 932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF CHEVROLET CORVETTE, IDENTIFICATION NO. TAG v. C., 932 So. 2d 623 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . .” § 932.704(5)(b). . . .

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, v. MULLIGAN,, 934 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 2006)

. . . It based this holding upon the language of the FCFA’s policy statement as found in section 932.704, Florida . . . We examine this holding by looking at the history and language of the FCFA, in particular section 932.704 . . . The FCFA was later renumbered to sections 932.701-.704; and, in 1992, section 932.704 was amended to . . . Relying on this policy statement in section 932.704, the Fourth District held that the City’s ordinance . . . Specifically, the Fourth District reasoned that because section 932.704 provides that law enforcement . . .

VELEZ, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT,, 934 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 2006)

. . . . § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . The person contesting the forfeiture in the second stage is identified in section 932.704 as a “claimant . . .

CLARK, v. FORFEITURE OF UNITED STATES CURRENCY AND A GMC TRUCK VIN, 912 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Clark from a forfeiture action under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act (“Act”), sections 932.701-932.704 . . .

A. M. COBB, v. LANGWORTHY,, 909 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . awarded costs and attorney fees to Langworthy’s counsel, together with damages pursuant to section 932.704 . . . Five months later, Langworthy filed a motion for damages and fees, pursuant to section 932.704. . . . See § 932.704(2), Fla. Stat.; Gervais v. City of Melbourne, 890 So.2d 412, 413 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). . . . City of Melbourne, 890 So.2d 412 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). . § 932.704(10), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . . Stat. . § 932.704(10), Fla. Stat. . . . .

ALVAREZ, v. CITY OF HIALEAH,, 900 So. 2d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See also § 932.704(1), Fla. Stat. (2004) providing that: ... . . .

In FORFEITURE OF JEEP CHEROKEE, No. C. v. St., 898 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . complaint, asserting, among other things, a claim for attorney’s fees pursuant to sections 57.105 and 932.704 . . . Allen filed a motion for determination of entitlement to attorney’s fees under sections 932.704 and 57.105 . . . In its order denying fees, the trial court stated that section 932.704(10) permits a court to award reasonable . . . 57.105, we decline to reach the issue as to whether she would also be entitled to fees under section 932.704 . . .

GERVAIS, v. CITY OF MELBOURNE,, 890 So. 2d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 932.704(2), Florida Statutes (2004), indicates that “all civil forfeiture cases shall be heard . . . Section 932.704(9), Florida Statutes (2004), specifically provides for monetary relief, including attorney . . .

CHUCK v. CITY OF HOMESTEAD POLICE DEPARTMENT, 888 So. 2d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Furthermore, section 932.704(1) of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act provides in pertinent part, . . . issue Of forfeiture shall be decided by a jury, unless such right is waived' by the claimant....” § 932.704 . . .

R. COX, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 881 So. 2d 641 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . & HIGHWAY SAFETY, costs of this action, and attorney’s fees, pursuant to Section 57.105 and Section 932.704 . . . He asserts that the counterclaim was compulsory under section 932.704(9), Florida Statutes (2001). . . . The right to damages in a case involving wrongful forfeiture is controlled by section 932.704, Florida . . . Nonetheless, at least some of Cox’s remaining claims do appear to be authorized by section 932.704(9) . . . In any event, our Pondella Hall for Hire case clarified the status of a section 932.704 claim. . . .

CITY OF MIAMI, v. S. WELLMAN,, 875 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 932.704(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . According to section 932.704(1) of the Forfeiture Act, It is the policy of this state that law enforcement . . . agree with the Fourth District in Mulligan that the ordinance conflicts with Forfeiture Act, section 932.704 . . .

PONDELLA HALL FOR HIRE, INC. v. LAMAR,, 866 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . In this count, Pondella alleged that “Section 932.704, Fla. . . . Section 932.704(9)(b), Florida Statutes (1993) provided for the following damages: (b) When the claimant . . . attributed to the continued seizure of income-producing property during the trial or appellate process. § 932.704 . . . The amendments to section 932.704(9)(b) were enacted in Chapter 95-265, Laws of Florida, which stated . . . Under this standard, the amendments to section 932.704(9)(b) were substantive because they expanded the . . .

MULLIGAN, v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD,, 871 So. 2d 249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . .” § 932.704(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . criminal purposes while protecting the proprietary interests of innocent owners and lienholders.... ” § 932.704 . . . Apart from a preemption of the forfeiture area, we also note the ordinance conflicts with FCFA section 932.704 . . .

T. DeGREGORIO, v. F. BALKWILL,, 853 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 2003)

. . . That version of the statute contained, as part of sections 932.703 and 932.704, two provisions which . . . a criminal charge arising in connection with the seizure or a forfeiture action pursuant to section 932.704 . . . seized property subject to forfeiture under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, sections 932.701-932.704 . . . in addressing these concerns, later held that due process was satisfied by the language in section 932.704 . . . Id. § 932.704(1). . . . determine the effect of the deadlines for filing forfeiture complaints that sections 932.701(2)(c) and 932.704 . . . Section 932.704(4) provides: “The seizing agency shall promptly proceed against the contraband article . . . Section 932.704(4) plainly states that the seizing agency “shall promptly proceed against the contraband . . . We hold that the requirement in section 932.704(4) to “promptly proceed” with a forfeiture action is . . . things, the changes added the current definition of “promptly proceed” as the term is used in section 932.704 . . .

TOWN OF OAKLAND, v. D. MERCER,, 851 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 932.704(4), Florida Statutes (2001), requires a seizing agency to “promptly proceed” with a civil . . . While section 932.704(4) requires the seizing agency to “promptly proceed” against the seized property . . . conclude that because the Legislature has not specified a consequence for noncomplianee with section 932.704 . . . It also follows that pursuant to section 932.704(4), Oakland’s complaint to forfeit the truck, filed . . . Section 932.704(4) requires a seizing agency to “promptly proceed” by filing a complaint in order to . . .

ROSADO, S. A. v. W. BIELUCH,, 827 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Appellants filed a Motion for Judgment for Damages against the Sheriff pursuant to section 932.704(9) . . . Karrh, 423 So.2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); § 932.704(2), Fla. . . . We reject appellants’ argument that section 932.704(9) of the forfeiture act,- requiring the seizing . . . Appellants also argue that the final sentence of section 932.704(10) should be interpreted to include . . . We interpret this part of section 932.704(10) to apply to collateral actions brought as a result of the . . .

GONZALEZ, v. CITY OF HOMESTEAD,, 825 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . .” § 932.704(3), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . See §§ 932.701(2)(a), 932.703(1), (6), 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . A forfeiture case proceeds in accordance with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. § 932.704(2), Fla . . .

KRIMSTOCK, v. W. KELLY,, 306 F.3d 40 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 932.704(1) ("It is the policy of this state that law enforcement agencies shall utilize the provisions . . .

ALVAREZ, v. CITY OF PLANTATION,, 824 So. 2d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See §§ 932.704 and 932.701(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (1997). Our supreme court, in English v. . . .

F. TEJADA, v. In FORFEITURE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN U. S. CURRENCY,, 820 So. 2d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 932.704(c), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . and affirmative defenses within 20 days after receipt of the complaint and probable cause finding. § 932.704 . . .

In LINCOLN TOWN CAR, VIN VIN F. v. T., 826 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . proceeding within forty-five days after the seizure, as required by sections 932.701(2)(e), 932.703(3), and 932.704 . . . Section 932.704(4), Florida Statutes (1999), requires that the seizing agency “promptly proceed against . . .

BUTLER, v. CITY OF MELBOURNE POLICE DEPARTMENT,, 812 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (1995). Butler’s later appeal of the order was untimely, see Butler v. . . .

CLOUD, v. STATE, 810 So. 2d 573 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 932.704(4). . . . . § 932.704(5)(c). . . . . Highway Patrol petitioned for forfeiture of this money in the circuit court in compliance with section 932.704 . . .

GONZALEZ, v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD,, 805 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 932.704(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . . See id. § 932.704(5)(c). . . . . § 932.704(6)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .

CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS, v. FORFEITURE OF A FORD RANGER PICKUP TRUCK VIN FL TAG, 803 So. 2d 847 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See §§ 932.701(2)(g), 932.704, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

OCEAN BANK, v. SAVE IMPORT AND EXPORT, INC., 797 So. 2d 609 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . was void where the bank had not been served with process pursuant to the Forfeiture Statute, section 932.704 . . . (Emphasis added) § 932.704(6)(a), Fla. Slat. (1997). . . . .

CREPAGE, v. CITY OF LAUDERHILL,, 774 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . filed a forfeiture complaint and verified supporting affidavits pursuant to sections 932.701 through 932.704 . . . Under section 932.704(4), Florida Statutes, the seizing agency must file the complaint within forty-five . . .

In FORFEITURE OF FORD PICKUP, IDENTIFICATION NO. E. v., 779 So. 2d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, v. ZABIELINSKI,, 785 So. 2d 517 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . First, section 328.05(3)(e) provides that the forfeiture is pursuant to sections 932.701-932.704, Florida . . . Therefore, section 328.05(3)(c) must be construed in pari materia with sections 932.701-932.704. . . . Section 932.704(1) provides that the policy of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act is to “deter and . . . enforcement agency, or the division, and which shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704 . . .

GAY, v. BEARY,, 758 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . which denied her motion for attorney’s fees in a forfeiture proceeding filed pursuant to subsection 932.704 . . . Thereafter, Gay moved for an award of attorney’s fees, costs and interest pursuant to subsection 932.704 . . . Subsection 932.704(10), Florida Statutes (1997) provides: When the claimant prevails, at the close of . . . The trial court denied Gay’s request for attorney’s fees based on subsection 932.704(10). . . . Subsection 932.704(9)(b) makes no reference to that provision and section 55.03 applies expressly and . . .

J. GOLON, v. JENNE,, 739 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Florida Statute section 932.704(1)(1997) provides in part that: It is also the policy of this state that . . . See 588 So.2d at 966-67; see also § 932.704, Fla. Stat. . . .

FLORIDA v. WHITE, 526 U.S. 559 (U.S. 1999)

. . . . § 932.704(1) (1997); cf. United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property, 510 U. . . . seized property until such rights, interest, and title are “perfected” in accordance with the statute); §932.704 . . . Stat. §932.704(1) (1997), also distinguish more mundane and temporary vehicle seizures performed for . . .

In FORFEITURE OF ONE HONDA PRELUDE v., 730 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 932.704, Florida Statutes (1997) requires the seizing agency to “promptly proceed” in its forfeiture . . . Because respondent failed to “promptly proceed” in its forfeiture of the vehicle as required by section 932.704 . . .

METIVER, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLES O. III, F., 720 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Metiver, 684 So.2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), Appellants sought attorney’s fees pursuant to § 932.704(10 . . . action which precipitated the forfeiture proceedings was a gross abuse of the agency’s discretion.” § 932.704 . . .

SEA SERVICES OF THE KEYS, INC. a d. b. a. v. STATE OF FLORIDA,, 156 F.3d 1151 (11th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 932.704(8); see also United States v. 92 Buena Vista Avenue, 507 U.S. 111, 125-26, 113 S.Ct. 1126 . . .

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, v. BARUCH,, 718 So. 2d 843 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See §§ 932.703(2)(a),(b), 932.704(5)(b). . . . See §§ 932.701(2)(h), 932.704, Fla. Stat. (1995); Cochran v. . . . determination as if no person entitled to notice had requested a preliminary hearing, pursuant to section 932.704 . . .

WHITE, v. STATE, 710 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 1998)

. . . . § 932.704(1), Fla. Stat. (1983). 479 So.2d at 110. . . .

COCHRAN, v. JONES, 707 So. 2d 791 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . to forfeiture by a seizing law enforcement agency, pursuant to applicable provisions of ss. 932.701-932.704 . . . to forfeiture by a seizing law enforcement agency, pursuant to applicable provisions of ss. 932.701-932.704 . . .

KERN, v. STATE, 706 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 932.704(3), Fla. . . . See also § 932.704(2) (all civil forfeiture cases to be heard before a circuit judge of the civil division . . . If the state wishes to forfeit the property, it must file forfeiture proceedings pursuant to section 932.704 . . . (emphasis added) . § 932.704(4), Fla. Sat. (1997). . § 932.701(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

STATE v. SOBIECK,, 701 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . .” § 932.704(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). . . . before a circuit judge in the civil division with the Florida Rules of Civil procedure governing. § 932.704 . . . And the seizing agency proceeds against the contraband article by filing a complaint. § 932.704(4), Fla . . . Notice must be given to persons who may claim an interest in the subject property. § 932.704(5), Fla. . . . that the contraband article was being used in violation of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. § 932.704 . . .

MUNOZ, v. CITY OF CORAL GABLES,, 695 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See § 932.704(6)(a) and (c), Fla. . . . Section 932.704(6)(a) and (c) provide in relevant part that: (6)(a) If the property is required by law . . .

GARCELL, v. R. HOLDER,, 689 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Garcell then scheduled a hearing on his motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to section 932.704(10), Florida . . .

STATE v. LLEWELLYN,, 682 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . After the felony charges were filed, the Sheriff of Orange County filed a complaint pursuant to section 932.704 . . .

B. MURROW, v. OSCEOLA COUNTY,, 679 So. 2d 883 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 932.704(3), Florida Statutes (1995) provides: Any trial on the ultimate issue of forfeiture shall . . .

WHITE, v. STATE, 680 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . constitutionally mandated prior to a seizure pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, sections 932.701-932.704 . . .

FULLWOOD, v. OSCEOLA COUNTY INVESTIGATIVE BUREAU,, 672 So. 2d 614 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . The applicable statute governing forfeiture proceedings, section 932.704, Florida Statutes (1993), provides . . . : § 932.704 Forfeiture proceedings.— (4) The seizing agency shall promptly proceed against the contraband . . .

In FORFEITURE OF STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE v. McCLUSTER Sr., 668 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with section 932.704. . . . See §§ 932.704(8)-(9)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

ALLEN, v. COMBINED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST NARCOTICS C. L. E. A. N., 650 So. 2d 144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 932.704(3), Florida Statutes (1993), provides as follows: Any trial on the ultimate issue of . . .

HICKS, v. CITY OF HIALEAH, In FORFEITURE OF IN U. S. CURRENCY, ETC, 647 So. 2d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Id.; see also id. § 932.704(6)(b). . . . . § 932.704(6)(a), (b), and does not address the method of service of process to be employed in serving . . . clarification. (1) Paragraph 932.704(6)(a) refers to "notice of the forfeiture complaint” and implies . . . Paragraph 932.704(6)(b) specifies the contents of the notice, contains a cross-reference to paragraph . . . (Emphasis added). (2) The first sentence of paragraph 932.704(6)(a) refers to title holders, owners, . . .

In FORFEITURE OF ONE FOOT HATTERAS VESSEL, II No. COCHRAN, v. ROSCIOLI YACHT SALES, INC., 642 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . law enforcement agency or the division, and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704 . . .

UNITED STATES v. IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, PLUS INTEREST,, 1 F.3d 1146 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 932.704; see also Department of Law Enforcement v. . . . court must enter a “final order of forfeiture,” or otherwise direct disposition of the property. § 932.704 . . .

C. BYROM, v. GALLAGHER,, 609 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1992)

. . . The Fifth District Court of Appeal found that section 932.704(1), Florida Statutes (1987), allowed Sheriff . . .

A. FINK, v. D. HOLT,, 609 So. 2d 1333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Although section 932.704(1), Florida Statutes (1991), provides that the seizing authority “shall promptly . . . See §§ 932.701-932.704, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . .

In FORFEITURE OF CHEVROLET, VIN COBBS, v. JOHNSON, Co., 605 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . state attorney proceeded against it in circuit court by rule to show cause, as prescribed in section 932.704 . . .

METRO- DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DADE COUNTY, v. HIDALGO,, 601 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . faced with a challenge to the facial validity of Florida’s Contraband Forfeiture Act, sections 932.701-932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF FORD RANGER PICKUP TRUCK,, 598 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 1992)

. . . statute provides as follows: (2) No property shall be forfeited under the provisions of ss. 932.701-932.704 . . .

J. PERRY, St. v. BOYNTON, Jr., 595 So. 2d 267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . . § 932.701-932.704, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

In FORFEITURE UNITED STATES CURRENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF NINETY- ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY- SEVEN AND DOLLARS, 595 So. 2d 998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . that, (3) No bona fide lienholder’s interest shall be forfeited under the provisions of ss. 932.701-932.704 . . . court by ordering the lienholder’s interest to be paid from such proceeds of the sale as provided in s. 932.704 . . .

FIRST COAST RESTAURANTS, INC. v. L. VOGEL, Jr., 592 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . as contraband by a law enforcement agency and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF OLDSMOBILE, VIN, 593 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . providing that the innocent owner’s property cannot be “forfeited under the provisions of ss. 932.701-932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF PIPER NAVAJO, MODEL PA- S N- U. S. REGISTRATON N-, 592 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 1992)

. . . as contraband by a law enforcement agency and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704 . . . , on Judiciary-Criminal, CS for HB 1467 (1987), Staff Analysis (revised May 25, 1987). . §§ 932.701-932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF ONE CESSNA T A, SERIAL NUMBER, 587 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Sections 932.701-932.704, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . as contraband by a law enforcement agency and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704 . . . contraband property by a law enforcement agency and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704 . . .

M. BENEDETTI, v. STATE, 584 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . before claiming property by forfeiture, the state must file forfeiture proceedings pursuant to section 932.704 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, v. REAL PROPERTY,, 588 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 1991)

. . . . § 932.704(1). . . . Id. § 932.704(3). . . . Short title; definition of “contraband article”.— (1) Sections 932.701-932.704 shall be known and may . . . be cited as the “Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act.” (2) As used in ss. 932.701-932.704, “contraband . . . (3)(a). 932.704. . . .

CITY OF CORAL GABLES, v. VALDES,, 582 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . it to return personal property seized pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act (§§ 932.701-932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF TEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED EIGHTY- EIGHT DOLLARS IN U. S. CURRENCY. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, v. LAZZARA Jr., 580 So. 2d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 932.704(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . We agree that this same standard should apply to determine “due proof” under section 932.704, Florida . . .

In FORFEITURE OF FORD RANGER PICKUP TRUCK, VIN FLORIDA LICENSE DPU U. S., 582 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . provides, in part, as follows: (2) No property shall be forfeited under the provisions of ss. 932.701-932.704 . . . activity. (3) No bona fide lienholder’s interest shall be forfeited under the provisions of ss. 932.701-932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF ONE VELOCITY GO- FAST VESSEL, H. I. N FL TCTR V. I. N., 577 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . law enforcement agency or the division, and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704 . . . Section 932.704 provides, in relevant part: The state attorney ... shall promptly proceed against the . . . , section 932.703(2) provides: No property shall be forfeited under the provisions of ss. 932.701 — 932.704 . . .

LAMBOY v. METRO- DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT,, 575 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . .-701-932.704, Florida Statutes (1989), known as the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. . . .

In FORFEITURE OF ONE SEAHAWK CIGARETTE VESSEL,, 572 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . means of said property, or said property is “personal property” as defined by Sections 932.701 through 932.704 . . . law enforcement agency or the division, and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704 . . .

In FORFEITURE OF DIONEFF v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES,, 571 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . .-701-932.704, Florida Statutes (1987), the “Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act” (hereinafter the “Act . . . “Contraband article” is defined in Section 932.701(2)(a): (2) As used in ss. 932.701-932.704, “contraband . . .

CITY OF CORAL GABLES, v. RODRIGUEZ,, 568 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . The Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, sections 932.701-932.704, Florida Statutes, provides for the seizure . . .