Cases from cite.case.law:

RUSS, Jr. v. STATE, 185 So. 3d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Nelson, 542 So.2d 1043, 1045 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); see also § 933.05, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

DAVIS, v. STATE, 153 So. 3d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .” § 933.05, Fla. Stat (2010). . . .

INGRAHAM, v. STATE, 811 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . The motion argued in part that the search warrant was insufficient on its face because section 933.05 . . .

STATE v. TAYLOR,, 784 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Furthermore, section 933.05, Florida Statutes (1999), requires that an executed warrant be returned within . . .

B. POWER, Jr. v. STATE, 605 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 1992)

. . . State, 222 So.2d 3, 5 (Fla.1969); § 933.05, Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .

STATE v. GAYLE,, 573 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Further, sections 933.05 and 933.07, Florida Statutes, require only that the warrant itself must describe . . .

K. CLAPSADDLE, v. STATE, 545 So. 2d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 933.05, Florida Statutes (1981), only requires that the place or thing to be searched be described . . .

STATE v. WADE, Jr., 544 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . .; § 933.05, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

PEREZ, v. STATE, 521 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . I, § 12; § 933.05, Fla.Stat. (1985); Carlton v. State, 449 So.2d 250 (Fla.1984); see also Sims v. . . .

SIMS, v. STATE, 483 So. 2d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Constitution, Amendment 4; Florida Constitution, Article I, Section 12; Sections 933.04, 933.05, Florida . . .

STATE v. CARSON, 482 So. 2d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . warrant was facially defective, in that the place to be searched was not described as required by section 933.05 . . . As such, we hold that the warrant in the present case was legally sufficient under section 933.05 and . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. FRANQUE, 10 Fla. Supp. 2d 81 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . reaffirmed the requirement of Article I, Section 12, Florida Constitution (1968) and Florida Statute 933.05 . . . affidavit which particularly describes the place to be searched and the person and thing to be seized. 933.05 . . .

SPERA, v. STATE, 467 So. 2d 329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . § 933.05, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

CARLTON, v. STATE, 449 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1984)

. . . This constitutional mandate has been further amplified by the Florida legislature in section 933.05, . . .

HARDEN, v. STATE, 433 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Fla. 3d DCA 1971) (failure to make return of seized property within ten days as required by section 933.05 . . .

STATE v. HAUGEE,, 402 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 933.05, Florida Statutes (1979), requires the warrant to name or describe “the person, place . . .

SUAREZ, v. STATE, 400 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See also § 933.05 Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(h)(l)(3). We find that it does not. . . .

PEZZELLA, v. STATE, 390 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Section 933.05 of the Florida Statutes (1977) redundantly contains a similar prohibition. . . .

S. GERARDI, Jr. v. STATE, 307 So. 2d 853 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . addressee at a private dwelling on a specific future date which is within the 10 day time limit set by § 933.05 . . .

CAIN v. STATE, 287 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1973)

. . . . § 933.05, F.S.A., prohibits the issuance of a search warrant in blank. Jackson v. . . .

BLOOM, v. STATE, 283 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . This constitutional command is further amplified by Section 933.05, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which specifically . . .

STATE v. CAIN, 272 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . Evidence was suppressed because the search warrant was “issued in blank in violation of Section 933.05 . . . Fla.Stat. § 933.05 (1971), F.S.A. . 1947. 202 Miss. 233, 31 So.2d 127. . Bell v. . . .

STATE v. FEATHERSTONE,, 246 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . Section 933.05, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. requires that the warrant be returned within ten days after its issuance . . .

STATE v. COOK,, 213 So. 2d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . officers executing the warrant and consequently violated both the letter and spirit of Fla.Stat., § 933.05 . . . See Fla.Stat., §§ 933.04 and 933.05, F.S.A. . . .

L. CARTER, v. STATE, 199 So. 2d 324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Section 933.05 F.S.A. prohibits issuance of a search warrant “except upon probable cause supported by . . .

BYERS, v. STATE, 109 So. 2d 382 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . used as a subterfuge in an effort to evade the Constitution of the State of Florida, Sections 933.04, 933.05 . . .