Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. STOUFFER,, 248 So. 3d 1165 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 933.06, Florida Statutes (2011), states: The judge must, before issuing the warrant, have the . . . See id. ; §§ 933.06, 933.18, Fla. Stat. . . .

MORENO- GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 67 So. 3d 1020 (Fla. 2011)

. . . Detective Hernandez had failed to fully sign the affidavit on the line provided as required by section 933.06 . . . tending to establish the grounds of the application or probable cause for believing that they exist. § 933.06 . . . Therefore, the affidavit did not comply with section 933.06. . . . Florida Statutes (2007), should preclude invalidation of the warrant for failure to comply with section 933.06 . . . For purposes of remand, we note that noncompliance with section 933.06 was not the sole basis for the . . .

STATE v. MORENO- GONZALEZ,, 18 So. 3d 1180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 933.06, Fla. . . . Florida law requires that the application for the search warrant be signed. § 933.06, Fla. . . .

R. MYLOCK, v. STATE, 750 So. 2d 144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . sworn affidavit as expressly required by Article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution and sections 933.06 . . . required by the express language in Article I, section 12, of the Florida Constitution and sections 933.06 . . . .2d 422, 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), and has done so by enacting the affidavit requirements in sections 933.06 . . .

TRANSAMERICAN REFINING CORP. v. DRAVO CORP., 139 F.R.D. 619 (S.D. Tex. 1991)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, 933.06 at 33-33 (2d ed. 1982); Andrulonis v. . . .

BONILLA, v. STATE, 579 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Compare: Section 933.06 of the Florida Statutes (1989) which provides that, in reviewing an application . . .

STATE v. GAYLE,, 573 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Sections 933.06 and 933.07 require the issuing magistrate to have affidavits or other proof before him . . .

L. NERSETH, W. J. v. UNITED STATES, 17 Cl. Ct. 660 (Cl. Ct. 1989)

. . . Plaintiff McChesney is requesting overtime pay in the total amount of $933.06 for pay periods 14 through . . . He seeks compensation in the amount of $933.06. . . .

HOWARD, v. STATE, 483 So. 2d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . 465 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) the affiant had not taken the requisite oath, pursuant to section 933.06 . . .

STATE v. L. BERNIE J., 472 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . .; § 933.06, Fla. Stat. (1983). . . .

COLLINS, v. STATE, 465 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 933.06, Florida Statutes (1983), as well as our federal and Florida Constitutions, require a . . . Section 933.06, Florida Statutes (1983), provides: Sworn application required before issuance. . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. HEPLER, 6 Fla. Supp. 2d 86 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1984)

. . . Florida Statute 933.06 requires that the affidavit must set forth “the facts tending to establish the . . .

STATE v. TOLMIE,, 421 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The statute in question, Section 933.06, Florida Statutes (1981), provides: The judge or magistrate must . . . Section 933.06, Florida Statutes (1981), mandates that, before the warrant issues, some person must subscribe . . . LETTS, Chief Judge, dissenting: Section 933.06, Florida Statutes (1979), provides: The judge or magistrate . . .

SWARTZ v. STATE, 316 So. 2d 618 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 933.06, which deals with applications for search warrants in general provides : “The judge or magistrate . . . its face, the State further urges that since the “premises” to be searched is an automobile, F.S. § 933.06 . . . Appellants counter by calling to our attention that F.S. § 933.06 (as well as F.S. § 933.18) was passed . . . We arrive at the inescapable conclusion, therefore, that insofar as F.S. § 933.06 might be construed . . .

STATE v. WOLFF, Jr., 310 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 1975)

. . . provision with the statutory section applicable to all search warrant affidavits, specifically Section 933.06 . . . witness” in Section 933.18, Florida Statutes, meaningfully distinguishes that statute from Section 933.06 . . .

SINGLETARY, v. STATE, 290 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Section 933.06, F.S.A. . RCrP Rule 3.121(a)(7). . . .

WOLFF, Jr. v. STATE, 291 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . this provision with the section applicable to affidavits for other search warrants (Fla.Stat. section 933.06 . . . that the State is not permitted to support the affidavit with additional evidence, as permitted by § 933.06 . . .

FIXEL, v. STATE, 256 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . . § 933.06. . . .

STATE v. LEWIS, STATE v. LEWIS,, 225 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . The anonymity of the informant can still be protected; and I do not construe § 933.06, F.S.A. as making . . .

E. PANZAVECCHIA, v. STATE, 201 So. 2d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . However, the State contended that, pursuant to the provisions of § 933.06, Fla. . . . We agree with the appellant. § 933.06 and § 933.18, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., were originally enacted at the . . . same Session of the Legislature. § 933.06, Fla. . . . that the State is not permitted to support the affidavit with additional evidence, as permitted by § 933.06 . . . Reversed and remanded with directions. . “§ 933.06 Sworn application required before issuance. — The . . .

L. CARTER, v. STATE, 199 So. 2d 324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Section 933.06 F.S.A. requires sworn affidavits and possibly “further testimony” tending to “establish . . .

F. HAMELMANN, v. STATE, 113 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . . § 933.06, F.S.A. .162 A.L.R. 1414 et seq. . . .

BYERS, v. STATE, 109 So. 2d 382 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . subterfuge in an effort to evade the Constitution of the State of Florida, Sections 933.04, 933.05 and 933.06 . . .

JAMES B. NORTH, SR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 159 Fla. 854 (Fla. 1947)

. . . Section 933.06 Florida Statutes 1941 prescribes that: “The judge or magistrate must, before issuing the . . .

MANUEL CARLOS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, 155 Fla. 740 (Fla. 1945)

. . . In support of these contentions counsel cites Sections 933.04, 933.06 and 933.07 F.S. and also one of . . .