Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. STOUFFER,, 248 So. 3d 1165 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 933.07(1), Florida Statutes, provides: The judge, upon examination of the application and proofs . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 130 So. 3d 757 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . IV; § 933.07(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

LIMBAUGH, v. STATE, 887 So. 2d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 933.07(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . And the presence of one actual limitation in subsection (2) of 933.07(1) demonstrates beyond any quibble . . . See § 933.07, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . We know from the addition of the citrus canker provision to section 933.07(2) that the Legislature is . . . See § 933.07(1), Fla. Stat. (2003) (providing for issuance of search warrants); § 933.02(3), Fla. . . . With regard to search and seizure, section 933.07(1), Florida Statutes (2003), authorizes the search . . . See § 933.07(2), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

M. HAIRE, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v., 870 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 2004)

. . . The Fourth District further concluded that section 933.07(2), Florida Statutes (2003), which authorizes . . . Although the State does not appeal the determination that section 933.07(2) is unconstitutional, the . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v. M. A. HAIRE, B. M., 836 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . property; (3) if search warrants are required, whether area-wide search warrants authorized under section 933.07 . . . that section 581.184 does not violate due process and is therefore constitutional, but that section 933.07 . . . The court held section 933.07(2) unconstitutional. . . . Second, it contends that section 933.07(2) authorizes area-wide administrative search warrants. . . . We hold that section 933.07(2), providing for area-wide warrants, is unconstitutional and a violation . . .

STATE v. VIATICAL SERVICES, INC., 741 So. 2d 560 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 933.07, Flat Stat. (1997). . . . The issuance of search warrants is governed by section 933.07, Florida Statutes (1997), which provides . . .

STATE v. GAYLE,, 573 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Further, sections 933.05 and 933.07, Florida Statutes, require only that the warrant itself must describe . . . Sections 933.06 and 933.07 require the issuing magistrate to have affidavits or other proof before him . . .

STATE v. NELSON,, 542 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . State, 508 So.2d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); §§ 933.07 & 933.11, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

BENSON, v. STATE, 526 So. 2d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . See §§ 933.04, 933.07. . . . Section 933.07 provides for warrants “to search ... the person named, for the property specified.” . . .

STATE v. GRIFFIS,, 502 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Quigg, 154 Fla. 348, 17 So.2d 697 (1944), but argues that sections 933.07 and 933.08, Florida Statutes . . . It is true that section 933.07 authorizes a judge to issue a search warrant to “any police officer.” . . . Section 933.07 provides: Issuance of search warrants. — The judge, upon examination of the application . . .

RYALS, Sr. v. STATE, 498 So. 2d 1365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 933.07, Florida Statutes (1985), requires a finding of probable cause before a judge can issue . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. LABRADA,, 13 Fla. Supp. 2d 111 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . Section 933.07-.08, Florida Statutes. . . . Search warrants are directed only to law enforcement officers, Section 933.07, Florida Statutes. . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. HEPLER, 6 Fla. Supp. 2d 86 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1984)

. . . F.S. 933.07. . . .

STATE v. HAUGEE,, 402 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 933.07, Florida Statutes (1979), provides the warrant is “to search the property described in . . .

STEWART, v. STATE, 389 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Section 933.07, Florida Statutes (1979), governs the issuance of a search warrant. . . . Consequently, the warrant did not comply with section 933.07. . . . The court reasoned that section 933.07 mandated the signing of the warrant and that strict compliance . . . that the deputy who served the search warrant was among that class of persons authorized by section 933.07 . . .

STATE v. RUSSO, Jr., 389 So. 2d 213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . specifically requiring that the seized property be brought before the court as required by Subsection 933.07 . . .

C. KAPLAN, v. STATE, 347 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Sections 933.04 and 933.07, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

THOMPSON, v. STATE, 342 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 1976)

. . . See § 933.07, Fla.Stat. (1975), permitting the issuance of search warrants “to any sheriff and his deputies . . .

JOHNSON v. STATE, 339 So. 2d 667 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . failure of Judge Knowles to affix a seal or the name of her office to the search warrant pursuant to § 933.07 . . .

T. MARTIN, v. STATE, 344 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Section 933.07, F.S.1973, requires that, upon sufficient application, a committing magistrate shall “ . . . are of the view that the failure of the issuing magistrate to sign an original warrant pursuant to § 933.07 . . .

PURCELL, v. STATE, 325 So. 2d 83 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . their contents simply was not authorized by the Constitution or by the warrant which, pursuant to § 933.07 . . .

STATE v. LAISER,, 322 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1975)

. . . other Court having jurisdiction of the offense, to be dealt with according to law. . . . ” Section 933.07 . . . The language of the warrant in this case substantially complied with the requirement of Section 933.07 . . .

STATE v. RICHARDSON,, 318 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Neither sec. 933.07, F.S., nor the decision in Laiser v. . . .

STATE v. PHILLIP, 311 So. 2d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 933.07. . . . to keep seized property in their possession, does not satisfy by implication the mandate of F.S. § 933.07 . . .

STATE v. JONES,, 307 So. 2d 456 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 933.07, requiring that the property be brought before the magistrate. . . .

ALFORD, v. STATE, 307 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 1975)

. . . . § 933.07, F.S. . . .

STATE v. HERNANDEZ,, 42 Fla. Supp. 199 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1974)

. . . was issued by the Honorable Edward Cowart, circuit judge; said warrant, pursuant to Florida Statute §933.07 . . . warrant in accordance with the express command of the warrant itself as well as the provisions of §933.07 . . . Unless the strictures of §933.07 are obeyed, such a determination cannot be made to the prejudice of . . . Schectman, 291 So.2d 259, 261 (Fla. 4th Dist. 1974), a strict construction of §933.07 mandates that “ . . . magistrate issuing the warrant or some other court having jurisdiction of the offense as prescribed by §933.07 . . .

LAISER, v. STATE, 299 So. 2d 39 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . search warrant and where said search warrant failed to command the executing officer, pursuant to F.S. 933.07 . . . (emphasis supplied) F.S. § 933.07 (1973) provides: “. . . Issuance of search warrants. . . . has urged that the phrase, “to be disposed of according to law” satisfies the requirements of F.S. 933.07 . . . A strict construction of Section 933.07 suggests that it is only the ‘property specified’ . . . that . . .

D. NOFS, v. STATE, 295 So. 2d 308 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . § 933.07, F.S.A. . . .

STATE v. SCHECTMAN,, 291 So. 2d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . warrant bring the person in possession thereof (jewelry) before the magistrate as prescribed by Section 933.07 . . . Section 933.07, in authorizing the issuance of search warrants, provides as follows: “933.07 Issuance . . . A strict construction of Section 933.07 and a strict conformity thereto suggests that it is only the . . . In our view, the decision in Dawson is inconsistent with the clear pronouncement of Section 933.07. . . . In our opinion Section 933.07 does not require that the search warrant contain a command to bring before . . .

STATE v. B. DAWSON, III,, 276 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . issuing the warrant or some other court having jurisdiction of the offense as prescribed by Section 933.07 . . .

R. NICHOLS, a k a v. STATE, 231 So. 2d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . . § 933.07, F.S.A., requires that the search warrant command the officer serving the same to search the . . .

STATE v. LEWIS, STATE v. LEWIS,, 225 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . issuing magistrate to reduce such testimony to writing if it is cumulative to the affiant’s, nor does § 933.07 . . .

L. CARTER, v. STATE, 199 So. 2d 324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Section 933.07 F.S.A. fixes the judicial duty upon the judge or magistrate to examine the application . . .

JOYNER, v. CITY OF LAKELAND, a, 90 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1956)

. . . . § 933.07, F.S.A. which provides in part as follows: “The judge or magistrate * * shall thereupon issue . . .

MELTON, v. STATE, 75 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1954)

. . . .-06, 933.07; Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A. 47 Am.Jur.,, Searches and Seizures, Sec. 3; Cornelius, Search . . .

JAMES B. NORTH, SR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 159 Fla. 854 (Fla. 1947)

. . . Section 933.07 Florida Statutes 1941 provides that “The judge or magistrate, upon examination of the . . .

MARION F. JOHNSON, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 157 Fla. 685 (Fla. 1946)

. . . See sub-paragraph (b) of Sec. 933.02 and Sec. 933.07 Fla. Statutes 1941 (same F.S.A.). . . .

MANUEL CARLOS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, 155 Fla. 740 (Fla. 1945)

. . . In support of these contentions counsel cites Sections 933.04, 933.06 and 933.07 F.S. and also one of . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA DAISY WILSON, v. H. LESLIE QUIGG, a, 154 Fla. 348 (Fla. 1944)

. . . The Circuit Judge, in his opinion, lays emphasis on the last clause of this Section 933.07, above quoted . . .