The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 933
SEARCH AND INSPECTION WARRANTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 933.20

933.20 “Inspection warrant”; definition.—As used in ss. 933.20-933.30, “inspection warrant” means an order in writing, in the name of the people, signed by a person competent to issue search warrants pursuant to s. 933.01, and directed to a state or local official, commanding him or her to conduct an inspection required or authorized by state or local law or rule relating to municipal or county building, fire, safety, environmental, animal control, land use, plumbing, electrical, health, minimum housing, or zoning standards.

History.—s. 1, ch. 82-8; s. 18, ch. 89-268; s. 1577, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 933.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 933.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 933.20

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 933.20

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 933.20.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SWEET SAGE CAF LLC, LLC, LLC, v. TOWN OF NORTH REDINGTON BEACH, FLORIDA,, 380 F. Supp. 3d 1209 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . . §§ 933.20 - 933.30. . . .

LUSH APARTMENTS, LLC, v. CITY OF LAUDERHILL,, 711 F. App'x 522 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . standards for conducting an inspection are set out in the Ordinance (including Schedule M) and in §§ 933.20 . . .

OHIO STATE CONFERENCE OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, v. HUSTED,, 43 F. Supp. 3d 808 (S.D. Ohio 2014)

. . . the Madison County Board, states that if Golden Week is reinstated, it will cost the Board-at least $933.20 . . . estimates for reinstating Golden Week ($8,000 to $12,000 in staffing costs alone for Hamilton County: $933.20 . . .

MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, v. CONCRETE STRUCTURES, INC., 114 So. 3d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Third, CSI asserts that the Florida statutes pertaining to “inspection warrants,” sections 933.20-933.30 . . . rights of access and inspection by obtaining administrative “inspection warrants” as defined in section 933.20 . . .

BRINKLEY v. COUNTY OF FLAGLER,, 769 So. 2d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . §§ 828.17 and 933.20 (1997). . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, v. V. M. R. INC. d b a s s, 591 So. 2d 944 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See §§ 933.20-933.30, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

In BLAKENEY, BLAKENEY, v. BENEFACT MORTGAGE, USA,, 126 B.R. 449 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1991)

. . . the sheriff, and agreed to reduce the “Sheriff-Deposit with Sale” figure on the proof of claim to $933.20 . . . The attorneys’ fees and sheriff’s costs have been reduced, by stipulation of Benefact, to $300 and $933.20 . . .

In NEWBURY STREET, INC., 75 B.R. 650 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1987)

. . . .$ 933.20 d. . . . Debtor received a second notice to quit for failure to pay water and sewer charges in the amount of $933.20 . . .

In TELTRONICS SERVICES, INC. ANACONDA- ERICSSON, INC. LM v. J. HESSEN,, 29 B.R. 139 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . Tr. 172.21-180.7 (SGM), 933.20-934.12 (DMC), 2306.13-2307.23 (REH); exh. 386-388; see “Plaintiff’s Further . . .