The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . electronic recording did not fall within any of the situations permitting interception delineated in Section 934.08 . . .
. . . for an Order Authorizing Interception of Wire, Oral and Electronic Communications pursuant to section 934.08 . . .
. . . Nationwide also paid $934.08 for "contents covered damages” minus a $500.00 deductible. . . .
. . . . § 934.08(4) (1997). . . .
. . . evidence is inadmissible in such proceedings because its use is not affirmatively authorized by section 934.08 . . .
. . . Court finds that the projected income, including government subsidies, from these three crops of $154,-934.08 . . .
. . . Section 2517(5) and Section 934.08(5) 18 U.S.C. Section 2517(5) [18 USCS §2517(5)] and F.S. . . . Section 934.08(5) provide for the possibility that law enforcement officials conducting a wiretap may . . . Section 934.08(5). . . . Section 934.08(5) is a situation where the state legislature has enacted an extremely narrow exception . . . Under Section 934.08(5) evidence of another offense (RICO) obtained by a properly authorized wiretap . . .
. . . For example see Florida Statutes, Section 905.24 (grand jury proceedings); Section 934.08 (information . . .
. . . improper disclosure of an intercepted wire or oral communication, in violation of Sections 934.10 and 934.08 . . . Section 934.08(3). . . . However, playing such a tape to persons other than those authorized in Section 934.08(3) constitutes . . .
. . . . § 934.08(5). . . . .
. . . Duplicate recordings may be made for use or disclosure pursuant to the provisions of § 934.08(1) and . . . disclosure of the contents of any wire or oral communication or evidence derived therefrom under § 934.08 . . .
. . . .” § 934.08(3), Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .
. . . Duplicate recordings may be made for use or disclosure pursuant to the provisions of s. 934.08(1) and . . .
. . . . § 2517(3); Florida Statutes § 934.08(3), F.S.A. . . . Fla.Stat. § 934.08, F.S.A. provides in part: (3) Any person who has received, by any means authorized . . .
. . . The petitioners have assigned as error the inclusion in the gross estate by the Commissioner of $934.08 . . .