Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 938.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 938.06 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 938.06

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 938
COURT COSTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 938.06
938.06 Cost for crime stoppers programs.
(1) In addition to any fine prescribed by law, when a person is convicted of any criminal offense, the county or circuit court shall assess a court cost of $20.
(2) The clerk of the court shall collect and forward, on a monthly basis, all costs assessed under this section, less $3 per assessment as a service charge to be retained by the clerk, to the Department of Revenue for deposit in the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund, to be used as provided in s. 16.555.
(3) As used in this section, the term “convicted” means a determination of guilt that is the result of a trial or the entry of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, regardless of whether adjudication is withheld.
History.s. 1, ch. 98-319; s. 22, ch. 2001-122; s. 125, ch. 2003-402; s. 31, ch. 2010-162.

F.S. 938.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 938.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 938.06


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 938.06
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 938.06.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

B. TALBOT, v. STATE, 159 So. 3d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . on the fine pursuant to section 938.04, (4) imposing a $20 surcharge on the fine pursuant to section 938.06 . . . 775.083, Florida Statutes (2009), and the surcharges imposed on that fine pursuant to sections 938.04 and 938.06 . . . Effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06 was amended to provide that the $20 assessment is a mandatory . . .

CRAPSER, v. STATE, 148 So. 3d 794 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . surcharge of $105 pursuant to section 938.04, Florida Statutes (2007), and the $20 cost pursuant to section 938.06 . . .

COLSON, v. STATE, 114 So. 3d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Previously, the $20 assessment for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund imposed pursuant to section 938.06, . . . However, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06 was amended to provide, that the $20 assessment for the . . .

SHARPE, v. STATE, 115 So. 3d 1021 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . amount of $52.50 pursuant to section 938.04, Florida Statutes; and a $20 court cost pursuant to section 938.06 . . .

YOUMAN, v. STATE, 112 So. 3d 693 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . pursuant to section 938.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes, and the $20 court cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06 . . . See § 938.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2008); Kirkland,, 106 So.3d at 5; cf. Spear v. . . . DCA 2013) (rehearing en banc) (finding no error in imposing the $20 court cost pursuant to section 938.06 . . . imposed under section 938.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes, and the $20 court cost imposed under section 938.06 . . .

ALVAREZ, v. STATE, 111 So. 3d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . We recognize that, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) was amended to provide that the $20 assessment . . .

BAITY, v. STATE, 111 So. 3d 267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . However, the trial court could not impose the additional surcharge of $20 pursuant to section 938.06( . . .

SIMS, v. STATE, 110 So. 3d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . 2007 and February 2008, the $20 cost for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund imposed pursuant to section 938.06 . . . State, 109 So.3d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding that the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06 . . .

DeSALVO, v. STATE, 107 So. 3d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . , Florida Statutes (2009), and the related surcharges imposed pursuant to sections 938.04 ($10) and 938.06 . . .

D. SPEAR, v. STATE, 109 So. 3d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . whether the $20 court cost imposed for crime stoppers programs in criminal cases pursuant to section 938.06 . . . Prior to July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) provided in part, “In addition to any fine prescribed by law . . . The Legislature amended section 938.06(1) effective July 1, 2010, to provide that “[i]n addition to any . . . In doing so, we cited to our Pullam opinion, which addressed section 938.06 prior to the amendment. . . . Reconsidering this issue en banc, we recede from our Pruitt decisions with respect to section 938.06 . . .

J. GILES, v. STATE Of, 103 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . because the trial court erred in imposing the fine, the $20 court cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06 . . .

KIRKLAND, v. STATE, 106 So. 3d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Finally, as the trial court did not impose a fine, pursuant to section 938.06(1), Fla. . . . "We recognize that, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) was amended to provide that the $20 assessment . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. STATE, 104 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . the trial court erred in imposing a $20 cost for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund pursuant to section 938.06 . . .

BURKE, v. STATE, 101 So. 3d 406 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . remand the Corrected Judgment for the trial court to strike the $20 court cost imposed under section 938.06 . . . State, 80 So.3d 456, 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that assessment authorized by section 938.06(1) . . .

HARRIS, v. STATE, 100 So. 3d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . We also strike the $20 court cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes (2009), because . . .

SANDERS, v. STATE, 101 So. 3d 373 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . motion with respect to the $20 surcharge for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund imposed pursuant to section 938.06 . . . We recognize that, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) was amended to provide that the $20 assessment . . .

PRUITT, v. STATE, 98 So. 3d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .

PRUITT, v. STATE, 98 So. 3d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .

PRUITT, v. STATE, 98 So. 3d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Additionally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .

PRUITT, v. STATE, 98 So. 3d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .

PRUITT, v. STATE, 98 So. 3d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .

PRUITT, v. STATE, 98 So. 3d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .

PRUITT, v. STATE, 98 So. 3d 237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .

J. CHAMBLEE, v. STATE, 93 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Florida Statutes; and $20.00 as a court cost surcharge in addition to any fine pursuant to section 938.06 . . . proper concession of error, we strike the $20.00 assessed as an additional surcharge pursuant to section 938.06 . . .

CLAVELLE, v. STATE, 80 So. 3d 456 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . also imposed a $20 charge as “Additional Court Costs” for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund, under section 938.06 . . . See § 938.06(1), Fla. Stat. . . . was sentenced as a habitual offender without any fine, and because no fine was imposed this section 938.06 . . .

S. MALLORY, v. STATE, 70 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . $105 pursuant to section 938.04, Florida Statutes (2009); and a $20 court cost pursuant to section 938.06 . . .

MORENO- GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 67 So. 3d 1020 (Fla. 2011)

. . . support of the warrant was not subscribed by the affiant, Detective Hernandez, as mandated by section 938.06 . . .

L. PULLAM, v. STATE, 55 So. 3d 674 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes a $20 court cost “in addition to any fine prescribed by law.” . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 33 So. 3d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . for fines and costs included a $20 cost for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund in accordance with section 938.06 . . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes the additional $20 cost as “an additional surcharge” “to any fine prescribed . . .

PERDUE, v. STATE, 17 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes the cost as “an additional surcharge” to “any fíne prescribed by law.” . . . the $525 in fines and surcharges were not properly imposed, the additional $20 costs under section 938.06 . . .

MASENGALE, v. STATE, 969 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . and costs also includes a $20 mandatory cost for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund pursuant to section 938.06 . . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes this cost as “an additional surcharge” to “any fine prescribed by law.” . . . was not properly imposed, the trial court could not impose the additional $20 surcharge under section 938.06 . . .

DADDS, v. STATE, 946 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Relying on section 938.06, Florida Statutes (2004), the trial court also imposed a $20 mandatory cost . . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes this cost as “an additional surcharge” to “any fine prescribed by law.” . . . was not properly imposed, the trial court could not impose the additional $20 surcharge under section 938.06 . . .

KIMBALL, v. STATE, 933 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Florida Statutes (2004), and the $20 assessment for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund, authorized by section 938.06 . . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes this assessment as “an additional surcharge” to “any fine prescribed by . . .

V. K. E. v. STATE, 934 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 2006)

. . . 938.05 imposes from $50.00 to $200.00, for the benefit of the Fine and Forfeiture Fund, and section 938.06 . . .

V. K. E. a v. STATE, 902 So. 2d 343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . 938.05 imposes from $50.00 to $200.00, for the benefit of the Fine and Forfeiture Fund, and section 938.06 . . .

LANG, v. STATE, 856 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . We also affirm all costs imposed, except the $20.00 assessed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . . We strike the $20.00 surcharge imposed pursuant to section 938.06 for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund because . . . surcharge only when a sentencing court has levied a “fine prescribed by law for any criminal offense.” § 938.06 . . . Imposition of the $20.00 cost, pursuant to section 938.06, is reversed. . . .