The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 938.06 ; and (3) a $50 fine under Fla. Stat. § 775.083(2). . . .
. . . on the fine pursuant to section 938.04, (4) imposing a $20 surcharge on the fine pursuant to section 938.06 . . . 775.083, Florida Statutes (2009), and the surcharges imposed on that fine pursuant to sections 938.04 and 938.06 . . . Effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06 was amended to provide that the $20 assessment is a mandatory . . .
. . . surcharge of $105 pursuant to section 938.04, Florida Statutes (2007), and the $20 cost pursuant to section 938.06 . . .
. . . Previously, the $20 assessment for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund imposed pursuant to section 938.06, . . . However, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06 was amended to provide, that the $20 assessment for the . . .
. . . amount of $52.50 pursuant to section 938.04, Florida Statutes; and a $20 court cost pursuant to section 938.06 . . .
. . . pursuant to section 938.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes, and the $20 court cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06 . . . See § 938.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2008); Kirkland,, 106 So.3d at 5; cf. Spear v. . . . DCA 2013) (rehearing en banc) (finding no error in imposing the $20 court cost pursuant to section 938.06 . . . imposed under section 938.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes, and the $20 court cost imposed under section 938.06 . . .
. . . We recognize that, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) was amended to provide that the $20 assessment . . .
. . . However, the trial court could not impose the additional surcharge of $20 pursuant to section 938.06( . . .
. . . 2007 and February 2008, the $20 cost for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund imposed pursuant to section 938.06 . . . State, 109 So.3d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding that the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06 . . .
. . . , Florida Statutes (2009), and the related surcharges imposed pursuant to sections 938.04 ($10) and 938.06 . . .
. . . whether the $20 court cost imposed for crime stoppers programs in criminal cases pursuant to section 938.06 . . . Prior to July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) provided in part, “In addition to any fine prescribed by law . . . The Legislature amended section 938.06(1) effective July 1, 2010, to provide that “[i]n addition to any . . . In doing so, we cited to our Pullam opinion, which addressed section 938.06 prior to the amendment. . . . Reconsidering this issue en banc, we recede from our Pruitt decisions with respect to section 938.06 . . .
. . . because the trial court erred in imposing the fine, the $20 court cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06 . . .
. . . Finally, as the trial court did not impose a fine, pursuant to section 938.06(1), Fla. . . . "We recognize that, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) was amended to provide that the $20 assessment . . .
. . . the trial court erred in imposing a $20 cost for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund pursuant to section 938.06 . . .
. . . remand the Corrected Judgment for the trial court to strike the $20 court cost imposed under section 938.06 . . . State, 80 So.3d 456, 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that assessment authorized by section 938.06(1) . . .
. . . We also strike the $20 court cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes (2009), because . . .
. . . motion with respect to the $20 surcharge for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund imposed pursuant to section 938.06 . . . We recognize that, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) was amended to provide that the $20 assessment . . .
. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Additionally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Finally, we strike the imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Florida Statutes; and $20.00 as a court cost surcharge in addition to any fine pursuant to section 938.06 . . . proper concession of error, we strike the $20.00 assessed as an additional surcharge pursuant to section 938.06 . . .
. . . also imposed a $20 charge as “Additional Court Costs” for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund, under section 938.06 . . . See § 938.06(1), Fla. Stat. . . . was sentenced as a habitual offender without any fine, and because no fine was imposed this section 938.06 . . .
. . . $105 pursuant to section 938.04, Florida Statutes (2009); and a $20 court cost pursuant to section 938.06 . . .
. . . support of the warrant was not subscribed by the affiant, Detective Hernandez, as mandated by section 938.06 . . .
. . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes a $20 court cost “in addition to any fine prescribed by law.” . . .
. . . for fines and costs included a $20 cost for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund in accordance with section 938.06 . . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes the additional $20 cost as “an additional surcharge” “to any fine prescribed . . .
. . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes the cost as “an additional surcharge” to “any fíne prescribed by law.” . . . the $525 in fines and surcharges were not properly imposed, the additional $20 costs under section 938.06 . . .
. . . and costs also includes a $20 mandatory cost for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund pursuant to section 938.06 . . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes this cost as “an additional surcharge” to “any fine prescribed by law.” . . . was not properly imposed, the trial court could not impose the additional $20 surcharge under section 938.06 . . .
. . . Relying on section 938.06, Florida Statutes (2004), the trial court also imposed a $20 mandatory cost . . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes this cost as “an additional surcharge” to “any fine prescribed by law.” . . . was not properly imposed, the trial court could not impose the additional $20 surcharge under section 938.06 . . .
. . . Florida Statutes (2004), and the $20 assessment for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund, authorized by section 938.06 . . . Section 938.06(1) authorizes this assessment as “an additional surcharge” to “any fine prescribed by . . .
. . . 938.05 imposes from $50.00 to $200.00, for the benefit of the Fine and Forfeiture Fund, and section 938.06 . . .
. . . 938.05 imposes from $50.00 to $200.00, for the benefit of the Fine and Forfeiture Fund, and section 938.06 . . .
. . . We also affirm all costs imposed, except the $20.00 assessed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes . . . We strike the $20.00 surcharge imposed pursuant to section 938.06 for the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund because . . . surcharge only when a sentencing court has levied a “fine prescribed by law for any criminal offense.” § 938.06 . . . Imposition of the $20.00 cost, pursuant to section 938.06, is reversed. . . .