Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 938.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 938.07 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 938.07

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 938
COURT COSTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 938.07
938.07 Driving or boating under the influence.Notwithstanding any other provision of s. 316.193 or s. 327.35, a court cost of $135 shall be added to any fine imposed pursuant to s. 316.193 or s. 327.35. The clerks shall remit the funds to the Department of Revenue, $25 of which shall be deposited in the Emergency Medical Services Trust Fund, $50 shall be deposited in the Operating Trust Fund of the Department of Law Enforcement to be used for operational expenses in conducting the statewide criminal analysis laboratory system established in s. 943.32, and $60 shall be deposited in the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Program Trust Fund created in s. 381.79.
History.s. 9, ch. 97-271; s. 22, ch. 98-94; s. 10, ch. 2000-155; s. 23, ch. 2001-122; s. 11, ch. 2002-263; s. 4, ch. 2006-176; s. 12, ch. 2010-161.

F.S. 938.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 938.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 938.07


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 938.07
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 938.07.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v. M. A. HAIRE, B. M., 836 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . In its order, the court made the following conclusions: 1) sections 581.184 and 938.07 are unconstitutional . . .

DENNIS JOSLIN COMPANY, LLC, v. ROBINSON BROADCASTING CORPORATION,, 977 F. Supp. 491 (D.C. Cir. 1997)

. . . Plaintiff, the current holder of the note, claims that defendants owe a principal sum of $558,-938.07 . . .

In KRESSNER, GORE, v. KRESSNER,, 164 B.R. 235 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . The court found that the debtor was liable on the contracts to Gore in the amount of $507,-938.07. . . .

LASATER S ESTATE v. SCOFIELD, 74 F. Supp. 458 (W.D. Tex. 1947)

. . . Plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of $1,047.02, with interest at 6% on $938.07 from October 17 . . .