Cases from cite.case.law:

AVANT, s v. C. JUDD, Jr. s, 259 So. 3d 832 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 941.03., .07, Fla. . . .

IN RE BAILEY J. Jr. Jr. Jr. v., 555 B.R. 557 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2016)

. . . Thomas Brown: $941.03 10. Wayne Tubbs: $1,143.58 11. Kenneth Jones: $134.48 Id. at *13. . . .

E. FRANCE, v. JUDD,, 932 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . §§ 941.03, .22, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . . § 941.03, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

D. TYMENSKI, v. STATE, 816 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Pennsylvania because the documentation produced was not properly authenticated pursuant to section 941.03 . . . Section 941.03 sets out the formal requirements needed for a demand for extradition: No demand for the . . . Although the documentation in this case may not meet all the formalities set forth in section 941.03, . . .

RENIEWICZ, a k a v. STATE, 734 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Because the Wisconsin demand complies with section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1997), we affirm the order . . .

STATE v. LUSTER,, 596 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1992)

. . . district court certified the following question as being of great public importance: Whether section 941.03 . . . copy of a judgment of conviction or of a sentence imposed in execution thereof” as required by section 941.03 . . . judgment of conviction, or sentence must be authenticated by the executive authority making the demand. § 941.03 . . .

STATE v. HUNT,, 584 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . concession that Hunt was not in Ohio at any time relevant to the charges in the Ohio indictment, section 941.03 . . . other state, any person in this state charged in such other state in the manner provided in section 941.03 . . .

LAWRENCE, v. LUSTER,, 575 So. 2d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . California extradition documents failed to meet the requirements of the Florida extradition statute, section 941.03 . . . Section 941.03 requires that the extradition demand be accompanied by “an authenticated copy of an indictment . . . A certificate of conviction signed by a clerk of court does not meet the mandate of section 941.03. . . . California extradition documents also satisfied the letter of California law and the spirit of section 941.03 . . . Section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1989) reads: No demand for the extradition of a person charged with . . . Abstract of the Judgment signed by the clerk of the California court clearly meets the mandate of section 941.03 . . . the following question as one that passes upon an issue of great public importance: Whether section 941.03 . . .

LAWRENCE, v. PESTANA,, 560 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . not been duly authenticated by the executive authority of the demanding state as required by section 941.03 . . . Section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1987), requires that the demand for extradition must be accompanied . . . As stated above, section 941.03 does require that the affidavit upon which the warrant was issued be . . . We find that the complaint in the present case satisfies the “affidavit” requirement of section 941.03 . . . 2d DCA 1984), a practically identical statement has been held to satisfy the requirement of section 941.03 . . .

McFARLAND, v. CARSON,, 504 So. 2d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . reversible error in the state’s alleged failure to comply with the statutory requirements of sections 941.03 . . .

C. SCHULTZ C. v. FRISBY, R. A., 807 F.2d 1339 (7th Cir. 1986)

. . . Wisconsin Statute § 941.03 makes it a felony to interfere with the orderly flow of traffic on a street . . . : “941.03 HIGHWAY OBSTRUCTION (1) Whoever creates an unreasonable risk and high probability of causing . . .

HENRY, v. STATE, 496 So. 2d 832 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . .” § 941.03, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . . conviction signed by the clerk of a New York court does not comply with the requirement of section 941.03 . . .

In EXTRADITION OF DIXON, a k a, 487 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . . §§ 941.02, 941.03, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

STATE v. DAVILA,, 481 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . § 941.03, Fla.Stat. (1983). . See supra note 2. . . .

JOSEY, v. GALLOWAY,, 482 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See § 941.03, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . This is also true in the case of a proceeding under section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1983). . . . Section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1981), requires that the governor of Florida have before him a valid . . . this fundamental constitutional right, we hold that the demand for extradition required by section 941.03 . . . Section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1983), states: Form of demand. — No demand for the extradition of a . . . particularly take issue with the majority’s holding that “the demand for extradition required by section 941.03 . . .

H. SHAPIRO, v. STATE, 456 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . INASMUCH AS THEY FAILED TO INCLUDE A PROPER SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT TO THE WARRANT AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 941.03 . . . It is unfortunate that by the order of placement of the alternatives in section 941.03, it appears that . . . A capias and a warrant, particularly as is contemplated by section 941.03, are not the same documents . . . The warrant, to be supported by affidavit of a committing magistrate as contemplated by section 941.03 . . . There was no warrant as contemplated by section 941.03. . . .

STATE v. SCORATOW,, 456 So. 2d 922 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . See §§ 941.03; 941.07, Fla.Stat.(1983). . . .

M. BRITTON, v. STATE, 447 So. 2d 458 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Petitioner contends that there was inadequate compliance with section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1981) . . . copy of a judgment of conviction or of a sentence imposed in execution thereof” must be provided. § 941.03 . . . someone’s conclusion as to the effect of that court action was acceptable, we must presume section 941.03 . . .

DOSTER, v. MIMS,, 444 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . no doubt that this request was sufficient to meet the requirements of law as provided for in section 941.03 . . .

E. CARTER, v. A. COLEMAN,, 443 So. 2d 491 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . . §§ 941.02, 941.03, 941.04, 941.07, Fla.Stat. (1981); see also Orton v. . . .

BRUNELLE, v. C. L. NORVELL, St., 433 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section- 941.03, Florida Statutes (1981) does not require the affidavits to aver that an accused was . . .

DOWDELL, v. STATE, 423 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Under Section 941.03, Florida Statutes, the extradition demand must allege that the person charged was . . . The trial court, construing Section 941.03, Florida Statutes, correctly held that the extradition was . . .

STATE v. SOTO,, 423 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1982)

. . . This Court held that sections 941.03 and 941.06, Florida Statutes (1941), of the Florida Uniform Criminal . . . any other state, any person in Florida charged in such other state in the manner provided in section 941.03 . . . Section 941.03, as it relates to section 941.06, requires that the demand for extradition be in writing . . . ALDERMAN, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON and MeDONALD, JJ., concur. . 941.03 Form of demand. — No demand . . . any other state, any person in this state charged in such other state in the manner provided in s. 941.03 . . .

C. SHUFTY, v. STATE, 419 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Concerning appellant’s extradition process, pursuant to section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1981), a copy . . .

WHEATON, v. STATE, 420 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . time of the commission of the crime charged and was not therefore subject to extradition under Section 941.03 . . . Section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1979), provides in pertinent part: “No demand for the extradition of . . . The requirement of Section 941.03 that the Governor’s demand be accompanied by an authenticated copy . . . Under Section 941.03, it must be shown “that the accused was present in the demanding state at the time . . .

SOTO, v. STATE, 409 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . with a crime in the [demanding state]. (3) Whether petitioner was a fugitive from justice, section 941.03 . . . Baden, supra, the court discussed the contents of an indictment which would satisfy Sections 941.03 and . . . 941.06, supra: So, when the two sections [§§ 941.03 & 941.06, Fla.Stat. (1941) ] are read in paria materia . . .

G. MOORE, v. STATE, 407 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . When extradition is sought, a written demand is filed in accordance with Section 941.03, Florida Statutes . . . The governor examines the demand to see that it contains the allegations required by Section 941.03, . . . misrepresentation, of which the appellant complains, does not relate to any allegations required under Section 941.03 . . .

J. FAULS, v. SHERIFF OF LEON COUNTY,, 394 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 1981)

. . . Upon determining that the requirements of section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1979), had been met, the . . .

STATE MEYERS, v. MILLER,, 388 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . See § 941.03, Fla.Stat. (1979); Chase v. Chase, 93 Fla. 963, 103 So. 113 (1927). In Cossette v. . . .

J. FAULS, v. SHERIFF OF LEON COUNTY,, 384 So. 2d 238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . properly authenticated by the executive authority of Georgia making the demand, pursuant to Section 941.03 . . .

STACK, v. STATE MORGAN,, 381 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The foregoing is consistent with Section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1977). . . . probable cause was established, we recede therefrom and reaffirm the simple test set down by Section 941.03 . . . Section 941.03, Florida Statutes: No demand for the extradition of a person charged with crime in another . . .

STATE GANDERT, III, v. T. ROBERTS,, 381 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The provisions of Section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1979), require that the written demand from the governor . . . requisition attached to the Michigan governor’s demand, the demand satisfies the requirements of Section 941.03 . . .

STATE KRASNER v. SANSTROM, 48 Fla. Supp. 107 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)

. . . papers filed by New York state did not satisfy the jurisdictional requirements of Florida Statutes 941.03 . . . When Florida Statute 941.03 and 941.06 are read with reference to one another they require that the person . . . Because the indictment does not meet the requirements of Florida Statutes 941.03 and 941.06, the indictment . . . Because affidavits do not meet the requirements of Florida Statute 941.03, the affidavits and Oneida . . . As petitioner interprets Florida Statutes 941.03 and 941.06, an indictment must stand or fall on its . . .

SALAZAR, v. R. SANDSTROM, E., 355 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . The warrant was issued, pursuant to Sections 941.03 and 941.06, Florida Statutes (1975), upon the requisition . . .

E. MILES, v. STATE O D., 339 So. 2d 246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Second, Section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1975), provides in pertinent part: . . . .

STATE v. GALE,, 312 So. 2d 824 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . the extradition of appellee, together with the properly authenticated documents as provided for in § 941.03 . . . authenticated copies of the documents required to be furnished by the demanding state pursuant to § 941.03 . . . with a crime in the State of New York. (3) Whether petitioner was a fugitive from justice, section 941.03 . . .

PALMER, v. STATE, 312 So. 2d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 941.03 require that the Governor’s Requisition and accompanying papers be signed or duly authenticated . . .

STATE v. D. COX,, 306 So. 2d 156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . § 941.03 (1973). . . . . § 941.03 (1973) to determine whether the demand should be recognized. Blasi v. State, Fla. . . . with a crime in th|- State of New York. (3) Whether petitioner was a fugitive from justice, section 941.03 . . .

STACK, v. STATE EBBOLE,, 284 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Section 941.03, F.S.A., provides, in part, that the affidavit made before the committing magistrate “ . . .

STATE DYER, v. S. WILSON,, 260 So. 2d 241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . The test, both by statute, Section 941.03, F.S.1969, F.S.A., and case law, Chase v. . . .

STATE GOODMAN, v. E. PURDY,, 240 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . appeal, Goodman argues, and the State agrees that these proceedings are under the alternative part of § 941.03 . . .

BROWN, v. E. PURDY,, 222 So. 2d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . § 941.03, F. . . .

BONAZZO, v. B. MICHELL,, 221 So. 2d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . F.S.1967, Section 941.03, F.S.A.; State ex rel. Owens v. . . .

COSSETTE, v. STATE, 221 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . F.S. 941.03, F.S.A. “ * * * The indictment, information or affidavit made before the magistrate must . . .

STATE, SHERWOOD v. MICHELL,, 30 Fla. Supp. 106 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1968)

. . . me that the accused was present in this State at the time of the commission of said crime,” whereas §941.03 . . .

STATE OWENS, v. E. BOYER,, 207 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Fla.Stat., Sec. 941.03, F.S.A. (1965). . . .

S. BLASI, v. STATE, 192 So. 2d 307 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . . § 941.03 . . . . state defends the trial court decision by arguing that the enumeration of documents found in F.S.A. 941.03 . . . To do so would be to nullify the explicit statutory alternatives found in F.S.A. § 941.03 and, in effect . . . Thus, we construe F.S.A. § 941.03 to require that those concerned pay heed to its terms to the end that . . . ANDREWS, J., dissents with opinion. . “941.03 Form of demand. — No demand for the extradition of a person . . . . § 941.03. . . .

W. COX, Jr. v. STATE, 180 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Section 941.03 Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides safeguards for such person so sought to be extradited . . .

STATE, LATINO v. BUCHANAN,, 27 Fla. Supp. 119 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1965)

. . . It follows that provisions of §941.03, Florida Statutes, have been thoroughly complied with in that the . . .

FARRELL v. BUCHANAN,, 26 Fla. Supp. 158 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1965)

. . . (1) The demand of the governor of South Carolina fails to comply with the Uniform Extradition Act, §941.03 . . .

Ed BLACKBURN, Jr. v. T. MUNSON,, 155 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . Sec. 941.03, Fla.Stat.1961, F.S.A., provides : “No demand for the extradition of a person charged with . . . authentication by incorporation by reference of said papers, which satisfied the criteria set forth in Sec. 941.03 . . . papers together, then, we hold that they contain sufficient information to meet the requirements of Sec. 941.03 . . .

TRICE, v. Ed BLACKBURN, Jr., 153 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . The Demand was in the form prescribed by § 941.03, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . . Chapter 941, Florida Statutes, and he is not subject to extradition under the procedure provided in § 941.03 . . .

F. CLARKE, v. Ed BLACKBURN, Jr., 151 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . the State of North Carolina at the time of the commission of the alleged crime (as is required by § 941.03 . . . The demand did not meet the requirements of either § 941.03 or § 941.06, supra, and it was, therefore . . . The remaining requirement of § 941.03, supra (that the demand shall be in writing and accompanied by . . . Section 941.03, Florida Statutes 1961, F.S.A.: “No demand for the extradition of a person charged with . . . of any other state, any person in this state charged in such other state in the manner provided in § 941.03 . . .

PECNIK, v. Ed BLACKBURN, Jr., 132 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . Deleting the alternatives not applicable to this case, Section 941.03, Florida Statutes 1959, F.S.A., . . . record of trial or conviction and in addition, the proceedings in that case were both under Section 941.03 . . .

O BRIEN v. STATE, 13 Fla. Supp. 57 (Palm Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. 1958)

. . . Section 941.03, Florida Statutes, provides— “No demand for the extradition of a person charged with crime . . . , that such officer is a “committing magistrate” within the meaning of that term as used in section 941.03 . . .

STATE v. C. BENNETT,, 90 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1956)

. . . Sec. 941.03, F.S.A. requires in part that: “No demand for the extradition of a-person charged with crime . . . Sec. 941.03, F.S.A., insofar as it requires an allegation that the accused was present in the demanding . . .

PERRY v. CULBREATH,, 6 Fla. Supp. 181 (Hillsborough Cty. Cir. Ct. 1953)

. . . did not contain the necessary allegation as to presence in the demanding state as required by section 941.03 . . . Baden, Sheriff (Fla.), 28 So. 2d 160, in discussing the two sections, 941.03 and 941.06, the Court says . . .

WILLIAM ENNIST v. ROY BADEN,, 158 Fla. 141 (Fla. 1946)

. . . properly issued because of the provisions of Section 3 and 6 of Chapter 20460 and now being sections 941.03 . . . Now, when we come to consider how the person is to be charged as provided by Sec. 941.03 we find that . . .