Cases from cite.case.law:

E. FRANCE, v. JUDD,, 932 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . this state with the commission of a crime in any other state, and, except in cases arising under s. 941.06 . . . been charged in such state with the commission of the crime, and, except in cases arising under s. 941.06 . . . is the person charged with having committed the crime alleged and, except in cases arising under s. 941.06 . . .

KASEMAN, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 329 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D.D.C. 2004)

. . . to Travis Butler • $3,836.19 to Rakim Camón • $1,351.35 to Mary Cohen • $945.11 to Kendra Corley • $941.06 . . .

D. TYMENSKI, v. STATE, 816 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . state shall be recognized by the Governor unless in writing alleging, except in cases arising under s. 941.06 . . .

STATE v. HUNT,, 584 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . committed and a subsequent departure from that state are not essential to the extradition since section 941.06 . . . underlying the opinion in Doran, is not an appropriate consideration in the crimes contemplated by section 941.06 . . . In contrast, section 941.06 provides: 941.06 Extradition of persons not present in demanding state at . . .

McFARLAND, v. CARSON,, 504 So. 2d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . error in the state’s alleged failure to comply with the statutory requirements of sections 941.03 and 941.06 . . .

JOSEY, v. GALLOWAY,, 482 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 941.06, Florida Statutes (1983), governs extradition of persons not present in the demanding . . . state shall be recognized by the Governor unless in writing alleging, except in cases arising under s. 941.06 . . .

STATE v. SOTO,, 423 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1982)

. . . This Court held that sections 941.03 and 941.06, Florida Statutes (1941), of the Florida Uniform Criminal . . . Section 941.06 provides that the Governor of Florida may surrender on demand of the governor of any other . . . Section 941.03, as it relates to section 941.06, requires that the demand for extradition be in writing . . . state shall be recognized by the Governor unless in writing alleging, except in cases arising under s. 941.06 . . . judgment of conviction, or sentence must be authenticated by the executive authority making the demand. 941.06 . . .

WHEATON, v. STATE, 420 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . January 15, 1981, the Governor of Virginia again demanded the extradition of Whea-ton, but under Section 941.06 . . . Under Section 941.06, it must be shown that the accused committed an act in a state other than the demanding . . .

SOTO, v. STATE, 409 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . in a third state which intentionally resulted in the commission of a crime in the demanding State, 941.06 . . . In addition, under Section 941.06, Florida Statutes (1979), a governor, on demand, may surrender a person . . . Baden, supra, the court discussed the contents of an indictment which would satisfy Sections 941.03 and 941.06 . . . , supra: So, when the two sections [§§ 941.03 & 941.06, Fla.Stat. (1941) ] are read in paria materia . . .

STACK, v. STATE MORGAN,, 381 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . state shall be recognized by the governor unless in writing alleging, except in cases arising under s. 941.06 . . .

STATE KRASNER v. SANSTROM, 48 Fla. Supp. 107 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)

. . . filed by New York state did not satisfy the jurisdictional requirements of Florida Statutes 941.03 and 941.06 . . . When Florida Statute 941.03 and 941.06 are read with reference to one another they require that the person . . . Because the indictment does not meet the requirements of Florida Statutes 941.03 and 941.06, the indictment . . . As petitioner interprets Florida Statutes 941.03 and 941.06, an indictment must stand or fall on its . . .

SALAZAR, v. R. SANDSTROM, E., 355 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . The warrant was issued, pursuant to Sections 941.03 and 941.06, Florida Statutes (1975), upon the requisition . . . Baden, 158 Fla. 141, 28 So.2d 160 (1946); Section 941.06, Florida Statutes (1975). Affirmed. . . . .

STATE v. GALE,, 312 So. 2d 824 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . in a third state which intentionally resulted in the commission of a crime in the demanding State, 941.06 . . .

STATE v. D. COX,, 306 So. 2d 156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . in a third state which intentionally resulted in the commission of a crime in the demanding State, 941.06 . . .

S. BLASI, v. STATE, 192 So. 2d 307 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . state shall be recognized by the governor unless in writing alleging, except in cases arising under § 941.06 . . .

W. COX, Jr. v. STATE, 180 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Sections 941.05 and 941.06, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., do provide for extradition under the Uniform Interstate . . .

STATE, WEISS v. BUCHANAN,, 24 Fla. Supp. 90 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1964)

. . . lawfulness of his restraint by the respondent, charging that the extradition papers do not comply with §941.06 . . . petitioner is not sought as a “‘fugitive from justice” but is properly demanded under provisions of §941.06 . . . documents certified by the governor of Ohio in his demand as authentic, complies with the requirements of §941.06 . . .

Ed BLACKBURN, Jr. v. T. MUNSON,, 155 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . state shall be recognized by the governor unless in writing alleging, except in cases arising under 941.06 . . .

TRICE, v. Ed BLACKBURN, Jr., 153 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . It was not, however, in the form required by (nor does it purport to he made pursuant to) § 941.06, Florida . . . state shall be recognized by the governor unless in writing alleging, except in cases arising under § 941.06 . . .

F. CLARKE, v. Ed BLACKBURN, Jr., 151 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . third state intentionally resulting in a crime in the State of North Carolina (as is required by § 941.06 . . . The demand did not meet the requirements of either § 941.03 or § 941.06, supra, and it was, therefore . . . Any other interpretation would render § 88.061 simply cumulative to § 941.06, since the latter section . . . state shall be recognized by the governor unless in writing alleging, except in cases arising under § 941.06 . . . Section 941.06, Florida Statutes 1961, F.S.A.: “The governor of this state may also surrender, on demand . . .

PECNIK, v. Ed BLACKBURN, Jr., 132 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . conviction and in addition, the proceedings in that case were both under Section 941.03 and Section 941.06 . . .

PERRY v. CULBREATH,, 6 Fla. Supp. 181 (Hillsborough Cty. Cir. Ct. 1953)

. . . commission of the alleged offense, but it is to be noted that the crime charged is covered by section 941.06 . . . Perry and the petition of the prosecuting officer, and is covered by the provisions of section 941.06 . . . Baden, Sheriff (Fla.), 28 So. 2d 160, in discussing the two sections, 941.03 and 941.06, the Court says . . .

WILLIAM ENNIST v. ROY BADEN,, 158 Fla. 141 (Fla. 1946)

. . . issued because of the provisions of Section 3 and 6 of Chapter 20460 and now being sections 941.03 and 941.06 . . . That is, whether or not a statute such as Sec. 941.06, supra, contravenes that part of Sec. 2 of Article . . . This brings us to the necessity of determining whether or not Sec. 941.06, supra, has been complied with . . . It will be observed that Sec. 941.06 provides that “The Governor of this State may also surrender on . . . appellant is demanded is insufficient to constitute the basis for a warrant of extradition under Sec. 941.06 . . .