Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 941.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 941.12 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 941.12

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 941
CORRECTIONS: INTERSTATE COOPERATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 941.12
941.12 Confinement in jail when necessary.
(1) The officer or persons executing the Governor’s warrant of arrest, or the agent of the demanding state to whom the prisoner may have been delivered, may, when necessary, confine the prisoner in the jail of any county or city through which he or she may pass; and the keeper of such jail must receive and safely keep the prisoner until the legal sufficiency of the prisoner’s arrest has been determined by the court and the officer or person having charge of the prisoner is ready to proceed on his or her route; such officer or person shall pay the jailer holding the prisoner the costs of the prisoner’s jailing and keeping.
(2) The officer or agent of a demanding state to whom a prisoner may have been delivered following extradition proceedings in another state, or to whom a prisoner may have been delivered after waiving extradition in such other state, and who is passing through this state with such a prisoner for the purpose of immediately returning such prisoner to the demanding state may, when necessary, confine the prisoner in the jail of any county or city through which he or she may pass; and the keeper of such jail must receive and safely keep the prisoner until the officer or agent having charge of the prisoner is ready to proceed on his or her route, such officer or agent, however, being chargeable with the expense of keeping; provided, however, that such officer or agent shall produce and show to the keeper of such jail satisfactory written evidence of the fact that he or she is actually transporting such prisoner to the demanding state after a requisition by the executive authority of such demanding state. Such prisoner shall not be entitled to demand a new requisition while in this state.
History.s. 12, ch. 20460, 1941; s. 24, ch. 57-1; s. 1603, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 941.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 941.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 941.12


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 941.12
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 941.12.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

M. SPICER, v. CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE, INC., 844 F. Supp. 1226 (N.D. Ill. 1993)

. . . Following the same procedures as above, a total of $941.12 is approved. 2.Data tapes The request for . . .

MANSFIELD APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, v. CITY OF MANSFIELD,, 988 F.2d 1469 (6th Cir. 1993)

. . . Reg. 941.12(f)(1) ... . . .

DRABKIN, v. A. I. CREDIT CORPORATION,, 800 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1986)

. . . Accordingly, in June 1980 Auto-Train delivered to AICCO a check for $522,-941.12, which included a downpayment . . .

DRABKIN, v. A. I. CREDIT CORPORATION,, 255 U.S. App. D.C. 128 (D.C. Cir. 1986)

. . . Accordingly, in June 1980 Auto-Train delivered to AICCO a check for $522,-941.12, which included a downpayment . . .

DRABKIN, v. A. I. CREDIT CORPORATION,, 800 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1986)

. . . Accordingly, in June 1980 Auto-Train delivered to AICCO a check for $522,-941.12, which included a downpayment . . .

In AUTO- TRAIN CORPORATION, a DRABKIN, v. A. I. CREDIT CORPORATION,, 9 B.R. 159 (Bankr. D.D.C. 1981)

. . . amount financed by AICCO was $834,406.87, the ‘cash price’ of $1,357,347.99 less the payment of $522,-941.12 . . .

HARVEY COAL CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 97 Ct. Cl. 529 (Ct. Cl. 1942)

. . . the plaintiff in the sum of $6,851.48, with interest as provided by law, as follows: In No. 1$602: $941.12 . . .