The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 941
CORRECTIONS: INTERSTATE COOPERATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 941.29

941.29 Interpretation.—The provisions of ss. 941.01-941.30 shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate its general purposes to make uniform the law of those states which enact it.

History.—s. 27, ch. 20460, 1941; s. 7, ch. 22858, 1945.

F.S. 941.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 941.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 941.29

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 941.29

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 941.29.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

I. KANTER, v. P. BARR,, 919 F.3d 437 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 941.29(1m) -violate the Second Amendment as applied to Kanter. . . . Stat. § 941.29(1m). . . . Section 941.29(1m) prohibits an individual from possessing a firearm if he has "been convicted of a felony . . . Id. § 941.29(1m)(a)-(b). B. Factual Background Kanter lives in Mequon, Wisconsin. . . . Stat. § 941.29(1m) are unconstitutional under the Second Amendment as applied to him. . . . . § 922(g)(1) and Wisconsin Statute § 941.29(1m) would stand on solid footing if their categorical bans . . .

CANNON, v. NEWPORT,, 850 F.3d 303 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . Stat: § 941.29(4) (2007). . . .

L. GIDDEON, v. A. FLYNN,, 830 F.3d 719 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 941.29(2), 947.01(1), and was sentenced to five years in prison and five years of supervised release . . .

M. BURRIS, v. P. SMITH,, 819 F.3d 1037 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 941.29(2)(a). . . .

BAER, v. E. LYNCH, D., 636 F. App'x 695 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 941.29(lm)(b), are unconstitutional, both, facially and as applied to him. . . . Stat. § 941.29(lm)(b). . . . The district court did not address Baer’s claim that section 941.29 violates the Wisconsin constitution . . . Stat, § 941.29(5)(a), A felon may also apply to the Attorney General of the United States for exclusion . . . Stat. § 941.29(5)(b); Logan v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LEO, Jr., 792 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 175.60(3)(a), (c), 941.29(l)(a). . . .

CHEVRON U. S. A. INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 116 Fed. Cl. 202 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . Later, Chevron also made other corrections, "resulting] in a net increase of $941.29 to Chevron’s claim . . .

BETKER, v. GOMEZ,, 692 F.3d 854 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 941.29(2)(a); see also State v. Black, 242 Wis.2d 126, 624 N.W.2d 363, 370-71 (2001). . . .

GONZALEZ, v. VILLAGE OF WEST MILWAUKEE,, 671 F.3d 649 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 941.29(2)(a); 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). . . .

BETKER, v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, A., 800 F. Supp. 2d 1002 (E.D. Wis. 2011)

. . . . § 941.29(2)(a) proscribes possession of a firearm not ownership, and the marital property law deals . . .

YANG, v. POLLARD,, 202 F. App'x 134 (7th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 941.29(2). . . .

VASQUEZ, v. KINGSTON,, 422 F. Supp. 2d 1006 (E.D. Wis. 2006)

. . . intentional homicide and for possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of §§ 940.01(1)(A) and 941.29 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SMITH,, 119 F. App'x 798 (7th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 941.29(2)(a), (5). . . . Stat. § 941.29(2)(a); Roehl, 977 F.2d at 377-78. AFFIRMED. . . .

SWARTZ, v. MATHES,, 291 F. Supp. 2d 861 (N.D. Iowa 2003)

. . . Stat. 941.29, which makes it illegal for a convicted felon to possess a gun) (rejecting the defendant . . . Stat. 941.29, his earlier felony convictions could have been predicates without violating the ex post . . .

PALEY, v. BIELUCH,, 785 So. 2d 692 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Stat. (2000) (providing that section 941.01 through 941.29 be cited as “Uniform Criminal Extradition . . .

T. WASHINGTON, v. SMITH,, 48 F. Supp. 2d 1149 (E.D. Wis. 1999)

. . . . § 941.29(2). . . .

FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, v. UNITED STATES, 152 F.3d 998 (D.C. Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 941.29 (same); Wyoming Stat. § 6-8-102 (same). . . .

D. CLAPPER, v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 946 F. Supp. 672 (E.D. Wis. 1996)

. . . . § 941.29. . . . Section 941.29, Wis.Stat., forbids the possession of firearms by various categories of persons based . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. H. WILLIS,, 825 F. Supp. 617 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . purchased Shearson stock on April 9, 1981, which he sold the same day (“day traded”), for a profit of $941.29 . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. EVANS,, 994 F.2d 317 (7th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 941.29 prohibits a convicted felon from possessing a firearm, the defendant has not had his right . . .

J. ROEHL, v. UNITED STATES, 977 F.2d 375 (7th Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 941.29, effective March 31, 1982, making it an offense for a convicted felon to possess a gun. . . . Although this enactment occurred later than Roehl’s conviction, the Act which created § 941.29 made it . . . Roehl’s 1966 and 1974 convictions could each be a predicate for criminal liability under Wis.Stat. § 941.29 . . . and he received the benefits of Wis.Stat. § 57.078, our reliance on § 941.29 gives it ex post facto . . . Our use of Wis.Stat. § 941.29 is only as evidence that Wisconsin views the operation of § 57.078 on a . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. ZIEGENHAGEN,, 776 F. Supp. 441 (W.D. Wis. 1991)

. . . . § 941.29. . . . Wis.Stat. § 941.29. . . . . § 941.29 evidences Wisconsin’s intent not to restore to convicted felons the right to possess a firearm . . . Stat. § 941.29 is intended to apply “regardless of the date the crime specified under section 941.29( . . . Wis.Stat. § 57.078 provided no greater enlightenment, and Wis.Stat. § 941.29 was not yet in effect. . . .

C. EWING a k a A. H. v. UNITED STATES, 914 F.2d 499 (4th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 6402(a), $28,-941.29 of the 1985 payments were applied to tax liabilities for years other than those . . .

GRIFFIN v. WISCONSIN, 483 U.S. 868 (U.S. 1987)

. . . . §941.29(2) (1985-1986). He moved to suppress the evidence seized during the search. . . .

BERWIND v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE CREIGHTON v. SAME, 137 F.2d 451 (3d Cir. 1943)

. . . Company adopted a resolution which approved the sale of the securities to Creighton for a price of $250,-941.29 . . .