Cases from cite.case.law:

A. ULLOA, v. CMI, INC., 133 So. 3d 914 (Fla. 2013)

. . . .” § 942.01(3), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

CMI, INC. v. A. ULLOA,, 73 So. 3d 787 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See §§ 942.01-.06, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

CMI, INC. a v. LANDRUM, 64 So. 3d 693 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . requirements of the law in failing to quash the subpoena that was not issued in accordance with sections 942.01 . . . See §§ 942.01-.06; New York v. O’Neill, 359 U.S. 1, 9, 79 S.Ct. 564, 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959). . . .

J. WOLF C. v. F. SCOBIE,, 28 F. App'x 545 (7th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 942.01(1) (1998). . . .

LIMA, v. STATE, 732 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See Harrell, 709 So.2d at 1369 n. 5; §§ 942.01-.06, Fla. Stat. (1997); see also Barber v. . . .

HARRELL, v. STATE, 709 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 1998)

. . . Breeden, 333 Md. 212, 634 A.2d 464, 469 (1993); see e.g., §§ 942.01-06, Fla. . . .

DELIT, v. STATE, 583 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . .” § 942.01(3), Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. FREEMAN, 36 Fla. Supp. 2d 114 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . Chapter 942.01, et. seq. . . .

RAKOVICH, v. WADE RAKOVICH, v. KASS,, 850 F.2d 1180 (7th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 942.01 (West 1982) (defamation); Wis.Stat.Ann. § 946.12 (West 1982) (misconduct in public office) . . . Wis.Stat.Ann. § 942.01 (West 1982). . . . .

In SUPERIOR COURT, 471 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . requiring appellants to appear as witnesses in a California criminal proceeding pursuant to sections 942.01 . . .

J. ROBISON, v. LESCRENIER a, 721 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir. 1983)

. . . . §§ 942.01, 939.51. . . .

A. BANNISTER, Jr. v. STATE, 358 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . An exception is the interstate extradition witness specifically provided for in §§ 942.01-06, Fla.Stat . . .

BRYAN, v. STATE, 290 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . §§ 942.01-942.06 F.S.A.; Ky.Rev.Stat. 421.230-421.-270. . State v. . . .

WALKER, v. M. COINER,, 474 F.2d 887 (4th Cir. 1973)

. . . . § 942.01; West Va.Code Ann. § 62-6A-1; Vol. 9, Uniform Laws Ann.; 29 Wash. & L.Rev. 383. . . .

R. LEEDS, v. LEVEY,, 443 F.2d 1363 (9th Cir. 1971)

. . . We accept the trial court’s computation of a charge against Levey of $117,-942.01 and a charge of $6,896.12 . . .

HUDDLESTON, v. COSTA, C. B, 314 F. Supp. 278 (W.D. Pa. 1970)

. . . . §§ 942.01-942.06, a statute also enacted in forty-one other States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico . . .

MILLER, v. J. E. DECKER,, 411 F.2d 302 (5th Cir. 1969)

. . . Stat.1957, §§ 942.01-942.06, F.S.A. . . .

GARRISON v. LOUISIANA, 379 U.S. 64 (U.S. 1964)

. . . Stat., 1961, § 942.01 (3); Wyo. Const., 1890, Art. 1, § 20. Cf. . . .

NEW YORK v. O NEILL, 359 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1959)

. . . Stat., 1957, §§ 942.01-942.06. . . .

PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK C. O NEILL, 100 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1958)

. . . Furthermore, the preceding section, Sec. 942.01, Florida Statutes 1955, F.S.A., titled “Definitions” . . .

In O NEILL, 9 Fla. Supp. 153 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1956)

. . . Perhaps the most serious objection to the constitutionality of the “uniform law” (sections 942.01 to . . .