Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 942 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 942 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 942

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 942
INTERSTATE EXTRADITION OF WITNESSES
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 942
CHAPTER 942
INTERSTATE EXTRADITION OF WITNESSES
942.01 Definitions.
942.02 Summoning witness in this state to testify in another state.
942.03 Witness from another state summoned to testify in this state.
942.04 Exemption from arrest and service of process.
942.05 Uniformity of interpretation.
942.06 Short title.
942.01 Definitions.
(1) “Witness,” as used in this chapter, includes a person whose testimony is desired in any proceeding or investigation by a grand jury or in a criminal action, prosecution, or proceeding held by the prosecution or the defense.
(2) “State” includes any territory of the United States and District of Columbia.
(3) “Summons” includes a subpoena, order, or other notice requiring the appearance of a witness.
History.s. 1, ch. 20458, 1941.
942.02 Summoning witness in this state to testify in another state.
(1) If a judge of a court of record, in any state which by its laws has made provision for commanding persons within that state to attend and testify in this state, certifies under the seal of such court that there is a criminal prosecution pending in such court, or that a grand jury investigation has commenced or is about to commence, that a person being within this state is a material witness in such prosecution or grand jury investigation, and that that person’s presence will be required for a specified number of days, upon presentation of such certificate to any judge of a court of record in the county in which such person is, such judge shall fix a time and place for a hearing and shall make an order directing the witness to appear at a time and place certain for the hearing. The witness shall at all times be entitled to counsel.
(2) If at a hearing the judge determines that the witness is material and necessary, that it will not cause undue hardship to the witness to be compelled to attend and testify in the prosecution or a grand jury investigation in the other state, and that the laws of the state in which the prosecution is pending, or grand jury investigation has commenced or is about to commence, will give to the witness protection from arrest and the service of civil and criminal process, the judge shall issue a summons, with a copy of the certificate attached, directing the witness to attend and testify in the court where the prosecution is pending, or where a grand jury investigation has commenced or is about to commence at a time and place specified in the summons. In any such hearing the certificate shall be prima facie evidence of all the facts stated therein.
(3) If said certificate recommends that the witness be taken into immediate custody and delivered to an officer of the requesting state to assure her or his attendance in the requesting state, such judge may, in lieu of notification of the hearing, direct that such witness be forthwith brought before her or him for said hearing; and the judge at the hearing being satisfied of the desirability of such custody and delivery, for which determination the certificate shall be prima facie proof of such desirability, may, in lieu of issuing subpoena or summons, order that said witness be forthwith taken in custody and delivered to an officer of the requesting state.
(4) If the witness, who is summoned as above provided, after being paid or tendered by some properly authorized person the sum of 10 cents a mile for each mile by the ordinary traveled route to and from the court where the prosecution is pending and $5 for each day that the witness is required to travel and attend as a witness, fails without good cause to attend and testify as directed in the summons, the witness shall be punished in the manner provided for the punishment of any witness who disobeys a summons issued from a court of record in this state.
History.s. 2, ch. 20458, 1941; s. 1, ch. 61-491; s. 1625, ch. 97-102.
942.03 Witness from another state summoned to testify in this state.
(1) If a person in any state, which by its laws has made provision for commanding persons within its borders to attend and testify in criminal prosecutions or grand jury investigations commenced or about to commence in this state, is a material witness in a prosecution pending in a court of record in this state, or in a grand jury investigation which has commenced or is about to commence, a judge of such court may issue a certificate under the seal of the court stating these facts and specifying the number of days the witness will be required. Said certificate may include a recommendation that the witness be taken into immediate custody and delivered to an officer of this state to assure his or her attendance in this state. This certificate shall be presented to a judge of a court of record in the county in which the witness is found.
(2) If the witness is summoned to attend and testify in this state, the witness shall be tendered the sum of 10 cents a mile for each mile by the ordinary traveled route to and from the court where the prosecution is pending, and $5 for each day that he or she is required to travel and attend as a witness. A witness who has appeared in accordance with the provisions of the summons shall not be required to remain within this state a longer period of time than the period mentioned in the certificate, unless otherwise ordered by the court. If such witness, after coming into this state, fails without good cause to attend and testify as directed in the summons, the witness shall be punished in the manner provided for the punishment of any witness who disobeys a summons issued from a court of record in this state.
History.s. 3, ch. 20458, 1941; s. 1626, ch. 97-102.
942.04 Exemption from arrest and service of process.
(1) If a person comes into this state in obedience to a summons directing him or her to attend and testify in this state, the person shall not while in this state pursuant to such summons be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil or criminal, in connection with matters which arose before his or her entrance into this state under the summons.
(2) If a person passes through this state while going to another state in obedience to a summons to attend and testify in that state, or while returning therefrom, the person shall not while so passing through this state be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil or criminal, in connection with matters which arose before his or her entrance into this state under the summons.
History.s. 4, ch. 20458, 1941; s. 1627, ch. 97-102.
942.05 Uniformity of interpretation.This chapter shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law of the states which enact it, and shall be only applicable to such state as shall enact reciprocal powers to this state relative to the matter of securing attendance of witnesses as herein provided.
History.s. 5, ch. 20458, 1941.
942.06 Short title.This chapter may be cited as the “Uniform Law to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Within or Without a State in Criminal Proceedings.”
History.s. 6, ch. 20458, 1941.

F.S. 942 on Google Scholar

F.S. 942 on Casetext

Amendments to 942


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 942
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 942.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

HALPRIN v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1200 (U.S. 2020)

. . . In re Halprin , 788 Fed.Appx. 941, 942, n. 2 (2019) (per curiam ). . . .

ZUCKERMAN, v. METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART., 140 S. Ct. 1269 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-942 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. ROMERO, Jr., 935 F.3d 1124 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Snow, 82 F.3d 935, 942 (10th Cir. 1996). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BAPTISTE,, 935 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Moran , 778 F.3d 942, 978 (11th Cir. 2015). Our decision in United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. GREEN,, 935 F.3d 677 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ramos-Medina, 706 F.3d 932, 942 (9th Cir. 2013), or whether he has otherwise "acted in a manner inconsistent . . .

COMPERE, v. NUSRET MIAMI, LLC, d b a a, 391 F. Supp. 3d 1197 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Corr. , 942 F.2d 1562, 1567-68 (11th Cir. 1991). . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Article II and the Twelfth Amendment ... 942 i. Role of the states after appointment 84 ... 942 ii. . . . City, Cty. of Denver, Colo. , 268 F.3d 942, 948 (10th Cir. 2001). * * * In summary, none of the Presidential . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . In In re Murchison , 349 U.S. 133, 134, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955), the judge acted as a "one-man . . .

UNITED STATES v. VALQUIER, 934 F.3d 780 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Alvarado-Rivera, 412 F.3d 942, 948-49 (8th Cir. 2005) (en banc). . . .

IN RE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE S SUNDAY TICKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Jr. v. LLC LLC NFL LLC LLC LP LLC LLC NFL LP LLC LP LLC LP Co. LLC LP LLC, 933 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Nat'l Football League , 814 F.3d 938, 942 (8th Cir. 2016) (noting that "courts have recognized that the . . .

M. RODEN, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 548 (S.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . Sullivan , 942 F.2d 301, 307 (6th Cir. 1991). . . .

ADAM AND EVE JONESBORO, LLC, v. PERRIN, In, 933 F.3d 951 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Koster , 713 F.3d 942, 952 (8th Cir. 2013). . . .

OSBORNE, v. HALL,, 934 F.3d 428 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . State , 942 So. 2d 193 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006), cert. denied , 942 So. 2d 164 (Miss. 2006). . . .

VALBRUNA SLATER STEEL CORPORATION, v. JOSLYN MANUFACTURING COMPANY,, 934 F.3d 553 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Shop, Inc. , 942 F.2d 1457, 1461 (9th Cir. 1991) (California law); Gargallo v. . . .

N. TIMM K. v. GOODYEAR DUNLOP TIRES NORTH AMERICA, LTD., 932 F.3d 986 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ford Motor Co ., 942 N.E.2d 791, 793-94 (Ind. 2011) (quoting Miller v. . . .

ASSOCIATION OF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS AGCO CNH LLC v. BURGUM, s, 932 F.3d 727 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sess. 942 (N.D. 2017). . . .

FLORES, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 353 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Meese, 790 F.2d 942, 953 (D.C. . . .

VIEIRA, v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC LLC LLC, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1117 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . City of Phoenix , 566 F.3d 936, 942 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Lopez v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PINEDA- DUARTE,, 933 F.3d 519 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 937, 942 (5th Cir. 2017) (credible threat of violence when defendant threatened drug debtor, held . . .

UNITED STATES v. GRADY,, 931 F.3d 727 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Guzman, 707 F.3d 938, 942 (8th Cir. 2013) (concluding that plea agreement and waiver were knowing and . . .

WEST, v. CITY OF CALDWELL, 931 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Strickland , 902 F.2d 937, 942 (11th Cir. 1990). The Third, Tenth, and D.C. . . .

UNITED STATES v. COONCE, Jr., 932 F.3d 623 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dale , 614 F.3d 942, 955 (8th Cir. 2010). . . .

MCADAMS, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT, INC, THE,, 931 F.3d 1132 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 942-43. . . .

L. JACKSON, v. BARTOW,, 930 F.3d 930 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . See, e.g. , Gomez , 434 F.3d at 942 ; Gomez v. Berge , 2004 WL 1852978, at *2 (W.D. Wis. . . . proceedings, including any constitutional violations that occurred before the plea was entered." 434 F.3d at 942 . . .

LAZO Ny v. SODEXO, INC., 931 F.3d 29 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Grp., Inc., 78 Mass.App.Ct. 806, 942 N.E.2d 1007, 1015 (2011) (noting that the purpose of the designation . . . See Bednark, 942 N.E.2d at 1013 n.18 ("We also observe that the Act does not explicitly require a 'designation . . .

DIAZ- QUIRAZCO, v. P. BARR,, 931 F.3d 830 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder , 621 F.3d 941, 942 n.1 (9th Cir. 2010) (reviewing de novo legal determinations regarding alien's . . . Carhart , 530 U.S. 914, 942, 120 S.Ct. 2597, 147 L.Ed.2d 743 (2000). . . .

IN RE LICKING RIVER MINING, LLC, v. LLC,, 603 B.R. 336 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2019)

. . . Farmers Nat'l Bank , 942 F.2d 381, 390 (6th Cir. 1991) (to avoid a finding of insolvency, the defendant . . .

UNITED STATES v. T. HERMAN,, 930 F.3d 872 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Carter , 410 F.3d 942 (7th Cir. 2005), came perilously close to applying section 2B3.1(b)(4)(B) based . . . Carter , 410 F.3d 942, 954 (7th Cir. 2005) ; United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. SCHMIDT,, 930 F.3d 858 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 942, 103 S.Ct. 3418 (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

MCGUIRE, v. INTELIDENT SOLUTIONS, LLC LLC,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 1261 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Corr. , 942 F.2d 1562, 1567 (11th Cir. 1991). This is a lenient standard. Grayson v. . . .

MEZA- LOPEZ, v. UNITED STATES, 929 F.3d 1041 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States, 553 U.S. 550, 562, 128 S.Ct. 1994, 170 L.Ed.2d 942 (2008) (noting that, for a money-laundering . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHYTE, a. k. a., 928 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Moran , 778 F.3d 942, 959 (11th Cir. 2015). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CAREY,, 929 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994) ; see also In re Murchison , 349 U.S. 133, 136, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942 . . .

MAZUR, KYC LLC LLC U. S. v. OSPINA BARAYA,, 275 So. 3d 812 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Masterpiece Homes, Inc., 942 So. 2d 995, 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). . . .

EUROPA EYE WEAR CORP. v. KAIZEN ADVISORS, LLC AO v. LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 228 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Reeve , 942 F. Supp. 2d 244, 258 (E.D.N.Y. 2013) (citations omitted). . . .

BRUCKER, v. CITY OF DORAVILLE, a, 391 F. Supp. 3d 1207 (N.D. Ga. 2019)

. . . In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955) ; Marshall, 446 U.S. at 243, 100 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CERVANTES,, 929 F.3d 535 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Alvarado-Rivera, 412 F.3d 942, 947 (8th Cir. 2005) (en banc). . . .

CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA, 928 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Weber , 767 F.3d 936, 942 (9th Cir. 2014) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. TZACIR- GARCIA,, 928 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Burris , 920 F.3d 942, 945 (5th Cir. 2019). . . .

UNITED STATES v. KIDD,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 250 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Gonzalez, 110 F.3d 936, 942 (2d Cir. 1997) (quoting United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. F. WHITE,, 928 F.3d 734 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rodriguez , 834 F.3d 937, 942-43 (8th Cir. 2016). . . .

DIVISION SIX SPORTS, INC. FINISH LINE, INC., 928 F.3d 631 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Mid-Valley Inc. , 942 F.2d 425, 427 (7th Cir. 1991). . . .

D. NELSON, v. GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC., 928 F.3d 639 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . applications would be preempted under § 1098g, as the Ninth Circuit made clear in Chae . 593 F.3d at 942 . . .

A. RUCHO, v. COMMON CAUSE, H. v. O., 139 S. Ct. 2484 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Id. , at 942. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, v. NEW YORK,, 139 S. Ct. 2551 (U.S. 2019)

. . . . ----, ----, 137 S.Ct. 929, 941-942, 197 L.Ed.2d 263 (2017). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DIGGLES, 928 F.3d 380 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Martinez , 250 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir. 2001). . . .

CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. v. J. J. WHITE, INC., 387 F. Supp. 3d 583 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Block, 744 S.W.2d 940, 942-43 (Tex. 1988) ; Elliott v. Hanover Ins. . . .

FLOWERS, v. MISSISSIPPI, 139 S. Ct. 2228 (U.S. 2019)

. . . concurring in result); and four justices would have held that no strikes violated Batson , 947 So.2d at 942 . . .

RIVERA, v. STATE, 274 So. 3d 537 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Rushin, 844 F.3d 933, 942-43 (11th Cir. 2016) (Jordan, J., concurring). . . .

IN RE NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION. HD LLC W. P. LLC, v., 927 F.3d 919 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . (R. 167, Page ID# 942.) . . . (R. 167, PageID 942.) . . .

IN RE L. FULTON, In S. In In, 926 F.3d 916 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . In re Jepson , 816 F.3d 942, 945 (7th Cir. 2016). A. . . .

MARTINEZ, v. L. RYAN,, 926 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . insulted presided over contempt proceedings); In re Murchison , 349 U.S. 133, 137, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942 . . .

FELTON, v. BARTOW,, 926 F.3d 451 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bradley , 448 F.3d 942, 948 (7th Cir. 2006). . . .

MATTHEWS, v. P. BARR,, 927 F.3d 606 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . 745 654 525 107 Cond Discharge 212 307 328 393 467 514 659 685 817 780 829 800 907 766 813 843 868 942 . . .

MANHATTAN COMMUNITY ACCESS CORPORATION, v. HALLECK,, 139 S. Ct. 1921 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Edmondson Oil Co. , 457 U.S. 922, 941-942, 102 S.Ct. 2744, 73 L.Ed.2d 482 (1982). . . . Edmondson Oil Co. , 457 U.S. 922, 942, 102 S.Ct. 2744, 73 L.Ed.2d 482 (1982) (state-created system "whereby . . .

UNITED STATES v. GUSTUS,, 926 F.3d 1037 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bussey, 942 F.2d 1241, 1250 (8th Cir. 1991). . . .

UNITED STATES v. FOX, Jr., 926 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Moran, 778 F.3d 942, 959 (11th Cir. 2015). . . .

DAVINCI AIRCRAFT, INC. v. UNITED STATES S., 926 F.3d 1117 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States (Dubin II ), 363 F.2d 938, 942 (Ct. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON,, 926 F.3d 954 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gray, 533 F.3d 942, 944 (8th Cir. 2008). . . .

BANDA, v. MCALEENAN,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 1099 (W.D. Wash. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 535 F.3d 942, 950 (9th Cir. 2008) (addressing detention under § 1226(a) ); Diouf . . .

FLORIDA PENINSULA INSURANCE COMPANY, v. NEWLIN, 273 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Gillett, 96 So. 3d 933, 942-43 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (citing Binger and reversing new trial order that had . . .

IN RE MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL- RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION NO. II, 387 F. Supp. 3d 323 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 942, 949 (E.D. Ark. 1998) (Arkansas), aff'd sub nom. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GIOVINCO,, 382 F. Supp. 3d 299 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Gonzalez, 110 F.3d 936, 942 (2d Cir. 1997) (quoting United States v. . . .

CANCINO CASTELLAR v. MCALEENAN, U. S., 388 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (S.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Nakatani , 342 F.3d 934, 942 (9th Cir. 2003) (holding that a court need not review arguments not specifically . . .

RAVENNA, v. VILLAGE OF SKOKIE J. R., 388 F. Supp. 3d 999 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Supp. 933, 942 (S.D.N.Y. 1980) )). . . . Supp. at 942-43 ). . . .

IN RE HYUNDAI AND KIA FUEL ECONOMY LITIGATION, R. P. A. P. M. D. J. S. L. J. E. J. L. P. J. M. A. L. E. D J. A. v. In R. P. A. P. M. D. J. S. L. J. E. J. L. P. J. M. A. L. E. D J. A. v. In R. P. A. P. M. D. J. S. L. J. E. J. L. P. J. M. A. L. E. D J. A. v. In R. P. A. P. M. D. J. S. L. J. E. J. L. P. J. M. A. L. E. D J. A. v. In R. P. A. P. M. D. J. S. L. J. E. J. L. P. J. M. A. L. E. D J. A. v. In v., 926 F.3d 539 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . In re Online DVD-Rental Antitrust Litig. , 779 F.3d 934, 942 (9th Cir. 2015). . . . Bluetooth Headset , 654 F.3d at 942. . . . Bluetooth Headset , 654 F.3d at 942. . . . Litig. , 654 F.3d at 942. . . .

A. TAYLOR, v. MOORE, 383 F. Supp. 3d 91 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Watkins, 942 F.2d 67, 72 (1st Cir. 1991) ). . . .

NAJERA- RODRIGUEZ, v. P. BARR,, 926 F.3d 343 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. , 247 Ill.Dec. 164, 731 N.E.2d at 942. . . .

LAWRENCE, v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, USAA v. ACE, 391 F. Supp. 3d 1077 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Co., Ltd., 942 F. Supp.2d 1254, 1269 (M.D. . . .

BOFFO, v. STATE, 272 So. 3d 876 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . State, 942 So. 2d 12, 14 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) ; see also Smith v. . . .

RED LABEL MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC. v. CHILA PRODUCTIONS, 388 F. Supp. 3d 975 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . See Bouchat , 737 F.3d at 942 (quoting Elvis Presley Enters., Inc. , 349 F.3d at 627 (explaining that . . .

REXING QUALITY EGGS, v. REMBRANDT ENTERPRISES, INC., 392 F. Supp. 3d 965 (S.D. Ind. 2019)

. . . Mid-Valley Inc. , 942 F.2d 425, 427 (7th Cir. 1991). . . .

MUSSELWHITE, v. FLORIDA FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY d b a, 273 So. 3d 251 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Co. , 942 F.Supp.2d 1254, 1262 (M.D. Fla. 2013) ; but see Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. . . .

YPF S. A. YPF B. V. v. APACHE OVERSEAS, INCORPORATED II S. A. R. L., 924 F.3d 815 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Local 2297, Int'l Union , 404 F.3d 942, 946 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Delta Queen Steamboat Co. v. . . .

N. DELA CRUZ, v. WILKIE,, 931 F.3d 1143 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 941, 942 (Fed. . . . Appx 941, 942 (Fed. . . .

HARLOW v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1046 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Co., 480 F.3d 942, 947 (9th Cir. 2007) ; United Steelworkers of Am. v. . . .

DESIGN BASICS, LLC, v. FORRESTER WEHRLE HOMES, INC., 380 F. Supp. 3d 692 (N.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . Design Basics, supra , 302 F.Supp.3d at 942-43 & n.1. . . . Id. at 942. . . .

COMBE INC. v. DR. AUGUST WOLFF GMBH CO. KG ARZNEIMITTEL,, 382 F. Supp. 3d 429 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Houston Computer Servs., Inc. , 918 F.2d 937, 942 (Fed. . . . Houston Computer Servs., Inc. , 918 F.2d 937, 942 (Fed. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CREWS,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 439 (W.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Anderson, 942 F.2d 606, 611 (9th Cir. 1991), they remain extrinsic sources. . . .

HOLMAN, v. JOHNSON JOHNSON, LLC, Co., 600 B.R. 6 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Brakegate, Ltd. , 942 F.2d 1223, 1225-26 (7th Cir. 1991) ; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1452(a) (noting that . . . See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) ; Hernandez , 942 F.2d at 1225-26. V. . . .

PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY REVOCABLE TRUST, a v. CORI, a a a a a a a v. a a a a a a, 924 F.3d 1004 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Nejezchleba, 477 F.3d 942, 946, 947 (8th Cir. 2007) (cleaned up). . . .

W. WESTMORELAND, v. TWC ADMINISTRATION LLC, d b a, 924 F.3d 718 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Clay Printing Co. , 955 F.2d 936, 942-43 (4th Cir. 1992) (holding that references to the need to "attract . . .

MACHADO AMADIS, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Meese , 790 F.2d 942, 956 (D.C. Cir. 1986). . . .

PENA, v. RODRIGUEZ,, 273 So. 3d 237 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Matter of SAJ, 942 P.2d 407, 410 (Wyo. 1997) (citation omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. YUREK,, 925 F.3d 423 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sierra-Castillo , 405 F.3d 932, 942 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting that a district court's comments at sentencing . . .

S. FULLER, Jr. v. CARILION CLINIC,, 382 F. Supp. 3d 475 (W.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Siwinski, 942 F.2d 257, 262 (4th Cir. 1991) ). . . .

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 992 (E.D. Mo. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 929, 942 (S.D. Iowa 2007). . . . Co. , 942 F. Supp. 949, 954 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). . . .

IN RE RENT- RITE SUPERKEGS WEST, LTD. v. LLC,, 603 B.R. 41 (Bankr. Colo. 2019)

. . . (In re Lindsay) , 59 F.3d 942, 948 (9th Cir. 1995) ("In federal question cases with exclusive jurisdiction . . .

DOE, v. B. RAUSCH,, 382 F. Supp. 3d 783 (E.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . Kiefer , 310 F.3d 937, 942 (6th Cir. 2002). . . .

CAMCO MANUFACTURING, INC. v. JONES STEPHENS CORP., 391 F. Supp. 3d 515 (M.D.N.C. 2019)

. . . Staley, 263 N.C. 199, 139 S.E.2d 185 (1964) ), aff'd 752 F.2d 942 (4th Cir. 1984) ; Gateway Mgmt. . . .

CULWICK, v. E. WOOD,, 384 F. Supp. 3d 328 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Campione , 942 F. Supp. 2d 279, 285 (E.D.N.Y. 2013) (citations omitted); accord Smith v. Metro. . . . See Campione , 942 F. Supp. 2d at 285. . . .

IN RE DEVAL CORPORATION, 601 B.R. 725 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Id. at 942. Id. at 944 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Id. (emphasis added). Id. . . .

ESTATE OF NUNEZ BY AND THROUGH NUNEZ, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,, 381 F. Supp. 3d 1251 (S.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . City of McMinnville , 942 F.Supp.2d 1096, 1103 (D. . . .

IN RE VARGAS MOYA, v. y, 601 B.R. 845 (Bankr. P.R. 2019)

. . . Watkins, 942 F.2d 67, 72 (1st Cir. 1991) ; Daury, 842 F.2d at 11. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WALOKE,, 923 F.3d 1152 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 942 (Knoch, J., dissenting). . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROMERO- LOBATO,, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1111 (D. Nev. 2019)

. . . Brown , 510 F.3d 870, 942 (9th Cir. 2007). . . .

UNITED STATES v. KELLY,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 721 (E.D. Wis. 2019)

. . . Concepcion, 942 F.2d 1170 (7th Cir. 1991) ), where the Seventh Circuit found that "a tenant has no reasonable . . . Concepcion, 942 F.2d at 1172. . . . (quoting Concepcion, 942 F.2d at 1172 ). . . . Concepcion, 942 F.2d at 1172. . . .

STEARNEY, v. UNITED STATES, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1037 (D. Ariz. 2019)

. . . JAI Dining Servs., Inc. , 245 Ariz. 578, 432 P.3d 937, 942-43 (App. 2018) (citing Ontiveros , reiterating . . .

ALLIANT TAX CREDIT INC, a XXVII, a XXVII, a XI, a XI, a v. M. MURPHY, III, L. L. C. a a LLC, a, 924 F.3d 1134 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Davenport , 906 F.3d 934, 942 (11th Cir. 2018) ("The expression of one thing implies the exclusion of . . .