Cases from cite.case.law:

J. JONES, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 832 So. 2d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . he was not entitled, as he argues, to additional credits which had not yet been awarded when section 944.278 . . .

D. WINKLER, v. W. MOORE, v. W. v. W., 831 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 2002)

. . . Langley, we discussed the reasons for the across-the-board cancellations taken pursuant to section 944.278 . . .

LYNCE, J. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, An, 772 So. 2d 571 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . credits and/or administrative gaintime pursuant to Attorney General Opinion 92-96 (1992), and/or section 944.278 . . .

BLACK, v. W. MOORE,, 768 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Department) violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution when, pursuant to section 944.278 . . . Section 944.278 provides in part that "[a]ll awards of administrative gain-time under s. 944.276 [repealed . . .

DIEHL, v. W. MOORE,, 767 So. 2d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . section 944.277, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), Florida Attorney General Opinion 92-96 (1992), and section 944.278 . . .

MOORE, v. W. MOORE,, 764 So. 2d 676 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . for writ of certiorari challenging the trial court’s 1999 order upholding the application of section 944.278 . . .

DONOVAN, v. W. MOORE,, 755 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Administrative Gain Time pursuant to either sections 944.28(1) or 948.06(7), it may utilize section 944.278 . . . probation revocation, the Lynce decision also forbids the cancellation of Donovan’s credits under section 944.278 . . . See § 944.278, Fla. Stat. (1997); ch. 93^06, § 35, at 2967, Laws of Fla. . . . Accordingly, we conclude that under the analysis of Lynce, the State cannot apply section 944.278 (the . . . Singletary, 695 So.2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(applying first part of section 944.278, canceling awards . . .

THOMAS, v. W. MOORE,, 748 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 1999)

. . . See § 944.278, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . the Department may not forfeit Administrative Gain Time or Provisional Credits pursuant to section 944.278 . . .

GRANT, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 730 So. 2d 805 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . 17, 1993, the Department of Corrections (the Department) canceled these credits pursuant to section 944.278 . . .

GOMEZ, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr. v. K. Jr. v. K. Jr. v. K. Jr. v. K. Jr., 733 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1998)

. . . See § 944.278, Fla. Stat. (1993)(note 2); ch. 93-406, §§ 32, 44, at 2966, 2974, Laws of Fla. . . .

L. MEOLA, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, L. v. K. v. K., 732 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1998)

. . . See § 944.278, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . Langley, we discussed the reasons for the across-the-board cancellations taken pursuant to section 944.278 . . . See § 944.278 (Supp.1990); ch. 89-526, §§ 5, 52, Laws of Fla. . . . .

STATE v. LANCASTER,, 731 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 1998)

. . . The third statute was section 944.278, Florida Statutes (1993), which was part of the act known as the . . . Therefore, the State maintains that there were no overcrowding credits to cancel under section 944.278 . . . Section 944.278 provides, in pertinent part: All awards of administrative gain-time under s. 9U.276 and . . . We conclude that both the first emphasized portion of section 944.278 providing for the cancellation . . . Singletary, 695 So.2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(applying first part of section 944.278 canceling awards . . . See § 944.278, Fla. Stat. (1993); ch. 93-406, § 32, 44, Laws of Fla. . . .

BERGELSON, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 721 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . cancellation by the Department of Corrections of 1,500 days of provisional credits pursuant to section 944.278 . . . In 1993, the Department canceled all of petitioner’s provisional credits pursuant to section 944.278, . . . Subsequently, in 1993, the legislature passed section 944.278 which, to the extent pertinent, read: All . . . The Department canceled petitioner’s previously awarded provisional credits pursuant to section 944.278 . . . Petitioner argues that the Department’s retroactive application of section 944.278 to cancel provisional . . .

ROYDHOUSE, v. STATE, 701 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . entitled to restoration of administrative gaintime and provisional credits cancelled pursuant to section 944.278 . . .

JACKSON, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 695 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . mandamus is reversed because he was unlawfully deprived of those benefits by the enactment of section 944.278 . . .

B. CRIDLAND, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 695 So. 2d 794 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . (Supp.1992), and section 944.278, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

STATE v. LANCASTER,, 687 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 1997)

. . . committed an offense prior to October 1, 1989, and completed his sentence prior to the enactment of section 944.278 . . . offense before October 1, 1989, and who completed their sentences prior to the 1993 enactment of section 944.278 . . .

R. M. OROSZ, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 693 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 1997)

. . . In 1993, while Orosz was serving this second sentence, the Legislature enacted section 944.278. . . . .” § 944.278, Fla.Stat. (1993) (emphasis added). . . .

CALAMIA, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr. HOCK, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 686 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 1996)

. . . both inmates, allege that the interpretation of sections 944.277, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), and 944.278 . . . the retroactive denial of administrative gain time and provisional credits by the adoption of section 944.278 . . . Thereafter, in 1993 the legislature repealed section 944.277 and enacted section 944.278, which canceled . . . hold that the retrospective application of section 944.277, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), and section 944.278 . . . apply retrospectively: section 944.277 (Supp. 1992) — through interpretation by the DOC— and section 944.278 . . . I would hold that the provisions of sections 944.277 (Supp.1992) and 944.278 can only be applied prospectively . . .

STATE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v. E. STEVENSON,, 695 So. 2d 727 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . But in 1993, the legislature enacted section 944.278 Florida Statutes: All awards of administrative gain-time . . . probation) had been violated and he had been sentenced over a year prior to the effective date of section 944.278 . . . statute was enacted all within the current term that he was serving held that the new statute (section 944.278 . . .

K. SINGLETARY, v. EVANS,, 676 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . sentencing for violation of probation, the cancellation of Galston’s provisional credit by section 944.278 . . .

DAVIS, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 659 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . However, as a result of the DOC’s interpretation of section 944.278, Florida Statutes (1993), Davis was . . . We do not rule on the merits of DOC’s interpretation of section 944.278 as it may apply to other cases . . .

CLARK, v. STATE, 656 So. 2d 252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Even before these credits were statutorily cancelled by section 944.278, Florida Statutes (1993), they . . .

LANCASTER, v. STATE, 656 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . committed an offense prior to October 1, 1989 and completed his sentence prior to the enactment of section 944.278 . . . that defendant completed his original sentence prior to 1993, when the legislature enacted section 944.278 . . .

T. ROBERTSON, v. HODGES,, 883 F. Supp. 668 (M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . Pursuant to Section 944.278, Florida Statutes (1993), DOC canceled the 301 days of provisional credits . . . The DOC canceled only the 301 days of provisional credits pursuant to Section 944.278, Florida Statutes . . .

R. M. OROSZ, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 655 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 1995)

. . . In 1993, while Orosz was serving this second sentence, the Legislature enacted section 944.278. . . . .” § 944.278, Fla.Stat. (1993) (emphasis added). . . .

J. HERRING, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 879 F. Supp. 1180 (N.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . . § 944.278 (1993). . . . In 1993 all provisional credits previously granted were cancelled by Fla.Stat. § 944.278. . . . But that claim becomes moot if a challenge to Fla.Stat. § 944.278 (1993) would fail. . . . Singletary, 645 So.2d 961 (Fla.1994) (cancellation of credit under § 944.278 only). . . . Section 944.278 was added by Ch. 93-406, § 35, Laws of Fla., effective June 17, 1993. . . .

HOCK, v. K. SINGLETARY,, 41 F.3d 1470 (11th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 944.278 (1993)). The cancellation of provisional credits is not an issue on appeal. . . . .

E. SIERS, v. FLORIDA STATE SENATE,, 644 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . court claimed that the Florida Senate’s action in passing Senate Bill No., 26B (1993) (now section 944.278 . . .

R. LANGLEY, v. K. SINGLETARY,, 645 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1994)

. . . However, Langley overlooks the fact that section 944.278, Florida Statutes (1993), voided all provisional . . .

GRIFFIN, v. K. SINGLETARY,, 638 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 1994)

. . . On June 17, 1993, DOC cancelled Griffin’s administrative gain time pursuant to section 944.278, Florida . . .

WAITE, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr., 632 So. 2d 192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . See § 944.278, Fla.Stat. (1993); ch. 93-406, §§ 32, 35, Laws of Fla. . . .