Cases from cite.case.law:

HEARD, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 264 So. 3d 214 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 944.28(1), Florida Statutes, which provides for the forfeiture of gain-time if the prisoner escapes . . .

JONES, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 906 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2018)

. . . section 944.279(1), Florida Statutes, which may include the forfeiture of gain time pursuant to section 944.28 . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE- REGULAR- CYCLE REPORT., 265 So. 3d 494 (Fla. 2018)

. . . (Gain time may be subject to forfeiture by the Department of Corrections under section 944.28(1), Florida . . .

WILLARD, v. STATE, 240 So. 3d 801 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999) ; §§ 944.279, 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. App. P. 9.410. . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 215 So. 3d 1237 (Fla. 2017)

. . . See §§ 944.275, 944.28, 944.281 Fla. Stat. . . .

A. WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 201 So. 3d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Williams pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2007). Affirmed. . . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 188 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 2015)

. . . (Gain time may be subject to forfeiture by the Department of Corrections under section 944.28('ll, Florida . . .

PURRIER, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 164 So. 3d 783 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings conducted by the Department of Corrections pursuant to s. 944.28 . . .

PONTON, v. STATE, 155 So. 3d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). Petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. . . .

FRANKLIN, v. STATE, 162 So. 3d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur. . . .

MONTESINOS, v. STATE, 143 So. 3d 1055 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . by that institution of disciplinary measures against Montesinos, pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

BRAY, v. STATE, 142 So. 3d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

HARMON, III, v. STATE, 136 So. 3d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009); Hall v. . . . Stat., for consideration of sanctions pursuant to § 944.28, Fla. Stat.). . . .

FORD, v. STATE, 123 So. 3d 655 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). See also Hudson v. . . .

A. GOOLSBY, v. STATE, 121 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). Rehearing "will not be entertained. . . .

DAWSON, v. STATE, 121 So. 3d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . institution of disciplinary measures against Dawson pursuant to Florida Statutes Sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 121 So. 3d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . by that institution of disciplinary measures against Williams, pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

BATTIE, v. STATE, 117 So. 3d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . consideration by that institution of disciplinary measures against Battie pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

C. DINKINS, v. STATE, 125 So. 3d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 944.28(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . . have discovered within the two-year time limit that his gain time could be forfeited under section 944.28 . . .

GOLFE, v. STATE, 125 So. 3d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). See Marc v. . . .

J. PETSOULES, v. STATE, 104 So. 3d 1284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. Rehearing -will not be entertained. . . .

B. GREENE, v. TUCKER,, 113 So. 3d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 944.28, Fla. . . . See § 944.28(1), (3), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

WHITE, v. STATE, 104 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . referred to the Department of Corrections for disciplinary action pursuant to sections 944.279 and 944.28 . . . White under sections 944.279 and 944.28, Florida Statutes. IT IS SO ORDERED. . . .

E. BASS, v. STATE, 103 So. 3d 933 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

FERRIS, Jr. v. STATE, 100 So. 3d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat.; see also Ibarra v. . . . order is not required to refer an inmate to DOC for disciplinary action under sections 944.279 and 944.28 . . . We also can, and should, refer this matter to DOC for disciplinary action under sections 944.279 and 944.28 . . .

K. SIMS, v. STATE Of, 114 So. 3d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). Rehearing will not be entertained. . . .

J. AUMILLER, v. STATE, 97 So. 3d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). Rehearing will not be entertained. . . .

J. PLUCINIK, v. STATE, 97 So. 3d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). Rehearing will not be entertained. . . .

HYDE, v. STATE, 97 So. 3d 944 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Stat. (2012); § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(m). . . .

W. HICKMON, v. STATE, 96 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). We do so now. See Isley v. . . .

SEYMORE, v. STATE, 96 So. 3d 1097 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Stat. (2012); § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). Reversed and remanded. . . .

L. SWEET, v. STATE, 97 So. 3d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012); Fla. R.Crim. . . .

HUDSON, v. STATE, 95 So. 3d 413 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). Affirmed. . . .

R. VILLALOBOS, v. STATE, 96 So. 3d 970 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . by that institution of disciplinary measures against Villalobos, pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

HALL, v. STATE, 94 So. 3d 655 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Pursuant to section 944.28(2)(a), Florida Statutes, “[a]ll or any part of the gain-time earned by a prisoner . . . Section 944.28(2)(b) provides that “[a] prisoners right to earn gain-time during all or any part of the . . . See § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). See Griffin v. . . . Corrections pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes, for consideration of sanctions pursuant to section 944.28 . . .

MIDDLETON, v. STATE, 95 So. 3d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . by that institution of disciplinary measures against Middleton, pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

QUEZADA, v. STATE, 92 So. 3d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

D. EDWARDS, v. STATE, 93 So. 3d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Stat. (2011); § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

KITTLES, v. STATE, 83 So. 3d 958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

L. DOMINGUEZ, v. STATE, 77 So. 3d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. POLEN, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur. . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 76 So. 3d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . regarding case number 97-32329; and (2) this Court should not sanction him pursuant to sections 944.279 and 944.28 . . . consideration by that institution of disciplinary measures against Johnson pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

SANDERS, v. STATE, 76 So. 3d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. MAY, C.J., GROSS and LEVINE, JJ„ concur. . . .

E. REEVES, v. STATE, 88 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Stat. (2011); § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 201 So. 3d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . 3d DCA 1999), and (2) why this Court should not sanction appellant pursuant to sections 944,279 and 944.28 . . .

W. CRITTENDEN, v. STATE, 67 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See §§ 944.09, 944.279(1), 944.28(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

E. RAMOS- PEREZ, v. STATE, 99 So. 3d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 944.28(1), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 430 F. App'x 768 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 944.28(1). . . .

MOSES, v. STATE, 57 So. 3d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Stat. (2009); § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). GROSS, C.J., MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur. . . .

CHASE, v. STATE, 57 So. 3d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 944.28(1), Fla. Stat. (2007); Horton v. State, 943 So.2d 859, 860 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). . . .

H. CORTES, v. STATE, 53 So. 3d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See §§ 944.09, 944.279(1), 944.28(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

MOORE, v. STATE, 55 So. 3d 600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . and abusive, as well as the trial court’s imposition of sanctions pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

WIMBERLY, v. STATE, 50 So. 3d 785 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . at Wimberly’s place of incarceration for consideration of sanctions pursuant to sections 944.279(1), 944.28 . . .

LeBOEUF, v. A. McNEIL,, 49 So. 3d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The circuit court denied relief, finding that the challenged action was authorized by sections 944.28 . . .

STONE, v. STATE, 48 So. 3d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . forwarded to appellant’s warden “for consideration of sanctions under Florida Statute sections 944.279(1), 944.28 . . .

F. SWEITZER, v. STATE, 46 So. 3d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .; § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .

F. JONES, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 48 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 2010)

. . . challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings conducted by the Department of Corrections pursuant to s. 944.28 . . .

O BERRY, v. STATE, 46 So. 3d 105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . additional sanctions, including, but not limited to, sanctions under either Florida Statute § 944.279 or § 944.28 . . . forwarded to O’Berry’s institution for disciplinary procedures pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

FAISON, Jr. v. STATE, 45 So. 3d 919 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Corrections for consideration of disciplinary measures against Faison pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

A. IBARRA, v. STATE, 45 So. 3d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . that his repeated filing of the same issues was frivolous and abusive, citing sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . . disciplinary proceeding did not violate the prisoner’s due process rights and that sections 944.279 and 944.28 . . . The Court held: “Any effect these statutes [sections 944.279 and 944.28(2)(a) ] have to cause an inmate . . .

MARC, v. STATE, 46 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. . . .

HOSWELL, v. STATE, 45 So. 3d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Stat. (2009); § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). WARNER, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur. . . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 44 So. 3d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 1037 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . is subject to “disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections”); § 944.28 . . .

B. PLEAS, Sr. v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 980 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . may recommend “disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections”); § 944.28 . . .

CLIFT, v. STATE, 43 So. 3d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . is subject to “disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections”); § 944.28 . . .

KNOWLES, v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . may recommend “disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections”); § 944.28 . . .

KHAN, v. STATE, 32 So. 3d 158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . rehearing motion to the Department of Corrections for consideration of sanctions under sections 944.279(1), 944.28 . . .

L. SMITH, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 27 So. 3d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 57.085(8), 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 26 So. 3d 534 (Fla. 2009)

. . . (Gain time may be subject to forfeiture by the Department of Corrections under section 944.28(1)). _ . . .

A. WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 22 So. 3d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See §§ 944.09, 944.279(1), 944.28(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

H. ELBERT, Jr. v. STATE, 20 So. 3d 961 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See §§ 944.28(1), 948.06(6), Fla. Stat. (1993); Eldridge v. . . .

G. JAMES, v. STATE, 17 So. 3d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . consideration by that institution of disciplinary measures against James pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

ALLEN, v. STATE, 16 So. 3d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . consideration by that institution of disciplinary measures against Allen pursuant to sections. 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

LARIMORE, v. STATE, 2 So. 3d 101 (Fla. 2008)

. . . forfeited the gaintime (2,830 days) earned on Lari-more’s 15-year prison sentence, relying on section 944.28 . . . release from custody because forfeiture of Lari-more’s gaintime was not authorized pursuant to section 944.28 . . . (1) where Larimore’s offense occurred before the effective date of the amendment to section 944.28 authorizing . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 998 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 2008)

. . . (Gain time may be subject to forfeiture by the Department of Corrections under section 944.28(1)). _ . . .

SCOTT, v. STATE, 995 So. 2d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . consideration by that institution of disciplinary measures against Scott pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

THOMAS, v. STATE, 993 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . §§ 944.279(1), 944.28(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

BARBER, v. STATE, 994 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . consideration by that institution of disciplinary measures against Barber pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

LENOIR, v. STATE, 992 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . barred from further pro se filings, and why he should not be sanctioned pursuant to sections 944.279 and 944.28 . . .

RUIZ, v. STATE, 992 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Florida Statutes (2008), including, but not limited to, the loss of gain time as provided in section 944.28 . . .

E. NICARRY, v. ESLINGER,, 990 So. 2d 661 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings conducted by the Department of Corrections pursuant to s. 944.28 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. STATE, 989 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . that the court erred in forfeiting his gain time, because the court had no authority under section 944.28 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 994 So. 2d 337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 944.28(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2007) (“All or any part of the gain-time earned by a prisoner according . . .

LANIER, v. STATE, 983 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . consideration by that institution of disciplinary measures against Lanier pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

J. DOYLE, v. STATE, 979 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . to the Department of Corrections that it bring disciplinary procedures against him under paragraph 944.28 . . .

HICKS, Jr. v. STATE, 974 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . consideration by that institution of disciplinary measures against Hicks pursuant to sections 944.279(1) and 944.28 . . .

D. PRESSLY, v. TADLOCK,, 968 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Moreover, in light of section 944.28(1), Florida Statutes (2000), it concludes that he has forfeited . . .

HALE, v. R. McDONOUGH,, 970 So. 2d 362 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings conducted by the Department of Corrections pursuant to s. 944.28 . . .

SMITH, v. A. FISHER, M. D., 965 So. 2d 205 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . at 353 (citing Ch. 96-106, Laws of Fla. codified at §§ 57.081, 57.085, 92.351, 95.11, 944.279, and 944.28 . . .

VALDEZ, v. STATE, 963 So. 2d 851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . should not recommend to the Department of Corrections that it sanction Valdez pursuant to sections 944.28 . . .

GRIFFIN, a k a a k a a k a F. a k a a k a a k a v. STATE, 962 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . se pleadings concerning case 75-584 and why the Court should not sanction him according to sections 944.28 . . . disciplinary measures against appellant pursuant to sections 944.279(1), Florida Statutes (2005), and 944.28 . . .

MINOR, v. STATE, 963 So. 2d 797 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 944.28(2)(a), Fla. . . .

VALDEZ, v. STATE, 994 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . should not recommend to the Department of Corrections that it sanction Valdez pursuant to sections 944.28 . . .

S. MORTON, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 957 So. 2d 667 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . parole was revoked, the Department declared a forfeiture of petitioner’s gain-time pursuant to section 944.28 . . . forfeiture of the right to earn gain-time in the future if it complies with the procedure set out in section 944.28 . . .

GURIDI, v. STATE, 959 So. 2d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . constitutes a frivolous appeal or proceeding pursuant to sections 944.279(1), Florida Statutes (2005), and 944.28 . . . disciplinary measures against appellant pursuant to sections 944.279(1), Florida Statutes (2005), and 944.28 . . .

DELLOFANO, v. STATE, 946 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) forfeited 98 days of his previously earned credit under section 944.28 . . . The trial court denied his motion: [P]ursuant to Section 944.28(1), Florida Statutes, the [DOC] may, . . .

G. HORTON, v. STATE, 943 So. 2d 859 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . DOC denied Petitioner’s request for additional credit, noting that, pursuant to section 944.28(1), for . . .

WHITE, a k a a k a a k a v. STATE, 937 So. 2d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . We also ordered defendant to show cause why we should not sanction him pursuant to section 944.28(2)( . . .

BORDERS, v. STATE, 936 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Borders’ gain time under section 944.28(1), Florida Statutes (2005). Mr. . . .

McGEE, v. STATE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 935 So. 2d 62 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . violated his parole, the Department of Corrections forfeited Appellant’s gain time pursuant to section 944.28 . . .