Cases from cite.case.law:

CAMPBELL, v. STATE v. L., 271 So. 3d 914 (Fla. 2018)

. . . and unusual punishment; (9) lethal injection constitutes cruel and unusual punishment; (10) section 945.10 . . .

A. GREGORY, v. STATE A. v. L., 224 So. 3d 719 (Fla. 2017)

. . . State, 132 So.3d 176, 205 (Fla. 2013) (explaining that “section 945.10(g), Florida Statutes (2013), makes . . .

ASAY, v. STATE v. L., 224 So. 3d 695 (Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 945.10(g), Fla. Stat. (2017); Muhammad v. State, 132 So.3d 176, 189 (Fla. 2013). . . .

ROBARDS, v. STATE, 214 So. 3d 568 (Fla. 2017)

. . . substantive errors during the guilt and penalty phases deprived Robards of a fair trial; (5) section 945.10 . . .

J. WRIGHT, v. STATE, 213 So. 3d 881 (Fla. 2017)

. . . he should receive a life sentence due to the superior intelligence of his codefendant; (2) section 945.10 . . .

L. KING, v. STATE, 211 So. 3d 866 (Fla. 2017)

. . . peremptory strike of Juror 111; (3) Florida’s lethal injection protocol is unconstitutional; (4) Section 945.10 . . . Identity of Executioners King also asserts that section 945.10, Florida Statutes (2014), which exempts . . .

ALLRED, v. STATE, 186 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2016)

. . . injection method constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment; and (10) section 945.10 . . . H.Execution Team Prohibition Appellant contends that section 945.10, Florida Statutes, which prevents . . .

CORRELL, v. STATE, 184 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Identity and Background of Execution Team Correll next contends that section 945.10, Florida Statutes . . . However, this Court has previously rejected constitutional challenges to section 945.10, as well as claims . . . State, 992 So.2d 120, 130 (Fla.2008) (“We [have] previously found section 945.10 facially constitutional . . . failed to justify reconsideration of prior rulings that have upheld the constitutionality of section 945.10 . . . as previously discussed, that information is confidential and exempt from disclosure under section 945.10 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 163 So. 3d 476 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Because the records at issue are confidential, see, e.g., §§ 456.057(7)(a), 945.10(1)(a), Fla. . . .

P. SMITH, v. STATE, 151 So. 3d 1177 (Fla. 2014)

. . . circumstances outweigh the aggravating circumstances for a life sentence to be appropriate; (9) section 945.10 . . . Section 945.10 Smith contends that the postcon-viction court erred when it failed to conduct an evidentiary . . . hearing on the constitutionality of Florida’s lethal injection procedures and, more specifically, section 945.10 . . . below, and are therefore preserved, we have previously rejected constitutional challenges to section 945.10 . . . State, 992 So.2d 120, 130 (Fla.2008) (‘We previously found section 945.10 facially constitutional and . . .

McLEAN, v. STATE v. D., 147 So. 3d 504 (Fla. 2014)

. . . it involves a risk that it will cause extreme pain in violation of the Eighth Amendment, (2) section 945.10 . . . State, 992 So.2d 120, 130 (Fla.2008) (‘We [have] previously found section 945.10 facially constitutional . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 147 So. 3d 469 (Fla. 2014)

. . . combination of cumulative errors in the guilt and penalty phases entitle Jackson to relief; (22) section 945.10 . . . two of his claims are not ripe, we also deny claim 22 (pertaining to the constitutionality of section 945.10 . . .

TURNER, v. STATE, 143 So. 3d 408 (Fla. 2014)

. . . , 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2848, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Ring; (8) cumulative error; (9) section 945.10 . . . State, 45 So.3d 444, 447-48 (Fla.2010) (rejecting challenge to constitutionality of section 945.10, Florida . . .

DEPARVINE, v. STATE v. D., 146 So. 3d 1071 (Fla. 2014)

. . . Lethal Injection Procedures, Coupled with Section 945.10, Florida Statutes, Which Prohibits Depar-vine . . . Deparvine alleges that section 945.10, Florida Statutes (2013), is unconstitutional because it prohibits . . . Because we have repeatedly rejected challenges to the constitutionality of section 945.10 on the merits . . .

LEBRON, v. STATE, 135 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2014)

. . . Le-brón also alleged that section 945.10, Florida Statutes (2009), infringes on his constitutional rights . . .

MUHAMMAD f k a v. STATE, 132 So. 3d 176 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Second, section 945.10(g), Florida Statutes (2013), makes the identity of the executioner and any persons . . . The provisions of section 945.10 which protect the confidentiality of the identity of members of the . . .

L. WHEELER, v. STATE L. v. D., 124 So. 3d 865 (Fla. 2013)

. . . was in jail; (6) Florida’s method of lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment; (7) section 945.10 . . . State, 992 So.2d 120, 130 (Fla.2008) (“We previously found section 945.10 facially constitutional and . . . behalf of Wheeler; (7) Florida’s lethal injection method of execution is unconstitutional; (8) section 945.10 . . .

M. McKIRE, v. S. TUCKER,, 97 So. 3d 906 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 945.10(3), Fla. Stat. (2012); Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-601.901(l)(a)(l), (4). . . .

TROY, v. STATE, 57 So. 3d 828 (Fla. 2011)

. . . statutory age mitigator; (4) Florida’s lethal injection protocols are unconstitutional; (5) section 945.10 . . . post-conviction court erred in denying his request for an evidentiary hearing on the constitutionality of section 945.10 . . . Furthermore, we have repeatedly rejected challenges to the constitutionality of section 945.10 on the . . . State, 992 So.2d 120, 130 (Fla.2008) (“We previously found section 945.10 facially constitutional and . . .

DARLING a k a v. STATE a k a v. A., 45 So. 3d 444 (Fla. 2010)

. . . constitutionality of lethal injection as administered in Florida and the constitutionality of sections 945.10 . . . prohibits CCRC from filing lethal-injection challenges under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (3) claims that section 945.10 . . . Constitutionality of Section 945.10 Darling’s constitutional challenge against section 945.10, Florida . . . , Florida Statutes (2007).”); Henyard, 992 So.2d at 130 (“[Appellant] alleges section 945.10, Florida . . . We previously found section 945.10 facially constitutional and decline to recede from our decision now . . .

SMITH, v. HERNANDEZ,, 20 So. 3d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . of active or former corrections officers, or was subject to discretionary disclosure under section 945.10 . . . Smith also raises constitutional challenges to sections 945.10(3) and 68.093(4). . . . Further, we find no constitutional infirmity in sections 945.10(3) and 68.093(4). . . .

COX, v. STATE, 5 So. 3d 659 (Fla. 2009)

. . . colleagues that Cox’s constitutional challenges to Florida’s current lethal-injection protocol and section 945.10 . . . State, 761 So.2d 1097, 1099 & nn. 3-4 (Fla.2000) (explaining that section 945.10, Florida Statutes, does . . . . § 1983 (2000); and (3) claims that section 945.10, Florida Statutes (2008), as interpreted by this . . .

VENTURA, v. STATE, 2 So. 3d 194 (Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 1983 (2000); (3) claims that section 945.10, Florida Statutes (2007), as interpreted by this Court . . . This Court has already addressed and rejected similar claims with regard to sections 27.702 and 945.10 . . .

HENYARD, v. STATE v. v. A., 992 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 2008)

. . . violates the Eighth Amendment, (2) section 27.702, Florida Statutes is unconstitutional, (3) section 945.10 . . . Section 9⅛5.10, Florida Statutes Next, Henyard alleges section 945.10, Florida Statutes, which exempts . . . We previously found section 945.10 facially constitutional and decline to recede from our decision now . . .

L. BROWN, v. A. McNEIL,, 976 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . The appellant contended that this rule, as well as section 945.10(3), Florida Statutes, is arbitrary . . .

CAMPUS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. EARNHARDT,, 821 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . In Bryan, the court analyzed a public records exemption provided in section 945.10(l)(e), Florida Statutes . . .

H. PROVENZANO, v. STATE, 761 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 2000)

. . . the circuit court pursuant to the public records exemptions found in sections 922.10, 922.106, and 945.10 . . .

BRYAN, v. STATE, 753 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2000)

. . . treatment for alcoholism; (2) declare unconstitutional public record exemptions contained in section 945.10 . . . Bryan’s second issue is whether public records disclosure exemptions under section 945.10(l)(e), Florida . . . Section 945.10 provides, in part: Confidential information. - (1) Except as otherwise provided by law . . . of the State Constitution: (e) Information which if released would jeopardize a person’s safety. § 945.10 . . . Therefore, section 945.10(l)(e) satisfies the constitutional requirements for an exemption to the public . . .

K. SINGLETARY, Jr. v. SMITH, 707 So. 2d 340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Pursuant to section 945.10(l)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), PSIs in the possession of the DOC are . . . Prior to the amendment of section 945.10 in 1994, the DOC could make PSIs available to officers and employees . . . to prohibit the DOC’s release of such information to a public defender representing a defendant. § 945.10 . . .

STANFIELD, v. SALVATION ARMY,, 695 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . discovery in the face of the confidentiality afforded to medical and substance abuse records by section 945.10 . . .

In ANGEL, JONES, v. STAR BANK, SOUTH CENTRAL OHIO,, 142 B.R. 194 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1992)

. . . $12,238.00) $3,927.64 (3) Pontiac Grand Prix Credit Service Charge $1,559.27 10% of principal amount 945.10 . . .

SHEFFIELD, v. STATE, 580 So. 2d 790 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 945.10(1), Florida Statutes (1989), provides: Except as provided below, information in a presentence . . . therewith, so we certify the following question as one of great public importance: WHETHER SECTION 945.10 . . .

A. PARK, v. L. DUGGER,, 548 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . He claimed entitlement to these evaluations under Section 945.10(2), Florida Statutes (1988), and Diaz . . .

J. DIAZ, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 519 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . (Fla.1982), appellant seeks a determination from this court as to the constitutionality of section 945.10 . . . Agreeing with appellant, we find section 945.10(2) to be unconstitutional. . . . His request was denied under Rule 33-6.006 and section 945.10. . . . Taking the position that section 945.10 was intended only to deny inmates confidential information in . . . Accordingly, we declare section 945.10(2), Florida Statutes (1985), to be unconstitutional. . . .

HORTON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 25 Fla. Supp. 2d 266 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1987)

. . . Constitution, and that they conflict with Section 944.09, Florida Statutes, and perhaps also with Section 945.10 . . . systematic conflict with 33-3.07 effectiveness as an Inmate Grievance as provided by 944.09(2)(a)(c)(d) and 945.10 . . .

B. FARBER, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 427 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Department of Corrections because he is denied access to that report under the provisions of section 945.10 . . . Section 945.10(2), Florida Statutes, moreover precludes him from examining the report once it is compiled . . . No such balancing of disparate interests is evident, however, from a reading of Section 945.10, which . . . parole and would, at the same time, eliminate the unequal treatment created by operation of Section 945.10 . . . Section 945.10, Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part: (1) Except as provided below, information . . .

R. ROLLE, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 426 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . See § 945.10(2), Fla.Stat. . . .

J. ARLOTTA, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 419 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . know if the documents contained in his appendix are in his Department of Corrections file, because § 945.10 . . .

JAMES, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 395 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 945.10(2), Fla.Stat. (1980), precludes an inmate from reviewing the contents of the report should . . .

BATTIS, Jr. v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 386 So. 2d 295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . .” § 945.10(3), Fla.Stat. (1979), states: “The Department of Corrections and the Commission shall mutually . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. L. WAINWRIGHT, G. P. V. E. W. J. R., 371 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Florida Statute § 945.10(2), proscribes the relief sought as follows: “No inmate of any institution, . . .

R. A. M. v. C. B. A. v., 32 T.C. 104 (T.C. 1959)

. . . North Carolina unemployment tax_ 6, 724. 32 _ Federal unemployment tax_ 747.15 _ Property tax- 12, 945.10 . . .

v., 10 F. 223 (C.C.D. Conn. 1882)

. . . bushels at 33-1 cents. “ 11. 427.08 “ “ 83J « Oct. 13. 381.34 “ “ 37-i « “ 17. 523.12 “ « 39 “ 22. 945.10 . . .