Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. MICHEL,, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018)

. . . ." § 947.002, Fla. Stat. . . .

ROOKS, v. STATE, 224 So. 3d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 947.002, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

ATWELL, v. STATE, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016)

. . . See § 947.002, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . seriousness of the offender’s present criminal offense and the offender’s past criminal record.” § 947.002 . . . here, the most serious offense of first-degree murder — “and the offender’s past criminal record.” § ,947.002 . . . decision to parole an inmate “is ah act of grace of the state and shall not be considered a right.” § 947.002 . . . seriousness of the offender’s present criminal offense and the offender’s past criminal record.” .§ 947.002 . . .

O FRANKLIN, v. STATE, 141 So. 3d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See §§ 947.002, 947.16, 947.18, Fla. Stat. (1981). . . . See §§ 947.002, 947.16(4), 947.18, Fla. Stat. . . .

FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, v. SPAZIANO,, 48 So. 3d 714 (Fla. 2010)

. . . .”); see also § 947.002(5), Fla. . . . We recognize that section 947.002, Florida Statutes (2009), titled “Intent,” confirms that parole is . . . not a matter of right, but is one of legislative grace. § 947.002(5), Fla. . . .

L. MEOLA, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, L. v. K. v. K., 732 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1998)

. . . See §§ 947.002(2), 947.165, 947.172, 947.173, 947.174, 947.1745, 947.1746, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . .

MYERS, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 705 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 947.002(2), Fla. Stat. (1997)(emphasis added). . . .

SULTENFUSS, v. SNOW, Jr. T. H. O. J., 7 F.3d 1543 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 947.002 (1985). . . .

WILLIAMS, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 625 So. 2d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . accomplish the purpose of the “Objective Parole Guidelines Act of 1978” that is, as stated in section 947.002 . . . paroling” and “allegations of arbitrary and capricious release and, therefore, potential abuses.” § 947.002 . . . Guidelines Act’s ultimate intent is to prevent arbitrary and capricious action by the Commission. § 947.002 . . . and eliminate “allegations of arbitrary and capricious release and, therefore, potential abuses.” § 947.002 . . .

TUBB, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 580 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 947.002(6), Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .

A. DAMIANO a k a A. v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, 785 F.2d 929 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . Section 947.002 specifically provides that parole is granted only when the Commission finds a reasonable . . .

FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, v. H. PAIGE,, 462 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1985)

. . . . § 947.002(1), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

E. PASCHAL, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 738 F.2d 1173 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 947.002(1) (1983 Supp.). . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 947.002(6) (1983 Supp.); see also Staton v. Wainwright, 665 F.2d 686, 688 (5th Cir. . . .

H. ROBERSON, v. FLORIDA PAROLE PROBATION COMMISSION, FLORIDA PAROLE PROBATION COMMISSION, v. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT,, 444 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 1983)

. . . . § 947.002, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

LOBO, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 433 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 947.002(1) provides: The present system lacks objective criteria for paroling and, thus, is subject . . .

E. JACKSON, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 424 So. 2d 930 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . While prior record may be the best predictor of recidivism, § 947.002(2), Jackson’s actions from over . . .

M. BUNDY, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 419 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 947.002(1), Florida Statutes. . . .

J. GOBIE, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, JACKSON, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, LOGAN, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 416 So. 2d 838 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . . § 947.002(1), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

STATON, v. L. WAINWRIGHT G., 665 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 947.002, the Commission retains substantial discretionary powers over the granting of a parole: No . . .

McKAHN, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 399 So. 2d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See Section 947.002 and Daniels v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, supra. . . .

DANIELS, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 401 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See Section 947.002(1). . . .

BATTIS, Jr. v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 386 So. 2d 295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Our attention is directed to § 947.002(2), Florida Statutes, wherein the legislature advises that “objective . . .

HIPKE, v. PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 380 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . See Section 947.002(2), Florida Statutes (1979). . . .