Cases from cite.case.law:

. . . . §§ 941.29(2), 947.01(1), and was sentenced to five years in prison and five years of supervised release . . .

. . . . § 947.01(2), the totality of the circumstances here — that Mr. . . . Stat. § 947.01. . . . Stat. § 947.01.” Memorandum from J.B. Van Hollen, Attorney Gen., to Wis. Dist. . . . Stat. § 947.01(2)) (2011 Wis. Act 35, § 86); see also United States v. . . . The Advisory Memorandum was published in 2009, well before subsection 947.01(2) was enacted. . . .

. . . . § 947.01, which has consistently been upheld as constitutional in the face of vagueness challenges. . . . Stat. § 947.01); Soglin v. Kauffman, 286 F.Supp. 851, 853-55 (W.D.Wis.1968) (same). . . .

. . . . § 947.01. . . .

. . . They list the violation as “947.01” and the severity as a Class B misdemeanor. . . . complaints further provide that Gonzalez-Mancilla’s actions were “contrary to” Wisconsin Statute §§ 947.01 . . . Wisconsin misdemeanor convictions, he argues that he was convicted solely of disorderly conduct under § 947.01 . . . of disorderly conduct, the judgment of conviction correctly notes his actions were a violation of § 947.01 . . . Stat. § 947.01 (2005). . . .

. . . . § 947.01(1) (disorderly conduct); § 939.63 (enhanced penalties for committing crimes while armed with . . . Stat. § 947.01 (2010). . . . Stat. § 947.01(2) (2012). . . . . § 947.01(2)), the fact that weapons were (1) being brandished by individuals, (2) who were part of . . .

. . . . § 947.01(1), was also dismissed pursuant to this consent decree. . . .

. . . . § 947.01(1), and Wis. . . .

. . . . § 947.01(2); see Wis. Act 35, 2011-2012 Wis. Legis. Serv. 825, 849 (West). . . . Stat. § 947.01(1). . . . Stat. § 947.01). . . . Stat. § 947.01.” . . . . § 947.01(1) (emphasis added). . . .

. . . . §§ 939.51, 941.20(1), 941.23, 947.01; State v. . . .

. . . . § 947.01. . . . heading, the criminal complaint alleges that FraustoVasquez engaged in conduct that violated both section 947.01 . . .

. . . Wisconsin Statute § 947.01 provides: “[w]hoever, in a public or private place, engages in violent, abusive . . .

. . . . § 947.01 (“Whoever, in a public or private place, engages in violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous . . .

. . . Stats., and disorderly conduct, in violation of § 947.01, Wis. Stats. On January 26, 2004, Mr. . . .

. . . . § 947.01. . . .

. . . . § 947.01. . . .

. . . . § 947.01(1).) . . .

. . . . §§ 947.01, 943.145 and 939.51 (West 1995). . . .

. . . . § 947.01. . . .

. . . Plaintiff’s Proof of Claim: present balance due $18,472.75, consisting of $17,525.74 of principal and $947.01 . . .

. . . dealing with a state prosecution of “topless” dancing under Wisconsin’s disorderly conduct statute, § 947.01 . . . dancing as entertainment” with violating the provisions of Wisconsin’s disorderly conduct statute, § 947.01 . . . prosecution had been commenced, these “entertainers and proprietors” sought in this court to challenge § 947.01 . . .

. . . “Sec. 947.01. Disorderly Conduct. . . .

. . . actions involve a challenge to the constitutionality of the Wisconsin disorderly conduct statute, § 947.01 . . . Section 947.01(1) is challenged as being unconstitutionally vague and over-broad as well as unconstitutional . . . In their complaints, all plaintiffs alleged “bad faith” enforcement of § 947.01(1) by defendants. . . . (1) is not enjoined because § 947.01(1) is facially overbroad. . . . She did so and was charged with a violation of § 947.01(1). . . .

. . . Section 947.01, Wis. Stats., reads: “Disorderly conduct. . . . such conduct tends to cause or provoke a disturbance * * The alleged vagueness and overbreadth of § 947.01 . . . The Zwicker court held that § 947.01 was not unconstitutional on its face. 270 F.Supp. at 136. . . . Kauffmann, 286 F.Supp. 851 (W.D.Wis.1968) (3-judge court), again presented a challenge to § 947.01 on . . . 13.26(1) (b) is no more open, and perhaps less open, to charges of vagueness and overbreadth than § 947.01 . . .

. . . . § 947.01, the Wisconsin disorderly conduct statute. . . .

. . . In each ease some of plaintiffs were arrested for alleged violation of see. 947.01(1), Wis.Stats., entitled . . . court elected to hold a hearing limited “to all issues raised by the pleadings and related to Sec. 947.01 . . . The statute reads as follows: “947.01 Disorderly conduct. . . . Subsequent to the hearing by this three-judge panel on the issue whether See. 947.01(1), as written, . . . We treat defendants’ partial answer, filed earlier, denying that See. 947.01(1), as written, is vague . . .

. . . . § 947.01 reads in pertinent part: "947.01. Disorderly conduct. . . . Further enforcement of Section 947.01, Wisconsin Statutes, the Disorderly Conduct Statute, will have . . . encouraged, followed and enforced by legislation including the Disorderly Conduct Statute, Section 947.01 . . . The Disorderly Conduct Statute, 947.01, Wisconsin Statutes, is unconstitutional on its face and as applied . . . Stat. §947.01 (1). . . .

. . . In my view, Sec. 947.01(1), Wis.Stats., as construed in State v. . . . In Givens it was contended that on its face Sec. 947.01(1) was fatally vague because it condemns “otherwise . . . It is enough that Sec. 947.01(1), as construed in Givens, may be applied to conduct protected by the . . . Button instructs us, we are to take into account “possible applications of [Sec. 947.01(1)] in other . . . In my view, applications of See. 947.01(1), as construed in Givens, to such “factual contexts beyond . . . prevent their being prosecuted by officials of the state of Wisconsin for an alleged violation of Sec. 947.01 . . . The Wisconsin statute provides as follows: “947.01 Disorderly conduct. . . . S. district court enjoining the defendants from further proceedings to enforce Wisconsin Statute 947.01 . . . The plaintiffs contend that Sec. 947.01 of the Wisconsin statutes, on its face, is vague, over broad . . . Wisconsin supreme court that the propounding of unpopular views will qualify for conviction under Sec. 947.01 . . . I go only so far as to conclude that sec. 947.01, Wis.Stats., is not, in the light of any decision of . . .

. . . Miscellaneous expenses in securing evidence, $947.01, which, with interest thereon, would amount to $2,168.65 . . .