Cases from cite.case.law:

HOWARD, v. STATE, 180 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 947.165, Florida Statutes (2014), requires the Florida Commission on Offender Review to develop . . .

A. EARLEY, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW,, 152 So. 3d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . In pertinent part, section 947.165(1), Florida Statutes (2014), provides as follows: The commission [ . . . CONVICTIONS: = RCF = 2 Points = 1 Point = 0 Points role guidelines are no longer objective, as section 947.165 . . . Commission to assess an additional 120 months in aggravation based on that conviction, since section 947.165 . . .

FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, v. SPAZIANO,, 48 So. 3d 714 (Fla. 2010)

. . . Section 947.165, Florida Statutes (2009), directs the Commission to develop and implement the objective . . . parole guidelines, “which shall be the criteria upon which parole decisions are made.” § 947.165(10) . . .

GOMEZ, v. K. SINGLETARY, Jr. v. K. Jr. v. K. Jr. v. K. Jr. v. K. Jr., 733 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1998)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 947.165, 947.173, 947.174, Fla. Stat. . . .

L. MEOLA, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, L. v. K. v. K., 732 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1998)

. . . See §§ 947.002(2), 947.165, 947.172, 947.173, 947.174, 947.1745, 947.1746, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . .

WILLIAMS, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 625 So. 2d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 947.165(1), Florida Statutes (1989), sets forth the following mandate to the Commission: The . . . Section 947.165(1), Fla.Stat. (1981), requires the Commission to develop and implement objective guidelines . . .

FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, v. JACKSON,, 618 So. 2d 766 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Fla. 1st DCA 1989), rev. denied, 542 So.2d 1333 (Fla.1989), which held that sections 947.1745(4) and 947.165 . . . release date could be utilized to extend a presumptive release date pursuant to section 947.-1745(4) and 947.165 . . .

ADAMS, v. STATE, 560 So. 2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . . § 947.165, Fla.Stat. (1979); Florida Parole and Probation Commission v. . . .

FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, v. J. PADOVANO, FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, v. P. DAVEY,, 554 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . The commission’s discretion as described in section 947.18 is not inconsistent with sections 947.165, . . .

TAYLOR, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 543 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . court upheld the Commission’s rule permitting aggravation based on alcohol abuse, as consistent with § 947.165 . . .

GATTIS, v. FLORIDA PAROLE PROBATION COMMISSION,, 535 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . wherein the court considered Gattis’ petition for writ of habeas corpus and concluded that sections 947.165 . . . writ of habeas corpus challenging the Commission action extending his PPRD and arguing that sections 947.165 . . . In turn, section 947.165(1) was amended to include the provision that ... . . . Neither do we hold that sections 947.165(1) and 947.1745(4) unconstitutionally invade the separation . . . Similarly, in the instant case, the amended sections 947.165(1) and 947.1745(4) represent a mere procedural . . .

FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, v. G. DORNAU,, 534 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Dornau’s PPRD on the basis of this judicial objection, in accordance with sections 947.1745(4) and 947.165 . . .

CARR, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 510 So. 2d 995 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 947.165(1), Florida Statutes, requires the adoption of objective parole guidelines “based on . . .

CARR v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, 25 Fla. Supp. 2d 160 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1986)

. . . Petitioner with a PPRD and to compute that date according to objective parole guidelines outlined in Section 947.165 . . .

FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, v. GRIFFIN,, 497 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . The appellee points out that section 947.165(1), Florida Statutes (1985), provides that factors used . . .

J. RUZICKA, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 480 So. 2d 190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 947.165(1), Florida Statutes states in part: Factors used in arriving at the salient factor score . . . However, we believe the two events are discrete for the purpose of Rule 23-21.07 and section 947.165( . . .

FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, v. H. PAIGE,, 462 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1985)

. . . Section 947.165(1), Fla.Stat. (1981), requires the Commission to develop and implement objective guidelines . . .

CALLAGHAN, v. STATE, 462 So. 2d 832 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . The legislature specifically provided in section 947.165 that factors used in arriving at the salient . . .

E. PASCHAL, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 738 F.2d 1173 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 947.165 (1983 Supp.). . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 947.165(1) (1983 Supp.). . . . Id. at 947.165(2). See Lopez v. . . . StatAnn. § 947.165(1) & (2) (1983 Supp.), and called for inmates to serve terms equivalent to those served . . .

MAY, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 435 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 1983)

. . . . § 947.165, Fla.Stat. (1979). . § 947.18, Fla.Stat. (1979), in particular, allows the commission a repository . . .

CHANEY, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 426 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 947.165(1), Florida Statutes (1981). . . .

KIRSCH, v. A. GREADINGTON, J., 425 So. 2d 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Based on its interpretation of § 947.165(1) and Rule 23-19.03 that the Commission may not use factors . . .

M. BUNDY, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 419 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Bundy argues that § 947.165(1), Florida Statutes (1981), prohibits an aggravation for exceptionally brutal . . . Section 947.165(1), Florida Statutes (1979), provides in part that “[fjactors used in arriving at the . . .

STEWART, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 419 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . as aggravating circumstances any factors that are used in arriving at the matrix time range, Section 947.165 . . .

A. NORD, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 417 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . that the Commission’s aggregation rule above referred to violates the legislative intent of Section 947.165 . . . aggregation rule is in violation of the statute overlooks the fact that under subsection (1) of Section 947.165 . . .

L. MATTINGLY, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 417 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Rule 23-19.03, FAC; Section 947.165(1). . . .

BRITT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE PROBATION COMMISSION,, 417 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . . § 947.165 and § 947.18, Florida Statutes (1979). . . . Section 947.165(2) requires the commission to review its procedures periodically and make any revisions . . . The decision in Lopez is accordingly consistent with the terms of § 947.165(2) in emphasizing the procedural . . .

J. GOBIE, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, JACKSON, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, LOGAN, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 416 So. 2d 838 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 947.165(1), Fla.Stat. (1981), requires the Commission to develop and implement objective guidelines . . .

ZYGADLO, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 414 So. 2d 600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . (2) failing to use the armed robbery conviction in setting the severity level, contrary to Section 947.165 . . . Section 947.165(1), Fla.Stat. (1979), provides: “The objective parole guidelines shall be ... based on . . .

P. FAUCETT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE PROBATION COMMISSION,, 413 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . . § 947.165, Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.Admin.Code Rule 23-19.01(5). . . .

LAMBETH, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 411 So. 2d 956 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Relying upon Section 947.165(5), Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.01, Lambeth . . .

LOWE, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 411 So. 2d 352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 407 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); § 947.165(1), Fla.Stat. ( . . .

BIZZIGOTTI, v. FLORIDA PAROLE PROBATION COMMISSION,, 410 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . See Section 947.165, Florida Statutes (1979), as amended July 1, 1979, effective retroactively to January . . .

LOPEZ, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 410 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Pursuant to § 947.165 Fla. . . . First, he argues that the Commission exceeded its authority by not complying with § 947.165 Fla.Stat. . . . Section 947.165(2) Fla.Stat. (1979) provides that “the Commission shall ... make any revisions considered . . .

STATON, v. L. WAINWRIGHT G., 665 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 947.165. . . .

JACOBSON, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 407 So. 2d 611 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . As to the first reason, § 947.165(1), Florida Statutes (1979), and Florida Administrative Code Rule 19.03 . . .

McKAHN, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 399 So. 2d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See §§ 947.165 and .172. . . .

DANIELS, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 401 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 947.165, Florida Statutes (1979); Chapters 19-23, Florida Administrative Code. . . . .

JAMES, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 395 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Sections 947.165, 947.172, Fla. Stat. (1980); Baker v. . . .

COMER, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 388 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Petitioner asserts that Rule 23-19.02(2)(g), Fla.Admin.Code, violates legislative intent as expressed in s. 947.165 . . .

D. BAKER, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 384 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . determine the initial matrix range as well as to “aggravate” beyond that range, in violation of Section 947.165 . . . Section 947.165(1) states in relevant part: “Factors used in arriving at the salient factor score and . . .