The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . For example, under section 947.174(3), Florida Statutes, the presumptive parole release date is reviewed . . .
. . . . § 947.174, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .
. . . Although the majority takes issue with the extended presumptive parole release date, section 947.174, . . . Pursuant to section 947.174(3), Florida Statutes, the presumptive release date is reviewed periodically . . . . § 947.174, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .
. . . Furthermore, the seven-year period between reviews is established by section 947.174(l)(b), Florida Statutes . . . court correctly determined that the 7-year review cycle in appellant’s cause is established by section 947.174 . . . factors apart from the offense at conviction) nor on the 7-year review cycle (which was mandated section 947.174 . . .
. . . Code R. 23-21.0155; § 947.174, Fla. Stat. (1998); Fla. Admin. Code R. 23-21.013(1). Mr. . . . date[;] however, the inmate shall continue to receive extraordinary interviews on a biennial basis. .947.174 . . .
. . . The FPC set Barreiro’s “subsequent interview” for March 2014 pursuant to section 947.174(l)(b), Florida . . .
. . . . §§ 947.172, 947.174(1) (1978); see also Tuff v. . . . Stat. § 947.174(1) (1978). . . . The Florida Legislature has twice modified § 947.174 to allow the Parole Commission to extend the interval . . . Stat. § 947.174(1)(b), but the category is broader than in California or Georgia. . . .
. . . See §§ 947.13(l)(a), 947.16(4)-(5), 947.172, 947.174(2)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . See §§ 947.16(5) & 947.174(2-3), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . . § 947.174(l)(b) violated the Ex Post Facto Clause because it provided for parole reviews once every . . . Fla.Stat. § 947.174(l)(a). . . . Fla.Stat. § 947.174(l)(b). . . . Section 947.174 is similar to the California statute that the Supreme Court upheld in Morales, as it . . . See Fla.Stat. § 947.174(l)(b); Morales, 514 U.S. at 510-11, 115 S.Ct. at 1603-04. . . .
. . . . § 947.174 (2001); see also Tuff v. . . . Stat. § 947.174(1)(a)-(b) (2001). . . . We have not addressed whether the current version of § 947.174 violates the Ex Post Facto clause. . . . Section 947.174 bears marked similarities to the California statute at issue in Morales. . . . Stat. § 947.174(1)(b). . . .
. . . Tuff argues that the retroactive application of the 1997 amendment to section 947.174, Florida Statutes . . . The relevant portion of this amendment was codified as section 947.174, Florida Statutes (1997): § 947.174 . . . The California law challenged (and ultimately upheld) in Morales is quite similar to section 947.174, . . . See § 947.174, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . See § 947.174, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . .
. . . See, e.g., §§ 947.165, 947.173, 947.174, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . See §§ 947.002(2), 947.165, 947.172, 947.173, 947.174, 947.1745, 947.1746, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . .
. . . . § 947.174, Fla. Stat. (1991). . . .
. . . Such notice shall stay the time requirements of s. 947.174. . . .
. . . Under section 947.174(1), Florida Statutes, biennial reviews are “limited to determining whether or not . . .
. . . would be the proper remedy only after an effective parole release date established pursuant to sections 947.174 . . .
. . . .” § 947.174(6), Fla.Stat. (1981) (now § 947.1745, Fla.Stat. (1983)). . . .
. . . See Sections 947.16(l)(a), 947.172(2), and 947.174, Florida Statutes. . . .
. . . . § 947.174 (1983 Supp.). C. . . .
. . . interviewed for purposes of establishing his effective parole release date (EPRD) and, as required by Section 947.174 . . .
. . . . § 947.174, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .
. . . Section 947.174(6) requires the Commission, at least 46 days prior to arrival of the PPRD, to decide . . .
. . . See § 947.174(6), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . The Commission is still bound by § 947.174(1) to review Jackson’s case biennially. . . .
. . . would be the proper remedy only after an effective parole release date established pursuant to sections 947.174 . . .
. . . This appeal is taken following Call’s biennial reinter-view, Section 947.174, Florida Statutes (1981) . . .
. . . Dornau’s presumptive parole release date (PPRD) came up for biennial review pursuant to Section 947.174 . . . Section 947.174(1), Florida Statutes (1981). AFFIRMED. ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur. . . .
. . . Section 947.174(2), Fla.Stat. (1981), permits the Commission to grant special reviews in its discretion . . .
. . . This had the effect of short-circuiting the parole release date interview procedure (Section 947.174, . . . matter to a Hearing Examiner for interview and recommendations to the Commission, pursuant to Section 947.174 . . . Section 947.174(6)(a), which outlines the final steps in the process of establishing an effective parole . . .
. . . See § 947.174(1), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . Section 947.174(2) provides, “The Commission, for good cause, may at any time request that a hearing . . .
. . . On its face, § 947.174(6), Fla.Stat. (1981), which prescribes the procedure for making the PPRD the EPRD . . . See § 947.174(6), Fla.Stat. (1981). .Both Payton and Berry involved the applicability of the doctrine . . .
. . . . § 947.174(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). . . .
. . . Section 947.174(1), Florida Statutes. . . . Section 947.174, subsection (2), providing that the Commission for good cause “may at any time” request . . . subsequent review by a hearing examiner panel, merely implements Section 947.174, and coincides with . . .
. . . . § 947.174. . . .
. . . Furthermore, § 947.174(3), Fla.Stat. (1978), states: “The Department shall, within a reasonable amount . . .
. . . No prisoner shall be placed on parole except as provided in ss. 947.172 and 947.174 by a vote of a majority . . . No prisoner shall be placed on parole except as provided in ss. 947.172 and 947.174 by a panel of no . . .