The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 947.1745, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .
. . . See § 947.1745(6), Fla. Stat. (2012); Fla. Admin. Code R. 23-21.015(1) (2012). . . . See § 947.1745(6); Fla. Admin. Code R. 23-21.015(1). Thereafter, a parole examiner interviewed Mr. . . . The pertinent wording of both section 947.1745(6) and rule 23-21.015(1) (2012) is as follows: Within . . . The pertinent wording of both section 947.1745(6) and rule 23-21.015(1) (2012) is as follows: "Within . . . that the person’s release will be Compatible with his or her own welfare and the welfare of society. . 947.1745 . . .
. . . sentencing court to raise "objections to petitioner being released on parole, as provided by section 947.1745 . . . permitting the sentencing court to raise objections to him being released on parole pursuant to section 947.1745 . . . Section 947.1745(6) provides that prior to an effective parole release date interview, “the commission . . . [T]he amended section[ ] 947.1745(4) [now codified at 947.1745(6) ] represents] a mere procedural change . . . (renumbering subsection 947.1745(4) as subsection (6)). Gattis predates Williams by 5 years. . . .
. . . for setting Petitioner’s parole interview within five years instead of two years pursuant to Section 947.1745 . . .
. . . Section 947.1745, Florida Statutes (2009), directs the Commission to establish the inmate’s effective . . .
. . . . § 947.1745, which authorizes consideration of a judicial objection and the suitability of the prisoner . . . Stat. § 947.1745(6) — which allows the FPC to obtain input from the sentencing judge about objections . . . The provision Tooma challenges, section 947.1745(6), consists of such procedural changes. . . .
. . . . § 947.1745. . . . Stat. § 947.1745(2). . . . Stat. § 947.1745(6). . . . Stat. § 947.1745(6). Id. . . . . Stat. § 947.1745(6) (amended 1997). . . .
. . . extending his presumptive parole release date based on a judicial objection to parole pursuant to section 947.1745 . . . court’s correspondence did not constitute an objection to parole release” within the meaning of section 947.1745 . . .
. . . See § 947.1745(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .
. . . See § 947.1745(1), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . See § 947.1745, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .
. . . While Gaines had alleged that application to his sentence of section 947.1745(6), Florida Statutes (1997 . . . On October 1, 1986, the Florida Legislature amended section 947.1745(4), Florida Statutes, to require . . . The statute was further amended and codified as section 947.1745(6) and now requires the following: If . . . On May 12, 1997, Judge Alex Ferrer, who was appointed pursuant to section 947.1745(6), Florida Statutes . . . In it, he alleged that section 947.1745 was unconstitutionally applied to him. . . .
. . . See §§ 947.002(2), 947.165, 947.172, 947.173, 947.174, 947.1745, 947.1746, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . .
. . . 947.172, Florida Statutes (1991), governs the establishment of a presumptive parole release date; section 947.1745 . . .
. . . Retrospective application of the provisions in section 947.1745(4) would permit the cir-euit judge to . . . Section 947.1745(4) states that any objection by the sentencing court to an inmate’s release on parole . . . Under sections 947.173 and 947.1745(4) the judge’s objection to release is “good cause in exceptional . . . This statutory provision was superseded by the adoption of section 947.1745(4) in 1987. . . . Subsection 947.1745(4) further provides that, "The provisions of this subsection shall be applicable . . .
. . . Prior to the June 2, 1988, release date, and pursuant to section 947.1745(4), Florida Statutes, the commission . . . Based on good cause in exceptional circumstances, pursuant to Section 947.1745(4) Florida Statutes, Circuit . . . On December 13, 1991, the lower court entered an order granting mandamus relief which found section 947.1745 . . . 535 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), rev. denied, 542 So.2d 1333 (Fla.1989), which held that sections 947.1745 . . . Therein, the circuit court “decline[d] to find Section 947.1745(4) facially unconstitutional.” . . .
. . . On February 13, 1991, the Commission notified Snipes’ sentencing court, pursuant to section 947.1745( . . . filed a petition for writ of mandamus, which the trial court granted, stating that although section 947.1745 . . . We conclude that the judicial objection in this case provided a proper basis under section 947.1745(4 . . . EXTENSION OF THE INMATE’S PPRD, CONSTITUTE GOOD CAUSE IN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES, AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 947.1745 . . . Section 947.1745(4) provides, in part, as follows: Within 90 days before the effective parole release . . .
. . . . § 947.1745, Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .
. . . court considered Gattis’ petition for writ of habeas corpus and concluded that sections 947.165 and 947.1745 . . . Ninety days prior to the arrival of Gattis’ PPRD, and pursuant to section 947.1745(4), the Commission . . . important to the review of an inmate’s PPRD the sentencing judge’s objection thereto, amended section 947.1745 . . . sentencing court files a written objection to the parole release of an inmate as provided for in s. 947.1745 . . . Neither do we hold that sections 947.165(1) and 947.1745(4) unconstitutionally invade the separation . . .
. . . Pursuant to section 947.1745(4), Florida Statutes (1986 Supp.), the Commission sent a letter to the sentencing . . . Dornau requested review under section 947.173, asserting that the Commission had violated section 947.1745 . . . no explanation of his objection other than that other parties objected to the release, that section 947.1745 . . . mandamus, requesting that the Commission be directed to establish his EPRD without regard to section 947.1745 . . . He asserted that section 947.1745(4) is vio-lative of due process, fails to provide adequate procedural . . .
. . . .-174(6), Fla.Stat. (1981) (now § 947.1745, Fla.Stat. (1983)). . . .
. . . . § 947.1745; see also Florida Parole and Probation Commission v. Paige, 462 So.2d 817 (Fla.1985). . . . This is not a case of new information as contemplated by section 947.1745, but of a new interpretation . . .
. . . .” § 947.174(6), Fla.Stat. (1981) (now § 947.1745, Fla.Stat. (1983)). . . .
. . . . § 947.1745 (1983 Supp.); May v. . . .