Cases from cite.case.law:

HENNIG, v. G. PRUMMELL, Jr. Of, 198 So. 3d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 948.04(2), states: “Upon the termination of the period of probation, the probationer shall be . . .

IBARRA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 736 F.3d 903 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 948.21, 948.03(4), 948.04(2), 948.20 (West, Westlaw through 1996 legislation). . . .

IBARRA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 721 F.3d 1157 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 948.21, 948.03(4), 948.04(2), 948.20 (West, Westlaw through 1996 legislation). . . .

STATE v. LaFAVE,, 113 So. 3d 31 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Department of Corrections (DOC) of its authority to recommend early termination pursuant to section 948.04 . . . LaFave argues that sections 948.04(3) and 948.05 specifically preclude “no early termination” provisions . . . demonstrates that the State’s inclusion of the “no early termination” provision did not violate sections 948.04 . . . unconstitutional because it did not divest DOC of its ability to recommend early termination pursuant to section 948.04 . . .

T. WRIGHT, v. STATE, 47 So. 3d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 948.04(2), Fla. Stat. (2009); see also Carroll v. . . .

GONZALEZ- RAMOS, v. STATE, 46 So. 3d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .”); see also § 948.04(2), Fla. . . . State, 954 So.2d 675, 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); see also § 948.04(2), Fla. Stat. (2001); State v. . . .

F. SANDERS, v. STATE, 35 So. 3d 864 (Fla. 2010)

. . . See § 948.04(2), Fla. . . .

VIDAURRE, v. STATE, 8 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . State, 954 So.2d 675, 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); see also § 948.04(2), Fla. Stat. (2001); State v. . . .

MURPHY, v. STATE, 976 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 948.04(3), Fla. Stat. (2005); Swedish v. . . .

JONES, v. STATE, 954 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 948.04(2), Fla. Stat. (2005); State v. Hall, 641 So.2d 403, 404 (Fla.1994). . . .

RIVERA, v. STATE, 939 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Cochran, 140 So.2d 300, 301 (Fla.1962)); see also § 948.04(2), Fla. . . .

CRAIN, v. STATE, 914 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 948.04(2), Florida Statutes (2005), provides that a probationer is entitled to be released from . . .

THERRIEN, v. STATE, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005)

. . . Section 948.04(3), Florida Statutes (2004), authorizes early termination of probation if the offender . . .

HEPBURN, v. STATE, 780 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See §§ 948.04-.05, Fla. Stat. (1993); see generally Arriaga v. . . .

HEBB, v. STATE, 714 So. 2d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 948.04(2), Fla. . . .

KRUG, v. STATE, 689 So. 2d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . conducting a thorough evidentiary hearing, the trial court concluded that under the provisions of Section 948.04 . . .

ARRIAGA, v. STATE, 666 So. 2d 949 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . S. 948.04(3), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . probationer; nor may the trial judge deprive the Department of Corrections of its authority under § 948.04 . . .

JONES, IV, v. STATE, 666 So. 2d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 948.04(3), Fla.Stat. (1998). This is impermissible, and, as stated in Baker v. . . .

STATE v. HALL,, 641 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 1994)

. . . The pertinent language contained in sections 948.04(2) and 948.06(1), Florida Statutes (1991), is substantially . . . See Shelby, 97 So.2d at 632 (relying on 1957 version of section 948.04); Brooker v. . . . Section 948.04(2) provides: Upon the termination of the period of probation, the probationer shall be . . . Although there have been various amendments to sections 948.-06(1) and 948.04(2) throughout the years . . . (rewrote section 948.04(2)); ch. 89-526, § 38, Laws of Fla. . . .

STATE v. J. FITZGERALD,, 640 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . This rule is based on the language in section 948.04(2) that “[u]pon the termination of the period of . . .

UNITED STATES v. GISPERT,, 864 F. Supp. 1193 (S.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . . § 948.04. . . . Florida Statute § 948.04 provides in pertinent part: (2) Upon the termination of the period of probation . . .

SUMMERS, v. STATE, 625 So. 2d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See sections 948.04 and 948.06(1), Florida Statutes, in which clear distinctions are drawn between the . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992)

. . . See sections 948.04 and 948.06(1), Florida Statutes, in which clear distinctions are drawn between the . . .

G. PURVIS, v. R. LINDSEY, STATE, 587 So. 2d 638 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . We reject the state’s contention that the second sentence in section 948.04, Florida Statutes (1989), . . .

M. G. A v. STATE, 556 So. 2d 820 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . . § 948.04, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

STAMPER, v. STATE, 528 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . authorized in section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes, and as is exempted by the last sentence in section 948.04 . . . 775.082, Florida Statutes, and that the maximum lawful period of probation is provided for in section 948.04 . . . on imprisonment provided in section 775.082; the time constraints on probation provided in section 948.04 . . . section 775.082, Florida Statutes, or the statutory time limitations on probation contained in section 948.04 . . .

HANKEY, v. STATE, 529 So. 2d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes, is not subject to the probation time limitations provided in section 948.04 . . .

TOLLEFSON, v. STATE, 525 So. 2d 957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 948.04(1), Florida Statutes (1987) provides: Defendants found guilty of misdemeanors who are . . .

SHAKTMAN, J. v. STATE, 529 So. 2d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . State, 391 So.2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 399 So.2d 1141 (Fla.1981); §§ 775.082(4)(b), 948.04 . . .

OLIVER, v. STATE, 517 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 948.04(2), Florida Statutes, provides that “[djuring the period of probation, the probationer . . . Since under section 948.04(2) appellant had not met the conditions of his probation, and was still under . . .

L. FORTUNE, v. STATE, 513 So. 2d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . §§ 806.13(b)1., 948.04(1), Fla.Stat. (1985); Smith v. . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 484 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1986)

. . . OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., dissent. . 775.082(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1983) (sixty days imprisonment); § 948.04 . . . Section 948.04(1) provides that "[d]efendants found guilty of misdemeanors who are placed on probation . . . observed that "probation cannot normally be extended beyond the maximum permissible sentence, [but section 948.04 . . . State, 339 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976) (finding that the open-ended provision of 948.04(1) does not . . .

BLACKBURN, v. STATE, 468 So. 2d 517 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Until 1974, Section 948.04, Florida Statutes (period of probation) provided that a term of probation . . .

J. D. B. a v. STATE, 463 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . The state points out that even though the general rule is as stated above, under section 948.04, Florida . . .

DAVIS, v. STATE, 461 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Such an exception is provided in section 948.04(1), Florida Statutes, for probation. . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 448 So. 2d 20 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . .-01(4) and 948.04(2) [now 948.01(8) and 948.03(4), respectively], which equals or exceeds one year is . . .

A. SHANKWEILER a k a R. v. STATE, 427 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . The maximum probationary period for criminal trespass is six months, see Section 948.04, Florida Statutes . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. STATE, 441 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . The statutory authority of the court is further limited by section 948.04, Florida Statutes (1981), which . . . be released and “shall not be liable to sentence for the crime for which probation was allowed.” § 948.04 . . . First, section 948.04(2), Florida Statutes (1981) states: (2) Upon the termination of the period of probation . . .

L. SMITH, v. STATE, 412 So. 2d 47 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Apj>ellant contends that he should have been sentenced as a youthful offender under section 948.04, Florida . . .

B. WHITE, v. STATE, 410 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . State, 355 So.2d 492 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); §§ 948.04(2) and 948.06(2), Fla. Stat. (1977). . . .

CLARK, v. STATE, 402 So. 2d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See Sections 948.06(1), 948.04(2), Florida Statutes (1979). . . .

HOLLOWAY, v. STATE, 393 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 948.04(1); Alderman v. State, 356 So.2d 928 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). . . .

CORRALIZA, v. STATE, 391 So. 2d 330 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . State, 356 So.2d 928 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); § 948.04(1), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

ROSE, v. STATE, 369 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . See Section 948.04, Florida Statutes (1975) and Alderman v. . . .

BOUIE, v. STATE, 360 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 775.082(4)(b) and Section 948.04(1), Florida Statutes (1977); Alderman v. . . .

STATE v. W. HOLMES, 360 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1978)

. . . . § 948.04 specified that a term of probation could not extend more than two years beyond the maximum . . .

D. ALDERMAN, v. STATE, 356 So. 2d 928 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 948.04, Florida Statutes (1975); Watts v. State, 328 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). . . .

J. WRIGHT, v. STATE, 345 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . combined period of a split sentence of jail time and probation can not, since the amendment of Section 948.04 . . .

McNULTY, v. STATE, 339 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Prior to July 1, 1974, Florida Statute 948.04 specified that a term of probation could not extend more . . . The state, in urging this court to reject the rationale of Watts, supra, argues that Sec. 948.04(1) removes . . .

PATRICK, v. STATE, 336 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Although Section 948.04, Florida Statutes (1973), authorized the court to extend the period of probation . . .

MAGNIN, v. STATE, 334 So. 2d 638 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 948.04, that probation could not extend more than two years beyond the maximum possible sentence, . . .

ADAMS, v. STATE, 330 So. 2d 505 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . On that date, Section 948.04, Florida Statutes, 1973, was in effect, and it permitted a period of probation . . .

HELMIG, v. STATE, 330 So. 2d 246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Appellant argues that § 948.04(1), Florida Statutes 1975, as amended by Chapter 74-112, Laws of Florida . . . than two years beyond the maximum term for which the defendant might have been sentenced . . . ,” § 948.04 . . . Appellant’s aggregate probation time is within the permissible limits of Section 948.04, Florida Statutes . . .

F. WATTS, v. STATE, 328 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 948.04 specified that a term of probation could not extend more than two years beyond the maximum . . . Fla.Stat. § 948.04, as amended, provides that a defendant found guilty of a misdemeanor may be placed . . .

MOORE v. STATE, 324 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Secs. 810.06, 775.082, F.S. 1973, 948.04, F.S.1973 (1974 Supp.), as amended by § 10, ch. 74 — 112, Fla.Laws . . .

WATT, v. STATE, 323 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Sec. 948.04, F.S.1973. . . .

McBRIDE, Sr. v. STATE, 311 So. 2d 752 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . (F.S. 948.04). The maximum sentence for simple assault, a second degree misdemeanor, is 60 days. . . .

J. FARHAT, v. STATE, 293 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Section 948.04, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . .

O. WATERS, v. STATE, 290 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Section 948.04, F.S.A., provides that the period of probation ordered by the court shall not exceed more . . .

T. WELDON, v. STATE, 287 So. 2d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . . § 948.04, F.S.A., provides that a trial court may place a defendant on probation for two years beyond . . .

CLAY, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 470 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1972)

. . . Record in and for Manatee County having lost jurisdiction over petitioner as to probation (see F.S. 948.04 . . . F.S.A. § 948.04. In its so-called reply brief, the State cites the Florida case of Carroll v. . . .

STREETER, v. STATE, 211 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . § 948.04, F.S.A. See also Carroll v. Cochran, Fla.1962, 140 So.2d 300. . . .

BROOKER, v. STATE, 207 So. 2d 478 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Section 948.04 of Chapter 948, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., relating to probation, provides: “Upon the termination . . . Section 948.04 F.S., F.S.A., provides that upon termination of the period of probation ‘the probationer . . .

ROY, v. STATE, 207 So. 2d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Sec. 948.04 F.S.A., which provides that upon termination of the period of probation, “the probationer . . .

COLEMAN, v. STATE, 205 So. 2d 5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Section 948.04, Fla.Stat. (1965), F.S.A. limits the period of probation to maximum sentence, plus two . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 196 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1967)

. . . (See 948.04 & 948.06(1) in which clear distinctions are drawn between the period of a sentence and the . . .

DELANEY, v. STATE, 190 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1966)

. . . . §§ 948.04, 948.06 and 800.01, F.S.A.). (3) The Circuit Court may at any time cause the Appellant to . . .

YATES, v. T. A. BUCHANAN,, 170 So. 2d 72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . . § 948.04. . . . . § 948.04. . . .

PICKMAN, v. STATE, 155 So. 2d 646 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . This point calls for an application of § 948.04, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. . . . The section is as follows: “948.04 Period of probation; duty of probationer The period of probation shall . . .

CARROLL, v. H. G. COCHRAN, Jr., 140 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1962)

. . . The court was authorized to do this by- the provisions of Sec. 948.04, F.S.A. . . . Under Sec. 948.04 F.S.A. it is provided that upon the termination of his period of probation, a probationer . . .

C. H. HELTON, v. STATE R. O., 106 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1958)

. . . . § 948.04, Fla.Stat.1941, F.S.A., as amended by Ch. 21775, Laws of 1943. . . .

STATE ARD, v. SHELBY,, 97 So. 2d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1957)

. . . Section 948.04 F.S., F.S.A., provides that upon termination of the period of ’probation “the probationer . . .