Cases from cite.case.law:

CASSEUS, v. STATE, 269 So. 3d 580 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . whose offenses occurred on or after the effective date of the statute. 68 So.3d at 411 (construing § 948.063 . . .

J. McCARRON, DOC v. STATE, 185 So. 3d 666 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . McCarron would be required to submit to electronic monitoring in accordance with section 948.063(2), . . .

COLVIN, v. STATE, 138 So. 3d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . He argues that the trial court’s imposition of electronic monitoring pursuant to section 948.063, Florida . . .

STATE v. FLYNN,, 95 So. 3d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . that he did not meet the criteria for the mandatory imposition of electronic monitoring under sections 948.063 . . . The Jessica Lunsford Act ("JLA”) is codified in section 948.063, Florida Statutes. Witch ard v. . . .

BLUE, v. STATE, 73 So. 3d 358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The record is unclear whether the trial court believed that the JLA (section 948.063, Florida Statutes . . .

WITCHARD, v. STATE, 68 So. 3d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . conditions of his sex offender probation to include mandatory electronic monitoring pursuant to section 948.063 . . . Section 948.063 mandates the electronic monitoring of certain sex offenders who violate their probation . . . Because we hold that section 948.063 does not apply to probationers such as Witchard whose offenses were . . . Section 948.063(1) was enacted as part of the JLA and became effective on September 1, 2005. . . . We recognize that section 948.063(2) did not become effective until July 1, 2006. . . .

BREWER, v. STATE, 99 So. 3d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . transcript of the modification hearing clearly confirms that the trial court intended to apply section 948.063 . . .

STATE v. PETRAE,, 35 So. 3d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . As the State argued below, section 948.063, Florida Statutes, mandates the electronic monitoring of certain . . . order electronic monitoring as a condition of the subsequent term of probation or community control. § 948.063 . . .

BELL, v. STATE, 24 So. 3d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Nevertheless, the State contends that section 948.063 provides a basis for the imposition of electronic . . . Section 948.063 provides in pertinent part: (2) If the probationer or offender is required to register . . . Because we conclude that Bell did not violate his probation, section 948.063(2) is inapplicable to Bell . . .

FIELDS, v. STATE, 968 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Eleven days later, the State filed a motion to impose electronic monitoring pursuant to section 948.063 . . . First, Fields contends that section 948.063 does not mandate electronic monitoring in this ease because . . . Section 948.063(1) clearly provides that the trial court’s obligation to require electronic monitoring . . . (1) If probation or community control for any felony offense is revoked by the court pursuant to s. 948.063 . . . Section 948.063(2) governs those instances where the trial court has modified a defendant’s probation . . .