Cases from cite.case.law:

THOMPSON, v. STATE, 250 So. 3d 132 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 948.09(3)(e), Fla. . . .

ESQUIVEL- QUINTANA, v. B. SESSIONS III,, 137 S. Ct. 1562 (U.S. 2017)

. . . . §§ 948.01(1), 948.09 (1993-1994) Where a state statute contains several different crimes that are described . . .

UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ- MEDINA,, 757 F.3d 425 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 948.09 for having sexual intercourse with a child age sixteen or older does not qualify as a “sex . . . Stat. § 948.09. He pleaded no contest to the charge and was sentenced to sixty days in jail. . . . Stat. § 948.09 is not a “sex offense” under the categorical approach because it does not include a four-year . . . Stat. § 948.09 (“Whoever has sexual intercourse with a child who is not the defendant’s spouse and who . . . . § 948.09. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GOMEZ,, 757 F.3d 885 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 948.02(1), 948.02(2), 948.09. . . . . Ann. §§ 948.02(2), 948.09. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. RANGEL- CASTANEDA,, 709 F.3d 373 (4th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 948.09. The general age of consent is seventeen in the remaining seven states. See Colo. . . .

SHACKER, v. STATE, 106 So. 3d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . toward cost of supervision, plus a 4% surcharge, unless otherwise exempted, in accordance with Section 948.09 . . .

PHILEMON, v. STATE, 82 So. 3d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . which the failure of a probationer ... to pay restitution or the cost of supervision as provided in s. 948.09 . . .

DEL VALLE, v. STATE, 80 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2011)

. . . probationer or offender in community control to pay restitution or the cost of supervision as provided in s. 948.09 . . .

CHANDLER, v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 1107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . probationer or offender in community control to pay restitution or the cost of supervision as provided in s. 948.09 . . .

C. C. N. v. STATE, 1 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . was held without C.C.N.’s presence or waiver thereof, and restitution was ordered in the amount of $948.09 . . . The court ordered restitution in the amount of $948.09. . . .

BROWN, Sr. v. A. McNEIL,, 591 F. Supp. 2d 1245 (M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . statutory conditions of Conditional Release in that he did willfully fail to comply with Florida Statutes 948.09 . . . The hearing officer further found Petitioner “did willfully fail to comply with Florida Statute 948.09 . . . found guilty of violating Condition 7 ... in that he did willfully fail to comply with Florida Statute 948.09 . . . Stat. § 948.09 ("Any person ... placed on ... conditional release supervision ... must, as a condition . . .

UNITED STATES v. LOPEZ- DeLEON,, 513 F.3d 472 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 948.09. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ- GUZMAN,, 506 F.3d 738 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 948.09. . . . .

V. FELTON, v. B. LINCOLN, PCCF PCCF PCCF, PCCF,, 429 F. Supp. 2d 226 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . disapproval of non-privileged correspondence with notice to the inmate or sender of the material. 103 C.M.R. 948.09 . . .

PARRISH, v. STATE, 898 So. 2d 1074 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . sentence of paragraph 12, requiring Parrish to pay the costs of such testing, is authorized by section 948.09 . . .

M. OSTA, v. STATE, 880 So. 2d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . probationer or offender in community control to pay restitution or the cost of supervision as provided in s. 948.09 . . .

GRIFFIS, v. STATE, 848 So. 2d 422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . the cost of supervision unless otherwise waived, plus a $2.00 monthly surcharge pursuant to section 948.09 . . .

R. GOVE, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 816 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . subject to specified terms and conditions, including payment of the cost of supervision pursuant to s. 948.09 . . .

GRAY, v. STATE, 791 So. 2d 560 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . § 948.09(l)(a)l (1999). . . . Section 948.09(l)(a)l provides: Any person ordered by the court, the Department of Corrections, or the . . .

BEUL, v. ASSE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 233 F.3d 441 (7th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 948.09, killed himself, leaving a note expressing fear of jail. . . .

HOPE CLINIC, v. E. RYAN, K. s D. v. E. M., 195 F.3d 857 (7th Cir. 1999)

. . . performed was the result of a sexual assault in violation of § 940.225, 944.06, 948.02, 948.025, 948.06 or 948.09 . . .

EDWARDS, Jr. v. STATE, 728 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 1999)

. . . DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09 . . .

STATE v. PORCHIA,, 716 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 1998)

. . . DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09 . . .

EDWARDS, Jr. v. STATE, 780 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09 . . .

STATE v. WILLIAMS,, 712 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1998)

. . . DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09 . . . The State, however, argued that none of these precedent eases addressed section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes . . . However, the State argues that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides a statutory basis . . . While section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), is limited to “urinalysis testing,” the trial court . . . Section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides in relevant part: In addition to any other required . . .

STATE v. L. SMITH,, 710 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 1998)

. . . DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09 . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. STATE, 708 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09 . . .

PORCHIA, v. STATE, 705 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . The state has pointed out that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995) appears to contain the requirement . . . DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09 . . .

L. SMITH, v. STATE, 702 So. 2d 1305 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . State, 700 So.2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that a . . . DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09 . . .

HUFF, v. STATE, 700 So. 2d 787 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . The State in this case has pointed out, however, that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides . . . DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 700 So. 2d 750 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . The State in this ease has pointed out, however, that section 948.09(6), Florida Statutes (1995), provides . . . DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09 . . .

HARRIS, Jr. v. STATE, 698 So. 2d 343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Such offender is exempt from further payment for cost of supervision as required in s. 948.09.” . . .

FELIX, v. STATE, 709 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . oral pronouncement was necessary; the defendant was put on notice of those requirements by section 948.09 . . .

L. JOHNSON, v. STATE, 696 So. 2d 831 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See §§ 948.03(l)(k), 948.09(6), Fla. Stat. (1995); Kopecki v. . . .

HAYGOOD, v. STATE, 687 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . The state argues that section 948.09(7), Florida Statutes (1995), permits courts to delegate to the Department . . . The statute reads: 948.09 Payment for cost of supervision and rehabilitation (7) The department shall . . .

NIEVES, v. STATE, 678 So. 2d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . statutorily mandated $2.00 per month surcharge to the Department of Corrections, pursuant to section 948.09 . . .

CAMPBELL, v. STATE, 661 So. 2d 122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Appellant may perform community service in lieu of paying the costs of supervision required by section 948.09 . . . It is also clear from the face of section 948.09(3) that any authority to exempt an individual from paying . . .

KIONKA, v. STATE, 660 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . It is also clear from the face of section 948.09(3), Florida Statutes (1994), that any authority to exempt . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 660 So. 2d 794 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Appellant may perform community service in lieu of paying the costs of supervision required by section 948.09 . . . It is also clear from the face of section 948.09(3) that any authority to exempt an individual from paying . . .

KLIMEK v. HORACE MANN INSURANCE CO., 14 F.3d 185 (2d Cir. 1994)

. . . Also, if the total damages do not exceed the $246,-948.09 paid in the settlements, Horace Mann would . . .

M. DYKES, v. STATE, 623 So. 2d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . because the defendant did not “expressly agree to pay any more than the assessment allowed by section 948.09 . . .

BLANCHETTE, v. STATE, 620 So. 2d 258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . We observed that section 948.09(1), Florida Statutes (1991), authorizes the trial court to require a . . . shall be funded by the state, to be effected in part by the assessments authorized pursuant to section 948.09 . . . This intent is evident when section 948.51 is read in pari materia with the section 948.09(1) provision . . . Rather, section 948.09(1), limiting such assessment to no less than $40 and no more than $50 per month . . . hours plus fee, but he did not expressly agree to pay any more than the assessment allowed by section 948.09 . . .

MARTIN, v. STATE, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 948.09(1) provides in part: (1) Any person under ... felony probation, ... shall be required . . . shall be funded by the state, to be effected in part by the assessments authorized pursuant to section 948.09 . . . This intent is evident when section 948.51 is read in pari materia with the section 948.09(1) provision . . . Rather, section 948.09(1), limiting such assessment to no less than $40 and no more than $50 per month . . .