Cases from cite.case.law:

VILLANUEVA, v. STATE, 200 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 2016)

. . . Section 948.31, Florida Statutes, which grants a trial court the discretion to order the evaluation of . . . District Court of Appeal held that application of “sex offender probation 'pursuant to sections 948.30 and 948.31 . . .

A. SAMUEL, v. J. FRANK,, 525 F.3d 566 (7th Cir. 2008)

. . . . §§ 948.02(2), 948.31(2), 948.30, and was sentenced to 38 years in prison to be followed by 16 years . . .

ADAMS, v. STATE, 979 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Stat. (2007) (emphasis added); see also § 948.31, Fla. . . . Lawson, 969 So.2d at 232; see §§ 948.001(10), 948.30(1)(c), 948.31, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

STURGES, v. STATE, 980 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . prison, anger management, and five years of sex offender probation pursuant to sections 948.30 and 948.31 . . .

P. McNEIL, v. UNITED STATES,, 78 Fed. Cl. 211 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . motion to supplement, which indicated that FMS had withheld $142.24 from plaintiffs total payment of $948.31 . . .

In HATFIELD, v. D. EFG U. S. A. MSU f k a, 257 B.R. 575 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2000)

. . . In that case, debt- or’s monthly income was $774.14 and his expenses were $948.31. . . .

In MARSH, v., 257 B.R. 569 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2000)

. . . In that case, debtor’s monthly income was $774.14 and his expenses were $948.31. . . .

L. VAN LOO, v. BRAUN,, 940 F. Supp. 1390 (E.D. Wis. 1996)

. . . . § 948.31(2). . . . . § 948.30(l)(b) and Wis.Stat. 948.31(2) by extending the unlawful detention of Cheryl Van Loo’s minor . . . The plaintiff invokes Wis.Stat. § 948.30(1) and (2) and Wis.Stat. § 948.31(2). . . . Section 948.31(2) is violated only if a person “withholds a child for more than 12 hours from the child . . . Stat. § 948.30(l)(b) and Wis.Stat. § 948.31(2). . . .

HAGGE, v. BAUER, a a, 827 F.2d 101 (7th Cir. 1987)

. . . Judge Reynolds awarded Hagge $43,-948.31 as reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in successfully . . . district court’s decision that it intended alternative holdings: “The plaintiff will be awarded $43,-948.31 . . .