The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . The issue presented in this appeal is whether section 950.09, Florida Statutes (1985), proscribing malpractice . . . 508 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), this court recently upheld the constitutional validity of section 950.09 . . . The appellants in that case pled nolo contendere to charges of violating section 950.09 in an incident . . . In this case, Dale Sims pled nolo contendere to the charge of malpractice by a jailer under section 950.09 . . . In deciding whether section 950.09 is unconstitutionally vague, we necessarily focus upon the phrase . . .
. . . Roulhac, appeal their convictions of malpractice by a jailer in violation of section 950.09, Florida . . . with aggravated battery under section 784.-045, a felony, and malpractice by a jailer under section 950.09 . . . Appellants unsuccessfully moved to dismiss the informations in both cases, contending that section 950.09 . . . Appellants contend that section 950.09 does not set forth the elements of the crime of “malpractice by . . . In deciding whether section 950.09 is unconstitutionally vague, we necessarily focus upon the phrase . . .
. . . for plaintiff for $499:32, and dismissed with prejudice defendant’s counterclaim in the amount of $950.09 . . .
. . . The return for the partnership reported an ordinary net loss of $32,-950.09 and a recognized long term . . .
. . . added 50 percent fraud penalties in the respective amounts of $1,134.59, $349.70, $23.74, $163.39, and $950.09 . . .
. . . deeds conveying to each said plaintiff and said intervener an undivided one-half interest in and to the 950.09 . . .