Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 950.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 950.09 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 950.09

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 950
JAILS AND JAILERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 950.09
950.09 Malpractice by jailers.If any jailer shall, by too great duress of imprisonment or otherwise, make or induce a prisoner to disclose and give evidence against some other person, or be guilty of willful inhumanity and oppression to any prisoner under his or her care and custody, the jailer shall be punished by removal from office and shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.s. 20, Feb. 10, 1832; RS 2574; GS 3490; RGS 5366; CGL 7500; s. 1178, ch. 71-136; s. 1694, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 950.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 950.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 950.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 950.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S950.09 - OBSTRUCT POLICE - MALPRACTICE BY JAILERS - M: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

L. SIMS, v. STATE, 510 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . The issue presented in this appeal is whether section 950.09, Florida Statutes (1985), proscribing malpractice . . . 508 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), this court recently upheld the constitutional validity of section 950.09 . . . The appellants in that case pled nolo contendere to charges of violating section 950.09 in an incident . . . In this case, Dale Sims pled nolo contendere to the charge of malpractice by a jailer under section 950.09 . . . In deciding whether section 950.09 is unconstitutionally vague, we necessarily focus upon the phrase . . .

O. POWELL D. v. STATE, 508 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Roulhac, appeal their convictions of malpractice by a jailer in violation of section 950.09, Florida . . . with aggravated battery under section 784.-045, a felony, and malpractice by a jailer under section 950.09 . . . Appellants unsuccessfully moved to dismiss the informations in both cases, contending that section 950.09 . . . Appellants contend that section 950.09 does not set forth the elements of the crime of “malpractice by . . . In deciding whether section 950.09 is unconstitutionally vague, we necessarily focus upon the phrase . . .

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD V. THE UNITED STATES, 192 Ct. Cl. 962 (Ct. Cl. 1970)

. . . for plaintiff for $499:32, and dismissed with prejudice defendant’s counterclaim in the amount of $950.09 . . .

L. v. v. E. P. v. v., 15 T.C. 496 (T.C. 1950)

. . . The return for the partnership reported an ordinary net loss of $32,-950.09 and a recognized long term . . .

v., 29 B.T.A. 600 (B.T.A. 1933)

. . . added 50 percent fraud penalties in the respective amounts of $1,134.59, $349.70, $23.74, $163.39, and $950.09 . . .

WHEELER v. TAFT, 279 F. 415 (5th Cir. 1922)

. . . deeds conveying to each said plaintiff and said intervener an undivided one-half interest in and to the 950.09 . . .