Cases from cite.case.law:

EUSTACHE, v. STATE, 248 So. 3d 1097 (Fla. 2018)

. . . See § 958.021, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . . substance abuse and other types of counseling and programs at each youthful offender institution. § 958.021 . . .

C. JACKSON, v. STATE, 191 So. 3d 423 (Fla. 2016)

. . . .” § 958.021, Fla. Stat. . . . youthful offenders “with older and. more experienced criminals during the terms of their, confinement.” § 958.021 . . . . § 958.021, Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis added). . . .

C. JACKSON, v. STATE, 137 So. 3d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .” § 958.021, Fla. Stat. . . . offenders’ “association with older and more experienced criminals during the terms of their confinement.” § 958.021 . . .

UNITED STATES v. NASH,, 558 F. App'x 599 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 958.021. Nash was convicted and sentenced in this system. . . . Stat. § 958.021 (“The purpose of this chapter is to improve the chances of correction and successful . . .

PRESSLEY, v. STATE, 73 So. 3d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 958.021, Florida Statutes (2009), part of the Youthful Offender Act, provides that “[i]t is the . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORTES, a. k. a. a. k. a., 427 F. App'x 803 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 958.021 (stating that the purpose of the Florida Youthful Offender Act is “to provide an additional . . .

BLACKER, v. STATE, 49 So. 3d 785 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 958.021, Florida Statutes (1997), expresses the legislative intent that youthful offender sentencing . . .

LEGETTE, v. STATE, 694 So. 2d 826 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See § 958.021, Fla. Stat. (1993); Ellis v. State, 475 So.2d 1021, 1023 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). . . .

McGLOCKING, v. STATE, 689 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See section 958.021, Florida Statutes. . . .

R. BLACKMON, v. STATE, 616 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . affirmatively appears from the record that appellant may qualify as a youthful offender pursuant to section 958.021 . . . record affirmatively reflects that appellant may qualify as a youthful offender pursuant to section 958.021 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 586 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . the legislature spelled out its intent as to the treatment of youthful offenders in Florida Statute 958.021 . . . Relevant to the issue before the Court is that part of Florida Statute 958.021 which states: The purpose . . . That is, in order to effect the overall intent of the legislature as manifested in Florida Statute 958.021 . . .

STATE v. LEZCANO,, 586 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . .” § 958.021, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

KEPNER, v. STATE, 577 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 1991)

. . . . § 958.021, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. JOHNSON, 45 Fla. Supp. 2d 113 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . the legislature spelled out its intent as to the treatment of youthful offenders in Florida Statute 958.021 . . . Relevant to the issue before the Court is that part of Florida Statute 958.021 which states: The purpose . . . That is, in order to effect the overall intent of the legislature as manifested in Florida Statute 958.021 . . .

STATE v. WATTS,, 558 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 1990)

. . . Offender Act, which, we have said, was intended to provide a “sentencing alternative,” see section 958.021 . . .

REAMS, v. STATE, 528 So. 2d 558 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . would violate the express intent of the legislature to provide a ‘sentencing alternative,’ see section 958.021 . . .

ALLEN, v. STATE, 526 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1988)

. . . would violate the express intent of the legislature to provide a “sentencing alternative,” see section 958.021 . . .

STATE v. DIERS,, 517 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 958.021, Fla.Stat. (1985). We, as did the third district in Weston and again in State v. . . .

L. ELLIS, v. STATE, 475 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See section 958.021, Florida Statutes (1983). . . .

B. WILSON, v. STATE, 438 So. 2d 108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . error to impose the three-year mandatory sentence under § 775.087(2) because of the provisions in § 958.021 . . .

MILLER, v. STATE, 411 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . See Section 958.021. . . .

WHITLOCK, v. STATE, 404 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . As stated in section 958.021, the legislature’s goal was to improve the chances of correction and successful . . .

STATE v. GOODSON,, 403 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 1981)

. . . “offenders who have demonstrated that they can no longer be handled safely as juveniles . . . . ” § 958.021 . . .

HARMON, v. STATE, 397 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Florida Statutes, Section 958.021 (1979); Killian v. State, 387 So.2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). . . .

ABRAM, v. STATE, 405 So. 2d 992 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 958.021 indicates that the act provides “an additional sentencing alternative” in order “to improve . . .

GOODSON, v. STATE, 392 So. 2d 1335 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The legislative intent expressed in section 958.021 does not require a different result because, as indicated . . .

J. KILLIAN, III, v. STATE, 387 So. 2d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . To the contrary, the legislative intent of the Florida Youthful Offender Act as expressed in Section 958.021 . . .