Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 958.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 958.03 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 958.03

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 958
YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 958.03
958.03 Definitions.As used in this act:
(1) “Department” means the Department of Corrections.
(2) “Community control program” means a form of intensive supervised custody in the community, including surveillance on weekends and holidays, administered by officers with restricted caseloads. Community control is an individualized program in which the freedom of the offender is restricted within the community, home, or noninstitutional residential placement and specific sanctions are imposed and enforced.
(3) “Court” means a judge or successor who designates a defendant as a youthful offender.
(4) “Probation” means a form of community supervision requiring specified contacts with parole and probation officers and other terms and conditions as provided in s. 948.03.
(5) “Youthful offender” means any person who is sentenced as such by the court or is classified as such by the department pursuant to s. 958.04.
History.s. 3, ch. 78-84; s. 119, ch. 79-3; s. 19, ch. 85-288; s. 98, ch. 94-209; s. 145, ch. 2019-167.

F.S. 958.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 958.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 958.03


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 958.03
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 958.03.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LOWE, v. STATE, 259 So. 3d 23 (Fla. 2018)

. . . Statutes (2011), is virtually identical to the definition of "community control program" in section 958.03 . . .

EUSTACHE, v. STATE, 248 So. 3d 1097 (Fla. 2018)

. . . . §§ 958.03(5), 958.04(2)(d), Fla. Stat. . . .

GALLIMORE, v. STATE, 100 So. 3d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 958.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

CHRISTIAN, Jr. v. STATE, 84 So. 3d 437 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 958.03(5), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

A. GREEN, v. STATE v. R., 975 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Section 958.03(5), Florida Statutes (2006), defines “youthful offender” as "any person who is sentenced . . .

STATE v. MILLER,, 888 So. 2d 76 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . The term, “probation,” is defined in section 958.03(4) as a means of community supervision requiring . . .

T. C. a v. LAYNE,, 725 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . The term is defined in section 958.03(2), the Youthful Offender Statute: . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 586 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . youthful offender by the Department of Corrections and thus falls within the definition of Florida Statute 958.03 . . .

STATE v. LEZCANO,, 586 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . that the courts have the power to “adjudicate” and “sentence” individuals as youthful offenders, §§ 958.03 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. JOHNSON, 45 Fla. Supp. 2d 113 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . youthful offender by the Department of Corrections and thus falls within the definition of Florida Statute 958.03 . . .

HOWARD, v. STATE, 508 So. 2d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Defendant alleges that the revocation of his community control pursuant to amended section 958.03, Florida . . . According to the law in effect at the time defendant was originally sentenced, section 958.03(2), provided . . .

BRADLEY, v. STATE, 462 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . A community control program, as described in section 958.03(2), means “an individualized program of restriction . . .

MORALES, A. M. H. v. STATE, 431 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . years imprisonment to be followed by two years in a community control program as defined by section 958.03 . . .

OSCAR MAYER CO. INC. Co. PA v. UNITED STATES, 623 F.2d 1223 (7th Cir. 1980)

. . . meatpacker and its Pennsylvania subsidiary sued to recover with interest alleged overpayments of $69,-958.03 . . .