The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Headquarters Ruling Letter 807732 (July 25, 1984)) that they were entitled to duty-free entry under TSUS item 960.15 . . .
. . . Headquarters Ruling Letter 807732 (July 25, 1984)) that they were entitled to duty-free entry under TSUS item 960.15 . . .
. . . In the July 7, 1997 order, Judge Wilken entered judgment in favor of Stanford for $3,396,-960.15, Verbatim . . .
. . . [it] previously permitted the duty-free entry of hearing aid parts pursuant to TSUS 960.15, which is . . . that ruling is irrelevant to the case at bar because it was expressly limited to merchandise under 960.15 . . .
. . . 074506/807732, * * * [it] previously permitted the duty-free entry of hearing aid parts pursuant to TSUS 960.15 . . . that ruling is irrelevant to the case at bar because it was expressly limited to merchandise under 960.15 . . .
. . . to bifurcate the second mortgage into a secured portion of $6,250.98, an unsecured portion of $13,-960.15 . . .
. . . that each of the kidney dialysis devices at issue in the case was correctly classifiable under item 960.15 . . .
. . . that each of the kidney dialysis devices at issue in the case was correctly classifiable under item 960.15 . . .
. . . end-stage renal failure are physically or mentally handicapped, as defined by the headnote to TSUS item 960.15 . . . imported merchandise is therapeutic, defendant would agree that it should be classified under item 960.15 . . . of the fact that Customs had permitted the prostheses themselves to enter duty-free under TSUS item 960.15 . . .
. . . end-stage renal failure are physically or mentally handicapped, as defined by the headnote to TSUS item 960.15 . . . imported merchandise is therapeutic, defendant would agree that it should be classified under item 960.15 . . . of the fact that Customs had permitted the prostheses themselves to enter duty-free under TSUS item 960.15 . . .
. . . certain medical instruments imported by Richards Medical Company (Richards) in accordance with item 960.15 . . . This particular exemption from duty was subsequently inserted as items 960.10, 960.12 and 960.15 of the . . . For the purpose of items 960.10, 960.-12, and 960.15— (a) The term “physically or mentally handicapped . . . Customs classified the hip prosthesis systems under item 960.15, TSUS, thus entitling them to duty-free . . . , on the grounds that they were “therapeutic,” and thus ineligible for classification under item 960.15 . . .
. . . medical instruments under item 709.27, Tariff Schedule of the United States ("TSUS”), rather than item 960.15 . . . (Stipulation at 2) The prosthetic systems were classified by Customs under duty-free item 960.15, TSUS . . . Richards filed two timely protests arguing that the instruments should also be classified under item 960.15 . . . for summary judgment arguing that the instruments are precluded from duty-free importation under item 960.15 . . . not remain in the body of the person, does not preclude classification of the instruments under item 960.15 . . .
. . . medical instruments under item 709.27, Tariff Schedule of the United States (“TSUS”), rather than item 960.15 . . . The prosthetic systems were classified by Customs under duty-free item 960.15, TSUS. . . . Richards filed two timely protests arguing that the instruments should also be classified under item 960.15 . . . for summary judgment arguing that the instruments are precluded from duty-free importation under item 960.15 . . . cover of the entries that are the subject of this action qualify for duty free allowance under item 960.15 . . .
. . . , 755.25-756.6 (SGM), 771.17-23 (SGM), 785.3-787.10 (SGM), 836.8-.23 (SGM), 893.9-.il (DMC), 959.21-960.15 . . .
. . . and specific findings will be made covering them: a. ) Casino clogging 3,716.87 b. ) Touch-up paint $ 960.15 . . . plaintiff has no right to back-charge defendant Continental Marble for this item. 20- The amount of $960.15 . . . workmen of defendant Continental Marble were responsible for such soiling as may have cost plaintiff $960.15 . . .
. . . The deficiency of $49,-960.15 in the original return for 1944 was determined by audit at this time. . . .
